Analysis of image quality and radiation dose in routine adult brain helical and wide-volume computed tomography procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare image quality and radiation dose between the helical and wide-volume scans to determine the protocol that provides a lower radiation dose without loss in image quality. METHODS: The study was prospectively conducted on consented adult patients that presented for routine brain CT. Image quality and radiation dose were compared between the helical and wide-volume scans on the Toshiba 160-slice Aquilion Prime CT scanner. The volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) for each scan mode were collected and compared. Image quality was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated using the unenhanced brain CT images. The data were analysed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software version 20 for both the descriptive and inferential statistics. A significant difference in image quality and radiation dose between the helical and wide-volume scans was determined based on a p-value of <0.05. RESULTS: A total of 54 participants were included, with two groups of 27 participants. The CTDIvol and DLP values were significantly p < 0.05 higher in the helical scan (CTDIvol: 65 mGy; DLP: 1597 mGy.cm) compared to the wide-volume scan (CTDIvol: 54 mGy; DLP: 1133 mGy.cm). The grey and white matters show a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the helical scan. Meanwhile, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly p < 0.05 higher in the wide-volume scan. The results from the visual grading methods were compared and showed superior image quality in helical over the wide-volume scan. CONCLUSION: Wide-volume provides a lower dose compared to helical and therefore, could be adopted as the routine protocol for brain CT for in house dose optimisation. Where clinical conditions warrant the need for a helical scan, the protocol should be optimised in line with the as low as reasonable achievable (ALARA) principle.

FIRST CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY TYPICAL RADIATION DOSE VALUES FROM A SINGLE CENTRE IN NIGERIA: A PILOT STUDY.

Concern regarding radiation dose associated with cardiac computed tomography (CT) still exists and requires the use of diagnostic reference levels for dose optimisation. Typical median doses were established for 58 consented adult patients from a single centre for coronary artery calcium score (CACS) as volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol): 5.9 mGy; dose length product (DLP): 86.6 mGy*cm and cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) as CTDIvol: 11.1 mGy; DLP: 190.8 mGy*cm. Wide radiation dose variability in terms of CTDIvol was noted for CACS: 2.7-15.9 mGy, a 6-fold, whereas for CCTA it ranges from 3.8 to 52.8 mGy, a 14-fold. The DLP values for CACS range from 33.2 to 344.2 mGy*cm, which is 10-fold, whereas for CCTA it ranges from 32.8 to 834.9 mGy*cm, a 25-fold. The typical values compared lower than the radiation dose from other countries; however, the wide variability in dose remains a call for concern.

Local diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography: Two hospitals study in northwest, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Mammography involves the use of low energy X-rays to image the breast tissue. Although low dose radiation is used, the use of ionising radiation implies the risk of inducing breast cancer. Thus, the study established local DRLs for digital mammography for in-house dose optimisation. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that had a total of 240 women that presented for mammography at the two tertiary institutions located in the Northwest region of Nigeria. Patient demographic information including compressed breast thickness (CBT), which is the breast tissue thickness across the imaging plate, and mean glandular dose (MGD) were recorded. Data were analysed based on descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS statistical software. The DRLs based on MGD and CBT were established and compared with the relevant data in the literature. RESULTS: Local DRLs based on MGD and CBT were established at the 75th percentile (craniocaudal (CC): 1.50 mGy; 57 mm; mediolateral (MLO): 1.60 mGy; 63 mm) and 95th percentile (CC: 3.74 mGy; 69 mm; MLO: 3.61 mGy; 76 mm). The MGD based on manual exposure was significantly (p < 0.005) higher compared to the automatic optimisation parameter (AOP) mode which suggests the need to continuously adhere to the use of AOP mode for in-house dose optimisation. CONCLUSION: The study established local DRLs for the digital mammography systems at the 75th and 95th percentiles which compared well with the values established in the literature. Manual selection of parameters should only be employed where there are legitimate indications as it is associated with high exposure. Also, manual selection of parameters should be based on preset tables as a function of compressed breast thickness.