Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
Psychol Med ; : 1-8, 2024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Suicide is one of the main external causes of death worldwide. People who have already attempted suicide are at high risk of new suicidal behavior. However, there is a lack of information on the risk factors that facilitate the appearance of reattempts. The aim of this study was to calculate the risk of suicide reattempt in the presence of suicidal history and psychosocial risk factors and to estimate the effect of each individual risk factor. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Studies on suicide reattempt that measured risk factors were searched from inception to 2022. The risk factors studied were those directly related to suicide history: history of suicide prior to the index attempt, and those that mediate the transition from suicidal ideation to attempt (alcohol or drug misuse, impulsivity, trauma, and non-suicidal self-injury). RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 11 905 articles. Of these, 34 articles were selected for this meta-analysis, jointly presenting 52 different effect sizes. The pooled effect size across the risk factors was significant (OR 2.16). Reattempt risk may be increased in presence of any of the following risk factors: previous history, active suicidal ideation, trauma, alcohol misuse, and drug misuse. However, impulsivity, and non-suicidal self-injury did not show a significant effect on reattempt. CONCLUSION: Most of the risk factors traditionally associated with suicide are also relevant when talking about suicide reattempts. Knowing the traits that define reattempters can help develop better preventive and intervention plans.

2.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 82: 72-81, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503084

RESUMO

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) stands out as a promising augmentation psychological therapy for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). To identify potential predictive and response biomarkers, this study examines the relationship between clinical domains and resting-state network connectivity in OCD patients undergoing a 3-month MBCT programme. Twelve OCD patients underwent two resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging sessions at baseline and after the MBCT programme. We assessed four clinical domains: positive affect, negative affect, anxiety sensitivity, and rumination. Independent component analysis characterised resting-state networks (RSNs), and multiple regression analyses evaluated brain-clinical associations. At baseline, distinct network connectivity patterns were found for each clinical domain: parietal-subcortical, lateral prefrontal, medial prefrontal, and frontal-occipital. Predictive and response biomarkers revealed significant brain-clinical associations within two main RSNs: the ventral default mode network (vDMN) and the frontostriatal network (FSN). Key brain nodes -the precuneus and the frontopolar cortex- were identified within these networks. MBCT may modulate vDMN and FSN connectivity in OCD patients, possibly reducing symptoms across clinical domains. Each clinical domain had a unique baseline brain connectivity pattern, suggesting potential symptom-based biomarkers. Using these RSNs as predictors could enable personalised treatments and the identification of patients who would benefit most from MBCT.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Atenção Plena , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Humanos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/terapia , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Atenção Plena/métodos , Descanso/fisiologia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Rede Nervosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Rede Nervosa/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Rede de Modo Padrão/diagnóstico por imagem , Rede de Modo Padrão/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vias Neurais/fisiopatologia , Vias Neurais/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 209, 2024 Feb 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low household income (HI), comorbidities and female sex are associated with an increased risk of dementia. The aim of this study was to measure the mediating effect of comorbidity and HI on the excess risk due to gender in relation to the incidence and prevalence of dementia in the general population. METHODS: A retrospective and observational study using real-world data analysed all people over 60 who were registered with the Basque Health Service in Gipuzkoa. The study measured HI level, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), age and sex. The prevalence and incidence of dementia were analysed using logistic regression and Poisson regression models, respectively, adjusted by HI, sex, comorbidity and age. We estimated the combined mediation effect of HI and comorbidity on the prevalence of dementia associated with gender. RESULTS: Of the 221,777 individuals, 3.85% (8,549) had a diagnosis of dementia as of 31 December 2021. Classification by the CCI showed a gradient with 2.90% in CCI 0-1, 10.60% in CCI 2-3 and 18.01% in CCI > 3. Both low HI and gender were associated with a higher crude prevalence of dementia. However, in the CCI-adjusted model, women had an increased risk of dementia, while HI was no longer statistically significant. The incidence analysis produced similar results, although HI was not significant in any model. The CCI was significantly higher for men and for people with low HI. The mediation was statistically significant, and the CCI and HI explained 79% of the gender effect. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity and low HI act as mediators in the increased risk of dementia associated with female sex. Given the difference in the prevalence of comorbidities by HI, individual interventions to control comorbidities could not only prevent dementia but also reduce inequalities, as the risk is greater in the most disadvantaged population.


Assuntos
Demência , Equidade de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Comorbidade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/epidemiologia
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331320

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective alternative to treat severe refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), although little is known on factors predicting response. The objective of this study was to explore potential sex differences in the pattern of response to DBS in OCD patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in 25 patients with severe resistant OCD. Response to treatment was defined as a ≥35% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score. Logistic regression models were calculated to measure the likelihood of response at short and long-term follow-up by sex as measured by Y-BOCS score. Similar analyses were carried out to study changes in depressive symptomatology assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Additionally, effect sizes were calculated to assess clinical significance. RESULTS: We did not observe significant clinical differences between men and women prior to DBS implantation, nor in the response after one year of stimulation. At long-term follow-up, 76.9% of men could be considered responders to DBS versus only 33.3% of women. The final response odds ratio in men was 10.05 with significant confidence intervals (88.90-1.14). No other predictors of response were identified. The sex difference in Y-BOCS reduction was clinically significant, with an effect size of 3.2. The main limitation was the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gender could influence the long-term response to DBS in OCD, a finding that needs to be confirmed in new studies given the paucity of results on predictors of response to DBS.

5.
J Affect Disord ; 351: 649-660, 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290587

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe mental disorders like Schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders (SRD) or Bipolar Disorder (BD) require pharmacological treatment for relapse prevention and quality of life improvement. Yet, treatment adherence is a challenge, partly due to patients' attitudes and beliefs towards their medication. Social media listening offers insights into patient experiences and preferences, particularly in severe mental disorders. METHODS: All tweets posted between 2008 and 2022 mentioning the names of the main drugs used in SRD and BD were analyzed using advanced artificial intelligence techniques such as machine learning, and deep learning, along with natural language processing. RESULTS: In this 15-year study analyzing 893,289 tweets, second generation antipsychotics received more mentions in English tweets, whereas mood stabilizers received more tweets in Spanish. English tweets about economic and legal aspects displayed negative emotions, while Spanish tweets seeking advice showed surprise. Moreover, a recurring theme in Spanish tweets was the shortage of medications, evoking feelings of anger among users. LIMITATIONS: This study's analysis of Twitter data, while insightful, may not fully capture the nuances of discussions due to the platform's brevity. Additionally, the wide therapeutic use of the studied drugs, complicates the isolation of disorder-specific discourse. Only English and Spanish tweets were examined, limiting the cultural breadth of the findings. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of social media research in understanding user perceptions of SRD and BD treatments. The results provide valuable insights for clinicians when considering how patients and the general public view and communicate about these treatments in the digital environment.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Lítio/uso terapêutico , Análise de Sentimentos , Anticonvulsivantes , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Inteligência Artificial , Qualidade de Vida
6.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 21(1): 18, 2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36859271

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental illnesses account for a considerable proportion of the global burden of disease. Economic evaluation of public policies and interventions aimed at mental health is crucial to inform decisions and improve the provision of healthcare services, but experts highlight that nowadays the cost implications of mental illness are not properly quantified. The objective was to measure the costs of excess use of all healthcare services by 1- to 30-year-olds in the Basque population as a function of whether or not they had a mental disorder diagnosis. METHODS: A real-world data study was used to identify diagnoses of mental disorders and to measure resource use in the Basque Health Service Registry in 2018. Diagnoses were aggregated into eight diagnostic clusters: anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorders, mood disorders, substance use, psychosis and personality disorders, eating disorders, and self-harm. We calculated the costs incurred by each individual by multiplying the resource use by the unit costs. Annual costs for each cluster were compared with those for individuals with no diagnosed mental disorders through entropy balancing and two-part models which adjusted for socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Of the 609,381 individuals included, 96,671 (15.9%) had ≥ 1 mental disorder diagnosis. The annual cost per person was two-fold higher in the group diagnosed with mental disorders (€699.7) than that with no diagnoses (€274.6). For all clusters, annual excess costs associated with mental disorders were significant. The adjustment also evidenced a social gradient in healthcare costs, individuals with lower SES consuming more resources than those with medium and higher SES across all clusters. Nonetheless, the effect of being diagnosed with a mental disorder had a greater impact on the mean and excess costs than SES. CONCLUSIONS: Results were consistent in showing that young people with mental disorders place a greater burden on healthcare services. Excess costs were higher for severe mental disorders like self-harm and psychoses, and lower SES individuals incurred, overall, more than twice the costs per person with no diagnoses. A socioeconomic gradient was notable, excess costs being higher in low SES individuals than those with a high-to-medium SES. Differences by sex were also statistically significant but their sizes were smaller than those related to SES.

