Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(5)2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771623

RESUMO

The emergent fungal pathogen Candida auris is increasingly recognised as an important cause of healthcare-associated infections globally. It is highly transmissible, adaptable, and persistent, resulting in an organism with significant outbreak potential that risks devastating consequences. Progress in the ability to identify C. auris in clinical specimens is encouraging, but laboratory diagnostic capacity and surveillance systems are lacking in many countries. Intrinsic resistance to commonly used antifungals, combined with the ability to rapidly acquire resistance to therapy, substantially restricts treatment options and novel agents are desperately needed. Despite this, outbreaks can be interrupted, and mortality avoided or minimised, through the application of rigorous infection prevention and control measures with an increasing evidence base. This review provides an update on epidemiology, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, risk factors, identification and typing, resistance profiles, treatment, detection of colonisation, and infection prevention and control measures for C. auris. This review has informed a planned 2024 update to the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA) guidance on the laboratory investigation, management, and infection prevention and control of Candida auris. A multidisciplinary response is needed to control C. auris transmission in a healthcare setting and should emphasise outbreak preparedness and response, rapid contact tracing and isolation or cohorting of patients and staff, strict hand hygiene and other infection prevention and control measures, dedicated or single-use equipment, appropriate disinfection, and effective communication concerning patient transfers and discharge.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos , COVID-19 , Candida auris , Candidíase , Controle de Infecções , Humanos , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Candidíase/epidemiologia , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/microbiologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Candida auris/efeitos dos fármacos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Candida/classificação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 152: e42, 2024 Feb 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403892

RESUMO

Excluding children with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from childcare until microbiologically clear of the pathogen, disrupts families, education, and earnings. Since PCR introduction, non-O157 STEC serotype detections in England have increased. We examined shedding duration by serotype and transmission risk, to guide exclusion advice. We investigated STEC cases aged <6 years, residing in England and attending childcare, with diarrhoea onset or sample date from 31 March 2018 to 30 March 2022. Duration of shedding was the interval between date of onset or date first positive specimen and earliest available negative specimen date. Transmission risk was estimated from proportions with secondary cases in settings attended by infectious cases. There were 367 cases (STEC O157 n = 243, 66.2%; STEC non-O157 n = 124, 33.8%). Median shedding duration was 32 days (IQR 20-44) with no significant difference between O157 and non-O157; 2% (n = 6) of cases shed for ≥100 days. Duration of shedding was reduced by 17% (95% CI 4-29) among cases reporting bloody diarrhoea. Sixteen settings underwent screening; four had secondary cases (close contacts' secondary transmission rate = 13%). Shedding duration estimates were consistent with previous studies (median 31 days, IQR 17-41). Findings do not warrant guidance changes regarding exclusion and supervised return of prolonged shedders, despite serotype changes.


Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli , Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Shiga Toxigênica , Criança , Humanos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Cuidado da Criança , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Diarreia/microbiologia
3.
J Infect ; 88(1): 15-20, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter bacteraemia is a rare complication of the most common bacterial gastrointestinal infection but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is limited data describing current trends in surveillance and antimicrobial resistance for the Campylobacter strains involved. At the Epsom and St Helier's University Hospital (ESTH), we noted a marked increase in Campylobacter bacteraemia infections in 2021. METHODS: We extracted Campylobacter reports using the UK Health Security Agency's (UKHSA) Second Generation Surveillance System (laboratory reporting system) between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2021. We reviewed patient records of patients with Campylobacter bacteraemia for details including presentation, past medical history, duration of hospital stay, and antibiotic use. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, ESTH reported a total of 34 cases of Campylobacter bacteraemia. In 2021, the estimated incidence was 6.8 cases per 100,000 population and in the surrounding area, the incidence was 0.4 per 100,000 population. The incidence rate of Campylobacter bacteraemia in London and the South East region was significantly lower than ESTH (RR = 0.17, p < 0.0001). Campylobacter bacteraemia cases at ESTH reported a high number of co-morbidities (average number of comorbidities = 2.3) and had a duration of stay in hospital of a median of 7 days (IQR = 4-10 days). Campylobacter jejuni was the most commonly reported species for stool and blood Campylobacter in ESTH, London, and South East England. CONCLUSION: Campylobacter bacteraemia reports at ESTH were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than the surrounding London and South East region. While no common cause for the exceedance of Campylobacter bacteraemia has been identified, common risk factors for Campylobacter bacteraemia infection include underlying health conditions, being older, and male.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Campylobacter , Campylobacter , Humanos , Masculino , Londres/epidemiologia , Hospitais Gerais , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Infecções por Campylobacter/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
4.
Euro Surveill ; 28(14)2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37022213

RESUMO

BackgroundYersiniosis is one of the most common food-borne zoonoses in Europe, but there are large variations in the reported incidence between different countries.AimWe aimed to describe the trends and epidemiology of laboratory-confirmed Yersinia infections in England and estimate the average annual number of undiagnosed Yersinia enterocolitica cases, accounting for under-ascertainment.MethodsWe analysed national surveillance data on Yersinia cases reported by laboratories in England between 1975 and 2020 and enhanced surveillance questionnaires from patients diagnosed in a laboratory that has implemented routine Yersinia testing of diarrhoeic samples since 2016.ResultsThe highest incidence of Yersinia infections in England (1.4 cases per 100,000 population) was recorded in 1988 and 1989, with Y. enterocolitica being the predominant species. The reported incidence of Yersinia infections declined during the 1990s and remained low until 2016. Following introduction of commercial PCR at a single laboratory in the South East, the annual incidence increased markedly (13.6 cases per 100,000 population in the catchment area between 2017 and 2020). There were notable changes in age and seasonal distribution of cases over time. The majority of infections were not linked to foreign travel and one in five patients was admitted to hospital. We estimate that around 7,500 Y. enterocolitica infections may be undiagnosed in England annually.ConclusionsFindings suggest a considerable number of undiagnosed yersiniosis cases in England, with possibly important changes in the epidemiology. The apparently low incidence of yersiniosis in England is probably due to limited laboratory testing.


Assuntos
Yersiniose , Yersinia enterocolitica , Animais , Humanos , Yersiniose/diagnóstico , Yersiniose/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente) , Zoonoses , Inglaterra/epidemiologia
5.
Microb Genom ; 8(4)2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442183

RESUMO

A hospital outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales was detected by routine surveillance. Whole genome sequencing and subsequent analysis revealed a conserved promiscuous blaOXA-48 carrying plasmid as the defining factor within this outbreak. Four different species of Enterobacterales were involved in the outbreak. Escherichia coli ST399 accounted for 35 of all the 55 isolates. Comparative genomics analysis using publicly available E. coli ST399 genomes showed that the outbreak E. coli ST399 isolates formed a unique clade. We developed a mathematical model of pOXA-48-like plasmid transmission between host lineages and used it to estimate its conjugation rate, giving a lower bound of 0.23 conjugation events per lineage per year. Our analysis suggests that co-evolution between the pOXA-48-like plasmid and E. coli ST399 could have played a role in the outbreak. This is the first study to report carbapenem-resistant E. coli ST399 carrying blaOXA-48 as the main cause of a plasmid-borne outbreak within a hospital setting. Our findings suggest complementary roles for both plasmid conjugation and clonal expansion in the emergence of this outbreak.


Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Plasmídeos/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo
7.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e044384, 2021 02 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602712

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to describe evolution, epidemiology and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in subjects tested at or admitted to hospitals in North West London. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (LNWH). PARTICIPANTS: Patients tested and/or admitted for COVID-19 at LNWH during March and April 2020 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and analytical epidemiology of demographic and clinical outcomes (intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality) of those who tested positive for COVID-19. RESULTS: The outbreak began in the first week of March 2020 and reached a peak by the end of March and first week of April. In the study period, 6183 tests were performed in on 4981 people. Of the 2086 laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases, 1901 were admitted to hospital. Older age group, men and those of black or Asian minority ethnic (BAME) group were predominantly affected (p<0.05). These groups also had more severe infection resulting in ICU admission and need for mechanical ventilation (p<0.05). However, in a multivariate analysis, only increasing age was independently associated with increased risk of death (p<0.05). Mortality rate was 26.9% in hospitalised patients. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm that men, BAME and older population were most commonly and severely affected groups. Only older age was independently associated with mortality.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
8.
Euro Surveill ; 26(8)2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632376

RESUMO

BackgroundCandida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen associated with bloodstream, wound and other infections, especially in critically ill patients. C. auris carriage is persistent and is difficult to eradicate from the hospital environment.AimWe aimed to pilot admission screening for C. auris in intensive care units (ICUs) in England to estimate prevalence in the ICU population and to inform public health guidance.MethodsBetween May 2017 and April 2018, we screened admissions to eight adult ICUs in hospitals with no previous cases of C. auris, in three major cities. Swabs were taken from the nose, throat, axilla, groin, perineum, rectum and catheter urine, then cultured and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Patient records were linked to routine ICU data to describe and compare the demographic and health indicators of the screened cohort with a national cohort of ICU patients admitted between 2016 and 2017.ResultsAll C. auris screens for 921 adults from 998 admissions were negative. The upper confidence limit of the pooled prevalence across all sites was 0.4%. Comparison of the screened cohort with the national cohort showed it was broadly similar to the national cohort with respect to demographics and co-morbidities.ConclusionThese findings imply that C. auris colonisation among patients admitted to ICUs in England is currently rare. We would not currently recommend widespread screening for C. auris in ICUs in England. Hospitals should continue to screen high-risk individuals based on local risk assessment.


