Epidemiologia e desfecho dos pacientes de alto risco cirúrgico admitidos em unidades de terapia intensiva no Brasil / Epidemiology and outcome of high-surgical-risk patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Brazil

RESUMO Objetivo: Definir o perfil epidemiológico e os principais determinantes de morbimortalidade dos pacientes cirúrgicos não cardíacos de alto risco no Brasil. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, observacional e multicêntrico. Todos os pacientes cirúrgicos não cardíacos admitidos nas unidades de terapia intensiva, ou seja, considerados de alto risco, no período de 1 mês, foram avaliados e acompanhados diariamente por, no máximo, 7 dias na unidade de terapia intensiva, para determinação de complicações. As taxas de mortalidade em 28 dias de pós-operatório, na unidade de terapia intensiva e hospitalar foram avaliadas. Resultados: Participaram 29 unidades de terapia intensiva onde foram realizadas cirurgias em 25.500 pacientes, dos quais 904 (3,5%) de alto risco (intervalo de confiança de 95% - IC95% 3,3% - 3,8%), tendo sido incluídos no estudo. Dos pacientes envolvidos, 48,3% eram de unidades de terapia intensiva privadas e 51,7% de públicas. O tempo de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva foi de 2,0 (1,0 - 4,0) dias e hospitalar de 9,5 (5,4 - 18,6) dias. As taxas de complicações foram 29,9% (IC95% 26,4 - 33,7) e mortalidade em 28 dias pós-cirurgia 9,6% (IC95% 7,4 - 12,1). Os fatores independentes de risco para complicações foram Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3; razão de chance − RC = 1,02; IC95% 1,01 - 1,03) e Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) da admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva (RC =1,17; IC95% 1,09 - 1,25), tempo de cirurgia (RC = 1,001; IC95% 1,000 - 1,002) e cirurgias de emergências (RC = 1,93; IC95% 1,10 - 3,38). Em adição, foram associados com mortalidade em 28 dias idade (RC = 1,032; IC95% 1,011 - 1,052) SAPS 3 (RC = 1,041; IC95% 1,107 - 1,279), SOFA (RC = 1,175; IC95% 1,069 - 1,292) e cirurgias emergenciais (RC = 2,509; IC95% 1,040 - 6,051). Conclusão: Pacientes com escores prognósticos mais elevados, idosos, tempo cirúrgico e cirurgias emergenciais estiveram fortemente associados a maior mortalidade em 28 dias e mais complicações durante permanência em unidade de terapia intensiva.

ABSTRACT Objective: To define the epidemiological profile and the main determinants of morbidity and mortality in noncardiac high surgical risk patients in Brazil. Methods: This was a prospective, observational and multicenter study. All noncardiac surgical patients admitted to intensive care units, i.e., those considered high risk, within a 1-month period were evaluated and monitored daily for a maximum of 7 days in the intensive care unit to determine complications. The 28-day postoperative, intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were evaluated. Results: Twenty-nine intensive care units participated in the study. Surgeries were performed in 25,500 patients, of whom 904 (3.5%) were high-risk (95% confidence interval - 95%CI 3.3% - 3.8%) and were included in the study. Of the participating patients, 48.3% were from private intensive care units, and 51.7% were from public intensive care units. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2.0 (1.0 - 4.0) days, and the length of hospital stay was 9.5 (5.4 - 18.6) days. The complication rate was 29.9% (95%CI 26.4 - 33.7), and the 28-day postoperative mortality rate was 9.6% (95%CI 7.4 - 12.1). The independent risk factors for complications were the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3; odds ratio - OR = 1.02; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.03) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) on admission to the intensive care unit (OR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.09 - 1.25), surgical time (OR = 1.001, 95%CI 1.000 - 1.002) and emergency surgeries (OR = 1.93, 95%CI, 1.10 - 3.38). In addition, there were associations with 28-day mortality (OR = 1.032; 95%CI 1.011 - 1.052), SAPS 3 (OR = 1.041; 95%CI 1.107 - 1.279), SOFA (OR = 1.175, 95%CI 1.069 - 1.292) and emergency surgeries (OR = 2.509; 95%CI 1.040 - 6.051). Conclusion: Higher prognostic scores, elderly patients, longer surgical times and emergency surgeries were strongly associated with higher 28-day mortality and more complications during the intensive care unit stay.

Respiratory Variation in Femoral Vein Diameter Has Moderate Accuracy as a Marker of Fluid Responsivity in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Shock Patients.

Ultrasound (US) is considered the first step in evaluation of patients with shock; respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (inferior vena cava collapsibility [IVCc]) is an important measurement in this scenario that can be impaired by patient condition or technical skills. The main objective of this study was to evaluate if respiratory variation of the femoral vein (femoral vein collapsibility [FVc]), which is easier to visualize, can adequately predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Forty-five mechanically ventilated septic shock patients in a mixed clinical-surgical, 30-bed intensive care unit were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent assessments of FVc, IVCc and cardiac output using a portable US device. The passive leg raising test was used to evaluate fluid responsiveness. FVc presented an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.678 (95% confidence interval: 0.519-0.837, p = 0.044) with a cutoff point of 17%, yielding a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 65% in predicting fluid responsiveness. IVCc had greater diagnostic accuracy compared with FVc, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.733 (95% confidence interval: 0.563-0.903, p = 0.024) and a cutoff point of 29%, yielding a sensitivity of 47% and specificity of 86%. In conclusion, FVc has moderate accuracy when employed as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously mechanically ventilated septic shock patients.

Mortality in chronically critically ill patients: Expanding the use of the ProVent score.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to look at the performance of the Prognosis for Prolonged Ventilation (ProVent) score with a short-term outcome as well as when used earlier during the course of prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary public hospital from August 2011 to August 2012. All patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during this period were included in the study. Chronically critically ill (CCI) patients were defined as those with 21 days of MV. In a subsequent analysis, we considered CCI patients to be those with 14 days of MV. The data were collected in 2 ways: review of a prospectively elaborated database and review of electronic records. RESULTS: During the study period, 1360 patients were admitted to the ICU. Of these, 152 patients (11.2%) were considered CCI. Patients with high ProVent score presented higher ICU mortality. Mortality ranged from 25.0% for patients with a score of 0 to 84.0% for patients with a score of greater than or equal to 4. The analysis of the ProVent score performed earlier during the evolution (14 days of MV) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The ProVent score can be used for short-term prognosis (mortality in the ICU) and earlier in the evaluation of CCI patients.