Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Nursing Students in a Greek University Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: the present study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing students at the University of Patras, western Greece, regarding sexually transmitted infections (STIs), sexual behavior and STI prevention measures, as well as the level of future healthcare professionals' education. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 231 medical and nursing students (n = 106 medical, and n = 125 nursing) completed and returned the pre-tested study questionnaire. RESULTS: Most participants (77.5%) were females and46.1% were in the age group of 18-21 years. Syphilis, HIV/AIDS, and Hepatitis B were regarded as STIs by 65.8% of them. Medical students could predominantly list the widely known STIs compared to nursing students (p = 0.004). Regarding HIV/AIDS, 72.7% of the respondents reported that it is transmitted sexually and through blood transfusion. However, medical students were better informed than nursing students (p = 0.001). Medical students as well as students in the final year of their studies were found to be better informed about the vaccines available to prevent STIs. Regarding the question about what constitutes a risky sexual behavior, 71.4% answered sexual intercourse without the use of condom and 18.6% indicated having sex with an unknown partner. Most participants (69.7%) were satisfied with the education provided by their institution and no statistically significant difference was observed between medical and nursing students. Almost all students (97.8%) agreed that the course/subject of sex education must be included in school programs. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis of knowledge and attitudes of Greek medical and nursing students regarding STIs, prevention measures and education level was conducted. The results of the present study could assist in the development of targeted training courses that can improve healthcare professionals' knowledge and ability to manage STIs.

Role of source control in critically ill candidemic patients: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Candidemia is associated with high mortality especially in critically ill patients. Our aim was to identify predictors of mortality among critically ill patients with candidemia with a focus on early interventions that can improve prognosis. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING: This retrospective study was conducted in Intensive Care Units from three European university hospitals from 2015 to 2021. Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture for Candida spp. were included. Patients who did not require source control were excluded. Primary outcome was 14-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 409 episodes of candidemia were included. Most candidemias were catheter related (173; 41%), followed by unknown origin (170; 40%). Septic shock developed in 43% episodes. Overall, 14-day mortality rate was 29%. In Cox proportional hazards regression model, septic shock (P 0.001; HR 2.20, CI 1.38-3.50), SOFA score ≥ 10 points (P 0.008; HR 1.83, CI 1.18-2.86), and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (P 0.003; HR 1.87, CI 1.23-2.85) were associated with 14-day mortality, while combined early appropriate antifungal treatment and source control (P < 0.001; HR 0.15, CI 0.08-0.28), and early source control without appropriate antifungal treatment (P < 0.001; HR 0.23, CI 0.12-0.47) were associated with better survival compared to those without neither early appropriate antifungal treatment nor source control. CONCLUSION: Early source control was associated with better outcome among candidemic critically ill patients.

Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Addition of macrolide antibiotics to ß-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of patients in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia is based on results from observational studies and meta-analyses rather than randomised clinical trials. We investigated if addition of the macrolide clarithromycin to treatment with a ß-lactam antibiotic in this population could improve early clinical response-the new regulatory endpoint for community-acquired pneumonia-and explored the possible contribution of modulation of the inflammatory host response to that outcome. METHODS: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3 prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, in which adults in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia who had systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin 0·25 ng/mL or more were enrolled in 18 internal medicine departments of public Greek hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation to standard of care medication (including intravenous administration of a third-generation cephalosporin or intravenous administration of ß-lactam plus ß-lactamase inhibitor combination) plus either oral placebo or oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Investigators, staff, and patients were masked to group allocation. The primary composite endpoint required that patients fulfilled both of the following conditions after 72 hours (ie, day 4 of treatment): (1) decrease in respiratory symptom severity score of 50% or more as an indicator of early clinical response and (2) decrease in SOFA score of at least 30% or favourable procalcitonin kinetics (defined as ≥80% decrease from baseline or procalcitonin <0·25 ng/mL), or both, as an indicator of early inflammatory response. Participants who were randomly assigned and received allocated treatment were included in the primary analysis population. This trial is complete and is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (2020-004452-15) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04724044). FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled between Jan 25, 2021, and April 11, 2023, and 278 individuals were randomly allocated to receive standard of care in combination with either clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139). 134 patients in the clarithromycin group (five withdrew consent) and 133 patients in the placebo group (six withdrew consent) were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint was met in 91 (68%) patients in the clarithromycin group and 51 (38%) patients in the placebo group (difference 29·6% [95% CI 17·7-40·3]; odds ratio [OR] 3·40 [95% CI 2·06-5·63]; p<0·0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 58 (43%) patients in the clarithromycin group and 70 (53%) patients in the placebo group (difference 9·4% [95% CI -2·6 to 20·9]; OR 0·67 [95% CI 0·42 to 1·11]; p=0·14). None of the serious TEAEs was judged to be related to treatment assignment. INTERPRETATION: Addition of clarithromycin to standard of care enhances early clinical response and attenuates the inflammatory burden of community-acquired pneumonia. The mechanism of benefit is associated with changes in the immune response. These findings suggest the importance of adding clarithromycin to ß-lactams for treatment of patients in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia to achieve early clinical response and early decrease of the inflammatory burden. FUNDING: Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis and Abbott Products Operations.

