KIT ATP-Binding Pocket/Activation Loop Mutations in GI Stromal Tumor: Emerging Mechanisms of Kinase Inhibitor Escape.

PURPOSE: Imatinib resistance in GI stromal tumors (GISTs) is primarily caused by secondary KIT mutations, and clonal heterogeneity of these secondary mutations represents a major treatment obstacle. KIT inhibitors used after imatinib have clinical activity, albeit with limited benefit. Ripretinib is a potent inhibitor of secondary KIT mutations in the activation loop (AL). However, clinical benefit in fourth line remains limited and the molecular mechanisms of ripretinib resistance are largely unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Progressing lesions of 25 patients with GISTs refractory to ripretinib were sequenced for KIT resistance mutations. Resistant genotypes were validated and characterized using novel cell line models and in silico modeling. RESULTS: GISTs progressing on ripretinib were enriched for secondary mutations in the ATP-binding pocket (AP), which frequently occur in cis with preexisting AL mutations, resulting in highly resistant AP/AL genotypes. AP/AL mutations were rarely observed in a cohort of progressing GIST samples from the preripretinib era but represented 50% of secondary KIT mutations in patients with tumors resistant to ripretinib. In GIST cell lines harboring secondary KIT AL mutations, the sole genomic escape mechanisms during ripretinib drug selection were AP/AL mutations. Ripretinib and sunitinib synergize against mixed clones with secondary AP or AL mutants but do not suppress clones with AP/AL genotypes. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that KIT remains the central oncogenic driver even in late lines of GIST therapy. KIT-inhibitor combinations may suppress resistance because of secondary KIT mutations. However, the emergence of KIT AP/AL mutations after ripretinib treatment calls for new strategies in the development of next-generation KIT inhibitors.

Phase II Study of Eribulin plus Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Soft-tissue Sarcomas: Clinical Outcomes and Biological Correlates.

PURPOSE: Eribulin modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment via cGAS-STING signaling in preclinical models. This non-randomized phase II trial evaluated the combination of eribulin and pembrolizumab in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in one of three cohorts: leiomyosarcoma (LMS), liposarcomas (LPS), or other STS that may benefit from PD-1 inhibitors, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Eribulin was administered at 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. (days 1 and 8) with fixed-dose pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. (day 1) of each 21-day cycle, until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. The primary endpoint was the 12-week progression-free survival rate (PFS-12) in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, median PFS, safety profile, and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment and on-treatment blood specimens were evaluated in patients who achieved durable disease control (DDC) or progression within 12 weeks [early progression (EP)]. Multiplexed immunofluorescence was performed on archival LPS samples from patients with DDC or EP. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients enrolled (LMS, n = 19; LPS, n = 20; UPS/Other, n = 18). The PFS-12 was 36.8% (90% confidence interval: 22.5-60.4) for LMS, 69.6% (54.5-89.0) for LPS, and 52.6% (36.8-75.3) for UPS/Other cohorts. All 3 patients in the UPS/Other cohort with angiosarcoma achieved RECIST responses. Toxicity was manageable. Higher IFNα and IL4 serum levels were associated with clinical benefit. Immune aggregates expressing PD-1 and PD-L1 were observed in a patient that completed 2 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of eribulin and pembrolizumab demonstrated promising activity in LPS and angiosarcoma.

Targeting DNA-PK.

This chapter explores the multifaceted roles of DNA-PK with particular focus on its functions in non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair. DNA-PK is the primary orchestrator of NHEJ but also regulates other biologic processes. The growing understanding of varied DNA-PK biologic roles highlights new avenues for cancer treatment. However, these multiple roles also imply challenges, particularly in combination therapies, with perhaps a higher risk of clinical toxicities than was previously envisioned. These considerations underscore the need for compelling and innovative strategies to accomplish effective clinical translation.

