Nasal nitric oxide in cystic fibrosis with and without humming.

BACKGROUND: Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) values are reduced in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Humming during nNO measurement increases nNO values in healthy subjects. Nasal NO is reduced in patients with CF, sinus disease or nasal polyps. Humming nNO values have not been reported in CF patients yet. Our aim was to explore humming nNO values in CF patients and assess whether nNO during humming is a better discriminator than silent nNO measurements in this patient group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross sectional study we measured nNO concentrations in healthy controls (HC) and in CF patients (n = 23 and 31, respectively). The participants held their breath for 10 s while air was passively extracted from one nostril with 700 mL min(-1) for direct NO measurements (NIOX chemiluminescence analyser). Subsequently nNO was measured during humming with the mouth closed for 10 s. RESULTS: Mean nNO in parts per billion (p.p.b.) (SD) during breath hold was 499 (164) and 240 (139), respectively. The median nNO peak (p.p.b., minimum-maximum) during humming was 1500 (425-4100) for HC and 120 (23-500) for CF. There was a highly significant difference between nNO both with and without humming between CF and HC (P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of nNO for detecting CF were better with humming. CONCLUSION: Nasal NO concentrations with and without humming are significantly decreased in CF. Humming nNO is an excellent discriminator between HC and CF and performs better than silent nNO.

Nasal NO measurement by direct sampling from the nose during breathhold: Aspiration flow, nasal resistance and reproducibility.

The objective of this study was assessment of the effect of aspiration flow, the nasal cycle, and time on nasal nitric oxide (nNO) concentrations in air sampled from one nostril during breathhold. nNO was measured in 45 healthy subjects (19 males, aged 18-45 years) from one nostril during breathholding. We compared nNO values and time to plateau in both nostrils with 3 aspiration flows (280, 700, 1,200 ml/min) and assessed the short-term and long-term reproducibility. Mean nNO values at flows of 280, 700 and 1,200 ml/min differed significantly (P < 0.01): 854, 474, 380 ppb, respectively. The (median) plateau was reached after 6, 4 and 3 s for the different flows. The within-subject coefficient of variability was always < 5%. We found no difference in nNO between left-, right-, largest or smallest nostril (P > 0.10). nNO values after 6, 24 h and 7 days were not significantly different from baseline (P > 0.10) and showed fair reproducibility. The highest aspiration flow was experienced as unpleasant. nNO can be measured in either nostril and shows no diurnal variation. The measurement is quick, reproducible, feasible and best accepted with an aspiration flow of 700 ml/min during breathhold for 10 s.

Nasal NO: normal values in children age 6 through to 17 years.

The present study is an assessment of normal values of nasal nitric oxide (nNO) in healthy children. Healthy children aged between 6-17 yrs were recruited from three schools in Rotterdam (The Netherlands). Breath was held for 10 s, while air was extracted from one nostril at 700 mL.min(-1). The mean nNO value at the response plateau after 7-10 s was recorded and the average of three measurements was used. In total, 340 children participated; the male:female ratio was 156:184. Three reliable measurements were available in 85% of the children. The nNO concentrations were distributed normally (mean 449 ppb, SD 115). They were not associated with sex, passive smoking or body mass index. In children aged <12 yrs nNO correlated positively with age, history of adenoidectomy and ambient NO. In children aged > or =12 yrs ambient NO was the only significant modifier. Prediction rules for nNO values in children were formulated. In conclusion, the current study presents normal values for nasal nitric oxide in children, which can be used to assess the value of nasal nitric oxide in respiratory illnesses.

Silent and humming nasal NO measurements in adults aged 18-70 years.

BACKGROUND: The concentration of nitric oxide (NO) measured from the nose is much higher than in the lower airways and increases during humming. We assessed nasal NO (nNO) normal values during breath hold and during humming in healthy adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nasal NO concentrations were measured in healthy adults (ages 18-70). They held their breath for 10 s and thereafter hummed as loud as possible with their mouths closed also for 10 s. During breath hold, air was passively extracted from one nostril with 700 mL min(-1). The average NO concentration at the plateau after 7-10 s was recorded and the mean of three consecutive measurements was calculated. During humming, air was extracted with 1200 mL min(-1), the peak NO values were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred healthy adults participated (37 men). The nNO concentrations during breath hold were distributed normally (mean: 455 parts per billion (p.p.b.), SD 147). A random subgroup of 40 out of the 100 subjects (15 men) performed nNO measurement during humming. The median peak NO value was 1019 p.p.b. (SD 561) at the first, and 837 p.p.b. (SD 408) at the second measurement. There was a significant difference between the peak NO values of first and second humming. CONCLUSION: We present normal values for nNO in adults, which can be used to assess the value of nNO in respiratory illnesses. The peak nNO values during humming are variable, and their clinical relevance remains to be shown.