Assuntos
Candida , Candidíase , Adulto , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/epidemiologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
9.
J Infect ; 79(2): 167-173, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31233810

RESUMO

A survey of laboratory testing capabilities for systemic fungal pathogens was undertaken in the UK, to identify where improved compliance with published standards and guidelines is required and to inform antifungal stewardship (AFS). The survey captured information from laboratories in the UK on diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases (IFD), including identification, serology, molecular diagnostics and susceptibility testing. The survey was circulated in March 2017 through key networks. Of 154 laboratories providing diagnostic mycology services in the UK, 80 (52%) responded to the survey. Results indicated that 85% of respondents identified fungal isolates from high risk patients to species level, and that many laboratories (78%) could access local susceptibility testing for yeasts, whereas 17% could for Aspergillus species. However, direct microscopy was only used in 49% as a first line investigation on samples where it would be appropriate. A low number of respondents identified yeasts cultured from intravascular line tips to species level (63%) and even fewer fully identified urine isolates from critically ill patients (42%) or the immunocompromised (39%). Less than half of respondents advised therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for flucytosine. Few laboratories had access to local ß-glucan (4%) or galactomannan (20%) testing. The survey highlights that the current level of fungal diagnostics in the UK is below accepted best practice with an urgent need to improve across many diagnostic areas including the timely accessibility of fungal biomarkers, susceptibility testing and provision of TDM testing. Improvements are important to facilitate the delivery of diagnostic driven AFS strategies as well as appropriate management of IFD.


Assuntos
Auditoria Clínica , Serviços de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/microbiologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Auditoria Clínica/métodos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/diagnóstico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/história , Padrões de Prática Médica , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
10.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 103(10): 1487-1490, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30563913

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of fungal infection after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) when donor tissue had been stored in hypothermic medium or organ culture. METHODS: We describe the clinical features of 10 cases of fungal infection (keratitis or endophthalmitis) following EK identified at three European centres. Case definition was the culture of fungus or a positive PCR from the host cornea or anterior chamber after EK. A survey of the incidence of infection after EK was conducted by the European Eye Bank Association. The main outcome measure was the number of cases in which donor tissue had been stored in hypothermic medium compared with organ culture. RESULTS: The 10 cases occurred between 2014 and 2017. All donor corneas had been stored in hypothermic medium sourced from three US eye banks. Three pairs of mate corneas caused infections in six recipients. Candida spp were identified from nine cases, with one isolate of Purpureocillium lilacinum. Data on 16 862 corneas supplied for EK were available from 16 European eye banks for the 5-year period from 2012. There were 17 reported cases of infection, of which 15 (88%) were fungal infections and 14 (82%) were Candida spp. Fungal infection was reported from 3 of 14 476 (0.02%) corneas supplied in organ culture compared with 12 of 2386 (0.50%) corneas supplied in hypothermic medium (p<0.0001). The incidence of infection after hypothermic storage was similar for material sourced from Europe (0.52%) or the USA (0.61%). CONCLUSIONS: Infection after EK is strongly associated with Candida spp. The possible explanations for the higher incidence of infection when tissue is stored in hypothermic medium are discussed.


Assuntos
Candidíase/epidemiologia , Úlcera da Córnea/epidemiologia , Criopreservação/métodos , Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/efeitos adversos , Endoftalmite/epidemiologia , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/epidemiologia , Preservação de Órgãos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Candidíase/microbiologia , Córnea , Úlcera da Córnea/microbiologia , Endoftalmite/microbiologia , União Europeia , Bancos de Olhos/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Cultura de Órgãos , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos
11.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(11): 1596-1600, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30251950

