Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
EuroIntervention ; 11(1): 75-84, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25868876

RESUMO

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the TriGuard™ Embolic Deflection Device (EDD), a nitinol mesh filter positioned in the aortic arch across all three major cerebral artery take-offs to deflect emboli away from the cerebral circulation, in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective, multicentre DEFLECT I study (NCT01448421) enrolled 37 consecutive subjects undergoing TAVR with the TriGuard EDD. Subjects underwent clinical and cognitive follow-up to 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed pre-procedure and at 4±2 days post procedure. The device performed as intended with successful cerebral coverage in 80% (28/35) of cases. The primary safety endpoint (in-hospital EDD device- or EDD procedure-related cardiovascular mortality, major stroke disability, life-threatening bleeding, distal embolisation, major vascular complications, or need for acute cardiac surgery) occurred in 8.1% of subjects (VARC-defined two life-threatening bleeds and one vascular complication). The presence of new cerebral ischaemic lesions on post-procedure DW-MRI (n=28) was similar to historical controls (82% vs. 76%, p=NS). However, an exploratory analysis found that per-patient total lesion volume was 34% lower than reported historical data (0.2 vs. 0.3 cm3), and 89% lower in patients with complete (n=17) versus incomplete (n=10) cerebral vessel coverage (0.05 vs. 0.45 cm3, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the first-generation TriGuard EDD during TAVR is safe, and device performance was successful in 80% of cases during the highest embolic-risk portions of the TAVR procedure. The potential of the TriGuard EDD to reduce total cerebral ischaemic burden merits further randomised investigation.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/terapia , Valva Aórtica , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Dispositivos de Proteção Embólica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/instrumentação , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Embolia Intracraniana/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ligas , Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/prevenção & controle , Brasil , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidade , Cognição , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/prevenção & controle , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Embolia Intracraniana/diagnóstico , Embolia Intracraniana/etiologia , Embolia Intracraniana/mortalidade , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA