RESUMO
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), etiological agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is currently detected by reverse transcription followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) of its viral RNA genome. Within the available alternatives, One-Step procedures are preferred since they are fast and significantly decrease preanalytical errors, minimizing the risk of diagnostic errors. Increasing the testing capacity and tracing contacts are essential steps to control the pandemic. However, high-cost commercial reagents subject to shortage and poor scalability have hindered the use of these technologies and their adoption for a wide population-scale testing, being even more critical in developing countries. In the current context, open-source initiatives have promoted global collaboration to promote accessible solutions for rapid local deployment. As a result, open protocols are being developed for the local production of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. This work aimed to produce an open-source system for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests in RNA clinical samples. We provide guidelines for standardizing an open One-Step RT-qPCR master mix using recombinant M-MLV reverse transcriptase together with either Pfu-Sso7d or Taq DNA polymerase. Both were tested on synthetic RNA and clinical samples, observing a good correlation when compared to commercial RT-qPCR kits. Nevertheless, the best results were obtained using M-MLV RT combined with Taq DNA polymerase in a probe-based RT-qPCR assay, allowing successful discrimination between positive and negative samples with accuracies comparable to a CDC-recommended commercial kit. Here, we demonstrate that these open RT-qPCR systems can be successfully used to identify SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples and potentially be implemented in any molecular diagnostic laboratory.
RESUMO
Background: Convalescent plasma (CP), despite limited evidence on its efficacy, is being widely used as a compassionate therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early CP therapy in COVID-19 progression. Methods: Open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial performed in an academic center in Santiago, Chile from May 10, 2020, to July 18, 2020, with final follow-up August 17, 2020. The trial included patients hospitalized within the first 7 days of COVID-19 symptoms onset, presenting risk factors for illness progression and not on mechanical ventilation. The intervention consisted in immediate CP (early plasma group) versus no CP unless developing pre-specified criteria of deterioration (deferred plasma group). Additional standard treatment was allowed in both arms. The primary outcome was a composite of mechanical ventilation, hospitalization for >14 days or death. Key secondary outcomes included: time to respiratory failure, days of mechanical ventilation, hospital length-of-stay, mortality at 30 days, and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR clearance rate. Results: Of 58 randomized patients (mean age, 65.8 years, 50% male), 57 (98.3%) completed the trial. A total of 13 (43.3%) participants from the deferred group received plasma based on clinical aggravation. We found no benefit in the primary outcome (32.1% vs 33.3%, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32-2.84, p>0.99) in the early versus deferred CP group. In-hospital mortality rate was 17.9% vs 6.7% (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.54-17.2, p=0.25), mechanical ventilation 17.9% vs 6.7% (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.54-17.2, p=0.25), and prolonged hospitalization 21.4% vs 30% (OR 0.64, 95%CI, 0.19-2.1, p=0.55) in early versus deferred CP group, respectively. Viral clearance rate on day 3 (26% vs 8%, p=0.20) and day 7 (38% vs 19%, p=0.37) did not differ between groups. Two patients experienced serious adverse events within 6 or less hours after plasma transfusion. Conclusion: Immediate addition of CP therapy in early stages of COVID-19 -compared to its use only in case of patient deterioration- did not confer benefits in mortality, length of hospitalization or mechanical ventilation requirement.
RESUMO
The technique RT-qPCR for viral RNA detection is the current worldwide strategy used for early detection of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. RNA extraction is a key pre-analytical step in RT-qPCR, often achieved using commercial kits. However, the magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic is causing disruptions to the global supply chains used by many diagnostic laboratories to procure the commercial kits required for RNA extraction. Shortage in these essential reagents is even more acute in developing countries with no means to produce kits locally. We sought to find an alternative procedure to replace commercial kits using common reagents found in molecular biology laboratories. Here we report a method for RNA extraction that takes about 40 min to complete ten samples, and is not more laborious than current commercial RNA extraction kits. We demonstrate that this method can be used to process nasopharyngeal swab samples and yields RT-qPCR results comparable to those obtained with commercial kits. Most importantly, this procedure can be easily implemented in any molecular diagnostic laboratory. Frequent testing is crucial for individual patient management as well as for public health decision making in this pandemic. Implementation of this method could maintain crucial testing going despite commercial kit shortages.
