Arterial hypertension and smoking in pregnant women in the Valencian Community: maternal and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension and smoking during pregnancy have been linked to various adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The objective of this work is to study how the smoking influences the development of hypertension, its effects on the pregnant woman, and on the newborn. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study in two phases was carried out: the descriptive first phase allows characterization of the sample and the analytical second phase is a case-control nested in a retrospective cohort corresponding to pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 712 women were included in the study. Of the 672 (94.4%) non-hypertensive women, 533 (79.3%) were non-smoking and 139 (20.7%) smoking. For the 40 (5.6%) hypertensive women, 30 (75.0%) were non-smoking and 10 (25.0%) smoking. The prevalence of hypertension was of 5.6%. Women who quit smoking before pregnancy saw a reduced risk of hypertension. For women who smoke during pregnancy, those of younger ages, with a normal body mass index, who are primiparous, employed and with a low-medium level of education have higher risk of hypertension. The risk of hypertension according to the level of physical activity during leisure time follows a "U" shape, with those who perform light physical activity at the lowest risk of hypertension. Hypertensive women have a higher risk of small for gestational age newborns. Smoking does not pose an additional risk for adverse outcomes once hypertension is diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should aim to determine the role of smoking habit in the appearance of hypertension in pregnancy in order to establish adequate intervention guidelines that may aid in reducing the prevalence of hypertension.

Sedentarismo en el embarazo: efectos sobre la madre y el recién nacido / Sedentary lifestyle in pregnancy: Effects on the mother and the newborn

Objetivo Identificar el estado de sedentarismo durante el embarazo y los factores asociados a este comportamiento, los posibles factores, su situación de salud y del recién nacido. Material y métodos Este estudio observacional transversal de 2 fases se desarrolló en el Hospital Universitario y Politécnico de La Fe, y participaron 228 mujeres embarazadas. Las características sociodemográficas maternas se obtuvieron mediante cuestionario estructurado e información de salud de la historia clínica electrónica, así como los resultados perinatales del recién nacido. Para evaluar el sedentarismo se valoró el ejercicio en el tiempo libre y el ejercicio en horario laboral, categorizándolos en función de la intensidad (sedentarismo, actividad leve, actividad moderada e intenso). Resultados En total, la prevalencia de sedentarismo fue del 31,14%. El perfil de este grupo tiene menor nivel educativo y desempleo (p<0,05), presentando una mayor prevalencia de problemas durante el parto, que requirió cesárea, así como problemas posparto en el recién nacido (p<0,05). Conclusiones La inactividad física es altamente prevalente entre las mujeres embarazadas. Debido a los beneficios (o no daños) atribuidos al ejercicio durante el embarazo. Se deben realizar mayores esfuerzos para superar las barreras para promover actividades entre las mujeres embarazadas que son más jóvenes, menos educadas y desempleadas, y aquellas con varios hijos y menores ingresos tienen menos probabilidades de participar en una cantidad adecuada de actividad física, conscientes de la importancia de hacerlo, resolviendo dudas y disipando temores que puedan surgir por una mala comprensión del mecanismo de su beneficio (AU)

Objective Identify the state of sedentary lifestyle during pregnancy and the factors associated with this behavior, the possible factors of your health situation and that of the newborn. Material and methods This two-phase, cross-sectional observational study was developed at the La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital and 228 pregnant women participated. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were obtained using structured questionnaire and health information from the electronic medical records, as well as perinatal results of the newborn. To assess sedentary lifestyle, exercise in free time and exercise during working hours were assessed, categorizing them based on intensity (sedentary lifestyle, light activity, moderate and intense activity). Results In total, the prevalence of physical inactivity was 31.14%. The profile of this group has a lower level of education and unemployment (P<.05), presenting a higher prevalence of problems during childbirth, which required a caesarean section, as well as problems after birth in the newborn (P<.05). Conclusions Physical inactivity is highly prevalent among pregnant women. Due to the benefits (or non-harm) attributed to exercise during pregnancy. Further efforts should be taken to overcome the barriers to promote activities among pregnant women who are younger, less well educated, and unemployed and those with multiple children and a lower income are less likely to engage in an adequate amount of physical activity, aware of the importance of doing it, resolving doubts and allaying fears that may arise from a poor understanding of the mechanism of its benefit (AU)

Fish intake in pregnant women and its impact on maternal-fetal health status / Ingesta de pescado en mujeres embarazadas y su impacto en el estado de salud materno-fetal

