Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. Serum markers and transient elastography (FibroScan).

Both the prognosis and potential treatment of chronic liver disease greatly depend on the progression of liver fibrosis, which is the ultimate outcome of chronic liver damage. Historically, liver biopsy has been instrumental in adequately assessing patients with chronic liver disease. Histological assessment allows clinicians both to obtain diagnostic information and initiate adequate therapy. However, the technique is not exempt of deleterious effects. Multiple diagnostic tests have been developed for the staging of fibrosis using noninvasive methods, most of them in the setting of chronic hepatitis C. The goal of this paper is to review available data on the staging and assessment of liver fibrosis with two methods: serum markers and transient elastography (FibroScan).

Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. Serum markers and transient elastography (FibroScan)

Both the prognosis and potential treatment of chronic liver diseasegreatly depend on the progression of liver fibrosis, which isthe ultimate outcome of chronic liver damage. Historically, liverbiopsy has been instrumental in adequately assessing patients withchronic liver disease. Histological assessment allows cliniciansboth to obtain diagnostic information and initiate adequate therapy.However, the technique is not exempt of deleterious effects.Multiple diagnostic tests have been developed for the staging of fibrosisusing noninvasive methods, most of them in the setting ofchronic hepatitis C. The goal of this paper is to review availabledata on the staging and assessment of liver fibrosis with two methods:serum markers and transient elastography (FibroScan®)(AU)

Predicción de fibrosis hepática con pruebas no invasivas. Una apuesta de futuro / No disponible

No disponible

Cribado del cáncer colorrectal mediante test de sangre oculta en heces / No disponible

No disponible

[Tolerability, safety, and efficacy of sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy: the role of age]. / Tolerancia, seguridad y eficacia de la preparación para colonoscopia con fosfato de sodio: el papel de la edad.

OBJECTIVES: To compare subjective tolerance and secondary adverse events to bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sodium phosphate (NaP) in adult patients and in those 65 or more years old. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective matched study, choosing 140 patients among all of those who underwent colonoscopy from March 2004 to May 2005. We investigated the presence of the next adverse events during bowel preparation: Fever, low digestive bleeding, abdominal pain, perianal pain, nausea, vomiting, thirst, somnolence, agitation, tremor and convulsions. We considered bad objective tolerance if the patient presented any one of these events. We also asked patients about subjective tolerance to preparation. RESULTS: Seventy patients prepared with PEG and seventy with NaP were included (69 women and 71 men, mean age 60.6 +/- 14.8 years). There was no relationship between subjective tolerance or the presence of adverse events and bowel cleansing with any of the products in general population or in elderly patients (p = 0.09 and p = 0.45 in the elderly). However, patients prepared with NaP showed more nausea than those who employed PEG (p < 0.009), overall women of 65 or more years old. There were no severe adverse events in patients prepared with NaP. Elderly showed better tolerance than younger patients, and women worst tolerance than men, irrespective of the lavage preparation employed. Patients prepared with PEG unfinished bowel cleansing more frequently than those with NaP. Cleanliness achieved with NaP was significantly better than that obtained with PEG. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy with NaP is as well tolerated, safe and effective as with PEG, even in elderly healthy patients, although it causes more nausea. Cleanliness with NaP is better than that achieved with PEG.

Metaplasia acinar pancreática en esófago de Barrett después de cirugía antirreflujo / Pancreatic acinar metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus after antireflux surgery

No disponible

[Electrolytic disturbances and colonoscopy: bowel lavage solutions, age and procedure].

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy and bowel preparation cause a number of serum electrolytes changes. AIMS: To determine the prevalence of these changes in patients who underwent colonoscopy and to identify risk factors for these effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty five patients undergoing colonoscopy were assessed prospectively. They have been previously randomized to receive either sodium phosphate (NaP) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) as preparation. Serum levels of sodium and potassium were analyzed before colonoscopy, immediately after the end of colonoscopy, and 1 hour thereafter. Serum calcium and phosphorus levels were measured just before colonoscopy. RESULTS: Twenty five patients (55.5%) received PEG and 17 (37.7%) NaP. Three patients (6.6%) did not follow the recommended bowel preparation instructions and were excluded from the study. Five patients (11%) developed hyponatremia, of whom, in 4 cases (8.8%), it occurred after the procedure. Thirteen patients (28.8%) developed hypokalemia, of whom it occurred after the end of the procedure in seven (15.5%). There was a non-significant trend to decreased serum potassium levels 1 hour after colonoscopy in patients prepared with NaP (63.6 vs 36.4%). The multivariate analysis showed that low potassium levels were independently associated with age and NaP preparation. Hypocalcemia was observed in 2 patients (4%) and hypophosphatemia in 8 (18%). Hyperphosphatemia was found in 8 cases (18%). Non-significant increases in phosphorus levels were observed in the NaP group. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal sequences of the development of serum electrolyte disturbances suggest that colonoscopy itself might play a role in the pathogenesis of these changes. Preparation for colonoscopy with NaP and the age of patients are risk factors for the development of hypokalemia.