Surface topography of resorbable porcine collagen membranes, and their effect on early osteogenesis: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is based on the use of different membranes that function as sealants and barriers in specific clinical situations. Among the several tissue production methods and origins, resorbable porcine-derived membranes are the most commonly used. Because these membranes are so diverse, and have several different clinical applications, doubts linger as to their effect in stimulating osteogenesis. The objective of this study was to make an in vitro evaluation of the viability and differentiation of osteoblastic cells cultured on the surface of the following collagen membranes: Jason® (Botiss Biomaterials), Collprotect® (Botiss Biomaterials), and Bio-Gide® (Geistlich). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fragments of the 3 resorbable collagen membranes (5 × 5 mm) were used, and pre-osteoblastic SAOS-2 cells (ATCC, USA) were plated on their porous surfaces. Evaluation of the membranes was performed at 3, 5 and 7 days, considering the following parameters: (1) topographic analysis of the different surfaces by scanning electron microscope; (2) cellular viability by MTT, (3) quantification of type I collagen and osteopontin by Elisa. The quantitative analyses were carried out using a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Collprotect® and Jason® membranes presented a rough surface with an irregular aspect on both sides, while double-layered Bio-Gide® had one layer with a smooth surface and the other with a rough surface along each respective length. The viability assays revealed that the cells cultured the cells grown on Collprotect® showed higher viability than those grown in Bio-Gide® or Jason®, especially after 5 and 7 days. After 3 and 5 days, evaluation of type I collagen showed that the cells plated on the Jason® and Collprotect® surfaces had greater collagen secretion than those plated on BioGide®. After 7 days, an increase in osteopontin levels was observed when the cells were plated on all the experimental membranes, compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: All the tested membranes were suitable for use in GTR clinical procedures. Their indication in specific regenerative cases depends on the mechanical and biological properties of their originating tissues, thus enabling better results and assertive choices by dental professionals.

Awareness regarding antimicrobial resistance and confidence to prescribe antibiotics in dentistry: a cross-continental student survey.

BACKGROUND: The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis is a major global threat and one of its biggest drivers is the overuse of antibiotics in humans. Dentists are responsible for 5-10% antibiotic prescriptions worldwide and recent data suggest that knowledge and prescribing practices need improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-survey was sent to dental students from six universities in Norway, Canada, and Brazil. Topics addressed covered awareness, confidence to prescribe antibiotics, and education needs. Data were presented descriptively and statistical testing was employed to compare group means when applicable. RESULTS: In total, 562 responses were collected across the three countries with a response rate of 28.6%. 'Antibiotic resistance' was among the highest priorities (scale 1-10) with an average of 8.86 (SEM ± 0.05), together with 'Gender inequality' (8.68 ± 0.07) and 'Climate change' (8.68 ± 0.07). Only 28.8% thought that Dentistry was engaged in national/international campaigns promoting awareness on the topic and 8.9% stated to have heard about the 'One Health' concept. Final year dental students showed an average confidence to prescribe antibiotics of 7.59 (± 0.14). Most students demonstrated interest in receiving additional education on all topics listed, with the three most pressing being 'antibiotic prescription for treatment of infections' (82.9%), 'drug interactions' (80.9%), and 'spread of antibiotic resistance' (79.6%). A trend was observed between higher awareness regarding the topic and higher confidence to prescribe. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to revisit dental education on antibiotic resistance with a global perspective and to create more stewardship initiatives that promote awareness on the topic.