Multi-omic features of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is a poor prognosis cancer and the molecular features underpinning response to treatment remain unclear. We investigate whole genome, transcriptomic and methylation data from 115 oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients mostly from the DOCTOR phase II clinical trial (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12609000665235), with exploratory analysis pre-specified in the study protocol of the trial. We report genomic features associated with poorer overall survival, such as the APOBEC mutational and RS3-like rearrangement signatures. We also show that positron emission tomography non-responders have more sub-clonal genomic copy number alterations. Transcriptomic analysis categorises patients into four immune clusters correlated with survival. The immune suppressed cluster is associated with worse survival, enriched with myeloid-derived cells, and an epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature. The immune hot cluster is associated with better survival, enriched with lymphocytes, myeloid-derived cells, and an immune signature including CCL5, CD8A, and NKG7. The immune clusters highlight patients who may respond to immunotherapy and thus may guide future clinical trials.

Laparoscopic fundoplication versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in obese patients: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is the standard surgical procedure for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is commonly performed to achieve weight loss in obese patients, but it also has anti-reflux properties. Hence, in the obese population suffering from GORD, LRYGB could be an alternative to LF. The aim of this trial will be to compare LF and LRYGB in an obese population presenting with GORD and being considered for surgery. METHODS: This will be an investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial. The research population will be obese patients (BMI 30-34.9 with waist circumference more than 88 cm (women) or more than 102 cm (men), or BMI 35-40 with any waist circumference) referred to a public hospital for consideration of anti-reflux surgery. The primary aim of the study will be to determine the efficacy of LF compared with LRYGB on subjective and objective control of GORD. Secondary aims include determining early and late surgical morbidity and the side-effect profile of LF compared with LRYGB and to quantify any non-reflux benefits of LRYGB (including overall quality of life) compared with LF. CONCLUSION: This trial will determine whether LRYGB is effective and acceptable as an alternative to LF for the surgical treatment of GORD in obese patients Registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12622000636752p (https://www.anzctr.org.au/).

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Isolated Limb Infusion for Locoregionally Metastatic Melanoma: An International Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally invasive procedure for delivering high-dose regional chemotherapy to patients with locally advanced or in-transit melanoma located on a limb. The current international multicenter study evaluated the perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes for patients who underwent ILI for stage 3B or 3C melanoma. METHODS: Patients undergoing a first-time ILI for stage 3B or 3C melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] 7th ed) between 1992 and 2018 at five Australian and four United States of America (USA) tertiary referral centers were identified. The primary outcome measures included treatment response, in-field (IPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 687 first-time ILIs were performed (stage 3B: n = 383, 56%; stage 3C; n = 304, 44%). Significant limb toxicity (Wieberdink grade 4) developed in 27 patients (3.9%). No amputations (grade 5) were performed. The overall response rate was 64.1% (complete response [CR], 28.9%; partial response [PR], 35.2%). Stable disease (SD) occurred in 14.5% and progressive disease (PD) in 19.8% of the patients. The median follow-up period was 47 months, with a median OS of 38.2 months. When stratified by response, the patients with a CR or PR had a significantly longer median IPFS (21.9 vs 3.0 months; p < 0.0001), DPFS (53.6 vs 12.7 months; p < 0.0001), and OS (46.5 vs 24.4 months; p < 0.0001) than the nonresponders (SD + PD). CONCLUSION: This study is the largest to date reporting long-term outcomes of ILI for locoregionally metastatic melanoma. The findings demonstrate that ILI is effective and safe for patients with stage 3B or 3C melanoma confined to a limb. A favorable response to ILI is associated with significantly longer IFPS, DPFS, and OS.

Patients with in-transit melanoma metastases have comparable survival outcomes following isolated limb infusion or intralesional PV-10-A propensity score matched, single center study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) and intralesional PV-10 are well described locoregional therapies for in-transit melanoma. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of these treatments on survival outcomes within a cohort matched for key characteristics. METHODS: Patients were treated using ILI or intralesional PV-10 at a single institution and the data prospectively recorded. Propensity score matching was performed using key covariates within a logistic regression model. The primary outcome was the melanoma-specific survival. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients nonrandomized were successfully matched. Both treatments produced similar best overall responses. The median melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was 74.4 months from ILI and 36.4 months from PV-10 treatments (P = 0.164). Within the ILI subgroup, the 12-, 24-, 36- and 60-month MSS rates were 85.3%, 75.3%, 60.1%, and 60.1%, respectively. From the time of PV-10 the corresponding 12-, 24-, 36-, and 60-month MSS rates were 82.6%, 70.0%, 53.9%, and 35.9%. On multivariate analysis, there was a significant difference in survival comparing completely with noncomplete responders ( P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that ILI and PV-10 treatments for in-transit disease produce comparable long-term survival. Both therapies have reproducible response rates and predominantly localized and tolerable side-effects.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. METHODS: A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.

An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy.

