Historical control histopathology data from amphibian metamorphosis assays and fathead minnow fish short term reproductive assays: A tool for data interpretation.

The Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay (AMA) is used to determine if a tested chemical has potential to impact the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis of Xenopus laevis tadpoles, while the Fish Short Term Reproduction Assay (FSTRA) assesses potential effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis of fish such as the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Several global regulatory programs routinely require these internationally validated tests be performed to determine the potential endocrine activity of chemicals. As such, they are conducted in accordance with standardized protocols and test criteria, which were originally developed more than a decade ago. Sizeable numbers of AMA and FSTRA studies have since been carried out, which allows for the mining of extensive historical control data (HCD). Such data are useful for investigating the existence of outlier results and aberrant control groups, identifying potential confounding variables, providing context for rare diagnoses, discriminating target from non-target effects, and for refining current testing paradigms. The present paper provides histopathology HCD from 55 AMA studies and 45 fathead minnow FSTRA studies, so that these data may become publicly available and thus aid in the interpretation of future study outcomes. Histopathology is a key endpoint in these assays, in which it is considered to be one of the most sensitive indicators of endocrine perturbation. In the current review, granular explorations of HCD data were used to identify background lesions, to assess the utility of particular diagnostic findings for distinguishing endocrine from non-endocrine effects, and to help determine if specific improvements to established regulatory guidance may be warranted. Knowledge gleaned from this investigation, supplemented by information from other recent studies, provided further context for the interpretation of AMA and FSTRA histopathology results. We recommend HCDs for the AMA and FSTRA be maintained to support the interpretation of study results.

An Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay Dietary Restriction Study: Lessons for Data Interpretation.

The amphibian metamorphosis assay (AMA) is a key in vivo endocrine screen to investigate chemicals with potential thyroid activity. The test guidelines and associated guidance consider that treatment-related effects on thyroid gland histomorphology automatically result in the assay being considered positive for thyroid activity, independent of the direction of change or conflicting results in the other biological endpoints. An AMA study was conducted with five different feeding rations equivalent to 50%, 30%, 20%, 10%, and 5% of the recommended feeding rate. Biological endpoints relating to growth and development, including thyroid gland histopathology, were evaluated, and the specificity of these endpoints for the determination of thyroid activity was assessed. There was no effect on survival or clinical signs of toxicity. Effects related to feed reduction generally occurred in a feeding ration-response manner and included reduced development stage; reduced body weight and body length metrics; decreased prevalence of thyroid follicular cell hyperplasia and hypertrophy, and the occurrence of thyroid atrophy; reduced liver vacuolation; and the occurrence of liver atrophy. The results indicate that treatment-related histopathological changes in the AMA can be induced by Non-chemical factors; therefore histopathological results are not necessarily diagnostically specific for chemically induced thyroid endocrine activity. Consequently, the interpretation of data from AMA studies should be adjusted accordingly. We recommend that the decision logic presented in the test guidelines and associated guidance be changed to reflect a requirement for directional agreement between the thyroid histopathology findings and the growth and developmental endpoints before it is concluded that a test substance has thyroid endocrine activity. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1061-1074. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Population-level variation in parasite resistance due to differences in immune initiation and rate of response.

Closely related populations often differ in resistance to a given parasite, as measured by infection success or failure. Yet, the immunological mechanisms of these evolved differences are rarely specified. Does resistance evolve via changes to the host's ability to recognize that an infection exists, actuate an effective immune response, or attenuate that response? We tested whether each of these phases of the host response contributed to threespine sticklebacks' recently evolved resistance to their tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus. Although marine stickleback and some susceptible lake fish permit fast-growing tapeworms, other lake populations are resistant and suppress tapeworm growth via a fibrosis response. We subjected lab-raised fish from three populations (susceptible marine "ancestors," a susceptible lake population, and a resistant lake population) to a novel immune challenge using an injection of (1) a saline control, (2) alum, a generalized pro-inflammatory adjuvant that causes fibrosis, (3) a tapeworm protein extract, or (4) a combination of alum and tapeworm protein. With enough time, all three populations generated a robust fibrosis response to the alum treatments. Yet, only the resistant population exhibited a fibrosis response to the tapeworm protein alone. Thus, these populations differed in their ability to respond to the tapeworm protein but shared an intact fibrosis pathway. The resistant population also initiated fibrosis faster in response to alum, and was able to attenuate fibrosis, unlike the susceptible populations' slow but longer lasting response to alum. As fibrosis has pathological side effects that reduce fecundity, the faster recovery by the resistant population may reflect an adaptation to mitigate the costs of immunity. Broadly, our results confirm that parasite detection and immune initiation, activation speed, and immune attenuation simultaneously contribute to the evolution of parasite resistance and adaptations to infection in natural populations.

Recommendations for the Development and Validation of Immunogenicity Assays in Support of Biosimilar Programs.

For biosimilar drug development programs, it is essential to demonstrate that there are no clinically significant differences between the proposed biosimilar therapeutic (biosimilar) and its reference product (originator). Based on a stepwise comprehensive comparability exercise, the biosimilar must demonstrate similarity to the originator in physicochemical characteristics, biological activity, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, including immunogenicity. The goal of the immunogenicity assessment is to evaluate potential differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the originator product in the incidence and severity of human immune responses. Establishing that there are no clinically meaningful differences in the immune response between the products is a key element in the demonstration of biosimilarity. An issue of practical, regulatory, and financial importance is to establish whether a two-assay (based on the biosimilar and originator respectively) or a one-assay approach (based on the biosimilar) is optimal for the comparative immunogenicity assessment. This paper recommends the use of a single, biosimilar-based assay for assessing immunogenic similarity in support of biosimilar drug development. The development and validation of an ADA assay used for a biosimilar program should include all the assessments recommended for an innovator program (10-16, 29). In addition, specific parameters also need to be evaluated, to gain confidence that the assay can detect antibodies against both the biosimilar and the originator. Specifically, the biosimilar and the originator should be compared in antigenic equivalence, to assess the ability of the biosimilar and the originator to bind in a similar manner to the positive control(s), as well as in the confirmatory assay and drug tolerance experiments. Practical guidance for the development and validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays to assess immunogenicity of a biosimilar in comparison to the originator, using the one-assay approach, are described herein.

Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Golimumab is a monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, which is used in ulcerative colitis with an exposure-response relationship. The goal of this study was to compare results obtained with different immunoassays (golimumab and antigolimumab antibodies trough levels). METHODS: This study was based on samples from 78 ulcerative colitis patients on golimumab treatment. Golimumab was quantified by either an anti-IgG detection antibody (Theradiag, Marne la Vallée, France) or an antibody directed against golimumab (Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Janssen R&D, San Diego, CA). Bridging drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Theradiag, Janssen R&D, and KU Leuven), a bridging drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Janssen R&D), and a radioimmunoassay (Sanquin) were used to quantify antidrug antibody. RESULTS: Median serum golimumab levels were 4.5, 3.5, 4.9, and 2.4 mcg/mL with Theradiag, Sanquin, KU Leuven, and Janssen R&D assay, respectively (P < 0.05). Correlation coefficients between assays ranged from 0.9 to 0.97. When using the KU Leuven and Janssen R&D assays, 86% of samples were in the same quartile of distribution of values, and for Sanquin and Janssen R&D assays, this overlap was 80%. The concordance observed for the other pairs was 83% (Sanquin/KU Leuven R&D), 71% (Theradiag/KU Leuven), and 68% (Theradiag/Janssen R&D and Theradiag/Sanquin). The specificity of assays for golimumab was demonstrated. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 28.2% of the samples with the Janssen R&D drug-tolerant assay and in the same 2 patients by the 3 other assays. CONCLUSIONS: Performances of these immunoassays were similar in terms of quality, but differences in the quantitative results point to the importance of using the same assay consistently to monitor a patient's treatment.

2018 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: focus on flow cytometry, gene therapy, cut points and key clarifications on BAV (Part 3 - LBA/cell-based assays: immunogenicity, biomarkers and PK assays).

The 2018 12th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis took place in Philadelphia, PA, USA on April 9-13, 2018 with an attendance of over 900 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day full immersion in bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small- and large-molecule bioanalysis involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA/cell-based assays approaches. This 2018 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2018 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity using LBA and cell-based assays. Part 1 (LCMS for small molecules, peptides, oligonucleotides and small molecule biomarkers) and Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LCMS for biotherapeutics and regulatory agencies' inputs) are published in volume 10 of Bioanalysis, issues 22 and 23 (2018), respectively.

Implementing a tiered approach to bioanalytical method validation for large-molecule ligand-binding assay methods in pharmacokinetic assessments.

Bioanalytical methods must enable the delivery of data that meet sound, scientifically justified, fit-for-purpose criteria. At early phases of biotherapeutic drug development, suitable criteria of a ligand-binding assay could be met for pharmacokinetic (PK) in-study sample testing without a full validation defined by regulatory guidelines. To ensure fit-for-purpose methods support PK testing through all phases of biotherapeutic development, three tiers of method validation - regulatory, scientific and research validations - are proposed. The three-tiered framework for method validation outlines the differences in the parameters that should be assessed, the acceptance criteria that may be applied, and the documentation necessary at each level. The criteria for selecting the appropriate application of each of these PK method validation workflows are discussed.

The nuclear hormone receptor gene Nr2c1 (Tr2) is a critical regulator of early retina cell patterning.

Nuclear hormone receptors play a major role in the development of many tissues. This study uncovers a novel role for testicular receptor 2 (Tr2, Nr2c1) in defining the early phase of retinal development and regulating normal retinal cell patterning and topography. The mammalian retina undergoes an overlapping yet biphasic period of development to generate all seven retinal cell types. We discovered that Nr2c1 expression coincides with development of the early retinal cells. Loss of Nr2c1 causes a severe vision deficit and impacts early, but not late retina cell types. Retinal cone cell topography is disrupted with an increase in displaced amacrine cells. Additionally, genetic background significantly impacts phenotypic outcome of cone photoreceptor cells but not amacrine cells. Chromatin-IP experiments reveal NR2C1 regulates early cell transcription factors that regulate retinal progenitor cells during development, including amacrine (Satb2) and cone photoreceptor regulators thyroid and retinoic acid receptors. This study supports a role for Nr2c1 in defining the biphasic period of retinal development and specifically influencing the early phase of retinal cell fate.

Comparisons of Serum Infliximab and Antibodies-to-Infliximab Tests Used in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials of Remicade®.

Monitoring infliximab (IFX) concentrations and antibodies-to-IFX (ATI) titers during inflammatory bowel disease treatment may allow more informed decisions in assessing exposure/response and determining appropriate dosing. To aid in interpreting results from different commercial tests in the context of Janssen's published Remicade® results, the reliability of Janssen's IFX and ATI assays was compared with commercial assays from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp. Test results were independently reported to Janssen. All assays were tested for specificity, selectivity, and precision. ATI assays were evaluated for sensitivity, drug interference, and potential interference of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). IFX assays were specific, accurate, and reproducible. Intra-class correlation of Janssen IFX assay results with those from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp were 0.960, 0.895, 0.931, and 0.971, respectively. ATI titers >10 interfered with IFX assessment in all IFX assays, whereas TNF-α (≤50 ng/mL) did not interfere with IFX detection in any assay. ATI assays specifically and reproducibly detected ATI. Janssen, Sanquin, and LabCorp ATI methods were more resistant to IFX interference than Dynacare and KU Leuven, which were affected by IFX concentrations at ≥2 µg/mL. TNF-α (<5 ng/mL) did not interfere with ATI detection. Strong agreement was observed between Janssen's IFX and ATI assays and the diagnostic service provider assays. Our study results indicate that all four commercially available assays are suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX. The substantial agreement reported here between the comparator assays and the Janssen drug-tolerant assay provides support to clinicians in their use of these commercial assays, and for understanding their patients' IFX and ATI results relative to published data from clinical studies of Remicade.

