A systematic review of in-person versus remotely delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain.

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid shift from in-person to virtually-delivered care. Many youth with chronic pain have the ability to access care virtually; however, little is known about the efficacy of pain care for youth with chronic pain delivered virtually when compared to in-person. Such evidence is essential to guide youth in making decisions about their care, but also to inform what options health professionals present to youth. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of interventions that are delivered in-person versus virtually for youth with chronic pain. Five databases (i.e., CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched in October 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compare single/multimodal interventions for pediatric chronic pain delivered in-person versus virtually. A total 3638 unique studies were identified through database and other searching, two of which satisfied established criteria for inclusion in this review. Both studies compared psychological interventions delivered virtually versus in-person for youth with chronic pain and showed comparable efficacy across modalities. The planned meta-analyses could not be conducted due to different outcomes within each study that could not be combined. This systematic review highlights a critical gap in the evidence regarding the efficacy of virtually delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain. This evidence is necessary to inform treatment decisions for youth, and further research is required to develop the evidence to inform clinical interventions, especially as virtual treatments continue to be offered.

The Relationship Between Parental and Family Functioning and Post-Concussive Symptoms After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review aimed to address the following questions: (1) Does mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) result in more parental distress or poorer family functioning than other injuries? (2) Does pre-injury or acute parental distress and family functioning predict post-concussive symptoms (PCS) after mTBI? and (3) Do acute PCS predict later parental distress and family functioning? The subjects of this review were children/adolescents who had sustained an mTBI before age 18 and underwent assessment of PCS and parent or family functioning. MEDLINE®, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched to identify original, empirical, peer-reviewed research published in English. PCS measures included parent- and child-reported symptom counts and continuous scales. Parent and family measures assessed parental stress, psychological adjustment, anxiety, psychiatric history, parent-child interactions, family burden, and general family functioning. A total of 11,163 articles were screened, leading to the inclusion of 15 studies, with 2569 participants (mTBI = 2222; control = 347). Collectively, the included articles suggest that mTBI may not result in greater parental distress or poorer family functioning than other types of injuries. Pre-injury or acute phase parental and family functioning appears to predict subsequent PCS after mTBI, depending on the specific family characteristic being studied. Early PCS may also predict subsequent parental and family functioning, although findings were mixed in terms of predicting more positive or negative family outcomes. The available evidence suggests that parent and family functioning may have an important, perhaps bidirectional, association with PCS after pediatric mTBI. However, further research is needed to provide a more thorough understanding of this association.

Longitudinal trajectories of posttraumatic headache after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study examined the trajectory, classification, and features of posttraumatic headache after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Children (N = 213; ages 8.00 to 16.99 years) were recruited from two pediatric emergency departments <24 hours of sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury or mild orthopedic injury. At 10 days, three months, and six months postinjury, parents completed a standardized questionnaire that was used to classify premorbid and posttraumatic headache as migraine, tension-type headache, or not otherwise classified. Multilevel mixed effects models were used to examine posttraumatic headache rate, severity, frequency, and duration in relation to group, time postinjury, and premorbid headache, controlling for age, sex, and site. RESULTS: PTH risk was greater after mild traumatic brain injury than mild orthopedic injury at 10 days (odds ratio = 197.41, p < .001) and three months postinjury (odds ratio = 3.50, p = .030), especially in children without premorbid headache. Posttraumatic headache was more frequent after mild traumatic brain injury than mild orthopedic injury, ß (95% confidence interval) = 0.80 (0.05, 1.55). Groups did not differ in other examined headache features and classification any time postinjury. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic headache risk increases after mild traumatic brain injury relative to mild orthopedic injury for approximately three months postinjury, but is not clearly associated with a distinct phenotype.