Effect of the leukotriene receptor antagonist MK-0679 on baseline pulmonary function in aspirin sensitive asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: The cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) have been shown to mediate airway obstruction evoked by several factors which trigger asthmatic reactions--for example, allergen and exercise. Accordingly, drugs which block the action or formation of these leukotrienes are being evaluated as a new treatment of asthma. Elevated production of leukotrienes has been reported in asthmatic subjects who are intolerant to aspirin and related nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In this study the influence of the specific leukotriene receptor antagonist MK-0679 was tested on basal airway function in asthmatic patients with documented aspirin intolerance. METHODS: The eight subjects in the study had a mean baseline FEV1 of 78% predicted (range 58-99%) and six required treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids (400-1200 micrograms budesonide/beclomethasone daily). On two separate days the subjects received either 825 mg MK-0679 or placebo, orally in a double blind, randomised, crossover design. RESULTS: The leukotriene antagonist MK-0679 caused bronchodilation which lasted for at least nine hours. The average peak improvement in FEV1 was 18% above the predrug baseline, but the bronchodilator response varied between 34% and 5% and was found to correlate strongly with the severity of asthma and aspirin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that ongoing leukotriene production may be one cause of persistent airway obstruction in aspirin sensitive asthmatic subjects and that they may benefit from treatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

Oral pharmacokinetics and food interaction of the leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist verlukast.

The influence of dose and food on the pharmacokinetic profile of orally administered verlukast, a leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. This was an open, four-period, single dose, randomised, crossover design including the following doses: one 75 mg tablet, one 250 mg tablet, 500 mg (2 x 250 mg) and 500 mg immediately following a standard meal. There were dose-related increases in the AUC, although after 500 mg verlukast this was disproportionately greater than with 75 mg (P = 0.04). Similarly, there were dose-related increases in C(max). No differences were observed in the t(max) between treatments. With respect to food, there was a 22% decrease (P = 0.02) in C(max) after 500 mg, and the AUC was 13% less (P = 0.052). The differences in the plasma concentration profiles betweeen fasted and fed states are not considered to be of clinical importance.

The leukotriene-receptor antagonist MK-0679 blocks airway obstruction induced by inhaled lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics.

Drugs which block the action or formation of the cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4) inhibit asthmatic responses evoked by allergen, exercise and cold dry air. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the specific leukotriene-receptor antagonist MK-0679 could block the airway obstruction induced by aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)) in aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. Eight asthmatics (mean age 45 yrs), with an average history of asthma and ASA-sensitivity of about 10 yrs duration, were subjected to bronchial provocation with lysine-ASA. Baseline ASA-sensitivity was first determined in an open prestudy session by inhalation of cumulative doses of lysine-ASA to establish the dose of ASA decreasing forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by 20% (PD20). Rechallenge with lysine-ASA was performed on two different occasions, 1 h after oral administration of placebo, or 750 mg of MK-0679, under double-blind conditions, in a randomized, cross-over design. Leukotriene formation was estimated by the measurement of urinary LTE4. The lysine-ASA challenge was highly reproducible (geometric mean for group PD20 being identical for the open prestudy and the placebo session), and was associated with a post-challenge increase in urinary LTE4. In contrast, after MK-0679, there was a rightward shift in the dose response relationship for all eight subjects (median shift being 4.4 fold), with three of the subjects failing to produce a 20% decrease in FEV1 despite inhalation of the highest dose of lysine-ASA feasible to deliver.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Urinary LTE4 excretion in antigen-provoked asthmatic patients treated with the inhaled LTD4 antagonist, L-648,051.

Leukotriene (LT) E4 represents the major LT metabolite in man, and its urinary excretion can be used as an indirect marker of systemic LTC4 and/or LTD4 synthesis and release. In the present study LTE4 excretion was monitored for 24 h in 12 atopic patients with mild asthma undergoing antigen bronchoprovocation as part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study of the aerosol-delivered LTD4 antagonist, L-648,051. Urinary LTE4 excretion was also studied separately in six of the patients after inhaling only diluent. Urine was sampled before, and serially after antigen challenge, at intervals corresponding to the immediate (0-3 h postchallenge) and late (3-6, 6-12, 12-24 h postchallenge) asthmatic reactions. LTE4 was determined by reversed-phase HPLC and radioimmunoassay. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was recorded serially through 8 h after inhalation of antigen and diluent. Compared to base-line measurements, antigen bronchoprovocation induced significant increases in mean LTE4 excretion rates 0-3 h postchallenge (i.e. during the immediate asthmatic response) after treatment with both placebo (P < 0.01) and L-648,051 (P < 0.05). These mean LTE4 excretion rates in the immediate phase were also significantly higher than the mean rates in the late phase (3-6 h and beyond); the excretion rates of LTE4 at these later time intervals were similar to base-line values. After inhalation of diluent, the LTE4 excretion rates in the intervals 0-3, 3-6, 6-12 and 12-24 h were unchanged from base-line values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Leukotriene D4 receptor blockade inhibits the immediate and late bronchoconstrictor responses to inhaled antigen in patients with asthma.

We have tested the hypothesis that leukotriene D4 (LTD4) receptor activation is involved in the development of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction. In two studies, patients with asthma received infusions of placebo or MK-571, a potent and specific LTD4 receptor antagonist (450 mg or 37.5 mg total dose, respectively). Antigen was inhaled during test-drug administration, and FEV1 was measured for 10 hours after challenge. Urine samples were collected for measurement of LTE4; plasma samples were drawn repeatedly for assay of MK-571. MK-571 infusions inhibited both immediate (0 to 3 hours) and late (3 to 10 hours) asthmatic responses. For the high MK-571 dose, the extent of inhibition, as assessed by the area under the curve of FEV1 versus time was 88% (p = 0.01) and 63% (p = 0.01), for immediate and late responses, respectively. The low MK-571 dose also inhibited both responses but to a minor extent. Mean urinary LTE4 excretion was elevated after antigen challenge and was unaffected by administration of the LTD4 receptor antagonist. The present study demonstrates that MK-571 inhibits antigen-induced asthma in a dose-related fashion; it had not effect on antigen-induced increases in urinary LTE4 excretions. The results suggest that LTD4 receptor activation plays an important role in antigen-induced asthma.

Bronchodilation with a potent and selective leukotriene D4 (LTD4) receptor antagonist (MK-571) in patients with asthma.

The sulfidopeptide leukotrienes LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 can cause airway smooth muscle contraction and have been implicated in the pathophysiology of asthma. MK-571 is a selective, potent LTD4 receptor antagonist that could attenuate airway obstruction in asthma by inhibiting the actions of sulfidopeptides at the LTD4 receptor site. The objectives of this study were to investigate the potential for MK-571 to cause bronchodilation in asthma patients with existing airway obstruction and to evaluate its effect on the bronchodilation response to an inhaled beta 2-agonist (albuterol). Twelve male patients (ages 19 to 42 yr) with asthma (baseline FEV1 50 to 80% predicted) participated in this placebo-controlled, randomized, two-period, cross-over study. On separate treatment days, each patient received either MK-571 or placebo intravenously for 6 h; inhaled albuterol was administered at the fifth and sixth hour of MK-571/placebo treatment to achieve maximal bronchodilation on that study day. Spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1) was monitored at intervals throughout each study period. MK-571 caused clinically significant bronchodilation; the increase in FEV1 above baseline, 20 min after the start of the MK-571 infusion, was 22 +/- 3.9% compared with 1.3 +/- 2.3% for placebo (mean +/- SE, p < 0.01). This degree of bronchodilation was maintained throughout the MK-571 infusion. In addition, bronchodilation from inhaled albuterol appeared additive with MK-571. Finally, baseline airway obstruction correlated with the degree of bronchodilation achieved with MK-571 (r = -0.73; p = 0.007).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma drug profiles and tolerability of MK-571 (L-660,711), a leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, in man.

We have studied the tolerability and plasma drug profiles of a leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, MK-571, given intravenously and as an oral solution in two separate trials. Study I (i.v.) involved 2 panels of 6 healthy men in a double-blind, alternating, incrementally increasing dose study with single doses up to 1500 mg. There was good tolerability at all doses. Plasma was assayed stereospecifically by HPLC for the S(+) and R(-) enantiomers of MK-571. For each enantiomer AUC values increased more than proportionately with increasing dose, suggesting nonlinear kinetics. The S(+) enantiomer was cleared more rapidly than the R(-) enantiomer. The apparent initial volume of distribution was less than 101 for both enantiomers. Study II (oral) involved 18 healthy subjects in 3 parallel groups who took multiple oral doses of 100, 300, and 600 mg t.i.d. for 31 doses. MK-571 administration was well tolerated, with only mild to moderate gastrointestinal discomfort at the highest dose. Total MK-571 (plasma samples assayed nonstereoselectively) was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, reaching peak concentrations at 1-2 h. Mean 8 h AUC increased from dose 1 to dose 31 in all subjects at all doses, suggesting a modest extent of accumulation (about 50%) of total MK-571 in plasma with a t.i.d. dosage regimen.

Dose-dependent kinetics of the enantiomers of MK-571, and LTD4-receptor antagonist.