An open-label, single-dose, phase 1 study of the absorption, metabolism and excretion of quizartinib, a highly selective and potent FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy male subjects, for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

1. Quizartinib absorption, metabolism and excretion were characterized in six healthy men receiving a single oral dose of 60 mg (≈100 µCi) of [14C]-quizartinib. Blood, plasma, urine and faeces were collected ≤336 h postdose. 2. Four hours postdose, maximum mean ± SD blood radioactivity concentrations were 296 ± 67.4 ng equivalents/g. A mean ± SD of 1.64 ± 0.482% and 76.3 ± 6.23% of the dose was recovered in urine and faeces, respectively, within 336 h postdose. 3. Radio-detector high-performance liquid chromatography (radio-HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) showed two main radioactive peaks in plasma, unchanged quizartinib and mono-oxidative metabolite, AC886. Five additional metabolites in plasma were identified by LC-MS, but low levels prevented radio-HPLC detection. Although unchanged quizartinib was the main radioactive component in faeces (mean, 4.0% of administered dose), 15 metabolites representing a mean of 1.0-3.5% of administered dose were found. Quizartinib was predominantly metabolized by phase I biotransformations (oxidation, reduction, dealkylation, deamination, hydrolysis and combinations thereof). 4. This study indicated that quizartinib was rapidly and orally bioavailable, extensively metabolized, with AC886 as the major circulating metabolite, and predominantly eliminated in faeces. Quizartinib was well tolerated in the subjects.

Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity investigation of a human anti-interleukin-17 monoclonal antibody in non-naïve cynomolgus monkeys.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of biologic therapeutics, especially monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in monkeys generally presents the most relevant predictive PK information for humans. However, human mAbs, xenogeneic proteins to monkeys, are likely to be immunogenic. Monkeys previously treated with a human mAb (non-naïve) may have developed antidrug antibodies (ADAs) that cross-react with another test mAb in subsequent studies. Unlike PK studies for small-molecule therapeutics, in which animals may be reused, naïve monkeys have been used almost exclusively for preclinical PK studies of biologic therapeutics to avoid potential pre-existing immunologic cross-reactivity issues. The propensity and extent of pre-existing ADAs have not been systematically investigated to date. In this study, the PK and immunogenicity of mAb A, a human anti-human interkeukin-17 mAb, were investigated in a colony of 31 cynomolgus monkeys previously exposed to other human mAbs against different targets. We screened the monkeys for pre-existing antibodies to mAb A prior to the PK study and showed that 44% of the monkeys had pre-existing cross-reactive antibodies to mAb A, which could affect the PK characterization of the antibody. In the subcolony of monkeys without measurable pre-existing ADAs, PK and immunogenicity of mAb A were successfully characterized. The impact of ADAs on mAb A PK was also demonstrated in the monkeys with pre-existing ADAs. Here we report the results and propose a pragmatic approach for the use of non-naïve monkeys when conducting PK studies of biologic therapeutics.

Systematic verification of bioanalytical similarity between a biosimilar and a reference biotherapeutic: committee recommendations for the development and validation of a single ligand-binding assay to support pharmacokinetic assessments.

For biosimilar drug development, it is critical to demonstrate similar physiochemical characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the biosimilar product compared to the reference product. Therefore, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity (antidrug antibody, ADA) assays that allow for the demonstration of biosimilarity are critical. Under the auspices of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Focus Group (LBABFG), a Biosimilars Action Program Committee (APC) was formed in 2011. The goals of this Biosimilars APC were to provide a forum for in-depth discussions on issues surrounding the development and validation of PK and immunogenicity assays in support of biosimilar drug development and to make recommendations thereof. The Biosimilars APC's recommendations for the development and validation of ligand-binding assays (LBAs) to support the PK assessments for biosimilar drug development are presented here. Analytical recommendations for the development and validation of LBAs to support immunogenicity assessments will be the subject of a separate white paper.

