Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Heart J ; 153(6): 1064-73, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17540211

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with coexistent heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a poor prognosis, possibly related to the underuse of standard medical therapies--angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Minnesota Heart Survey, identifying patients hospitalized in 2000 in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolitan area with heart failure. The main outcome measure was the association of ACE-I and ARB use on 30-day and 1-year mortality, stratified by glomerular filtration rate (GFR). RESULTS: Compared to patients with heart failure with preserved renal function (GFR > or = 90 mL/min), patients with severely impaired renal function (GFR <15 mL/min) were far less likely to receive ACE-I or ARB during hospitalization (52.0% vs 69.5%, P < .0001) or at discharge (50.5% vs 65.1%, P < .0001). Worsening renal function was associated with increased mortality, both at 30 days and at 1 year. The inhospital use of either an ACE-I or ARB was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.59) after adjusting for multiple risk factors. Similarly, the discharge prescription of either an ACE-I or ARB was associated with a significant reduction in adjusted 1-year mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). However, among patients on dialysis, there was no benefit of ACE-I or ARB on either 30-day or 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ARB are underused in patients with heart failure with chronic kidney disease. Given the reduction in 30-day and 1-year mortality, these medications should be considered in most patients with heart failure, independent of underlying renal function. Among patients on hemodialysis, further investigation is warranted.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Nefropatias/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/epidemiologia
2.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 17(4): 211-5, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15831975

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although radio contrast volume has been associated with worsening post-procedural kidney function, this relationship has not been extensively studied using an iso-osmolar contrast agent in chronic kidney disease patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients undergoing cardiac catheterization at the University of Minnesota from 2000 to 2004, using the iso-osmolar contrast agent, iodixanol. All patients were included who had calculated creatinine clearance (CCR) < 60 mL/min, not on dialysis, and serum creatinine measured on the same day and within 7 days after the procedure. Comparison of a subgroup with severe chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus was compared to a similar historical control group that used the low-osmolar contrast agent, iohexol. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and CCR were 2.9 +/- 1.5 mg/dL and 33.4 +/- 12.0 mL/min (mean +/- standard deviation), respectively, at baseline in 117 cases. Peak creatinine increased by 0.03 +/- 0.7 mg/dL after 84.3 +/- 67.3 mL of iodixanol was used. Contrast-induced nephropathy definition was fulfilled in 22 (18.8%) cases. A non-significant negative correlation was found between the volume of iodixanol and the change in creatinine (r2 = 0.0011, p = 0.7254). A subgroup with severe chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus with iodixanol had a significantly lower creatinine increase (n = 25, 0.09 +/- 0.5 mg/dL), compared to historical controls (n = 42, 0.7 +/- 0.8 mg/dL) with iohexol (p < 0.001). A non-significant positive correlation between volume of contrast and change in creatinine was found in this subgroup who received iodixanol (n = 25, r2 = 0.0756, p = 0.1835), but was significant in the historical controls who received iohexol (n = 42, r2 = 0.135, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of iso-osmolar radio contrast does not affect the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. A randomized trial evaluating the incidence of contrast nephropathy would verify the safety of ad hoc versus staged angiographic procedures in this population.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Creatinina/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Ácidos Tri-Iodobenzoicos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Angiografia Coronária , Complicações do Diabetes/sangue , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Iohexol/efeitos adversos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Concentração Osmolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácidos Tri-Iodobenzoicos/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...