Objective The objective was to evaluate the consumption of fish in pregnant women and its association with maternal and infant outcomes. Material and methods In this observational study carried out at the La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital in Valencia, 300 pregnant women participated. The participants were divided into 2 groups according to their fish consumption during pregnancy for comparison. The χ2 test or ANOVA test were applied for comparisons for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. Results It was observed that 49% of women consumed adequate amounts of fish during pregnancy (2 or 3 weekly servings). Significant differences were observed for iron supplementation (higher in women with inadequate fish consumption), threatened pregnancy loss (higher in women with inadequate fish consumption), infant size (better in women with adequate fish consumption), and arterial O2 pressure (better in women with adequate fish consumption). In regard to the other components of the dietary pattern, no differences were observed but the adequacy of intake for grains and white meat was very poor (less than 5.0%). Conclusions Half of the women met the recommendations for fish intake during pregnancy and presented an overall healthier eating pattern but without statistical significance (AU)

Objetivo Evaluar el consumo de pescado en mujeres embarazadas y su asociación con la salud materno-infantil. Material y métodos En este estudio observacional llevado a cabo en el Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia participaron 300 mujeres embarazadas. Las participantes se dividieron en dos grupos según su consumo de pescado durante el embarazo para comparar. Para las comparaciones de variables cualitativas y cuantitativas se aplicaron la prueba de χ2 o la ANOVA, respectivamente. Resultados Se observó que el 49% de las mujeres consumieron cantidades adecuadas de pescado durante el embarazo (2 o 3 raciones semanales). Se observaron diferencias significativas para la suplementación con hierro (mayor en mujeres con consumo inadecuado de pescado), amenaza de pérdida del embarazo (mayor en mujeres con consumo inadecuado de pescado), tamaño del bebé (mejor en mujeres con consumo adecuado de pescado) y presión arterial de O2 (mejor en mujeres con consumo adecuado de pescado). En cuanto a los demás componentes del patrón dietético, no se observaron diferencias, pero la adecuación del consumo de cereales y de carnes blancas fue muy pobre (menos del 5,0%). Conclusiones La mitad de las mujeres cumplían con las recomendaciones de consumo de pescado durante el embarazo y presentaban un patrón alimentario globalmente más saludable, pero sin significación estadística (AU)

Fish intake in pregnant women and its impact on maternal-fetal health status.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the consumption of fish in pregnant women and its association with maternal and infant outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this observational study carried out at the La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital in Valencia, 300 pregnant women participated. The participants were divided into 2 groups according to their fish consumption during pregnancy for comparison. The χ2 test or ANOVA test were applied for comparisons for qualitative and quantitative variables respectively. RESULTS: It was observed that 49% of women consumed adequate amounts of fish during pregnancy (2 or 3 weekly servings). Significant differences were observed for iron supplementation (higher in women with inadequate fish consumption), threatened pregnancy loss (higher in women with inadequate fish consumption), infant size (better in women with adequate fish consumption), and arterial O2 pressure (better in women with adequate fish consumption). In regard to the other components of the dietary pattern, no differences were observed but the adequacy of intake for grains and white meat was very poor (less than 5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the women met the recommendations for fish intake during pregnancy and presented an overall healthier eating pattern but without statistical significance.

[Sedentary lifestyle in pregnancy: Effects on the mother and the newborn]. / Sedentarismo en el embarazo: efectos sobre la madre y el recién nacido.

OBJECTIVE: Identify the state of sedentary lifestyle during pregnancy and the factors associated with this behavior, the possible factors of your health situation and that of the newborn. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This two-phase, cross-sectional observational study was developed at the La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital and 228 pregnant women participated. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were obtained using structured questionnaire and health information from the electronic medical records, as well as perinatal results of the newborn. To assess sedentary lifestyle, exercise in free time and exercise during working hours were assessed, categorizing them based on intensity (sedentary lifestyle, light activity, moderate and intense activity). RESULTS: In total, the prevalence of physical inactivity was 31.14%. The profile of this group has a lower level of education and unemployment (P<.05), presenting a higher prevalence of problems during childbirth, which required a caesarean section, as well as problems after birth in the newborn (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physical inactivity is highly prevalent among pregnant women. Due to the benefits (or non-harm) attributed to exercise during pregnancy. Further efforts should be taken to overcome the barriers to promote activities among pregnant women who are younger, less well educated, and unemployed and those with multiple children and a lower income are less likely to engage in an adequate amount of physical activity, aware of the importance of doing it, resolving doubts and allaying fears that may arise from a poor understanding of the mechanism of its benefit.