A phase 1, randomized study to assess the pharmacokinetic comparability of siltuximab derived from two different cell lines in healthy subjects.

Siltuximab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against interleukin (IL-6), is under development by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. During early clinical development, siltuximab was produced in a murine Sp2/0 myeloma cell line. The production cell line was switched to stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line for subsequent clinical development. A two-part, parallel-group, phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single IV administration of Sp2/0- and CHO-derived siltuximab in healthy subjects. The results from this study demonstrated PK comparability of siltuximab produced from Sp2/0 and CHO cell lines. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and AUC0-84day following 1.4 mg/kg doses was (99.4%, 111.3%) and (98.1%, 109.6%), respectively, both within the pre-specified comparability range of 80-125%. Siltuximab derived from either the Sp2/0 or CHO cell lines was in general well tolerated and was not found to be immunogenic in this study.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous ustekinumab between Chinese and non-Chinese healthy male subjects across two Phase 1 studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab, a human immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1κ) monoclonal antibody against interleukin-12/23p40, has been reported to be significantly efficacious in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab have been previously studied in Asian patients with psoriasis, the pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab has not been reported for Asian patients. The objective of this analysis was to compare the pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab in Chinese and non-Chinese subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two Phase 1, open-label, single-period, inpatient/outpatient studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab following a single subcutaneous (SC) injection. In Study 1, non-Chinese healthy male subjects (n = 31) received a single SC injection of ustekinumab 90 mg. In Study 2, Chinese healthy male subjects (n = 24) were randomized (1:1) to receive a single SC injection of ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg. Serum ustekinumab concentrations were measured using validated immunoassays. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analyses. After data collection, a linear mixed model approach was used to compare the log-transformed maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curves (AUCs) generated from the 90-mg dose groups in the two studies. The ratios of the geometric means of the Cmax and AUCs in Chinese subjects (Test) to those in non-Chinese subjects (Reference) along with the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: The mean body weight was 80.3 kg in non-Chinese (Caucasian: 77.4 %; black: 12.9 %; Asian: 0.0 %; other: 9.7 %) and 65.7 kg in Chinese subjects, with an overall mean of 74 kg. Across studies and dose groups, the median time corresponding to the Cmax (tmax) was 4.0-8.5 days, the mean terminal half-life (t½) was approximately 3 weeks, and the mean apparent volume of distribution based on the terminal phase (Vz/F) was 80.3-97.3 mL/kg. In the 90-mg groups, mean exposure parameters of ustekinumab were 1.1- to 1.3-fold higher in Chinese versus non-Chinese subjects. However, exposure parameters were not significantly different between the two study populations when individual parameters were adjusted to a subject weighing 74 kg: the 90 % CIs of the geometric mean ratios (Chinese versus non-Chinese) for weight-adjusted Cmax, AUC from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUClast), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) were (0.76-1.09), (0.85-1.16) and (0.88-1.22), respectively. Ustekinumab was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events; one subject (non-Chinese) developed anti-drug antibodies to ustekinumab. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab were comparable between Chinese and non-Chinese healthy male subjects when exposure parameters were adjusted by subject body weight. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 1, conducted with non-Chinese subjects (March-July 2006), was completed before the 7th revision of the Declaration of Helsinki and was therefore exempt from registration under the existing guidelines. The clinical trial registration number for Study 2, conducted with Chinese subjects (October 2009-June 2010), is NCT01081704.

Preclinical evaluation of the metabolism and disposition of RRx-001, a novel investigative anticancer agent.