Oral Antibiotics for Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Bacteremia and endocarditis are two clinical syndromes that, for decades, were managed exclusively with parenteral antimicrobials, irrespective of a given patient's clinical condition, causative pathogen, or its antibiotic susceptibility profile. This clinical approach, however, was based on low-quality data and outdated expert opinions. When a patient's condition has improved, gastrointestinal absorption is not compromised, and an oral antibiotic regimen reaching adequate serum concentrations is available, a switch to oral antibacterials can be applied. Although available evidence has reduced the timing of the oral switch in bacteremia to three days/until clinical improvement, there are only scarce data regarding less than 10-day intravenous antibiotic therapy in endocarditis. Many standard or studied oral antimicrobial dosages are smaller than the approved doses for parenteral administration, which is a risk factor for treatment failure; in addition, the gastrointestinal barrier may affect drug bioavailability, especially when the causative pathogen has a minimum inhibitory concentration that is close to the susceptibility breakpoint. A considerable number of patients infected by such near-breakpoint strains may not be potential candidates for oral step-down therapy to non-highly bioavailable antibiotics like beta-lactams; different breakpoints should be determined for this setting. This review will focus on summarizing findings about pathogen-specific tailoring of oral step-down therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis, but will also present laboratory and clinical data about antibiotics such as beta-lactams, linezolid, and fosfomycin that should be studied more in order to elucidate their role and optimal dosage in this context.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Healthcare Workers towards Antibiotic Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Two Major Tertiary Hospitals in Western Greece.

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) and antimicrobial stewardship arethe two sides of the same coin that constitute a public health hydra. This study aimed to assessthe knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers (HCWs), on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in Western Greece. A total of 200 healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, and others) from the two largest tertiary hospitals in Western Greece were included in our survey. HCWs seem not to decide based on patient opinion in order to prescribe antibiotics. Approximately 97% of them are aware of their main adverse effects. Remarkably, 25% of respondents prescribe antibiotics due to diagnostic uncertainty, and 32.5% of them prescribe antibiotics based on their experience. HCWs statedthat they do not report adverse effects often. Inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were mentioned as the main reason for bacterial resistance to antimicrobials. Monitoring the patient's treatment progress, using electronic prescriptions, and adhering to international guidelines were suggested as solutions to the problem. Post Hoc analysis showed that nursing staff apply to the national guidelines (p: 0.011) and use electronic prescriptions (p: 0.003) less often compared to consultants, doctor directors, and trainees. The findings of our survey may be useful for the development of future national education programs and interventions thatmay improve healthcare workers' knowledge and ability to manage antibiotics.

Laboratory Surveillance of Acinetobacter spp. Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary University Hospital during a 9-Year Period.

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections have become a threat for public health worldwide. The aim of the present study was to follow-up resistance patterns of Acinetobacter spp. bloodstream isolates in a Tertiary University Hospital over the last nine years, from 2014 to 2022. Susceptibility patterns were followed for the following antimicrobial agents: amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and colistin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, minocycline, piperacillin/tazobactam were evaluated from 2020 to 2023. During the study period, 853 Acinetobacter spp. bloodstream infections (BSIs) were recorded, accounting for 5.36% of all BSIs. A. baumannii was isolated in 795 cases (93.2%), during the study period. Most BSIs were recorded in adult intensive care units (ICU) (46.2%) and medical wards (42%). Among A. baumannii isolates, 4.5% were multidrug-resistant, 84.7% were extensively drug-resistant, and 8.5% were pandrug-resistant. Resistance to carbapenems was over 95%. Resistance to tigecycline increased significantly during the last years of the study (2020-2022); A. baumannii isolates with MIC ≤ 2 µg/mL accounted for 28.5% of all isolates. Resistance to colistin exhibited an increasing pattern up to 42.2% in 2022. Increasing resistance rates and the evolution of pandrug-resistant isolates call for the urgent application of preventive and response actions.

The Role of the Pancreatic Stone Protein in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Infection-Related Complications: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) is an acute-phase protein that is mainly secreted by pancreatic cells in response to stress. The current literature supports its use as a predictor of sepsis. Its prognostic role has recently been evaluated in a point-of-care setting, mostly in high-risk patients. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate its utility in the prognosis of patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. METHODS: Adult patients consecutively admitted to the Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital of Patras, Greece, with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection were enrolled. PSP levels were measured within 24 h of admission in whole blood. RESULTS: a total of 40 patients were included after being diagnosed with IAI. PSP was used as an independent predictive factor for sepsis after adjusting for age with OR = 7.888 (95% CI: 1.247-49.890). PSP also predicted readmission and the need for treatment escalation (p: <0.01) and was an excellent prognostic factor regarding these outcomes (AUC = 0.899, 95% CI: 0.794-1.0, and AUC = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.748-0.976, respectively). PSP also proved superior to CRP, ferritin, and fibrinogen in sepsis diagnosis, treatment escalation, and readmission prediction with an AUC of 0.862, 0.698, and 0.899, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSP can predict unfavorable outcomes, such as sepsis development, readmission, and the need for treatment escalation among patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Radiologic Features of T10 Paravertebral Muscle Sarcopenia: Prognostic Factors in COVID-19.

Background: Sarcopenia, defined as a small cross-sectional area (CSA) in computed tomography (CT) measurements of skeletal muscles, serves as a disease severity marker in various clinical scenarios, including pulmonary conditions and critical illness. Another parameter of sarcopenia, the level of myosteatosis, reflected by the tissue's radiodensity, in the thoracic skeletal muscles group, has been linked to disease progression in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We hypothesize that CT-derived measurements of the skeletal muscle density (SMD) and the CSA of thoracic skeletal muscles can predict outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the CT scans of 84 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to two of Greece's largest academic teaching hospitals between April 2020 and February 2021. CSA and SMD at the level of the T10 vertebra were measured using computational imaging methods. The patient population was stratified according to survival status and CT severity score (CT-SS). Correlations were drawn between the radiologic features of sarcopenia, CT severity subgroups, serum inflammatory markers, and adverse events, e.g., death and intubation. Results: Thoracic muscles' CSA measurements correlate with CT-SS and prominent inflammatory markers, such as white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and D-dimers. Moreover, according to linear regression analysis, CSA seems to predict CT-SS variation significantly (ß = -0.266, P = 0.018). CSA proved to differ significantly across survivors (P = 0.027) but not between CT severity categories and intubation subgroups. The AUC (area under the curve) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the predictive value of thoracic muscles' CSA in mortality is 0.774 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66 - 0.83, P < 0.000). The optimal cut-off value (Youden index = 0.57) for mortality prognosis, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 88.9%, is 15.55. Thoracic muscles' SMD analyses did not reveal any significant correlations. Conclusions: Easy to obtain and accurately calculated, radiologic features can provide a reliable alternative to laboratory methods for predicting survival in COVID-19. Thoracic muscles' CSA measurement in the level of the T10 vertebra, an acclaimed prognostic imaging assessment that relates directly to CT-SS and inflammatory markers in COVID-19 pneumonia, is a fairly specific tool for survival prognosis.

Remdesivir: Effectiveness and Safety in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 (ReEs-COVID-19)-Analysis of Data from Daily Practice.

Remdesivir was the first antiviral approved for treating COVID-19. We investigated its patterns of use, effectiveness and safety in clinical practice in Greece. This is a retrospective observational study of hospitalized adults who received remdesivir for COVID-19 in September 2020-February 2021. The main endpoints were the time to recovery (hospital discharge within 30 days from admission) and safety. The "early" (remdesivir initiation within 24 h since hospitalization) and "deferred" (remdesivir initiation later on) groups were compared. One thousand and four patients (60.6% male, mean age 61 years, 74.3% with severe disease, 70.9% with ≥1 comorbidities) were included, and 75.9% of them were on a 5-day regimen, and 86.8% were in the early group. Among those with a baseline mild/moderate disease, the median (95% CI) time to recovery was 8 (7-9) and 12 (11-14) days for the early and deferred groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding estimates for those with a severe disease were 10 (9-10) and 13 (11-15) days, respectively (p = 0.028). After remdesivir initiation, increased serum transaminases and an acute kidney injury were observed in 6.9% and 2.1%, respectively. Nine (0.9%) patients discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. The effectiveness of remdesivir was increased when it was taken within 24 h since admission regardless of the disease severity. Remdesivir's safety profile is similar to that described in clinical trials and other real-world cohorts.

Alterations in gut immunological barrier in SARS-CoV-2 infection and their prognostic potential.

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily associated with mild respiratory symptoms, a subset of patients may develop more complicated disease with systemic complications and multiple organ injury. The gastrointestinal tract may be directly infected by SARS-CoV-2 or secondarily affected by viremia and the release of inflammatory mediators that cause viral entry from the respiratory epithelium. Impaired intestinal barrier function in SARS-CoV-2 infection is a key factor leading to excessive microbial and endotoxin translocation, which triggers a strong systemic immune response and leads to the development of viral sepsis syndrome with severe sequelae. Multiple components of the gut immune system are affected, resulting in a diminished or dysfunctional gut immunological barrier. Antiviral peptides, inflammatory mediators, immune cell chemotaxis, and secretory immunoglobulins are important parameters that are negatively affected in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mucosal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, Th17 cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and macrophages are activated, and the number of regulatory T cells decreases, promoting an overactivated immune response with increased expression of type I and III interferons and other proinflammatory cytokines. The changes in the immunologic barrier could be promoted in part by a dysbiotic gut microbiota, through commensal-derived signals and metabolites. On the other hand, the proinflammatory intestinal environment could further compromise the integrity of the intestinal epithelium by promoting enterocyte apoptosis and disruption of tight junctions. This review summarizes the changes in the gut immunological barrier during SARS-CoV-2 infection and their prognostic potential.

Association of Antiretroviral Therapy with Platelet Function and Systemic Inflammatory Response in People Living with HIV: A Cross-Sectional Study.

People living with HIV (PLWHIV) present an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. We aimed to assess whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) pharmacologically enhances platelet reactivity and platelet activation intensity, and explore the potential association with underlying inflammatory status. This was a cross-sectional cohort study carried out among PLWHIV on diverse ART regimens. Platelet reactivity and activation intensity were assessed using the bedside point-of-care VerifyNow assay, in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), measurements of monocyte-platelet complexes, and P-selectin and GPIIb/IIIa expression increase, following activation with ADP, respectively. Levels of major inflammatory markers and whole blood parameters were also evaluated. In total, 71 PLWHIV, 59 on ART and 22 healthy controls, were included in this study. PRU values were significantly elevated in PLWHIV compared to controls [Mean; 257.85 vs. 196.67, p < 0.0001], but no significant differences were noted between ART-naïve or ART-experienced PLWHIV, or between TAF/TDF and ABC based regimens, similar to systemic inflammatory response. However, within-group analysis showed that PRUs were significantly higher in ABC/PI vs ABC/INSTI or TAF/TDF + PI patients, in line with levels of IL-2. PRU values did not correlate strongly with CD4 counts, viral load, or cytokine values. P-selectin and GPIIb/IIIa expression increased following ADP activation and were significantly more prominent in PLWHIV (p < 0.005). Platelet reactivity and platelet activation intensity were shown to be increased in PLWHIV, but they did not appear to be related to ART initiation, similar to the underlying systemic inflammatory response.

Fungemia due to rare non-Candida yeasts between 2018 and 2021 in a Greek tertiary care university hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Non-Candida yeasts, although rare, are increasingly encountered and recognized as a growing threat. METHODS: Cases of bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to non-Candida yeasts (NCYs) during the last four years (2018-2021) are presented. RESULTS: During the study period, 16 cases caused by non-Candida yeasts out of 400 cases of yeast BSIs were recorded, corresponding to an incidence of 4%. Yeasts that were isolated included Cryptococcus spp (4 isolates-25%), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (2 isolates-12.5%), Trichosporon asahii (7 isolates-43.75%) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3 isolates-18.75%). Predisposing factors involved mostly hematological malignancies, long term hospitalization or major surgical interventions. Most isolates, 15 out of 16 were susceptible to amphotericin B. Voriconazole was the most active azole in vitro. All isolates, except Saccharomyces spp., were resistant to echinocandins. DISCUSSION: Early recognition of rare yeasts as causative agents of BSIs and prompt initiation of appropriate treatment based on current guidelines and expertise remain crucial in efficient patient management.

Intestinal barrier dysfunction as a key driver of severe COVID-19.

The intestinal lumen harbors a diverse consortium of microorganisms that participate in reciprocal crosstalk with intestinal immune cells and with epithelial and endothelial cells, forming a multi-layered barrier that enables the efficient absorption of nutrients without an excessive influx of pathogens. Despite being a lung-centered disease, severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects multiple systems, including the gastrointestinal tract and the pertinent gut barrier function. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can inflict either direct cytopathic injury to intestinal epithelial and endothelial cells or indirect immune-mediated damage. Alternatively, SARS-CoV-2 undermines the structural integrity of the barrier by modifying the expression of tight junction proteins. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 induces profound alterations to the intestinal microflora at phylogenetic and metabolomic levels (dysbiosis) that are accompanied by disruption of local immune responses. The ensuing dysregulation of the gut-lung axis impairs the ability of the respiratory immune system to elicit robust and timely responses to restrict viral infection. The intestinal vasculature is vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2-induced endothelial injury, which simultaneously triggers the activation of the innate immune and coagulation systems, a condition referred to as "immunothrombosis" that drives severe thrombotic complications. Finally, increased intestinal permeability allows an aberrant dissemination of bacteria, fungi, and endotoxin into the systemic circulation and contributes, to a certain degree, to the over-exuberant immune responses and hyper-inflammation that dictate the severe form of COVID-19. In this review, we aim to elucidate SARS-CoV-2-mediated effects on gut barrier homeostasis and their implications on the progression of the disease.

Vitamin D and Microbiome: Molecular Interaction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis.

Studies of systemic autoimmune diseases point to characteristic microbial patterns in various diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Autoimmune diseases, and IBD in particular, show a predisposition to vitamin D deficiency, leading to alterations in the microbiome and disruption of intestinal epithelial barrier integrity. This review examines the role of the gut microbiome in IBD and discusses how vitamin D-vitamin D receptor (VDR)-associated molecular signaling pathways contribute to the development and progression of IBD through their effects on gut barrier function, the microbial community, and immune system function. The present data demonstrate that vitamin D promotes the proper function of the innate immune system by acting as an immunomodulator, exerting anti-inflammatory effects, and critically contributing to the maintenance of gut barrier integrity and modulation of the gut microbiota, mechanisms that may influence the IBD development and progression. VDR regulates the biological effects of vitamin D and is related to environmental, genetic, immunologic, and microbial aspects of IBD. Vitamin D influences the distribution of the fecal microbiota, with high vitamin D levels associated with increased levels of beneficial bacterial species and lower levels of pathogenic bacteria. Understanding the cellular functions of vitamin D-VDR signaling in intestinal epithelial cells may pave the way for the development of new treatment strategies for the therapeutic armamentarium of IBD in the near future.

Efficacy of Fosfomycin-Containing Regimens for Treatment of Bacteremia Due to Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series Study.

Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) has evolved over the last decades as a major problem in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative nosocomial infections, associated with high mortality rates especially in the intensive care unit (ICU). Recent reports highlight the increasing prevalence of resistance to colistin, a last resort therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant AB. We retrospectively evaluated the characteristics, treatment regimens and outcomes of twenty patients with pan-drug resistant (PDR) AB primary bacteremia hospitalized in the ICU of the University General Hospital of Patras, during a two-year period (October 2020-September 2022). The 28-day mortality reached 50%. Between survivors and non-survivors, no differences were found regarding age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). However, non-survivors had higher APACHE II scores and higher prevalence of septic shock and COVID-19 infection. A significantly higher percentage in the survivor group received Fosfomycin as part of the combination regimen. Inclusion of fosfomycin in the combination therapeutic regimen was associated with significantly better survival as compared to non-fosfomycin-containing regimens. In view of the increasing prevalence of PDR-AB infections in ICUs, its associated high rates of mortality and the lack of effective treatment options, the observed survival benefit with fosfomycin inclusion in the therapeutic regimen merits further validation in larger prospective studies.

Impact of Bacterial Infections on COVID-19 Patients: Is Timing Important?

BACKGROUND: Along with important factors that worsen the clinical outcome of COVID-19, it has been described that bacterial infections among patients positive for a SARS-CoV-2 infection can play a dramatic role in the disease process. Co-infections or community-acquired infections are recognized within the first 48 h after the admission of patients. Superinfections occur at least 48 h after admission and are considered to contribute to a worse prognosis. Microbiologic parameters differentiate infections that happen after the fifth day of hospitalization from those appearing earlier. Specifically, after the fifth day, the detection of resistant bacteria increases and difficult microorganisms emerge. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19 on the length of the hospital stay and mortality. METHODS: A total of 177 patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 pneumonia were consecutively sampled during the third and fourth wave of the pandemic at a University Hospital in Greece. A confirmed bacterial infection was defined as positive blood, urinary, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or any other infected body fluid. Patients with confirmed infections were further divided into subgroups according to the time from admission to the positive culture result. RESULTS: When comparing the groups of patients, those with a confirmed infection had increased odds of death (odds ratio: 3.634; CI 95%: 1.795-7.358; p < 0.001) and a longer length of hospital stay (median 13 vs. 7 days). A late onset of infection was the most common finding in our cohort and was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death. Mortality and the length of hospital stay significantly differed between the subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this case series, microbial infections were an independent risk factor for a worse outcome among patients with COVID-19. Further, a correlation between the onset of infection and a negative outcome in terms of non-infected, community-acquired, early hospital-acquired and late hospital-acquired infections was identified. Late hospital-acquired infections increased the mortality of COVID-19 patients whilst superinfections were responsible for an extended length of hospital stay.

The role of cerebrospinal fluid levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and electroencephalography in the assessment of impaired consciousness in the context of infection.

INTRODUCTION: The sepsis syndrome is potentially affecting several organs and systems irrespectively of the primary source of the infection. Alterations of the brain function in sepsis patients may result either from a primary central nervous system (CNS) infection or could be part of the sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), a common complication of sepsis, characterized by a diffuse dysfunction of the brain due to an infection elsewhere in the body without overt CNS infection. Aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of electroencephalography and the biomarker neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) when measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the management of these patients. METHODS: Patients presenting at the emergency department with altered mental status and signs of infection were included in this study. Among initial assessment and treatment of the patients based on the international guidelines for treating sepsis, NGAL was measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using ELISA technique. Electroencephalography was performed when possible within 24 hours after admission and EEG abnormalities were recorded. RESULTS: 32 of 64 patients included in this study were diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) infection. CSF NGAL was significantly higher in patients with CNS infection compared to patients without CNS infection (18.1 [5.1-71.1] vs 3.6 [1.2-11.6]; p<0.001). There was a trend for higher CSF NGAL in patients with EEG abnormalities, which did not reach statistical significance (p=0.106). CSF NGAL levels were similar between survivors and non-survivors (medians: 7.04 vs 11.79). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting at the emergency department with altered mental status and signs of infection, CSF NGAL was significantly higher in patients with CSF infection. Its role in this acute setting should be evaluated further. CSF NGAL could be suggestive of EEG abnormalities.

Tocilizumab versus baricitinib in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19: an open label, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials comparing tocilizumab and baricitinib in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed. This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial aiming to address this unmet need. METHODS: To determine whether baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab, we assessed whether the upper boundary of the two-sided 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) did not exceed 1.50. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death by day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to hospital discharge by day 28 and change in WHO progression scale at day 10. RESULTS: We assigned 251 patients with COVID-19 and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of <200 to receive either tocilizumab (n = 126) or baricitinib (n = 125) plus standard of care. Baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab for the primary composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death by day 28 (mechanical ventilation or death for patients who received baricitinib, 39.2% [n = 49/125]; mechanical ventilation or death for patients who received tocilizumab, 44.4% [n = 56/126]; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.21; p 0.001 for non-inferiority). Baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab for the time to hospital discharge within 28 days (patients who received baricitinib- discharged alive: 58.4% [n = 73/125] vs. patients who received tocilizumab- discharged alive: 52.4% [n = 66/126]; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.61-1.18; p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). There was no significant difference between the baricitinib and tocilizumab arms in the change in WHO scale at day 10 (0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-1.0]; p 0.83). DISCUSSION: In the setting of this trial, baricitinib was non-inferior to tocilizumab with regards to the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death by day 28 and the time to discharge by day 28 in patients with severe COVID-19.

Burnout Among Healthcare Workers During Covid-19 Pandemic: Results from Seven Hospitals in Western Greece.

Background: Burnout is increasingly being recognized as a major concern, affecting the physical and mental well-being of Healthcare workers (HCWs). Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of occupational exhaustion in healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, paramedics, assistants, administrative staff) and possible contributing factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study was conducted from March to September 2022 in seven (7) hospitals in Western Greece. It was carried out using an anonymous questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on results of previously published studies and consisted of 22 multiple-choice questions. Results: There were 259 (60.2%) female and 178 (39.8%) male participants enrolled in the study. The majority of the respondents were nurses (n=207, 48.1%), followed by doctors (n+ 178, 41.4%). There was a marked increase in emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal fulfillment and pandemic-related total burnout in participants older than 61 years old (40,05±2,2, 27,16±1,0, 21,11±4,1, 88,32±4,3, respectively). Widow/ers healthcare workers were mostly affected from pandemic related burnout compared to married, unmarried, and divorced healthcare workers. Respondents without postgraduate education demonstrated significantly greater prevalence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and pandemic-related total burnout in comparison to those with doctoral/master degree. The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout among paramedics and administrative staff was higher than that seen in doctors and nurses(32,82±3,8 vs32,08±5,0/29,11±4,7 22,33±4,0 vs21,57±3,1/18,89±5,4 19,60±3,9 vs17,26±2,8/15,24±3,7 74,76±10,4 vs70,92±9,5/63,23±12,1).The prevalence of emotional exhaustion and work-related total burnout was significantly higher among doctors, nurses, paramedics, and administrative staff working with direct contact with COVID-19 patients than those among healthcare workers working without direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: The present study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers.