The Rise and Fall of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in a Community Hospital: Is It Possible to Turn the Tide of History?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) drains are alternatives to cholecystectomy in critically ill patients in whom surgery carries an unacceptably high risk. Recently, several studies demonstrated a significant increase in complications in patients undergoing PC in comparison to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PC drainage or cholecystectomy from 2014 through 2019 at our institution. We determined the rate of PC use and performed a linear regression analysis to evaluate PC utilization over time. After creating institutional guidelines and reeducating physicians on appropriate use of PC drainage in 2019, we compared PC utilization to prior years. RESULTS: A total of 146 PCs and 3163 cholecystectomies were performed over the study period. Of the cholecystectomies, 754 (23.8%) were performed in hospitalized patients under urgent or emergent conditions. Of the patients with acute cholecystitis, 16.2% were treated with PC. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between year and rate of PC procedures (p<0.001). The rate of PC rose from 13.8 to 22.5% between 2014 and 2018 and dropped to 10.9% (p=0.006) in 2019 after the reeducation program. CONCLUSIONS: With a rising rate of PC utilization and in light of recent studies suggesting increased complications and healthcare costs for patients undergoing this procedure, care needs to be taken to ensure that only appropriate patients are referred for PC. Publication of institutional guidelines, resident and attending surgeon reeducation, and case review can reduce placement of unnecessary PCs.

Operating-Room Procedures Do Not Increase Risk of COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Operating-room procedures canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic depleted hospital revenue and potentially worsened patient outcomes through disease progression. Despite safeguards to resume elective procedures, patients remain apprehensive of contracting COVID-19 during hospitalization and recovery. We investigated symptomatic COVID-19 infection in patients undergoing operating-room procedures during the spring 2020 outbreak in Fairfield County, CT, a heavily affected New York Metropolitan area. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 419 operating-room patients in Danbury and Norwalk Hospitals between 3/16/20 and 5/19/20. COVID-19 infection was assessed through test results or documented well-being within 2 weeks postdischarge. Variables studied were procedure classification, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Postprocedural COVID-19 infection was analyzed using binomial tests comparing rates to state-mandated infection data. RESULTS: Six patients developed COVID-19 after 212 urgent-elective and 207 emergent procedures. Overall postprocedural infection risk was equivalent to community infection risk (P > .05). No infections occurred in 1-2 day stays or urgent-elective procedures with discharge home (both P < .05). Discharges home reduced the risk to one-sixth of community spread (P = .03). Risk of infection doubled in hospitalizations > 5 days (P = .05) and quadrupled in discharges to extended care facilities (P = .01). DISCUSSION: Operating-room procedures did not increase the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 infection during an outbreak. Urgent-elective and emergent procedures during further outbreaks appear safe when anticipating short stays with discharges home. When anticipating prolonged hospitalization or discharges to facilities, appropriate delay of urgent-elective procedures may minimize risk of infection.