RESUMO

In January 2015, Public Health England and the United Kingdom (UK) Ministry of Defence investigated cases of diarrhoea and fever in military personnel recently returned to the UK after supporting the response to the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone. Tests for Ebola virus infection were negative. PCR tests detected the ipaH gene in 10/12 faecal specimens, and Shigella boydii serotype 20 was isolated from 7 patients. A case control study was undertaken and analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Consumption of a coronation chicken lunch at the transit camp in Sierra Leone (SL) 24-48 h prior to departure for the UK was significantly associated with disease [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 28.15, 95 % CI: 1.87-422.65]. In the context of heightened concern during the Ebola epidemic, this outbreak highlights the importance of rapid and effective microbiological and epidemiological investigations to identify the aetiological agent in patients presenting with fever and diarrhoea.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Disenteria Bacilar/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Shigella boydii/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Animais , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Galinhas/microbiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/epidemiologia , Disenteria Bacilar/etiologia , Disenteria Bacilar/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/microbiologia , Contaminação de Alimentos , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Militares , Sorogrupo , Shigella boydii/classificação , Shigella boydii/genética , Shigella boydii/imunologia , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Adulto Jovem
13.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 31(1)2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29142078

RESUMO

The emerging pathogen Candida auris has been associated with nosocomial outbreaks on five continents. Genetic analysis indicates the simultaneous emergence of separate clades of this organism in different geographical locations. Invasive infection and colonization have been detected predominantly in patients in high-dependency settings and have garnered attention due to variable antifungal resistance profiles and transmission within units instituting a range of infection prevention and control measures. Issues with the identification of C. auris using both phenotypic and molecular techniques have raised concerns about detecting the true scale of the problem. This review considers the literature available on C. auris and highlights the key unknowns, which will provide direction for further work in this field.


Assuntos
Candida , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Candidíase/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Humanos
14.
J Med Microbiol ; 66(11): 1581-1589, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068278

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We sought to explore the current status of antifungal stewardship (AFS) initiatives across National Health Service (NHS) Trusts within England, the challenges and barriers, as well as ways to improve current AFS programmes. METHODOLOGY: An electronic survey was sent to all 155 acute NHS Trusts in England. A total of 47 Trusts, corresponding to 30 % of English acute Trusts, responded to the the survey; 46 Trusts (98 %) had an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme but only 5 (11 %) had a dedicated AFS programme. Overall, 20 (43 %) Trusts said they included AFS as part of their AMS programmes. From those conducting AFS programmes, 7 (28 %) have an AFS/management team, 16 (64 %) monitor and report on antifungal usage, 5 (20 %) have dedicated AFS ward rounds and 12 (48 %) are directly involved in the management of invasive fungal infections.Results/Key findings. Altogether, 13 acute Trusts (52 %) started their AFS programme to manage costs, whilst 12 (48 %) commenced the programme due to clinical need; 27 (73 %) declared that they would increase their AFS initiatives if they could. Of those without an AFS programme, 14 (67 %) responded that this was due to lack of resources/staff time. Overall, 12 Trusts (57 %) responded that the availability of rapid diagnostics and clinical support would enable them to conduct AFS activities. CONCLUSION: Although a minority of Trusts conduct dedicated AFS programmes, nearly half include AFS as part of routine AMS activities. Cost issues are the main driver for AFS, followed by clinical need. The availability of rapid diagnostics and clinical support could help increase AFS initiatives.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Micoses/tratamento farmacológico , Micoses/epidemiologia , Medicina Estatal
17.
Health Technol Assess ; 21(23): 1-188, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28619124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteritis is a common, transient disorder usually caused by infection and characterised by the acute onset of diarrhoea. Multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GPP) tests simultaneously identify common bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens using molecular testing. By providing test results more rapidly than conventional testing methods, GPP tests might positively influence the treatment and management of patients presenting in hospital or in the community. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for GPP tests [xTAG® (Luminex, Toronto, ON, Canada), FilmArray (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) and Faecal Pathogens B (AusDiagnostics, Beaconsfield, NSW, Australia)] and to develop a de novo economic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of GPP tests with conventional testing in England and Wales. DATA SOURCES: Multiple electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database were searched from inception to January 2016 (with supplementary searches of other online resources). REVIEW METHODS: Eligible studies included patients with acute diarrhoea; comparing GPP tests with standard microbiology techniques; and patient, management, test accuracy or cost-effectiveness outcomes. Quality assessment of eligible studies used tailored Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Philips checklists. The meta-analysis included positive and negative agreement estimated for each pathogen. A de novo decision tree model compared patients managed with GPP testing or comparable coverage with patients managed using conventional tests, within the Public Health England pathway. Economic models included hospital and community management of patients with suspected gastroenteritis. The model estimated costs (in 2014/15 prices) and quality-adjusted life-year losses from a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies informed the review of clinical evidence (17 xTAG, four FilmArray, two xTAG and FilmArray, 0 Faecal Pathogens B). No study provided an adequate reference standard with which to compare the test accuracy of GPP with conventional tests. A meta-analysis (of 10 studies) found considerable heterogeneity; however, GPP testing produces a greater number of pathogen-positive findings than conventional testing. It is unclear whether or not these additional 'positives' are clinically important. The review identified no robust evidence to inform consequent clinical management of patients. There is considerable uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of GPP panels used to test for suspected infectious gastroenteritis in hospital and community settings. Uncertainties in the model include length of stay, assumptions about false-positive findings and the costs of tests. Although there is potential for cost-effectiveness in both settings, key modelling assumptions need to be verified and model findings remain tentative. LIMITATIONS: No test-treat trials were retrieved. The economic model reflects one pattern of care, which will vary across the NHS. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review and cost-effectiveness model identify uncertainties about the adoption of GPP tests within the NHS. GPP testing will generally correctly identify pathogens identified by conventional testing; however, these tests also generate considerable additional positive results of uncertain clinical importance. FUTURE WORK: An independent reference standard may not exist to evaluate alternative approaches to testing. A test-treat trial might ascertain whether or not additional GPP 'positives' are clinically important or result in overdiagnoses, whether or not earlier diagnosis leads to earlier discharge in patients and what the health consequences of earlier intervention are. Future work might also consider the public health impact of different testing treatments, as test results form the basis for public health surveillance. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD2016033320. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.