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been effectively expanded to various surgical specialities including oesophagectomy. Despite nutrition being a key component, actual nutrition outcomes and specific guidelines are lacking. This cohort comparison study aims to compare nutritional status and adherence during implementation of a standardised post-operative nutritional support protocol, as part of ERAS, compared to those who received usual care. METHODS: Two groups of patients undergoing resection of oesophageal cancer were studied. Group 1 (n = 17) underwent oesophagectomy between Oct 2014 and Nov 2016 during implementation of an ERAS protocol. Patients in group 2 (n = 16) underwent oesophagectomy between Jan 2011 and Dec 2012 prior to the implementation of ERAS. Demographic, nutritional status, dietary intake and adherence data were collected. Ordinal data was analysed using independent t tests, and categorical data using chi-square tests. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in nutrition status, dietary intake or length of stay following implementation of an ERAS protocol. Malnutrition remained prevalent in both groups at day 42 post surgery (n = 10, 83% usual care; and n = 9, 60% ERAS). A significant difference was demonstrated in adherence with earlier initiation of oral free fluids (p <0.008), transition to soft diet (p <0.004) and continuation of jejunostomy feeds on discharge (p <0.000) for the ERAS group. CONCLUSION: A standardised post-operative nutrition protocol, within an ERAS framework, results in earlier transition to oral intake; however, malnutrition remains prevalent post surgery. Further large-scale studies are warranted to examine individualised decision-making regarding nutrition support within an ERAS protocol.

Patterns of Recurrence in Patients with Stage IIIB/C Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck Following Surgery With and Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: Is Isolated Regional Recurrence Salvageable?

BACKGROUND: Understanding recurrence patterns is vital for guiding treatment. This study describes recurrence patterns for patients with stage IIIB/C head and neck melanoma (HNM) after therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) ± adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). We also report outcomes for salvage therapy for patients with isolated regional relapse. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institution prospective database of 173 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIIB/C HNM undergoing TLND between 1997 and 2012 was retrospectively reviewed. Timing and patterns of recurrence were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were undertaken using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods to determine factors predictive of recurrence. Median follow-up was 32 months. RESULTS: Adjuvant RT was administered to 66/173 (38 %) patients. Patients selected for RT had a higher AJCC stage and had more extracapsular invasion. The 5-year distant, cervical nodal and in-transit recurrence rates were 38, 10, and 13 %, respectively, following surgery alone compared with 60, 17, and 31 %, respectively, for the adjuvant RT group. The head and neck regional 5-year recurrence rate (combining in-basin nodal and in-transit) was 23 % for the entire cohort. Isolated cervical recurrence occurred in 19 patients: 17/19 underwent salvage surgery (10/17 patients received RT after salvage surgery) and 2/19 had RT alone. However, distant recurrence occurred in 12/19 salvage patients, with most occurring within 12 months, while 4/19 were disease free. CONCLUSIONS: Using a selective approach for adjuvant RT, isolated cervical recurrence after TLND is uncommon. Isolated cervical recurrence can be salvaged effectively with further local therapy; however, distant disease frequently follows.

A novel treatment for metastatic melanoma with intralesional rose bengal and radiotherapy: a case series.

Three patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with intralesional rose bengal followed by external beam radiotherapy. In all cases patients had an impressive response without significant increase in acute radiation reaction.

A prospective phase II study of adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy following nodal surgery in malignant melanoma-Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Study 96.06.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant postoperative therapy after resection of localised malignant melanoma involving regional lymph nodes remains controversial. There are no randomised trials that confirm that postoperative radiation conveys a benefit in terms of regional control or survival. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients with melanoma involving lymph nodes were registered on a prospective study to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiation therapy. The regimen consisted of 48Gy in 20 fractions to the nodal basin using recommended treatment guidelines for each of the major node sites. The primary endpoints were regional in-field relapse and late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were adjacent relapse, distant relapse, overall survival, progression-free survival and time to in-field progression. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiation therapy was well tolerated by all of the patients. As the first site of relapse, regional in-field relapses occurred in 16/234 patients (6.8%). The overall survival was 36% at 5 years. The progression-free survival and regional control rates were 27% and 91%, respectively, at 5 years. Patients with more than 2 nodes involved had a significantly worse outcome in terms of distant relapse, overall and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: We believe that adjuvant radiation therapy following nodal surgery could offer a possible benefit in terms of regional control. These results require confirmation in a randomised trial.

Feasibility of chemoradiation therapy with protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer patients not suitable for cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation therapy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer in patients not fit for surgery. The regimen most commonly used includes cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Little data exists regarding alternative chemotherapy regimens in patients not suitable for cisplatin. We report on a regimen using protracted infusion 5-fluorouracil alone for both curative and palliative indications. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with localized esophageal cancer suitable for curative chemoradiation therapy and 24 patients suitable for palliative therapy were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) daily throughout the radiation therapy. The radiation dose was 56 to 60 Gy in 28 to 30 fractions (curative patients) and 30 to 35 Gy in 15 fractions (palliative patients). RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 75 years. The regimen was tolerable. Significant grade 3 toxicities experienced were esophagitis (11%) and venous catheter toxicity (9%). The median survival was 17 months for curative patients and 9 months for palliative patients. The complete response rate was 86% endoscopically and 45% radiologically for curative patients. Relief of dysphagia was experienced in 67% of palliative patients. Quality of life was satisfactory in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil given concurrently with radiation therapy is a useful alternative to platinum-based chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.