Variants of SLC2A10 may be Linked to Poor Response to Metformin.

Purpose: A study among Filipinos revealed that only 15% of patients with diabetes achieved glycemic control, and poor response to metformin could be one of the possible reasons. Recent studies demonstrate how genetic variations influence response to metformin. Hence, the present study aimed to determine genetic variants associated with poor response to metformin. Methods: Using a candidate variant approach, 195 adult Filipino participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were enrolled in a case-control study. Genomic DNA from blood samples were collected. Allelic and genotypic associations of variants with poor response to metformin were determined using exact statistical methods. Results: Several polymorphisms were nominally associated with poor response to metformin (P uncorr < 0.05). The most notable is the association of multiple variants in the SLC2A10 gene-rs2425911, rs3092412, and rs2425904-with common additive genetic mode of inheritance. Other variants that have possible associations with poor drug response include rs340874 (PROX-AS1), rs815815 (CALM2), rs1333049 (CDKN2B-AS1), rs2010963 (VEGFA), rs1535435 and rs9494266 (AHI1), rs11128347 (PDZRN3), rs1805081 (NPC1), and rs13266634 (SLC30A8). Conclusion: In Filipinos, a trend for the association for several variants was noted, with further observation that several mechanisms may be involved. The results may serve as pilot data for further validation of candidate variants for T2DM pharmacotherapy.

Association of sunlight exposure with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels among working urban adult Filipinos.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of different levels of sunlight exposure, measured using the Filipino sunlight exposure questionnaire (SEQ) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels among working urban adult Filipinos. METHODS: Seventy-five adult participants, living and working in Metro Manila, for at least 1 year, were grouped according to their perceived sunlight exposure pattern: low sunlight exposure (mostly indoor work); moderate sunlight exposure (both indoor and outdoor work); and high sunlight exposure (mostly outdoor work). After completion of the self-administered Filipino SEQ, they underwent serum 25-OHD level determination. Strength of correlation between the SEQ scores and 25-OHD levels was computed. RESULTS: Serum 25-OHD levels generally increased with increasing sunlight exposure levels. The overall Pearson's correlation between the SEQ scores and 25-OHD levels of the participants was 0.396 (P = 0.001). The correlation for the individual domains was 0.342 for intensity of sunlight exposure (P = 0.003), 0.321 for factors affecting sunlight exposure (P = 0.005), and 0.256 for sun protection practices (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The sunlight exposure of working urban adult Filipinos, as measured by the Filipino SEQ, has an overall significant, direct and moderate association with serum 25-OHD levels. This Filipino SEQ can serve as a valuable clinical tool for sunlight exposure assessment to identify individuals at risk for vitamin D deficiency.