RRx-001 has shown promise as a novel cancer therapeutic agent. The disposition of RRx-001 was evaluated in vitro and after intravenous administration to rats. At both 24 and 168 h after a single intravenous administration of ¹4C-RRx-001 (10 mg/kg), the majority of radiolabel was in the blood. The recovery of label in excreta was quite low, but the major route of radiolabel excretion was via the kidney, with approximately 26% in the urine by the first 8 h and decreasing amounts in all subsequent collections to a total of 36.3% by 168 h. The partitioning of total radioactivity in red blood cells (RBCs) and plasma was determined after in vitro addition to human, rat, dog, and monkey whole blood at 1 and 20 µM. In rat, at 30 min, approximately 75% of the radioactivity is associated with RBCs and 25% with plasma. In human, at 30 min, approximately 25% of the radioactivity is associated with RBCs and 75% with plasma. Analysis by liquid chromatography/radiodetection/mass spectrometry showed that ¹4C-RRx-001 reacted rapidly with whole blood to give four major soluble metabolites: the GSH and Cys adducts of RRx-001 (M1 and M2) and the corresponding mononitro GSH and Cys adducts (M3 and M4). Human Hb was incubated with cold RRx-001 in buffer, and a standard proteomics protocol was used to separate and identify the tryptic peptides. Standard peptide collision-induced fragment ions supported the structure of the peptide GTFATLSELHCDK with the alkylation on the Cys-93 locus of the Hb ß chain.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody (sirukumab) in healthy subjects in a first-in-human study.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Interleukin (IL)-6 is a cytokine known for pleiotropic and pro-inflammatory functions. IL-6 is involved in various disease processes including lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, insulin resistance and malignancy. Anti-IL-6 receptor therapy has recently been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Sirukumab, a human monoclonal antibody against soluble IL-6, has been found to bind to human IL-6 with high affinity and specificity and thus suppress the biological activity of IL-6. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety of sirukumab in cynomolgus monkeys, a toxicologically relevant animal species, following repeated intravenous and subcutaneous administrations. This study shows that sirukumab has desirable pharmacokinetic characteristics (linear pharmacokinetics with long half-life), a low incidence of immunogenicity and a well-tolerated safety profile in healthy subjects, supporting further development of sirukumab as a potentially valuable therapeutic agent. AIMS: To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of sirukumab (CNTO 136) following intravenous (i.v.) infusion in healthy subjects. METHODS: Forty-five healthy adult subjects (38 men and seven women) were randomly assigned to receive a single i.v. dose of placebo or sirukumab (0.3, 1, 3, 6 or 10 mg kg(-1) in a dose-escalating manner). All treated subjects were observed for 96 h post infusion and underwent 20-week follow-up evaluations. Serum samples were collected to measure sirukumab concentrations, pharmacodynamic biomarkers and antibodies to sirukumab. Non-compartmental analysis and population PK modelling were conducted to characterize the PK of sirukumab. RESULTS: Adverse events were generally brief in duration, mild or moderate in intensity and non-dose-dependent. No serious adverse events were observed in the sirukumab-treated subjects. Both C(max) and AUC(0,∞) increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner. Median terminal half-life ranged from 18.5 to 29.6 days. A two-compartment model adequately described the PK of sirukumab following i.v. administration. Population estimates for the clearance (CL), the central volume of distribution (V(1)), the inter-compartmental clearance (Q) and the peripheral volume of distribution (V(2)) were 0.364 l day(-1), 3.28 l, 0.588 l day(-1) and 4.97 l, respectively. Compared with placebo subjects, a sustained decrease from baseline in C-reactive protein was observed in all sirukumab-treated dose groups, although no clear dose-response relationship was observed. No subjects were positive for antibodies to sirukumab. CONCLUSIONS: Sirukumab had a well-tolerated safety profile, desirable PK characteristics and a low incidence of immunogenicity following an i.v. infusion of 0.3 to 10 mg kg(-1) in healthy subjects.