Hyper-Dependence on NHEJ Enables Synergy between DNA-PK Inhibitors and Low-Dose Doxorubicin in Leiomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive sarcoma for which standard chemotherapies achieve response rates under 30%. There are no effective targeted therapies against LMS. Most LMS are characterized by chromosomal instability (CIN), resulting in part from TP53 and RB1 co-inactivation and DNA damage repair defects. We sought to identify therapeutic targets that could exacerbate intrinsic CIN and DNA damage in LMS, inducing lethal genotoxicity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed clinical targeted sequencing in 287 LMS and genome-wide loss-of-function screens in 3 patient-derived LMS cell lines, to identify LMS-specific dependencies. We validated candidate targets by biochemical and cell-response assays in vitro and in seven mouse models. RESULTS: Clinical targeted sequencing revealed a high burden of somatic copy-number alterations (median fraction of the genome altered =0.62) and demonstrated homologous recombination deficiency signatures in 35% of LMS. Genome-wide short hairpin RNA screens demonstrated PRKDC (DNA-PKcs) and RPA2 essentiality, consistent with compensatory nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) hyper-dependence. DNA-PK inhibitor combinations with unconventionally low-dose doxorubicin had synergistic activity in LMS in vitro models. Combination therapy with peposertib and low-dose doxorubicin (standard or liposomal formulations) inhibited growth of 5 of 7 LMS mouse models without toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of DNA-PK inhibitors with unconventionally low, sensitizing, doxorubicin dosing showed synergistic effects in LMS in vitro and in vivo models, without discernable toxicity. These findings underscore the relevance of DNA damage repair alterations in LMS pathogenesis and identify dependence on NHEJ as a clinically actionable vulnerability in LMS.

TSC2 inactivation, low mutation burden and high macrophage infiltration characterise hepatic angiomyolipomas.

AIMS: Although TSC1 or TSC2 inactivating mutations that lead to mTORC1 hyperactivation have been reported in hepatic angiomyolipomas (hAML), the role of other somatic genetic events that may contribute to hAML development is unknown. There are also limited data regarding the tumour microenvironment (TME) of hAML. The aim of the present study was to identify other somatic events in genomic level and changes in TME that contribute to tumorigenesis in hAML. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we performed exome sequencing in nine sporadic hAML tumours and deep-coverage targeted sequencing for TSC2 in three additional hAML. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence were carried out for 15 proteins to characterise the tumour microenvironment and assess immune cell infiltration. Inactivating somatic variants in TSC2 were identified in 10 of 12 (83%) cases, with a median allele frequency of 13.6%. Five to 18 somatic variants (median number: nine, median allele frequency 21%) not in TSC1 or TSC2 were also identified, mostly of uncertain clinical significance. Copy number changes were rare, but detection was impaired by low tumour purity. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated numerous CD68+ macrophages of distinct appearance from Küpffer cells. Multiplex immunofluorescence revealed low numbers of exhausted PD-1+/PD-L1+, FOXP3+ and CD8+ T cells. CONCLUSION: hAML tumours have consistent inactivating mutations in TSC2 and have a low somatic mutation rate, similar to other TSC-associated tumours. Careful histological review, standard IHC and multiplex immunofluorescence demonstrated marked infiltration by non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, mostly macrophages.

Malignant Proliferating Pilar Tumor: Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Study of 17 Cases.

Proliferating pilar tumors are rare neoplasms that differentiate toward the outer sheath near the isthmus and can rarely undergo malignant transformation. We performed histopathologic evaluation on 26 benign proliferating pilar tumor (BPPT) and 17 malignant proliferating pilar tumor (MPPT). Ki-67 and p53 immunostains were performed on 13 BPPT and 10 MPPT. Six MPPT cases were successfully analyzed by a next-generation sequencing platform which surveyed exonic DNA sequences of 447 cancer genes and 191 regions across 60 genes for rearrangement detection. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the BPPT and MPPT groups. Follow-up data of 16 of 17 MPPT (median, 25 mo) showed metastasis in 1 MPPT. The histologic features associated with MPPT include size >2.5 cm, adjacent desmoplastic stroma, small nests or cords of atypical epithelium in surrounding stroma, irregular infiltration or borders, abnormal keratinization, large hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, severe cytologic atypia, nuclear pleomorphism, necrosis, and increased mitotic figures. MPPT harbors copy number gains of 15q and losses of 6p and 6q, findings previously reported in BPPT. However, MPPT harbors frequent TP53 mutations as molecular markers of progression. Different from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, MPPT more frequently demonstrates low tumor mutational burden and typically lacks a UV signature, suggestive of a different etiologic pathway than squamous cell carcinoma. In summary, with a median follow-up of 25 months, this study shows that MPPT is a biologically indolent carcinoma with rare metastasis. Molecular analyses suggest a non-UV-related pathogenesis with frequent TP53 aberration.