Enfermedad periodontal y diabetes mellitus gestacional: estudio caso-control / Periodontal disease and gestational diabetes mellitus: a case-control study

Antecedentes: Los estudios que relacionan la enfermedad periodontal (EP) y la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) no son concordantes. Nuestro objetivo principal es evaluar la posible asociación entre la EP y la DMG. Además, analizamos los factores de riesgo para la DMG en nuestra muestra. Métodos: Participaron 180 gestantes, 90 con DMG y 90 controles, del Hospital La Fe de Valencia. Se pasó un cuestionario y realizo un examen periodontal, valorándose los siguientes parámetros: número de dientes, índices de placa y sangrado al sondaje, profundidad de sondaje (PS) y nivel de inserción de clínica (NIC). La periodontitis se definió según criterios de la CDC-AAP. Resultados: Las DMG tuvieron mayor valor promedio de PS (p = 0,001) y NIC (p = 0,028). Un 74,4% de las pacientes con DMG presentaron inflamación gingival vs. 57,8% de las no diabéticas. La periodontitis fue más prevalente en las pacientes con DMG (p < 0,05). La edad materna, el nivel de estudios y la presencia de periodontitis son factores independientes de riesgo para la DMG (OR = 1,16, IC 95% 1,07 a 1,25, p < 0,001), (OR = 0,37, IC 95% 0,19 a 0,72, p < 0,005) y (OR = 2,79, IC 95% 1,40 a 5,59, p < 0,005), respectivamente. Conclusiones: Los resultados sugieren que las embarazadas con diabetes gestacional asocian más enfermedad periodontal que aquellas sin dicha enfermedad gestacional. En nuestra muestra el riesgo de DMG puede estimarse a partir de la periodontitis, la edad y el nivel de estudios.(AU)

Background: Studies linking periodontal disease (PD) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are not consistent. Our main objective is to evaluate the possible association between PD and GDM. We also analysed the risk factors for GDM in our sample. Methods: 180 pregnant women participated, 90 with GDM and 90 controls, from Valencia's Hospital La Fe. A questionnaire was completed and a periodontal examination was performed, assessing the following parameters: number of teeth, plaque and bleeding on probing indices, probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL). Periodontitis was defined according to the criteria of CDC-AAP. Results: The GDM group had a higher mean value of PD (p = .001) and CAL (p = .028). Of the patients with GDM, 74.4% had gingival inflammation compared to 57.8% of the non-diabetic patients. Periodontitis was more prevalent in patients with GDM (p < .05). Maternal age, educational level and periodontitis are independent risk factors for GDM (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25, p < .001), (OR = .37, 95% CI .19 to .72, p < .005) and (OR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.40 to 5.59, p < .005) respectively. Conclusions: The results suggest that pregnant women with gestational diabetes have more associated periodontal disease than those without gestational diabetes. In our sample, the risk for GDM can be estimated from periodontitis, age, and educational level.(AU)

Síndrome de bridas amnióticas: caso clínico y revisión del tema / Amniotic band syndrome: case report and review of the literatura

El síndrome de bridas amnióticas (SBA) es un conjunto de anomalías congénitas, que asocia lesiones por constricción o amputación de miembros o dedos, asociado a la presencia de bridas amnióticas. Es una entidad con baja incidencia y suele ser de aparición esporádica. Suele cursar con anillos de constricción en la parte distal de los miembros o en los dedos o en casos más graves presentar amputación completa de miembros u asociación con otras malformaciones. El diagnóstico prenatal se produce sólo en el 29-50% de los casos. Presentamos el caso de una paciente con diagnóstico ecográfico de brida amniótica en la semana 12 de gestación (AU)

Amniotic band syndrome is a set of congenital birth defects consisting of constriction rings and limb or digit amputations, associated with the presence of amniotic bands. The incidence of this complication is low and its occurrence is sporadic. This syndrome usually causes constriction rings in the distal end of limbs or digits, which, in severe cases, can lead to complete amputation of the limbs or other malformations. Only 29-50% of cases are diagnosed prenatally. We report the case of a patient with an ultrasonographic diagnosis of amniotic band syndrome in week 12 of pregnancy (AU)

Características de los recién nacidos tras fecundación in vitro / Birth characteristics due to in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques

Objetivo: determinar en una unidad neonatal de nivel II la frecuencia de nacimientos tras fecundación in vitro (FIV) incluyendo FIV-ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) y comparar sus características con los de fecundación natural (FN), según sean gemelares o únicos. Pacientes y método: estudio prospectivo mediante revisiones fetales desde la semana 12 de gestación tras FIV, al nacer y al año de vida. Del 1 de enero de 2004 al 31 de marzo de 2007 nacieron 7.008 recién nacidos (RN), 113 tras FIV y 6.895 por FN. Resultados: la gemelaridad es del 2,4% en FN y el 56,6% en FIV (p<0,001). La edad materna media en únicos es 28±9 años en FN y 36±4 en FIV (p<0,05); en gemelares es 29±10 años en FN y 35±4 en FIV (p<0,05). La edad gestacional media en únicos es 38±4 semanas en FN y 39±2 en FIV y 36±1 semanas en gemelares FN y FIV. La tasa de prematuridad (<37 semanas) y la de bajo peso (<2.500g) no difiere estadísticamente entre únicos y gemelares FN y FIV. El 23,13% de los únicos FN y el 51,02% de los únicos FIV nacieron por cesárea (p<0,001), pero la diferencia entre gemelares FN (71,42%) y FIV (79,69%) no es estadísticamente significativa. El 5,3% de los RN vivos FIV y el 1,1% de los FN nacieron con defectos congénitos (p<0,002). El riesgo relativo (RR) de defectos congénitos de los FIV frente a los FN es 4,83 (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 2,14-10,83). Conclusiones: si se comparan según número de fetos, los FIV suponen el 1,61% de los RN, difieren de los FN en edad materna, gemelaridad, cesáreas (únicos) y defectos congénitos, pero no en prematuridad ni bajo peso (AU)

Objective: To determine the number of deliveries after 31 weeks gestation (w), from in vitro fertilization (IVF), including Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), and to compare characteristics with those achieved by natural fertilization (NF). We analyse twin and singleton pregnancies separately. Patients and method: This descriptive and prospective study monitors children from foetus, from 12 weeks after IVF, to 12 months of age, including the newborn period. There were 7008 newborns between 1st January 2004 and 31st March 2007 of which there were 113 from IVF and 6895 from NF. Results: Twin-pregnancies in NF is 2.4%, whereas in IVF it is 56.6%, (p<0.001). Mean mother age is 28±9 years (y) in NF and 36±4y in IVF singletons (p<0.05), and 29±10 y in NF and 35±4 y in IVF twins (p<0.05). Mean gestational age is 38±4 w and 39±2w in NF and IVF singletons and 36±1 w in NF and IVF twins. No statistically significant differences were found in prematurity rate (<37 w) and low birth weight (< 2500g) between singletons and twins from IVF or NF. Caesarean sections were 23.13% and 51.02% from singleton NF and IVF (p<0.001). No statistically differences were found between twins NF (71.42%) and IVF (79.69%). Malformations at birth were observed in 5.3% of IVF and in 1.1% of NF newborns (p<0.002). Relative risk of malformations (RR) IVF versus NF is 4.83 (95% CI, 2.14-10.83). Conclusions: Only 1.61% of newborns comes from IVF techniques. There are significant differences in age of mother, twin- pregnancies, caesarean sections (singletons) and congenital defects between them and NF newborns. There were no differences found in prematurity and low birth weight between them and NF newborns, when compared by number of foetus (AU)

[Birth characteristics due to in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques]. / Características de los recién nacidos tras fecundación in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of deliveries after 31 weeks gestation (w), from in vitro fertilization (IVF), including Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), and to compare characteristics with those achieved by natural fertilization (NF). We analyse twin and singleton pregnancies separately. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This descriptive and prospective study monitors children from foetus, from 12 weeks after IVF, to 12 months of age, including the newborn period. There were 7008 newborns between 1st January 2004 and 31st March 2007 of which there were 113 from IVF and 6895 from NF. RESULTS: Twin-pregnancies in NF is 2.4%, whereas in IVF it is 56.6%, (p<0.001). Mean mother age is 28+/-9 years (y) in NF and 36+/-4y in IVF singletons (p<0.05), and 29+/-10 y in NF and 35+/-4 y in IVF twins (p<0.05). Mean gestational age is 38+/-4 w and 39+/-2w in NF and IVF singletons and 36+/-1 w in NF and IVF twins. No statistically significant differences were found in prematurity rate (<37 w) and low birth weight (< 2500g) between singletons and twins from IVF or NF. Caesarean sections were 23.13% and 51.02% from singleton NF and IVF (p<0.001). No statistically differences were found between twins NF (71.42%) and IVF (79.69%). Malformations at birth were observed in 5.3% of IVF and in 1.1% of NF newborns (p<0.002). Relative risk of malformations (RR) IVF versus NF is 4.83 (95% CI, 2.14-10.83). CONCLUSIONS: Only 1.61% of newborns comes from IVF techniques. There are significant differences in age of mother, twin- pregnancies, caesarean sections (singletons) and congenital defects between them and NF newborns. There were no differences found in prematurity and low birth weight between them and NF newborns, when compared by number of foetus.