The disposition of the enantiomers of MK-571 (MK-0679 and L-668,018) following single i.v. doses of MK-571 (L-660,711) was studied in a three way cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Each volunteer received 75 mg, 300 mg and 600 mg i.v. doses of MK-571 at weekly intervals. The disposition of both enantiomers appeared dose-dependent, since the AUC increased disproportionately faster than the dose. The dose dependency was much more pronounced for L-668,018: its AUC increased 6-fold from the 75 to the 300 mg dose, 16-fold from 75 to 600 mg and 2.7 fold from 300 to 600 mg. For MK-0679, the corresponding increases in AUC were 4.8-, 11-, and 2.3 fold. Regardless of dose, the elimination of L-668,018 was more rapid than that of MK-0679. The disposition of MK-0679 needs to be investigated independently to detect any potential influence of L-668,018 on its disposition.

MK-571, a potent antagonist of leukotriene D4-induced bronchoconstriction in the human.

MK-571 is a novel leukotriene D4/E4 (LTD4/E4) receptor antagonist. The ability of MK-571 to inhibit LTD4-induced bronchoconstriction was examined both in six healthy volunteers and in six asthmatic subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study design. LTD4 challenges were performed during a constant infusion with placebo or the active compound. The provocative concentration of LTD4 causing a 35% decrease in SGaw (PC35 SGaw) was 4.8 +/- 0.6 x 10(-5) M (mean +/- SEM) in healthy volunteers and 1.8 +/- 0.7 x 10(-6) M in asthmatic subjects during placebo treatment. Intravenous MK-571 (1,500, 86, or 28 mg) inhibited the LTD4-induced bronchoconstriction completely in healthy volunteers, up to an inhaled concentration of 10(-4) M LTD4. In asthmatic subjects, 28 mg MK-571 caused a significant, at least 44-fold, rightward shift of the dose-response curve to LTD4, whereas 277 mg shifted the dose-response curve at least 84-fold to the right. MK-571 is therefore a potent antagonist of LTD4-induced bronchoconstriction in both normal volunteers and asthmatic patients. MK-571 also caused a small but significant increase in baseline airway caliber in asthmatic patients, suggesting the presence of LTD4 in asthmatic airways and thus providing further support to a role for sulfidopeptide leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma.

Inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by MK-571, a potent leukotriene D4-receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Exercise is a common stimulus of bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma, who also have bronchoconstriction after inhaling the sulfidopeptide leukotriene D4 (LTD4). The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of LTD4 as a mediator of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 12 subjects with stable asthma were treated intravenously with MK-571 (160 mg), a selective and potent LTD4-receptor antagonist, or placebo, 20 minutes before each of two challenges involving exercise at a level previously demonstrated to cause a fall of at least 20 percent in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). The two exercise challenges were separated by one week. The results of the challenges were expressed as both the maximal fall in FEV1 after exercise and the time to recovery from bronchoconstriction. RESULTS: Treatment with MK-571 attenuated exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in all the subjects. The mean (+/- SEM) maximal percent decrease in FEV1 after exercise was 25.2 +/- 3.5 percent in the subjects taking placebo and 9.2 +/- 2.5 percent in the subjects taking MK-571 (P less than 0.001). The mean percent inhibition for the entire group was 69.5 percent. The mean time to recovery after exercise was 33.4 +/- 4.0 minutes in the placebo group and 8.4 +/- 2.5 minutes in the MK-571 group (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pretreatment with a potent and selective LTD4 antagonist markedly attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, and it suggests that LTD4 is a major mediator of this type of bronchoconstriction.

Indomethacin blocks airway tolerance to repetitive exercise but not to eucapnic hyperpnea in asthmatic subjects.

We have examined the effects of indomethacin (I) on tolerance to the bronchomotor effects of repetitive challenge with exercise (EX) and eucapnic hyperpnea (EH) in 7 asthmatic subjects. Each subject was studied on 4 separate days. EH was performed for 4 min at a minute ventilation found previously to increase specific airway resistance (SRaw) by 8 units (cm H2O/L/s). All exercise challenges were performed on a cycle ergometer for 5 min at a constant work load. Subjects breathed room temperature, dry air for both stimuli. SRaw was serially measured before and after each stimulus. Tolerance was examined by giving up to 3 repetitions of EH or EX, allowing a return of SRaw to within 1 unit of baseline between repetitions. Placebo (P) or I (25 mg four times a day for 7 doses) was administered in a single-blind manner. The timing between stimulus repetitions on the P day was matched to that of the I day. After P, the initial rise in SRaw was similar for both EX and EH, with a significant and progressive decrease in this rise after each stimulus repetition (p = 0.032 for EX, p = 0.006 for EH). After I, tolerance was still demonstrated to EH (p = 0.002), but not to EX (p = 0.231). This finding indicates that EH and EX are not identical stimuli, since there is an I-sensitive mechanism (possibly a bronchodilating prostaglandin) associated with the development of tolerance to EX but not to EH. Our data also suggest a possible additional bronchoconstricting mechanism associated with EX and not with EH.