Phase II Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide for Advanced Uterine Leiomyosarcoma (NCI Protocol 10250).

PURPOSE: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with frequent metastatic relapse after curative surgery. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit for advanced disease. Multiomics profiling studies have identified homologous recombination deficiency in uLMS. In preclinical studies where olaparib and temozolomide provided modest activity, the combination was highly effective for inhibiting uLMS tumor growth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NCI Protocol 10250 is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study evaluating olaparib and temozolomide in advanced uLMS. Patients with progression on ≥1 prior line received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 orally once daily with olaparib 200 mg orally twice a day both on days 1-7 in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was the best objective response rate (ORR) within 6 months. A one-stage binomial design was used. If ≥5 of 22 responded, the treatment would be considered promising (93% power; α = .06). All patients underwent paired biopsies that were evaluated with whole-exome sequencing (WES)/RNAseq and a RAD51 foci formation assay. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were evaluable. The median age was 55 years, and 59% had received three or more prior lines. Best ORR within 6 months was 23% (5 of 22). The overall ORR was 27% (6 of 22). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 months to not estimable). Hematologic toxicity was common (grade 3/4 neutropenia: 75%; thrombocytopenia: 32%) but manageable with dose modification. Five of 16 (31%) of tumors contained a deleterious homologous recombination gene alteration by WES, and 9 of 18 (50%) were homologous recombination-deficient by the RAD51 assay. In an exploratory analysis, mPFS was prolonged for patients with homologous recombination-deficient versus homologous recombination-proficient tumors (11.2 v 5.4 months, P = .05) by RAD51. CONCLUSION: Olaparib and temozolomide met the prespecified primary end point and provided meaningful clinical benefit in patients with advanced, pretreated uLMS.

Recurrent Tumor Suppressor Alterations in Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma.

Primary pericardial mesotheliomas are extremely rare, accounting for <1% of all mesotheliomas, and their molecular genetic features and predisposing factors remain to be determined. Here, we report the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic findings of 3 pericardial mesotheliomas without pleural involvement. Three cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2022 were included in the study and analyzed by immunohistochemistry and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS); corresponding nonneoplastic tissue was sequenced in all cases. Two patients were female and 1 was male, aged between 66 and 75 years. Two patients each had prior asbestos exposure and were smokers. Histologic subtypes were epithelioid in 2 cases and biphasic in 1 case. Immunohistochemical staining identified expression of cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and calretinin in all cases, D2-40 in 2 cases, and WT1 in 1 case. Staining for tumor suppressors revealed loss of p16, MTAP, and Merlin (NF2) expression in 2 cases and loss of BAP1 and p53 in 1 case. Abnormal cytoplasmic BAP1 expression was observed in an additional case. Protein expression abnormalities correlated with NGS results, which showed concurrent complete genomic inactivation of CDKN2A/p16, CDKN2B, MTAP, and NF2 in 2 mesotheliomas and of BAP1 and TP53 in 1 mesothelioma each, respectively. In addition, 1 patient harbored a pathogenic BRCA1 germline mutation, which resulted in biallelic inactivation in the mesothelioma. All mesotheliomas were mismatch repair proficient and showed several chromosomal gains and losses. All patients died from disease. Our study demonstrates that pericardial mesotheliomas share common morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features with pleural mesothelioma, including recurrent genomic inactivation of canonical tumor suppressors. Our study adds new insights into the genetic landscape of primary pericardial mesothelioma and highlights BRCA1 loss as a potential contributing factor in a subset of cases, thereby contributing to refined precision diagnostics for this rare cancer.

