Gene Replacement Therapy: A Primer for the Health-system Pharmacist.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive review of gene replacement therapy with guidance and expert opinion on handling and administration for pharmacists. SUMMARY: There are currently ∼2600 gene therapy clinical trials worldwide and 4 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gene therapy products available in the United States. Gene therapy and its handling are different from other drugs; however, there is a lack of guidance from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), FDA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), and professional associations regarding their pharmaceutical application. Although the NIH stratifies the backbone biologicals of viral vectors in gene therapies into risk groups, incomplete information regarding minimization of exposure and reduction of risk exists. In the absence of defined guidance, individual institutions develop their own policies and procedures, which often differ and are often outdated. This review provides expert opinion on the role of pharmacists in institutional preparedness, as well as gene therapy handling and administration. A suggested infrastructural model for gene replacement therapy handling is described, including requisite equipment acquisition and standard operating procedure development. Personnel, patient, and caregiver education and training are discussed. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists have a key role in the proper handling and general management of gene replacement therapies, identifying risk level, establishing infrastructure, and developing adequate policies and protocols, particularly in the absence of consensus guidelines for the handling and transport of gene replacement therapies.

Minimal clinically important change in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) after treatment in cervical dystonia patients using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). METHODS: Changes in the TWSTRS from an observational study of abobotulinumtoxinA in the routine management of cervical dystonia (NCT01314365) were analyzed using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) as anchor. RESULTS: For the overall population (N = 304, baseline TWSTRS-Total score 43.4 ±â€¯19.4), the MCIC for the TWSTRS Total score was -11.9 (95%CI: -13.9, -10.0; p < 0.0001). However, thresholds ranged from -3.2 to -18.0 dependent on baseline severity. TWSTRS-Total scores improved linearly by 3 points for every one-point PGIC increase. There was similar linearity between the graded PGIC categories and TWSTRS subscale scores (severity, disability, and pain). CONCLUSIONS: A 3-point change is the minimal clinically important change after treatment using TWSTRS as endpoint with higher cutoffs for greater baseline disease severity. For an average trial population (TWSTRS-total: 40-45), a 12-point decrease is clinically meaningful.

Multicenter observational study of abobotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in cervical dystonia: The ANCHOR-CD registry.

BACKGROUND: The ANCHOR-CD prospective observational registry study evaluated the effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA in adult idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) in clinical practice. METHODS: Adults with CD were eligible. Treating physicians determined abobotulinumtoxinA dose and treatment interval. The primary endpoint was patient response rate (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [TWSTRS] score reduction≥25% and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] score of +2 or +3 at Week 4 of Cycle 1). RESULTS: 350 patients enrolled (75% women; mean age 59±13.6years; 27.4% botulinum neurotoxin-naive) and 347 received at least 1 treatment. The median abobotulinumtoxinA dose for Cycle 1 was 500 Units. At Week 4, the responder rate was 30.6% (n=304) and the TWSTRS total score decreased 27.4% from baseline. PGIC of at least "Much improved" was documented in 43.6% of patients and maintained in Cycles 2 through 4 (43.3%, 48.9%, and 52.8%, respectively). A total of 39 adverse events (31 study drug-related) were reported in 17 patients (5%); the most common were dysphagia (n=6), muscle weakness (n=4), and neck pain (n=3). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the beneficial effect of abobotulinumtoxinA on CD in routine clinical practice as measured by improvements in TWSTRS and PGIC. No new safety concerns were identified.

A Retrospective, Single-Center Comparative Cost Analysis of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA for Cervical Dystonia Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Chemodenervation with botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is recommended as first-line treatment for the management of cervical dystonia. The choice of BoNT for treatment is subject to the consideration of several factors, including cost. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs incurred by patients and payers for onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) or abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) for the treatment of cervical dystonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, noninterventional closed cohort study of cervical dystonia patients within a single U.S. private neurological practice. Patient and payer incurred costs from medical billing records for patients satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria treated from November 1, 2009, through January 1, 2013, were de-identified and included in the analysis. Forty-seven patients initially treated with at least 3 consecutive cycles of ONA, followed by at least 3 consecutive cycles of ABO were included, representing 282 injection cycles available for analysis. Patients were required to have had a positive response to treatment with both agents and no concomitant treatment with BoNT for any other condition during the analysis period. The analysis compared the primary endpoint of median overall payer and patient incurred costs reimbursed to the clinic under each treatment regimen. For the purposes of this cost analysis, comparable clinical outcomes on both therapies was assumed.   RESULTS: Switching from ONA to ABO resulted in an overall incurred reimbursement cost savings for payers and patients. Median costs per injection cycle for ONA were $1,925 ($0-$2,814) compared with $1,214 ($229-$2,899; P less than 0.0001) for ABO, representing an approximate 37% reduction in incurred reimbursement costs inclusive of toxin and procedure. Overall toxin reimbursement costs, patient out-of-pocket toxin costs, and the cost of unavoidable waste were also lower when patients were treated with ABO.  CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated for cervical dystonia, switching from ONA to ABO resulted in payer and patient reimbursement cost reductions in a single U.S. private practice with outcomes assumed to be similar.