7.
Alzheimers Res Ther ; 14(1): 171, 2022 11 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36371267

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the use of Souvenaid for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been previously evidenced. To complete the economic analysis, there is a need to assess whether society can afford it. The objective of this study was to carry out a budget impact analysis of the use of Souvenaid in Spain under the conditions of the LipiDidiet clinical trial from a societal perspective. METHODS: We built a population model that took into account all the cohorts of individuals with AD, their individual progression, and the potential impact of Souvenaid treatment on their trajectories. Patient progression data were obtained from mixed models. The target population was estimated based on the population forecast for 2020-2035 and the incidence of dementia. Individual progression to dementia measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes was reproduced using mixed models. Besides the costs of treatment and diagnosis, direct costs of medical and non-medical care and indirect costs were included. RESULTS: The epidemiological indicators and the distribution of life expectancy by stages validated the model. From the third year (2022), the differences in the cost of dementia offset the incremental cost of diagnosis and treatment. The costs of dependency reached €500 million/year while those of the intervention were limited to €40 million. CONCLUSIONS: Souvenaid, with modest effectiveness in delaying dementia associated with AD, achieved a positive economic balance between costs and savings. Its use in the treatment of prodromal AD would imply an initial cost that would be ongoing, but this would be offset by savings in the care system for dependency associated with dementia from the third year. These results were based on adopting a societal perspective taking into account the effect of treatment on the use of health, social, and family resources.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Humanos , Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Espanha/epidemiologia , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Análise Custo-Benefício
8.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed) ; 15(3): 167-175, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272739

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Incidence rates of dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are not known and this hampers the assessment of their population burden. The objective of this study was to obtain an approximate estimate of the population incidence and prevalence of both dementia and NPS. METHODS: Given the dynamic nature of the population with dementia, a retrospective study was conducted within the database of the Basque Health Service (real-world data) at the beginning and end of 2019. Validated random forest models were used to identify separately depressive and psychotic clusters according to their presence in the electronic health records of all patients diagnosed with dementia. RESULTS: Among the 631,949 individuals over 60 years registered, 28,563 were diagnosed with dementia, of whom 15,828 (55.4%) showed psychotic symptoms and 19,461 (68.1%) depressive symptoms. The incidence of dementia in 2019 was 6.8/1000 person-years. Most incident cases of depressive (72.3%) and psychotic (51.9%) NPS occurred in cases of incident dementia. The risk of depressive-type NPS grows with years since dementia diagnosis, living in a nursing home, and female sex, but falls with older age. In the psychotic cluster model, the effects of male sex, and older age are inverted, both increasing the probability of this type of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The stigmatization factor conditions the social and attitudinal environment, delaying the diagnosis of dementia, preventing patients from receiving adequate care and exacerbating families' suffering. This study evidences the synergy between big data and real-world data for psychiatric epidemiological research.