Assuntos
Diarreia/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/economia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Animais , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diarreia/parasitologia , Diarreia/virologia , Gastroenterite/parasitologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Parasitos/isolamento & purificação , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medicina Estatal , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Vírus/isolamento & purificação
18.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0173196, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253337

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GPP) tests simultaneously identify bacterial, viral and parasitic pathogens from the stool samples of patients with suspected infectious gastroenteritis presenting in hospital or the community. We undertook a systematic review to compare the accuracy of GPP tests with standard microbiology techniques. REVIEW METHODS: Searches in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were undertaken from inception to January 2016. Eligible studies compared GPP tests with standard microbiology techniques in patients with suspected gastroenteritis. Quality assessment of included studies used tailored QUADAS-2. In the absence of a reference standard we analysed test performance taking GPP tests and standard microbiology techniques in turn as the benchmark test, using random effects meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: No study provided an adequate reference standard with which to compare the test accuracy of GPP and conventional tests. Ten studies informed a meta-analysis of positive and negative agreement. Positive agreement across all pathogens was 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) when conventional methods were the benchmark and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.77) when GPP provided the benchmark. Negative agreement was high in both instances due to the high proportion of negative cases. GPP testing produced a greater number of pathogen-positive findings than conventional testing. It is unclear whether these additional 'positives' are clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: GPP testing has the potential to simplify testing and accelerate reporting when compared to conventional microbiology methods. However the impact of GPP testing upon the management, treatment and outcome of patients is poorly understood and further studies are needed to evaluate the health economic impact of GPP testing compared with standard methods. The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO as CRD42016033320.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Adulto , Criança , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Fezes/virologia , Gastroenterite/parasitologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Padrões de Referência
19.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(2): 596-603, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27687074

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), and to determine epidemiological characteristics, laboratory methods and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in acute care facilities. METHODS: A 6 month survey was undertaken in November 2013-April 2014 in 21 sentinel UK laboratories as part of the European Survey on Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) project. Up to 10 consecutive, non-duplicate, clinically significant and carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae were submitted to a reference laboratory. Participants answered a questionnaire on relevant laboratory methods and IPC measures. RESULTS: Of 102 isolates submitted, 89 (87%) were non-susceptible to ≥1 carbapenem, and 32 (36%) were confirmed as CPE. CPE were resistant to most antibiotics, except colistin (94% susceptible), gentamicin (63%), tigecycline (56%) and amikacin (53%). The prevalence of CPE was 0.02% (95% CI = 0.01%-0.03%). The incidence of CPE was 0.007 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI = 0.005-0.010), with north-west England the most affected region at 0.033 per 1000 patient-days (95% CI = 0.012-0.072). Recommended IPC measures were not universally followed, notably screening high-risk patients on admission (applied by 86%), using a CPE 'flag' on patients' records (70%) and alerting neighbouring hospitals when transferring affected patients (only 30%). Most sites (86%) had a laboratory protocol for CPE screening, most frequently using chromogenic agar (52%) or MacConkey/CLED agars with carbapenem discs (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant CPE is currently low, but these MDR bacteria affect most UK regions. Improved IPC measures, vigilance and monitoring are required.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , beta-Lactamases/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...