Validity of the Self- Mini Nutritional Assessment (Self- MNA) for the Evaluation of Nutritional Risk. A Cross- Sectional Study Conducted in General Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is a frequent condition in the elderly especially in hospitals and in nursing homes, and even among the free-living elders the prevalence is not negligible (5-10%). Awareness towards malnutrition is still limited. The lack of time for nutritional assessment by the overcommitted healthcare personnel, including the general practitioners (GPs), may represent one possible explanation for limited recognition of malnutrition. Therefore, a self-administered instrument could be useful in raising alert on the GPs and allow early detection of malnutrition and early care provision. The aim of the present study was to analyze the validity of the Self-MNA that takes cue from the Mini Nutritional Assessment- Short Form (MNA-SF) and has been adapted to be self-administered by free-living elderly subjects. METHODS: Participants were recruited from patients referring to the GP offices in Italy. Nutritional evaluation was performed through the administration of Full-MNA, MNA-SF and Self-MNA. The comorbidity level was assessed through the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). The level of difficulty in filling out the test was reported by the participants, and the time spent to complete the Self-MNA was also registered. RESULTS: A total of 226 subjects, 125 women and 101 men (75.1 ±8 and 75.3 ± 8 years old, respectively; p=0.89) were enrolled, and 214 (94.7%) of them completed the Self-MNA. According with the Full-MNA test score, 8.4% of women and 3.5% of men were classified as malnourished, whereas 32.7% of women and 31.4% of men were at risk of malnutrition. Agreement between Self-MNA and Full-MNA, and Self-MNA vs. MNA-SF was classified as "moderate" (k = 0.476 and 0.496 respectively; p < 0.001). Self-MNA showed a fair predictive value compared to the Full-MNA and MNA-SF tests (76.6 and 79.9%, respectively) with a barely adequate sensitivity (70.9 and 75.4%, respectively). The analysis of the characteristics of FN (false negative: subjects who were considered at risk of malnutrition or malnourished at Full-MNA but not at Self-MNA) showed that the clinical and functional aspects of these subjects (age, comorbidity and severity, time necessary to complete the Self-MNA, decrease in food intake, severe illness in the past 3 months, dementia and depression, fluid intake, need for feeding assistance, arm and calf circumferences) were very similar to the characteristics of true positive subjects. Patients required 6.7 ± 4.5 minutes to complete the test and 25 subjects (11.7%) needed more than 10 minutes, up to a maximum of 30 minutes. Patients who stated a greater difficulty were older (79.8 ± 7 vs. 73.5 ± 7 years; p<0.001), they were more «malnourished¼ at Full-MNA (10.7 vs. 1,7%; p= 0.006) and clinical status was characterized by a higher severity index (1.72 ± 0.6 vs. 1.41 ± 0.4; p= 0.008). CONCLUSION: In the present study we investigated the validity of the Self-MNA in a sample of free-living elderly subjects. The results obtained confirm the validity of the test that may represent a useful tool for the GPs, although some important limitations need to be considered, limiting its use in clinical practice.

Persistence with denosumab therapy in women affected by osteoporosis with fragility fractures: a multicenter observational real practice study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Persistence is commonly considered a key factor for the successful management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Denosumab is the first biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis with satisfying data regarding the persistence with this therapy. AIM: The purpose of this multicenter observational real practice study was to evaluate the persistence with denosumab treatment in post-menopausal women affected by osteoporosis. MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Women were recruited in four specialized centers for the management of osteoporosis in North, Center and South of Italy. We included women with a diagnosis of post-menopausal osteoporosis, aged >50 years, able to obtain a prescription according to the Italian reimbursement criteria in force during the study period for anti-osteoporotic pharmacological treatment. They initiated a treatment with subcutaneous denosumab (Prolia®) 60 mg/every 6 months between November 2011 and May 2016. Women who had received aromatase inhibitors were excluded. Patients were assessed at baseline and every 6 months for all treatment length. Persistence data were evaluated for a total of 36 months. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy women were enrolled; mean aged 70 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2. At the Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment, the mean lumbar spine T-score was -2.76 ± 1.14 standard deviations (SD) and the mean femoral neck T-score was -2.49 ± 0.80 SD. During the study, the total persistence was 91.4%. Total dropouts were 75 (8.6%), higher within the initial 6-month period of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Persistence to denosumab treatment in our observational real practice study was very high. These results suggest that factors such as frequency of visits, pharmacological schedule, and opportunity to call the doctor might play an important role in the persistence and adherence to treatment to obtain maximum therapeutic effect and avoid further fragility fractures.

Lean mass in obese adult subjects correlates with higher levels of vitamin D, insulin sensitivity and lower inflammation.

AIM: Several chronic metabolic alterations are present in obese subjects. While it is well known about the detrimental effect of abdominal adipose tissue on chronic metabolic clinical condition, less is known on the role of lean mass in obese subjects. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the potential correlation of muscle mass, metabolic condition and inflammation status in obese individuals. METHODS: The study included 426 obese subjects (86 men and 340 female; mean age 44.8 ± 14 years; BMI: 34.9 ± 6.1 kg/m(2)). Exclusion criteria were chronic medical conditions or use of medications affecting bone metabolism, alterations of hormonal and nutritional status, vitamin D supplementation, recent weight loss and prior bariatric surgery. Patients underwent measurements of bone mineral density (lumbar and hip) and body composition (lean mass, total and trunk fat mass) by dual X-ray absorptiometry and were evaluated for hormonal and metabolic profile and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Higher lean body mass (LM%) was inversely correlated with homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (p < 0.0091; r(2) 0.03938) and associated with lower fibrinogen levels (p < 0.0001; r(2) 0.1263). Interestingly, in obese subjects, LM% was associated with higher levels of vitamin D (p < 0.0001, r(2) 0.1140), osteocalcin (p < 0.0001, r(2) 0.2401) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) (p < 0.0002, r(2) 0.1367). CONCLUSION: Our results show for the first time that in obese patients, higher amounts of lean mass are directly linked to a lower inflammatory profile and to better insulin sensitivity, but also to the presence of higher level of vitamin D and IGF-1. Moreover, these data suggest that higher levels of lean mass in obese people correlate with a better metabolic profile and, thus, strongly suggest the need to develop programs to facilitate an increase in physical activity in obese people.