Sources of outlier data in the bioanalytical and clinical part of a piroxicam bioequivalence study.

OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes the potential outliers in the bioanalytical and clinical part of a bioequivalence study, the effect on bioequivalence decisions whether or not it is appropriate to eliminate them from the statistical evaluation of bioequivalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical part was a cross-over, two periods, two sequences bioequivalence study concerning two piroxicam formulations, on healthy subjects. A simulation study evaluated the influence of 10% errors on the percent bias of calculated concentrations from nominal ones. RESULTS: In bioequivalence studies, it is not possible to distinguish between relevant types of outliers based only on statistical criteria. The "problem" is particularly acute when the omission of outliers leads to a bias in the decision concerning bioequivalence from rejection to acceptance. In such cases, there is the suspicion of subjective analysis and torture of data. The effect of analytical errors at high plasma levels was criticized for the calculated concentrations in the neighborhood of lower limit of quantification. Errors at low concentrations have a less significant effect. In the pharmacokinetic analysis, several types of outliers were shown: single points, curves, pairs of curves corresponding to the same subject, intrasubject ratios of areas under curves and maximum concentrations. These pharmacokinetic outliers could have had, at the same time, bioanalytical, physiological and physicochemical causes. CONCLUSION: Considering the results, it was proposed the following algorithm in the analysis of outlier data and outlier subjects in bioequivalence studies: evaluation of the implications of the decision concerning elimination of outliers on the decision concerning bioequivalence; application of the statistic tests for detection of outliers data; evaluations from the point of view of physiological pharmacokinetics, final decision concerning elimination of outliers.

Gelatin tannate versus other antidiarrheal medication in children with acute gastroenteritis: a retrospective, observational study.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gelatin tannate (GT) for acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in children. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, children admitted for AGE received GT ± oral rehydration solution (ORS; n = 46) or other antidiarrheal medications ± ORS (n = 46). Number and consistency of stools were recorded. RESULTS: Children were aged 6 months to 7.9 years. GT ± ORS reduced diarrhea duration (29.0 vs 45.4 h, p < 0.0001) and normalized stool consistency at 72 h in significantly more patients (87.0 vs 30.4%; p = 0.026) compared with other antidiarrheal medications ± ORS. Differences in favor of GT were apparent from 12 h onward. CONCLUSION: GT is more effective than conventional treatment for managing AGE in children.

Effectiveness and safety profile of ipilimumab therapy in previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma - the Romanian Patient Access Program.

PURPOSE: The Romanian Patient Access Program (Ro-PAP, CA 184-427), part of the European Expanded Access Program (EAP), was developed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile ipilimumab in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma (unresectable or metastatic melanoma). The objective of our retrospective observational study of patients included in this program was to provide data recorded in real-life settings. METHODS: We analysed 89 patients enrolled in Ro-PAP, CA 184-427 (54 men and 35 women) aged between 29 and 89 years. The patients received ipilimumab 3mg/kg, administered with short 30-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks, having a total of 4 doses. Patients were assessed for tumor response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and were monitored for adverse events (AE). RESULTS: At 12 weeks after the completion of therapy, the complete and partial response rates were 6.74% each, stable disease 15.73%, with the best overall response rate 13.48% and disease control rate 29.21%. Median OS was 189.00 days (95% CI 69.50-308.49) and median PFS 124.00 days (95% CI 85.05-162.94). The level of patient functionality at the beginning of ipilimumab treatment showed to be an important predictor of outcome, as patients with ECOG performance status (PS) (0) before therapy with ipilimumab had a higher OS compared with those with impaired functionality. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ipilimumab in daily clinical practice demonstrated to be effective and safe, consistent with data coming from randomized clinical trials or other observational studies.

Efficacy and safety of APT198K for the treatment of infantile colic: a pilot study.

AIM: Comparing efficacy and safety of APT198K (xyloglucan plus heat-killed Lactobacillus reuteri SGL01 and Bifidobacterium brevis SGB01) versus a lactase dietary supplement as first-line treatment of infantile colic. METHODS: Randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel group, active-controlled study, in 46 infants aged 3-16 weeks with infantile colic, receiving APT198K or a lactase dietary supplement for 10 days. RESULTS: Number and duration of crying episodes decreased significantly versus baseline in both groups. On day 8, the mean duration of crying per episode was significantly shorter in the APT198K group compared with the lactase group (9.14 ± 5.34 vs 13.22 ± 5.29 min; p = 0.014) and remained so up to day 11. CONCLUSION: APT198K decreased the mean duration per crying episode significantly more than a lactase dietary supplement in infants with colic. Further evaluation in larger studies is warranted. Clinical trial registry: EudraCT number 2014-002860-334; https://eudract.ema.europa.eu .