The relationship between perceived parenting practices and anxiety in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their parents face challenges throughout their lives that can lead to anxiety lasting into adulthood. We aim to assess the association between perceived parenting practices and anxiety beyond pediatric medical-surgical histories in adults with CHD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of adults with CHD was conducted at the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI). Perception of parental practices during childhood was retrospectively assessed using validated self-report questionnaires, while anxiety in adulthood was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Sociodemographic and medical information were collected from a questionnaire and medical records. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 223 participants, 59% were female, and the mean age was 46 ± 14 years. Perceived parenting practices explained more variance (11%) in the anxiety score than pediatric medical-surgical history (2%). In our final model, anxiety was significantly associated with age, parental history of anxiety, and positive parenting practices, but not with overprotection. CONCLUSIONS: Parenting practices are associated with anxiety in adults with CHD beyond pediatric medical-surgical history and sociodemographic. Positive parenting practices may be protective against anxiety in adulthood. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine causality.

Evolution of burnout and psychological distress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a 1-year observational study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers remain unknown. We aimed to determine the one-year progression of burnout and mental health since pandemic onset, and verify if protective factors against psychological distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (Cyr et al. in Front Psychiatry; 2021) remained associated when assessed several months later. METHODS: We used validated questionnaires (Maslach Burnout Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] Checklist for DSM-5 scales) to assess burnout and psychological distress in 410 healthcare workers from Quebec, Canada, at three and 12 months after pandemic onset. We then performed multivariable regression analyses to identify protective factors of burnout and mental health at 12 months. As the equivalent regression analyses at three months post-pandemic onset had already been conducted in the previous paper, we could compare the protective factors at both time points. RESULTS: Prevalence of burnout and anxiety were similar at three and 12 months (52% vs. 51%, p = 0.66; 23% vs. 23%, p = 0.91), while PTSD (23% vs. 11%, p < 0.0001) and depression (11% vs. 6%, p = 0.001) decreased significantly over time. Higher resilience was associated with a lower probability of all outcomes at both time points. Perceived organizational support remained significantly associated with a reduced risk of burnout at 12 months. Social support emerged as a protective factor against burnout at 12 months and persisted over time for studied PTSD, anxiety, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers' occupational and mental health stabilized or improved between three and 12 months after the pandemic onset. The predominant protective factors against burnout remained resilience and perceived organizational support. For PTSD, anxiety and depression, resilience and social support were important factors over time.

Trajectory of patients consulting the emergency department for high blood pressure values.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) visits for high blood pressure are increasing in frequency. We aimed to map those patients' trajectory, from referral sources to the type of care received at the ED to anticipated actions for future high blood pressure concerns, and to better understand their reasons for consulting the ED for high blood pressure values. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, patients who presented to the Montreal Heart Institute's ED for elevated blood pressure were recruited in a prospective observational study including a post hoc structured telephone interview and medical chart review. Five possible referral sources were predetermined. We provided proportions and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were recruited (female: 59%, mean age: 69 ± 12). A majority (93%, 95% CI 88-98%) possessed a home blood pressure device, among which 46% (95% CI 36-56%) remembered receiving advice for its use. The main referral sources for high blood pressure to the ED were self-reference (53%, 95% CI 43-63%), advice of a lay person (19%, 95% CI 11-27%) or a nurse (13%, 95% CI 6-20%). Mainly, patients reported being concerned by concomitant symptoms or experiencing acute medical consequences (44%, 95% CI 34-54%), having followed the recommendation of a third party (33%, 95% CI 24-42%), or having concerns about their medication (6%, 95% CI 1-11%). Two weeks following their ED visits, consulting ED remained the main choice for future concerns about high blood pressure for 27% of participants. When specifically asked if they would return to the ED for elevated blood pressure, 73% (95% CI 64-83%) said yes. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who consulted the ED for elevated blood pressure values were self-referred. More can be done to promote blood pressure education, effective use of personal blood pressure devices, and recommendations for patients and health professionals when confronted with high blood pressure results.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les visites aux services d'urgence pour hypertension artérielle (TA) sont de plus en plus fréquentes. Nous avons cherché à cartographier le parcours de ces patients, depuis les sources d'orientation jusqu'au type de soins reçus aux urgences, en passant par les mesures prévues en cas de problèmes futurs de tension artérielle élevée, et à mieux comprendre les raisons pour lesquelles ils consultent les urgences pour des valeurs de tension artérielle élevées. MéTHODES: Entre 2018 et 2020, les patients qui se sont présentés aux urgences de l'Institut de cardiologie de Montréal pour une TA élevée ont été recrutés dans le cadre d'une étude observationnelle prospective comprenant une entrevue téléphonique structurée post-hoc et un examen des dossiers médicaux. Cinq sources de référence possibles ont été prédéterminées. Nous avons fourni des proportions et des intervalles de confiance à 95 %. RéSULTATS: Au total, 100 patients ont été recrutés (femmes : 59 %, âge moyen : 69 ± 12). Une majorité (93%, IC à 95% 88-98%) possédait un tensiomètre à domicile, parmi lesquels 46% (IC à 95% 36-56%) se souvenaient avoir reçu des conseils pour son utilisation. Les principales sources d'orientation vers les urgences en cas de tension artérielle élevée étaient l'auto-référence (53 %, IC 95 % 43-63 %), le conseil d'un tiers non-professionnel de la santé (19 %, IC à 95 % 11-27 %) ou d'une infirmière (13 %, IC à 95 % 6-20 %). Principalement, les patients ont déclaré être préoccupés par des symptômes concomitants ou des conséquences médicales aiguës (44 %, IC à 95 %, 34-54 %), avoir suivi la recommandation d'un tiers (33 %, IC à 95 %, 24-42 %) ou avoir des préoccupations au sujet de leurs médicaments (6 %, IC à 95 %, 1-11 %). Deux semaines après leur visite au service d'urgence, la consultation du service d'urgence est restée le principal choix en cas de préoccupations futures concernant l'hypertension artérielle pour 27 % des participants. À la question spécifique de savoir s'ils retourneraient aux urgences pour une TA élevée, 73% (IC à 95% 64-83%) ont répondu oui. CONCLUSIONS: La plupart des patients qui ont consulté les urgences pour des valeurs élevées de la tension artérielle se sont adressés d'eux-mêmes. Il y a place à l'amélioration pour promouvoir l'éducation sur la TA, l'utilisation efficace des appareils de pression artérielle personnels et les recommandations aux patients et aux professionnels de la santé lorsqu'ils sont confrontés à des résultats élevés en matière de TA.

Hair cortisol change at COVID-19 pandemic onset predicts burnout among health personnel.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has put chronic pressure on worldwide healthcare systems. While the literature regarding the prevalence of psychological distress and associated risk factors among healthcare workers facing COVID-19 has exploded, biological variables have been mostly overlooked. METHODS: 467 healthcare workers from Quebec, Canada, answered an electronic survey covering various risk factors and mental health outcomes three months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of them, 372 (80%) provided a hair sample, providing a history of cortisol secretion for the three months preceding and following the pandemic's start. We used multivariable regression models and a receiver operating characteristic curve to study hair cortisol as a predictor of burnout and psychological health, together with individual, occupational, social, and organizational factors. RESULTS: As expected, hair cortisol levels increased after the start of the pandemic, with a median relative change of 29% (IQR = 3-59%, p < 0.0001). There was a significant association between burnout status and change in cortisol, with participants in the second quarter of change having lower odds of burnout. No association was found between cortisol change and post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression symptoms. Adding cortisol to individual-occupational-socio-organizational factors noticeably enhanced our burnout logistic regression model's predictability. CONCLUSION: Change in hair cortisol levels predicted burnout at three months in health personnel at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This non-invasive biological marker of the stress response could be used in further clinical or research initiatives to screen high-risk individuals to prevent and control burnout in health personnel facing an important stressor.

Factors Associated With Burnout, Post-traumatic Stress and Anxio-Depressive Symptoms in Healthcare Workers 3 Months Into the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study.

Objective: This study examined how best to identify modifiable protective and risk factors for burnout in healthcare workers in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual, occupational, organizational and social factors were investigated. The study also assessed the impact of these factors on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. Methods: Healthcare workers in the Quebec (Canada) healthcare system were recruited between May 21 to June 5, 2020. Participants answered an electronic survey 3 months after the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak began in Canada. Using the Maslach Burnout Inventory, PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, we studied the prevalence of burnout, PTSD, anxiety and depression in this cohort. Multivariable logistic or linear regression models including resilience, social and organizational support, workload and access to mental health help, simulation techniques and protective personal equipment (PPE) as well as perception of PPE security were conducted for each outcome. Results: In mid-June 2020, 467 participants completed the survey. We found that half (51.8%) of the respondents experienced burnout characterized by emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization at least once a week. In total, 158 healthcare workers (35.6%) displayed severe symptoms of at least one of the mental health disorders (24.3% PTSD, 23.3% anxiety, 10.6% depression). Resilience (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: [0.55-0.87]; p = 0.002) and perceived organizational support (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: [0.61-0.93]; p = 0.009) were significantly associated with burnout and other outcomes. Social support satisfaction, perception of PPE security, work type and environment, mental health antecedents and reassignment were associated with PTSD and/or anxiety and/or depression, but not burnout. Conclusion: Future studies should address primarily resilience and perceived organizational support to promote mental health and prevent burnout, PTSD, anxiety and depression.

Posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence in medical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: PTSD is increasingly recognized following medical traumas although is highly heterogeneous. It is difficult to judge which medical contexts have the most traumatic potential and where to concentrate further research and clinical attention for prevention, early detection and treatment. The objective of this study was to compare PTSD prevalence in different medical populations. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on PTSD following medical traumas was conducted as well as a meta-analysis with final pooled result and 95% confidence intervals presented. A meta-regression was used to investigate the impact of potential effect modifiers (PTSD severity, age, sex, timeline) on study effect size between prevalence studies. RESULTS: From 3278 abstracts, the authors extracted 292 studies reporting prevalence. Using clinician-administered reports, the highest 24 month or longer PTSD prevalence was found for intraoperative awareness (18.5% [95% CI=5.1%-36.6%]) and the lowest was found for epilepsy (4.5% [95% CI=0.2%-12.6%]). In the overall effect of the meta-regression, only medical events or procedures emerged as significant (p = 0.006) CONCLUSION: This review provides clinicians with greater awareness of medical contexts most associated with PTSD, which may assist them in the decision to engage in more frequent, earlier screening and referral to mental health services.