Assuntos
Demência , Transtornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Casas de Saúde , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/etiologia , Aprendizado de Máquina
9.
Brain Stimul ; 15(5): 1128-1138, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Twenty years after the first use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), our knowledge of the long-term effects of this therapeutic option remains very limited. OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to assess the long-term effectiveness and tolerability of DBS in OCD patients and to look for possible predictors of long-term response to this treatment. METHODS: We studied the course of 25 patients with severe refractory OCD treated with DBS over an average follow-up period of 6.4 years (±3.2) and compared them with a control group of 25 patients with severe OCD who refused DBS and maintained their usual treatment. DBS was implanted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens (vALIC-Nacc) in the first six patients and later at the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) in the rest of patients. Main outcome was change in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score between the two groups assessed using mixed models. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. RESULTS: Obsessive symptoms fell by 42.5% (Y-BOCS score) in patients treated with DBS and by 4.8% in the control group. Fifty-six per cent of DBS-treated patients could be considered responders at the end of follow-up and 28% partial responders. Two patients among those who rejected DBS were partial responders (8%), but none of the non-DBS group achieved criteria for complete response. HDRS and GAF scores improved significantly in 39.2% and 43.6% among DBS-treated patients, while did not significantly change in those who rejected DBS (improvement limited to 6.2% in HDRS and 4.2% in GAF scores). No statistically significant predictors of response were found. Mixed models presented very large comparative effect sizes for DBS (4.29 for Y-BOCS, 1.15 for HDRS and 2.54 for GAF). Few patients experienced adverse effects and most of these effects were mild and transitory. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term comparative effectiveness and safety of DBS confirm it as a valid option for the treatment of severe refractory OCD.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Cápsula Interna/fisiologia , Núcleo Accumbens , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Rev. psiquiatr. salud ment. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 15(3): 167-175, jul. - sept. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-207932

RESUMO

Introduction: Incidence rates of dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are not known and this hampers the assessment of their population burden. The objective of this study was to obtain an approximate estimate of the population incidence and prevalence of both dementia and NPS.Methods: Given the dynamic nature of the population with dementia, a retrospective study was conducted within the database of the Basque Health Service (real-world data) at the beginning and end of 2019. Validated random forest models were used to identify separately depressive and psychotic clusters according to their presence in the electronic health records of all patients diagnosed with dementia.Results: Among the 631,949 individuals over 60 years registered, 28,563 were diagnosed with dementia, of whom 15,828 (55.4%) showed psychotic symptoms and 19,461 (68.1%) depressive symptoms. The incidence of dementia in 2019 was 6.8/1000 person-years. Most incident cases of depressive (72.3%) and psychotic (51.9%) NPS occurred in cases of incident dementia. The risk of depressive-type NPS grows with years since dementia diagnosis, living in a nursing home, and female sex, but falls with older age. In the psychotic cluster model, the effects of male sex, and older age are inverted, both increasing the probability of this type of symptoms.Conclusions: The stigmatization factor conditions the social and attitudinal environment, delaying the diagnosis of dementia, preventing patients from receiving adequate care and exacerbating families’ suffering. This study evidences the synergy between big data and real-world data for psychiatric epidemiological research. (AU)


Introducción: Se desconocen las tasas de incidencia de los síntomas neuropsiquiátricos (SN) asociados a la demencia, lo cual dificulta la evaluación de su carga para la población. El objetivo de este estudio fue obtener una estimación aproximada de la incidencia y prevalencia en la población tanto de la demencia como de los SN.Métodos: Dada la naturaleza dinámica de la población con demencia, se realizó un estudio dentro de la base de datos del Servicio Vasco de Salud (datos del mundo real) a comienzos y finales de 2019. Se utilizaron modelos de bosques aleatorios validados para identificar por separado los clústeres depresivos y psicóticos, con arreglo a su presencia en los registros sanitarios electrónicos de todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de demencia.Resultados: Entre los 631.949 individuos mayores de 60 años registrados, 28.563 fueron diagnosticados de demencia, de los cuales 15.828 (55,4%) mostraron síntomas psicóticos y 19.461 (68,1%) síntomas depresivos. La incidencia de la demencia en 2019 fue de 6,8/1.000 personas-años. Muchos de los casos incidentes de SN depresivos (72,3%) y psicóticos (51,9%) se produjeron en casos de demencia incidente. El riesgo de SN de tipo depresivo se incrementa con factores tales como los años transcurridos desde que se diagnostica la demencia, la residencia en un sanatorio, y el sexo femenino, pero desciende con la edad avanzada. En el modelo de clúster psicótico, los efectos del sexo masculino y la edad avanzada se invierten, incrementando ambos la probabilidad de este tipo de síntomas.Conclusiones: El factor de estigmatización condiciona el entorno social y actitudinal, demorando el diagnóstico de la demencia, impidiendo que los pacientes reciban los cuidados adecuados, y exacerbando el sufrimiento de las familias. Este estudio evidencia la sinergia entre los grandes datos y los datos del mundo real para la investigación epidemiológica psiquiátrica. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Neuropsiquiatria , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais
11.
Front Neuroinform ; 16: 807584, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35221957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Machine learning modeling can provide valuable support in different areas of mental health, because it enables to make rapid predictions and therefore support the decision making, based on valuable data. However, few studies have applied this method to predict symptoms' worsening, based on sociodemographic, contextual, and clinical data. Thus, we applied machine learning techniques to identify predictors of symptomatologic changes in a Spanish cohort of OCD patients during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: 127 OCD patients were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and a structured clinical interview during the COVID-19 pandemic. Machine learning models for classification (LDA and SVM) and regression (linear regression and SVR) were constructed to predict each symptom based on patient's sociodemographic, clinical and contextual information. RESULTS: A Y-BOCS score prediction model was generated with 100% reliability at a score threshold of ± 6. Reliability of 100% was reached for obsessions and/or compulsions related to COVID-19. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were predicted with less reliability (correlation R of 0.58 and 0.68, respectively). The suicidal thoughts are predicted with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 88%. The best results are achieved by SVM and SVR. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal that sociodemographic and clinical data can be used to predict changes in OCD symptomatology. Machine learning may be valuable tool for helping clinicians to rapidly identify patients at higher risk and therefore provide optimized care, especially in future pandemics. However, further validation of these models is required to ensure greater reliability of the algorithms for clinical implementation to specific objectives of interest.

