Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing for osteoporotic ankle fractures in the frail patient: a narrative review with a clinical score proposal for the decision-making process.

Osteoporotic ankle fractures result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture, known as 'low-energy' trauma, such as those equivalent to a fall from a standing height or less. Osteoporotic ankle fractures in frail patients are becoming more and more frequent in daily practice and represent a therapeutic challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The main problems with frail patients are the poor condition of the soft tissues around the ankle, dependence for activities of daily living and high comorbidity. The decision to operate on these patients is complex because conservative treatment is poorly tolerated in unstable fractures and conventional open reduction and internal fixation is associated with a high rate of complications. The authors conducted a narrative review of the literature on primary tibiotalocalcaneal nailing of ankle fractures in frail patients and categorized the different factors to consider when treatment is indicated for this conditon. Difficulty of ambulation, age over 65 years old, deteriorated baseline state and instability of the fracture were the most frequently considered factors. Finally, the authors propose an easy and quick clinical scoring system to help in the decision-making process, although further comparative studies are required to explore its validity.

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures With a Loose Stem: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Stem Revision.

BACKGROUND: It is recommended revision for periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHF) with a loose stem. However, several authors have argued that under certain conditions, this fracture could be treated using osteosynthesis. The aim is to compare stem revision versus internal fixation in the treatment of PPHF with a loose stem. METHODS: All patients with PPHF with a loose stem treated by osteosynthesis and stem revision between January 2009 and January 2019 were included. We assessed hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Charlson comorbidity index, surgery time, blood transfusion, complications, reoperation rate, first-year mortality, radiological, and functional results. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included (40 osteosyntheses and 17 stem revision), with an average follow-up time of 3.1 years. Their mean age was 78.47 years (R 45-92). In the osteosynthesis group, fewer patients required blood transfusion (32.5% vs. 70.6%), surgical times were shorter (108 minutes vs. 169 minutes), and the cost was lower, both in terms of total cost (€14,239.07 vs. €21,498.45 and operating room cost (€5014.63 vs. €8203.34). No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of complications, reoperation rate, or functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Compared with stem revision, osteosynthesis requires less surgery time, has a lower need for blood transfusions, and a reduced hospital cost. Stem revision remains the treatment of choice in PPHF with a loose stem, but in V-B2 fractures in elderly patients with low functional demand, high anesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥3), and many comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥5) in whom anatomic reconstruction is possible, osteosynthesis can be a viable option. EVIDENCE LEVEL: Historical cohorts. Level III.

Prevalence of bone marrow edema in a study population with foot and/or ankle pain.

Bone marrow edema (BME) is an imaging diagnosis defined by an abnormal accumulation of intraosseous interstitial fluid within a bone on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigation. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BME in patients with foot and/or ankle pain studied using MRI. This was a retrospective observational work on patient cases and controls studied through MRI of the foot and/or ankle at our Foot and Ankle Unit (FAU). An analytical statistical analysis and a multivariate analysis were performed to eliminate possible confounding factors. 1950 foot and/or ankle MRI cases were reviewed, of which 451 presented bone edema (23% prevalence). The average patient age was 51.8 (range, 7-87); the talus bone was most frequently affected: post-traumatic in 43.5% of cases, degenerative in 34.7% and there was no specific cause identified in 6.3% (these cases were termed 'idiopathic'). With regards to risk factors, in the case of gender, the odds ratio (OR) of men suffering bone oedema was 1.5 times higher than that of women (P = 0.003); for immunosuppression the OR was 3.4 times higher (P = 0.001); while among those with a smoking habit it was 0.59 (P = 0.001), meaning that after ruling smoking out as a possible confounding factor, it was, in fact, revealed to be a protective factor. The prevalence of bone edema in MRI in patients with foot and/or ankle pain was 23%. The average patient was male, aged approximately 50, with traumatic or degenerative origin talus bone oedema. Level of Evidence: Level IV, revision observational study.