Unrestricted vs 3-day low-residue diet for colonoscopy preparation. Results of a feasibility randomized trial.

AIM: To compare the impact of an unrestricted diet with a 3-day low-residue diet before colonoscopy on bowel preparation quality. METHODS: A randomized, multicenter, researcher-blinded, parallel-group feasibility trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of an unrestricted diet versus a 3-day low-residue diet for colonoscopy preparation. Participants, aged 50 to 69, were enrolled in a colorectal cancer screening program with no factors linked to poor bowel cleansing. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale was used to evaluate colon preparation during intubation and withdrawal. Secondary outcomes included bowel exploration time, adenoma and polyp detection rates, and preparation and diet tolerability. The trial is registered under Clinical Trials (NCT04664543). RESULTS: One hundred and two individuals (mean age 59.3 ± 5.5 years, 40.1% female) were randomly assigned to each diet. All participants in both groups achieved adequate preparation (Boston scores ