Cemiplimab for locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) represents approximatively 1% of all BCCs. Metastatic BCC (mBCC) is even more rare. Most cases are observed in immunocompromised patients, particularly solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs). When surgery and/or radiation therapy for laBCC or mBCC is not reasonable, oral hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) therapy may be initiated. LaBCC or mBCC patients with primary or secondary resistance, progression or intolerance to HHIs could benefit from programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors as this has recently been published for cemiplimab, a recombinant IgG4 human monoclonal antibody anti-PD-1 for the intravenous treatment of laBCC and mBCC. AREAS COVERED: Principal studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab for laBCC and mBCC are presented and discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Cemiplimab is the first FDA (2021) approved anti-PD-1 antagonist for the systemic treatment of laBCC and mBCC which had previously shown disease progression on or intolerance to HHIs. Experts currently recommend cemiplimab as a first-line systemic alternative. As cemiplimab therapy is associated with a risk of organ graft rejection, advantages and disadvantages should be evaluated for every individual OTR patient with laBCC or mBCC, eligible for cemiplimab therapy.

Oncological patients' reactions to COVID-19 pandemic: A single institution prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid reorganization in all human and hospital activities, with impact on cancer patients. AIM: An analysis of cancer patients fears, and awareness of COVID-19 has been done in this study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed cancer patients' reactions to the pandemic and their perception of oncological care reorganization, through a 12-item survey, proposed at the peak of pandemic and 3 months later. Overall, 237 patients were included in the study. During the peak of pandemic 34.6% of patients were more worried about COVID-19 than cancer versus 26.4% in the post-acute phase (p = .013). Although 49.8% of patients in the acute phase and 42.3% in the post-acute phase considered their risk of death if infected ≥50%, and more than 70% of patients thought to be at higher risk of complications, the majority of them did not consider the possibility to stop or delay their treatment. Patients were more interested in following news about COVID-19 than cancer and they complied with all preventive measures in more than 90% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although cancer patients worried about COVID-19 and evaluated the risk of complication or death due to COVID-19 as extremely high, they were still asking for the best oncological treatment.

Cemiplimab for locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: safety, efficacy, and position in therapy panel.

INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (lacSCC) is rare. Approximately one-fourth of the cases are observed among immunocompromised patients, in particular in solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs). LacSCC has a very poor prognosis. Surgery with or without radiotherapy remains the golden standard of treatment for cSCC. However, in advanced cases, there is a medical need for alternative treatment options. Classic systemic treatments include chemotherapy and/or EGFR inhibitors. Recently the effectiveness of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been demonstrated for lacSCC. Cemiplimab is a recombinant IgG4 human monoclonal antibody against the PD-1 protein for the intravenous treatment of lacSCC. AREAS COVERED: The principal studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab for lacSCC are presented. EXPERT OPINION: Cemiplimab is the first anti-PD-1 antibody that was FDA (2018) and EMA (2019) approved as a systemic treatment for lacSCC and/or metastatic cSCC when curative surgery or radiotherapy is no longer amenable. For this situation, experts currently recommend cemiplimab as a first-line systemic alternative. As cemiplimab therapy is potentially associated with a risk of organ graft rejection, pros and cons should be evaluated for every individual OTR patient with lacSCC.