Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 23(1): e33-e41, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35383710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis are cranial deformities resulting from the early closure of 1 or more sutures. Concomitant facial changes are complex and usually result from the involvement of multiple sutures, which may lead to restriction of cranial growth and brain expansion, ocular compression, and breathing difficulties. Surgical techniques to correct syndromic craniosynostosis have improved over time, considerably reducing the rate of complications of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To describe in detail (step-by-step) and with pertinent anatomic considerations the technique of monobloc frontofacial advancement using internal distractors. METHODS: We describe the monobloc frontofacial advancement technique with the use of internal distractors, which we use in patients with primary syndromic craniosynostosis (Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer) who have major facial hypoplasia and secondary respiratory repercussions. To illustrate this technique, the procedure was performed in 2 cranial models: an adult artificial acrylic skull of normal morphology for better evidence of anatomic repairs and a 3-dimensional printed infant skull from a tomography file obtained from a child diagnosed with Apert syndrome. RESULTS: The benefits of osteogenic distraction and better surgical timing for each procedure are presented. We presented the changes and details of osteotomies performed during the procedure, as well as anatomic details and care regarding the pterygomaxillary dysjunction. CONCLUSION: Monobloc frontofacial distraction is a procedure with widely demonstrated aesthetic and functional results, and this detailed step-by-step description may improve familiarity with the anatomic landmarks of the procedure and provide a better dynamic understanding of the distraction process.


Assuntos
Acrocefalossindactilia , Disostose Craniofacial , Craniossinostoses , Acrocefalossindactilia/diagnóstico por imagem , Acrocefalossindactilia/cirurgia , Adulto , Criança , Disostose Craniofacial/diagnóstico por imagem , Disostose Craniofacial/cirurgia , Craniossinostoses/diagnóstico por imagem , Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Osteotomia/métodos
2.
World Neurosurg ; 141: e324-e333, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32445896

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical assistance applications for smartphones have the potential to be used in daily practice; however, regular reviews of these tools are required. StereoCheck (Mevis, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) is a mobile application (app) designed to compute stereotactic coordinates as a checking tool. The present study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the StereoCheck app. METHODS: The present observational and prospective study included 26 patients who had undergone frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy. A standard stereotactic planning software (Framelink, version 5.0 [Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA]) was used to define the target coordinates. The surgical planning images were transferred to StereoCheck using 2 image input methods: photographs of the screen monitor and digitally exported images of the screen monitor. Five examiners performed the target coordinate definitions using StereoCheck on 2 occasions. The accuracy and reliability of the app were evaluated in tests that compared the planning methods (app vs. standard software), multiple examiners, and sequential tests. RESULTS: The StereoCheck accuracy using photographs of the screen was 2.71 ± 0.86 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.37-3.06). Using the digitally exported images, it was 0.82 ± 0.61 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.07). The accuracy between the 2 methods was greater using the exported images (P < 0.01) and was not affected by the clinical and radiological features. The accuracy of StereoCheck among multiple examiners and in sequential tests showed a mean distance between the targets and coordinates of <1.00 mm. Thus, an excellent level of reliability for the StereoCheck coordinates (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.8) was verified in all contexts. CONCLUSION: StereoCheck showed satisfactory accuracy and reliability. The use of photographs to compute the coordinates could lead to a significant decrease in the accuracy of the app.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/cirurgia , Aplicativos Móveis , Smartphone , Técnicas Estereotáxicas , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/instrumentação , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional/instrumentação , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...