Transient elastography evaluation of hepatic and spleen stiffness in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HES) has not been evaluated by transient elastography so far and its correlation with ultrasound variables remains to be defined. AIMS: The aim of this study was to describe the parameters of liver and spleen stiffness in HES assessed by transient elastography in comparison with cirrhotics and controls evaluating its correlation with ultrasonographic data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HES, hepatitis C virus-cirrhotic, and control patients were included in this sectional study. Liver and spleen stiffness were compared among the three groups. The ultrasonographic parameters were compared with transient elastography in HES patients. RESULTS: Thirty HES, 30 hepatitis C virus-cirrhotic patients, and 17 controls were included. Those with HES presented liver stiffness that was significantly higher than the controls and lower than the cirrhotics: 9.7 (3.6-75.0) versus 3.7 (2.8-5.4) versus 27.0 (14.7-61.5) kPa (P<0.001). Spleen stiffness values were comparable between hepatosplenic and cirrhotics: 66.4 (25.7-75.0) versus 69.1 (18.0-75.0) kPa (P=0.78) and were significantly higher than the controls 16.5 kPa (6.3-34.3) (P<0.001). In patients with HES, high spleen stiffness was associated with right liver lobe diameter (P=0.015), splenic artery resistance index (P=0.002), portal vein diameter (P=0.021), portal vein area (P=0.008), portal vein congestion index (P=0.035), splenic vein diameter (P=0.013), and spleen diameter (P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness may be a useful tool to differentiate portal hypertension related to cirrhosis from that of HES. High spleen stiffness is a potential surrogate marker of portal hypertension in this population.

Factors associated with carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaques in type 2 diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Factors associated with carotid atherosclerosis are unclear in type 2 diabetic patients. The aim was to investigate the independent correlates of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaques in these individuals. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we measured carotid IMT at three sites (common carotid, bifurcation and internal carotid artery) and the severity of extracranial carotid artery (ECCA) atherosclerosis by plaque score in 441 type 2 diabetic patients. Nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors [ambulatory blood pressures (BPs), aortic stiffness, C-reactive protein and ankle-brachial index) were obtained. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions assessed the independent correlates of carotid IMT and ECCA plaque score. RESULTS: Patients with greater carotid IMT or plaque scores had worse clinical and laboratory profile than those with lower IMT and plaque scores, including higher BPs, aortic stiffness and prevalences of diabetic complications. On multivariate analysis, carotid IMT and plaques were mainly associated with older age, male sex, current-past smoking and ambulatory BPs, but not with clinic BPs. Night-time pulse pressure was the most important modifiable determinant of increased carotid IMT. No microvascular complication was independently associated with carotid atherosclerosis, except retinopathy for plaque score. Additionally, internal carotid IMT and plaque score were associated with ankle-brachial index in the subgroup of patients without macrovascular diseases. CONCLUSION: In type 2 diabetic patients, older age, male sex, smoking status and ambulatory BPs, particularly night-time pulse pressure, were the main independent correlates of ultrasonographic carotid atherosclerosis. This finding reinforces the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring in type 2 diabetes management.