Expanding the Clinicopathologic and Molecular Spectrum of Lipoblastoma-Like Tumor in a Series of 28 Cases.

Lipoblastoma-like tumor (LLT) is a rare adipocytic neoplasm with a predilection for the vulva. Since 2002, <30 cases have been reported, characterizing it as an indolent tumor that may sometimes recur locally. Diagnosis can be challenging due to its rarity and morphologic overlap with other adipocytic tumors. Thus far, there are no specific molecular or immunohistochemical features to aid in the diagnosis of LLT. Recent case reports have described LLT arising at other sites, including the spermatic cord and gluteal region, suggesting wider anatomical distribution. We present a large series of LLT to further characterize its clinicopathologic and molecular features. Twenty-eight cases of LLT were retrieved from departmental and consult archives (including 8 from a prior series). The cohort comprised 28 patients (8 males, 20 females) with a median age of 28 years (range: 1-80 years). There were 17 primary LLT of the vulva. Other anatomical sites included the scrotum (n = 3), spermatic cord (n = 2), inguinal region (n = 2), limbs (n = 2), pelvis (n = 1), and retroperitoneum (n = 1). Median tumor size was 6.0 cm (range: 1.8-30.0 cm). The tumors had a lobulated architecture and were typically composed of adipocytes, lipoblasts, and spindle cells in a myxoid stroma with prominent thin-walled vessels. Using immunohistochemistry, a subset showed loss of Rb expression (12/23 of samples). Follow-up in 15 patients (median: 56 months) revealed 8 patients with local recurrence and 1 patient with metastases to the lung/pleura and breasts. Targeted DNA sequencing revealed a simple genomic profile with limited copy number alterations and low mutational burden. No alterations in RB1 were identified. The metastatic LLT showed concurrent pathogenic PIK3CA and MTOR activating mutations, both in the primary and in the lung/pleural metastasis; the latter also harbored TERT promoter mutation. One tumor had a pathogenic TSC1 mutation, and one tumor showed 2-copy deletion of CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP. No biologically significant variants were identified in 8 tumors. No gene fusions were identified by RNA sequencing in 4 tumors successfully sequenced. This study expands the clinicopathologic spectrum of LLT, highlighting its wider anatomical distribution and potential for occasional metastasis. Molecularly, we identified activating mutations in the PI3K-MTOR signaling pathway in 2 tumors, which may contribute to exceptional aggressive behavior.

GLI1 Immunohistochemistry Distinguishes Mesenchymal Neoplasms With GLI1 Alterations From Morphologic Mimics.

