Quality of life and satisfaction of patients after oncoplastic or traditional breast-conserving surgery using the BREAST-Q (BCT module): a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The oncoplastic conservative surgery was developed as a natural evolution of traditional surgery, attempting to improve the therapeutic and aesthetic outcomes where tumor resection could be followed by not-adequate results. Our primary aim is to evaluate how patient satisfaction and quality-of-life after conservative oncoplastic surgery, using BREAST-Q (BCT Module), change pre- and post-operatively. The secondary aim is to compare patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic or traditional conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 647 patients who underwent traditional conservative surgery or oncoplastic surgery from January 2020 to December 2022. Only 232 women (35.9%) completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire on a web-based platform, at the preoperative phase and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: The average score of "Psychosocial well-being" and "Satisfaction with Breasts" 3 months after surgery showed a statistically significant improvement, while the average score for "Physical well-being: Chest" at 3 months showed a worsening compared to the baseline. "Sexual well-being" did not show statistically significant change. A significant difference between the post-operative outcome of oncoplastic surgery and traditional surgery was observed only for Physical well-being (better for traditional surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes 3 months after the surgery, except for physical discomfort that increases especially after oncoplastic surgery. Furthermore, our data, as well as many others, point to the appropriateness of using OCS where there is an effective indication, while the perspective of patients cannot find significant superiority over TCS in any of the areas analyzed.

PROMs in post-mastectomy care: Patient self-reports (BREAST-Q™) as a powerful instrument to personalize medical services.

One of the goals of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is to satisfy the patient's outcome. Recent studies therefore tended to focus on the patient's perception of the care and on the impact on quality of life using patients-reported-outcome-measures (PROMs), able to measure the health status directly without the clinician's interposition. We present a preliminary prospective study on 333 patients who underwent mastectomy with IBR in a two-year period, in a single Italian centre, using a dedicated PROMs, the BREAST-Q™, to determine the patient's satisfaction. We studied two groups of IBR: Group A (two-step with tissue-expander) and Group B (one-step: prosthesis/mesh) and conducted a pre- and post-operative comparison for each group to evaluate score-gain over time, and a group-score comparison to determine whether differences were significant between reconstruction types. Two-hundred-and-nine were actually enrolled and 132 completed all the questionnaires. The response rate was 62.8% and the compliance rate (completion of all the questionnaires) was 63.1%. In both groups all the analyzed domains worsened comparing the pre and post-operative period; the differences were statistically significant only for physical and sexual-wellbeing. In the comparison between the two groups, none of the detected differences reached the statistical significance. According to our experience, we can state that PROMs could improve the health concept redefining the variables to be monitored even if data is still insufficient to draw any definitive conclusion. PROMs can help surgeons and patients decide the most appropriate surgery for a particular patient-profile and to identify those who require further support.

Male secretory breast cancer: case in a 6-year-old boy with a peculiar gene duplication and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Secretory breast cancer (SBC) is one of the rarest breast cancer (BC), representing the majority of BC in childhood. Nevertheless, it elicits a lot of interest both for the peculiar morphology and the characteristic genetic features. Currently, there is no consensus on optimal treatment strategy. Therefore, it is useful to report every case in order to establish treatment algorithms. METHODS: We describe the case of a 6-year-old boy diagnosed with a SBC, with peculiar genomic and immunohistochemical features. Moreover, we carried out a review of the literature in order to analyze the present state of knowledge about this rare entity. RESULTS: To the best of our knowledge, there are only 120 cases published in literature, only 32 in males and only 2 younger than 6 years. Furthermore, this one had peculiar genomic and immunohistochemical features. Indeed, even if SBC expresses basal-cell markers, our patient had a triple-negative tumor expressing both basal and luminal cell markers. Furthermore, the boy's genomic profile revealed not only positivity for the typical SBC's translocation t(12;15), but also for a 3q28 duplication, found in his father (healthy) and paternal grandfather (with a previous BC). None were positive for BRCA mutation. This locus includes only one gene encoding for a growth factor recently linked to Early Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy-47 and Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Even if the literature does not provide evidence of a pathogenic role it is not possible to exclude a cancer-predisposing activity. CONCLUSIONS: SBC is a rare type of BC, characterized by triple-negative features with an unexpectedly good prognosis. More data are needed to fully understand the behavior of this cancer and genomic profiling could be helpful in improving its diagnosis and management.