12.
World J Psychiatry ; 11(9): 659-680, 2021 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34631467

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Twenty years after its first use in a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the results confirm that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for patients with severe and resistant forms of the disorder. Nevertheless, many unknowns remain, including the optimal anatomical targets, the best stimulation parameters, the long-term (LT) effects of the therapy, and the clinical or biological factors associated with response. This systematic review of the articles published to date on DBS for OCD assesses the short and LT efficacy of the therapy and seeks to identify predictors of response. AIM: To summarize the existing knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 31, 2020, using the following strategy: "(Obsessive-compulsive disorder OR OCD) AND (deep brain stimulation OR DBS)." Clinical trials and observational studies published in English and evaluating the effectiveness of DBS for OCD in humans were included and screened for relevant information using a standardized collection tool. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a main diagnosis of OCD, DBS conducted for therapeutic purposes and variation in symptoms of OCD measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) as primary outcome. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Forty articles identified by the search strategy met the eligibility criteria. Applying a follow-up threshold of 36 mo, 29 studies (with 230 patients) provided information on short-term (ST) response to DBS in, while 11 (with 155 patients) reported results on LT response. Mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 8.0 mo for the ST studies and 63.7 ± 20.7 mo for the LT studies. Overall, the percentage of reduction in Y-BOCS scores was similar in ST (47.4%) and LT responses (47.2%) to DBS, but more patients in the LT reports met the criteria for response (defined as a reduction in Y-BOCS scores > 35%: ST, 60.6% vs LT, 70.7%). According to the results, the response in the first year predicts the extent to which an OCD patient will benefit from DBS, since the maximum symptom reduction was achieved in most responders in the first 12-14 mo after implantation. Reports indicate a consistent tendency for this early improvement to be maintained to the mid-term for most patients; but it is still controversial whether this improvement persists, increases or decreases in the long term. Three different patterns of LT response emerged from the analysis: 49.5% of patients had good and sustained response to DBS, 26.6% were non responders, and 22.5% were partial responders, who might improve at some point but experience relapses during follow-up. A significant improvement in depressive symptoms and global functionality was observed in most studies, usually (although not always) in parallel with an improvement in obsessive symptoms. Most adverse effects of DBS were mild and transient and improved after adjusting stimulation parameters; however, some severe adverse events including intracranial hemorrhages and infections were also described. Hypomania was the most frequently reported psychiatric side effect. The relationship between DBS and suicide risk is still controversial and requires further study. Finally, to date, no clear clinical or biological predictors of response can be established, probably because of the differences between studies in terms of the neuroanatomical targets and stimulation protocols assessed. CONCLUSION: The present review confirms that DBS is a promising therapy for patients with severe resistant OCD, providing both ST and LT evidence of efficacy.

