RESUMO
Factors correlating with successful administration of flu vaccine in an emergency department (ED) were examined. Patients 18 years and older were screened for indications for flu immunization. Vaccine was offered to those with indications. Of 3425 patients screened, 1311 had indications, 705 of 1311 agreed to immunization, and 513 of 705 were immunized. Factors related to immunization agreement were comorbidity, interviewer, and being 50 to 64 years old with prior immunization. Immunization factors were month, comorbidity, and not being pregnant. Factors associated with suboptimal acceptance and receipt should be addressed in future efforts.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Programas de Imunização , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
We determined if a patient-self assessment/provider reminder tool (A/R) would increase administration of the eight vaccines that may be indicated for adults. In three family practice clinics, the A/R was completed by intervention patients and given to their provider. Control patients received an exercise reminder. On the day of the intervention, influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccines vaccine were administered significantly (P<0.01) more commonly to intervention patients in one clinic, Td in the second, and none in the third. There were no additional significant differences during one year of follow-up. A number of barriers to comprehensive vaccination were encountered.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Alerta , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina contra Varicela , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza , Masculino , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Toxoide TetânicoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Eight or more vaccines may be indicated for adults in the United States. Determining if any vaccines are needed requires integrating information on the patient's demographic and behavioral risk factors and health status, the health status of the patient's close contacts, and the patient's immunization history. This process can be time consuming for providers and their staff. We used patient self-assessment as a method of determining which vaccines are indicated for a patient and whether indicated vaccines had been received. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional convenience sample of 300 adults in three family practice settings. Participants completed a self-assessment tool to determine if influenza, pneumococcal, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), tetanus, hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines were indicated and previously received. A chart audit was then performed to obtain similar information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement (kappa statistic [< 0.00: poor agreement; 0.00-0.20: slight; 0.21-0.40: fair; 0.41-0.60: moderate; 0.61-0.80: substantial; 0.81-1.00: almost perfect]) between the self-assessment tool and the audit for (1) indicated vaccines and (2) previous receipt of indicated vaccines indicated according to both the assessment form and the audit. RESULTS: Agreement between the self-assessment tool and chart review was substantial or better only for pneumococcal and MMR vaccines (kappa=0.65 and 0.85, respectively). For influenza vaccine, agreement improved (from kappa = 0.56 to kappa = 0.74) when indications attributable to health conditions of family members were excluded. Agreement regarding receipt of vaccines was highest for influenza vaccine (kappa = 0.70). Only 57% of patients correctly recalled tetanus vaccination that were documented in the medical record (kappa = -0.04). Kappa statistics were unreliable for hepatitis A and B vaccines because so few vaccinations had been received. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies in agreement regarding indications for vaccines appeared to result from absence of information in the medical record regarding high risk behaviors and family contacts. Lack of agreement regarding vaccines that had been previously been received appeared due to both poor recall and lack of documentation. Combining medical record audit with self-assessment may be the most complete assessment of vaccination status of adults, but requires reconciling disagreements. Electronic medical records and registries that contain information about risk factors and previously administered vaccines may be necessary to overcome some these problems.