Glioma-associated oncogene 1 ( GLI1 ) alterations have been described in pericytoma with t(7;12), gastroblastoma, plexiform fibromyxoma, and an emerging class of GLI1 -rearranged or amplified mesenchymal neoplasms including "nested glomoid neoplasm". The immunophenotype of these tumor types is nonspecific, making some cases difficult to diagnose without sequencing. The utility of GLI1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in distinguishing nested glomoid neoplasms and pericytomas with t(7;12) from morphologic mimics is unknown. To investigate the diagnostic value of GLI1 IHC, we determined its sensitivity and specificity in a "test cohort" of 23 mesenchymal neoplasms characterized by GLI1 alterations, including 12 nested glomoid neoplasms (7 GLI1 -rearranged, 4 GLI1 amplified, and 1 unknown GLI1 status), 9 pericytomas with t(7;12), 1 gastroblastoma, and 1 malignant epithelioid neoplasm with PTCH1 :: GLI1 fusion. GLI1 IHC was 91.3% sensitive in this cohort; all tumors except 2 pericytomas with t(7;12) expressed GLI1. GLI1 was also expressed in 1 of 8 (12%) plexiform fibromyxomas. Nineteen of 22 GLI1-positive tumors showed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, while 3 showed nuclear staining only. GLI1 IHC was 98.0% specific; among morphologic mimics [40 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 10 atypical lung carcinoids, 20 paragangliomas, 20 glomus tumors, 20 solitary fibrous tumors, 10 Ewing sarcomas, 10 alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS), 10 BCOR -altered sarcomas, 10 myoepitheliomas, 9 myopericytomas, 9 epithelioid schwannomas, 9 ossifying fibromyxoid tumors, 10 biphasic synovial sarcomas, 10 PEComas, 31 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 10 inflammatory fibroid polyps, 11 pseudoendocrine sarcomas], 5 of 249 tumors expressed GLI1 (2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, 1 ARMS, 1 Ewing sarcoma, 1 BCOR -altered sarcoma). GLI1 IHC was also performed on a separate cohort of 13 molecularly characterized mesenchymal neoplasms in which GLI1 copy number gain was identified as a putatively secondary event by DNA sequencing (5 dedifferentiated liposarcoma [DDLPS], 2 adenosarcomas, 2 unclassified uterine sarcomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, 1 ARMS, 1 intimal sarcoma, 1 osteosarcoma); 2 DDLPS, 1 ARMS, and 1 unclassified uterine sarcoma expressed GLI1. Lastly, because pleomorphic sarcomas sometimes show GLI1 amplification or copy number gain, GLI1 IHC was performed on a separate "pleomorphic sarcoma" cohort: GLI1 was expressed in 1 of 27 DDLPS, 1 of 9 leiomyosarcomas, and 2 of 10 pleomorphic liposarcomas, and it was negative in 23 well-differentiated liposarcomas and 9 unclassified pleomorphic sarcomas. Overall, GLI1 IHC was 91.3% sensitive and 98.0% specific for mesenchymal tumor types with driver GLI1 alterations among morphologic mimics. GLI1 expression was less frequent in other tumor types with GLI1 copy number gain. Given its specificity, in the appropriate morphologic context, GLI1 IHC may be a useful diagnostic adjunct for mesenchymal neoplasms with GLI1 alterations.

Concurrent inhibition of CDK2 adds to the anti-tumour activity of CDK4/6 inhibition in GIST.

BACKGROUND: Advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is characterised by genomic perturbations of key cell cycle regulators. Oncogenic activation of CDK4/6 results in RB1 inactivation and cell cycle progression. Given that single-agent CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy failed to show clinical activity in advanced GIST, we evaluated strategies for maximising response to therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition. METHODS: Targeted next-generation sequencing and multiplexed protein imaging were used to detect cell cycle regulator aberrations in GIST clinical samples. The impact of inhibitors of CDK2, CDK4 and CDK2/4/6 was determined through cell proliferation and protein detection assays. CDK-inhibitor resistance mechanisms were characterised in GIST cell lines after long-term exposure. RESULTS: We identify recurrent genomic aberrations in cell cycle regulators causing co-activation of the CDK2 and CDK4/6 pathways in clinical GIST samples. Therapeutic co-targeting of CDK2 and CDK4/6 is synergistic in GIST cell lines with intact RB1, through inhibition of RB1 hyperphosphorylation and cell proliferation. Moreover, RB1 inactivation and a novel oncogenic cyclin D1 resulting from an intragenic rearrangement (CCND1::chr11.g:70025223) are mechanisms of acquired CDK-inhibitor resistance in GIST. CONCLUSIONS: These studies establish the biological rationale for CDK2 and CDK4/6 co-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced GIST, including metastatic GIST progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Superficial CD34-Positive Fibroblastic Tumor: A Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Study of 59 Cases.

Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor (SCD34FT) is a rare soft tissue neoplasm that shows overlapping features with PRDM10 -rearranged soft tissue tumor ( PRDM10 -STT). This study characterizes the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of SCD34FT in a series of 59 cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess for PRDM10 rearrangement was performed in 12 tumors. Immunohistochemistry for CADM3 and WT1 was performed; CADM3 was also assessed in histologic mimics. Our cohort of 33 male and 26 female had a median age of 42 (range: 14 to 85) years. Tumors were most commonly located in the lower limb (73%), upper limb (8%), back (7%), and supraclavicular region (3%). The median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range: 1.0 to 9.0 cm). Clinical follow-up in 32 patients (median duration: 26 mo) revealed 2 local recurrences (6%). One patient developed regional lymph node metastases which were completely excised. Microscopically, SCD34FT comprised spindled and pleomorphic cells with glassy cytoplasm and occasional granular cell change. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed PRDM10 rearrangement in 3/8 cases (38%). SCD34FT frequently expressed CADM3 (95%) and WT1 (75%). CADM3 was less diffusely positive in pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor (40%), pleomorphic liposarcoma (20%), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (10%). We corroborate that SCD34FT is indolent but may rarely metastasize to lymph nodes without adverse outcomes. CADM3 and WT1 may be useful in the distinction from histologic mimics. Since cases of SCD34FT with and without demonstrable PRDM10 rearrangement were clinicopathologically indistinguishable, our study further supports that SCD34FT and PRDM10 -STT likely constitute a single entity.

YWHAE-NUTM2 oncoprotein regulates proliferation and cyclin D1 via RAF/MAPK and Hippo pathways.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is the second most common subtype of uterine mesenchymal cancer, after leiomyosarcoma, and oncogenic fusion proteins are found in many ESS. Our previous studies demonstrated transforming properties and diagnostic relevance of the fusion oncoprotein YWHAE-NUTM2 in high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) and showed that cyclin D1 is a diagnostic biomarker in these HG-ESS. However, YWHAE-NUTM2 mechanisms of oncogenesis and roles in cyclin D1 expression have not been characterized. In the current studies, we show YWHAE-NUTM2 complexes with both BRAF/RAF1 and YAP/TAZ in HG-ESS. These interactions are functionally relevant because YWHAE-NUTM2 knockdown in HG-ESS and other models inhibits RAF/MEK/MAPK phosphorylation, cyclin D1 expression, and cell proliferation. Further, cyclin D1 knockdown in HG-ESS dephosphorylates RB1 and inhibits proliferation. In keeping with these findings, we show that MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors have anti-proliferative effects in HG-ESS, and combinations of these inhibitors have synergistic activity. These findings establish that YWHAE-NUTM2 regulates cyclin D1 expression and cell proliferation by dysregulating RAF/MEK/MAPK and Hippo/YAP-TAZ signaling pathways. Recent studies demonstrate Hippo/YAP-TAZ pathway aberrations in many sarcomas, but this is among the first studies to demonstrate a well-defined oncogenic mechanism as the cause of Hippo pathway dysregulation.

Re-evaluating tumors of purported specialized prostatic stromal origin reveals molecular heterogeneity, including non-recurring gene fusions characteristic of uterine and soft tissue sarcoma subtypes.

Tumors of purported specialized prostatic stromal origin comprise prostatic stromal sarcomas (PSS) and stromal tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). Prior studies have described their clinicopathologic characteristics, but the molecular features remain incompletely understood. Moreover, these neoplasms are morphologically heterogeneous and the lack of specific adjunctive markers of prostatic stromal lineage make precise definition more difficult, leading some to question whether they represent a specific tumor type. In this study, we used next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing to profile 25 primary prostatic mesenchymal neoplasms of possible specialized prostatic stromal origin, including cases originally diagnosed as PSS (11) and STUMP (14). Morphologically, the series comprised 20 cases with solid architecture (11 PSS and 9 STUMP) and 5 cases with phyllodes-like growth pattern (all STUMP). Combined DNA and RNA sequencing results demonstrated that 19/22 (86%) cases that underwent successful sequencing (either DNA or RNA) harbored pathogenic somatic variants. Except for TP53 alterations (6 cases), ATRX mutations (2 cases), and a few copy number variants (-13q, -14q, -16q and +8/8p), the findings were largely nonrecurrent. Eight gene rearrangements were found, and 4 (NAB2-STAT6, JAZF1-SUZ12, TPM3-NTRK1 and BCOR-MAML3) were useful for reclassification of the cases as specific entities. The present study shows that mesenchymal neoplasms of the prostate are morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous and include neoplasms that harbor genetic aberrations seen in specific mesenchymal tumors arising in other anatomic sites, including soft tissue and the uterus. These data suggest that tumors of purported specialized prostatic stromal origin may perhaps not represent a single diagnostic entity or specific disease group and that alternative diagnoses should be carefully considered.

Relationships between highly recurrent tumor suppressor alterations in 489 leiomyosarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is the most common soft tissue and uterine sarcoma, but no standard therapy is available for recurrent or metastatic LMS. TP53, p16/RB1, and PI3K/mTOR pathway dysregulations are recurrent events, and some LMS express estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR). To characterize relationships between these pathway perturbations, the authors evaluated protein expression in soft tissue and uterine nonprimary leiomyosarcoma (np-LMS), including local recurrences and distant metastases. METHODS: TP53, RB1, p16, and PTEN expression aberrations were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 227 np-LMS and a comparison group of 262 primary leiomyosarcomas (p-LMS). Thirty-five of the np-LMS had a matched p-LMS specimen in the TMAs. Correlative studies included differentiation scoring, ER and PR IHC, and CDKN2A/p16 fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Dysregulation of TP53, p16/RB1, and PTEN was demonstrated in 90%, 95%, and 41% of np-LMS, respectively. PTEN inactivation was more common in soft tissue np-LMS than uterine np-LMS (55% vs 31%; P = .0005). Moderate-strong ER expression was more common in uterine np-LMS than soft tissue np-LMS (50% vs 7%; P < .0001). Co-inactivation of TP53 and RB1 was found in 81% of np-LMS and was common in both soft tissue and uterine np-LMS (90% and 74%, respectively). RB1, p16, and PTEN aberrations were nearly always conserved in p-LMS and np-LMS from the same patients. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that nearly all np-LMS have TP53 and/or RB1 aberrations. Therefore, therapies targeting cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint vulnerabilities should be prioritized for evaluations in LMS.

A Randomized Trial of Combined PD-L1 and CTLA-4 Inhibition with Targeted Low-Dose or Hypofractionated Radiation for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Prospective human data are lacking regarding safety, efficacy, and immunologic impacts of different radiation doses administered with combined PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter phase II study randomly assigning patients with metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to repeated low-dose fractionated radiation (LDFRT) or hypofractionated radiation (HFRT) with PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition. The primary endpoint was response outside the radiation field. Correlative samples were analyzed using multiplex immunofluorescence (IF), IHC, RNA/T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), and Olink. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were evaluable for response. Median lines of prior therapy were four (range, 1-7). Sixteen patients demonstrated toxicity potentially related to treatment (84%), and 8 patients had grade 3-4 toxicity (42%). Best response was stable disease in 1 patient with out-of-field tumor shrinkage. Median overall survival was 3.8 months (90% confidence interval, 2.3-5.7 months). Correlative IF and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed increased infiltration of CD8+ and CD8+/PD-1+/Ki-67+ T cells in the radiation field after HFRT. LDFRT increased foci of micronuclei/primary nuclear rupture in two subjects. CyTOF and RNA-seq demonstrated significant declines in multiple circulating immune populations, particularly in patients receiving HFRT. TCR sequencing revealed treatment-associated changes in T-cell repertoire in the tumor and peripheral blood. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility and safety of adding LDFRT and HFRT to PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade. Although the best response of stable disease does not support the use of concurrent PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition with HFRT or LDFRT in this population, biomarkers provide support that both LDFRT and HFRT impact the local immune microenvironment and systemic immunogenicity that can help guide future studies.

Mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract with NTRK rearrangements: a clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and molecular study of eight cases, emphasizing their distinction from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Mesenchymal tumors driven by NTRK fusions are clinically and morphologically heterogeneous. With an increasing number of clinicopathological entities being associated with NTRK fusions, the diagnostic and predictive value of the identification of NTRK fusions is uncertain. Recently, mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract with NTRK fusions were described as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but the nosology of such neoplasms remains controversial. We report eight mesenchymal tumors involving the gastrointestinal tract with NTRK1 or NTRK3 rearrangements. The tumors occurred in six children and two adults, five males and three females (age range 2 months-55 years; median 3.5 years), and involved the small intestine (n = 4), stomach (n = 2), rectum (n = 1), and mesentery (n = 1). Clinical outcomes were variable, ranging from relatively indolent (n = 2) to aggressive diseases (n = 2). Morphologically, the tumors were heterogeneous and could be classified in the following three groups: (1) infantile fibrosarcoma involving the gastrointestinal tract (n = 4), enriched for NTRK3 fusions; (2) low-grade CD34-positive, S100 protein-positive spindle-cell tumors, associated with NTRK1 fusions (n = 2); and (3) unclassified high-grade spindle-cell sarcomas, with NTRK1 fusions (n = 2). By immunohistochemistry, the tumors demonstrated diffuse pan-TRK expression, of variable intensity, and lacked a specific line of differentiation. Four cases expressed CD34, which was coexpressed with S100 protein in three cases. Expression of SOX10, KIT, and DOG1 was consistently absent. Molecular genetic testing identified TPM3-NTRK1 (n = 3), TPR-NTRK1, LMNA-NTRK1, and ETV6-NTRK3 (n = 2), and SPECC1L-NTRK3 in-frame gene fusions. We conclude that the evaluation of mesenchymal spindle-cell neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract without a definitive line of differentiation should include interrogation of NTRK alterations, particularly in pediatric patients. Mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract with NTRK rearrangements are clinically and morphologically heterogeneous, and few, if any, seem related to GIST.

NR4A3 Immunohistochemistry Reliably Discriminates Acinic Cell Carcinoma from Mimics.

Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) harbors a recurrent t(4;9)(q13;q31) translocation, which leads to upregulation of Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 3 (NR4A3). Previous work on tissue microarrays suggests that NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) may be useful in the diagnosis of AciCC. Thus far, only a single study has evaluated the utility of NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the diagnosis of AciCC, using a tissue microarray to assess most non-AciCC tumor types. Herein we evaluate the diagnostic performance of NR4A3 IHC for AciCC in a large cohort of 157 salivary gland tumors, using whole tissue sections. The cohort consisted of 37 AciCC (6 of them (16%) with high grade transformation), 30 secretory carcinomas (SC), and 90 additional salivary gland tumors, including mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC), polymorphous adenocarcinomas (PAC), pleomorphic adenomas (PA), salivary duct carcinomas (SDC), and adenoid cystic carcinomas (AdCC). NR4A3 nuclear staining by IHC was considered positive if present in more than 5% of tumor cells. Overall, 92% of AciCC (34/37) expressed NR4A3 by IHC, with strong (89%) or moderate (3%) nuclear staining, yielding a sensitivity of 92%. IHC detected NR4A3 expression in all cases of recurrent/metastatic AciCC and tumors with high grade transformation. Importantly, all SC were negative for NR4A3 IHC, with no staining in 28/30 cases and weak focal staining, in < 5% of cells, in 2/30 (7%). Similarly, all MEC (20/20), SDC (20/20) and AdCC (10/10) were negative for NR4A3 by IHC, as were most PA (18/20; 15%) and PAC (18/20; 5%). Two PA and two PAC showed multifocal expression of NR4A3 in more than 5% of cells, of weak intensity in 3 cases and moderate in 1 PAC, yielding an overall specificity of 97% for NR4A3 IHC for the diagnosis of AciCC. In conclusion, NR4A3 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for AciCC; moderate to strong and/or diffuse NR4A3 expression is a consistent and diagnostic feature of AciCC.