13.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33774222

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Incidence rates of dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are not known and this hampers the assessment of their population burden. The objective of this study was to obtain an approximate estimate of the population incidence and prevalence of both dementia and NPS. METHODS: Given the dynamic nature of the population with dementia, a retrospective study was conducted within the database of the Basque Health Service (real-world data) at the beginning and end of 2019. Validated random forest models were used to identify separately depressive and psychotic clusters according to their presence in the electronic health records of all patients diagnosed with dementia. RESULTS: Among the 631,949 individuals over 60 years registered, 28,563 were diagnosed with dementia, of whom 15,828 (55.4%) showed psychotic symptoms and 19,461 (68.1%) depressive symptoms. The incidence of dementia in 2019 was 6.8/1000 person-years. Most incident cases of depressive (72.3%) and psychotic (51.9%) NPS occurred in cases of incident dementia. The risk of depressive-type NPS grows with years since dementia diagnosis, living in a nursing home, and female sex, but falls with older age. In the psychotic cluster model, the effects of male sex, and older age are inverted, both increasing the probability of this type of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The stigmatization factor conditions the social and attitudinal environment, delaying the diagnosis of dementia, preventing patients from receiving adequate care and exacerbating families' suffering. This study evidences the synergy between big data and real-world data for psychiatric epidemiological research.

14.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 146(2): 61-64, ene. 2016. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-147762

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue medir la relación coste-efectividad del tratamiento con simeprevir y sofosbuvir en pacientes con hepatitis C crónica genotipo 1 y grados de fibrosis F3-F4, de acuerdo con los resultados del ensayo clínico COSMOS. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se utilizó un modelo de Markov para estimar los costes y los resultados clínicos desde el comienzo del tratamiento. Usando como horizonte temporal toda la vida del paciente, en el modelo se simuló la progresión de la enfermedad entre los diferentes estados de salud de la enfermedad hepática crónica asociada a la hepatitis C. RESULTADOS: Los regímenes de 12 semanas se situaron por debajo del umbral de 40.000 €/año de vida ajustado por calidad. Por el contrario, aun con una reducción del 50% del coste de adquisición, el régimen de 24 semanas demostró un nivel de eficiencia en el límite del requerido por la disponibilidad a pagar utilizada en la literatura médica española. CONCLUSIONES: Este último dato justificaría la introducción de un coste igual para la duración de 12 y 24 semanas, asegurando la eficiencia del tratamiento de duración prolongada


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the cost-effectiveness of the treatment with simeprevir and sofosbuvir in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with F3-F4 levels of fibrosis, according to the results of the COSMOS trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the costs and clinical outcomes from the start of therapy. In the model, the progression was simulated alongside the different health states of the chronic liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C using whole life as time-horizon. RESULTS: The 12-weeks treatment schemes was below the threshold of €40,000 per quality-adjusted life year. On the contrary, despite the 50% cost reduction, the 24-weeks regimen demonstrated a limited level of efficiency when compared with the willingness to pay used in the Spanish medical literature. CONCLUSIONS: This finding would support the introduction of a flat rate in the price of drugs without taking into account the duration of treatment to ensure that treatment with 24 weeks was efficient


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/terapia , Fibrose/complicações , Fibrose/epidemiologia , Antivirais/economia , Antivirais/farmacologia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Genótipo , Antígenos da Hepatite C/economia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Hepatite C Crônica/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Eficácia-Efetividade de Intervenções , 50303
15.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 146(2): 61-4, 2016 Jan 15.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26654558

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the cost-effectiveness of the treatment with simeprevir and sofosbuvir in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with F3-F4 levels of fibrosis, according to the results of the COSMOS trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Markov model was used to estimate the costs and clinical outcomes from the start of therapy. In the model, the progression was simulated alongside the different health states of the chronic liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C using whole life as time-horizon. RESULTS: The 12-weeks treatment schemes was below the threshold of €40,000 per quality-adjusted life year. On the contrary, despite the 50% cost reduction, the 24-weeks regimen demonstrated a limited level of efficiency when compared with the willingness to pay used in the Spanish medical literature. CONCLUSIONS: This finding would support the introduction of a flat rate in the price of drugs without taking into account the duration of treatment to ensure that treatment with 24 weeks was efficient.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Simeprevir/uso terapêutico , Sofosbuvir/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Custos de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/economia , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/economia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Simeprevir/economia , Sofosbuvir/economia , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...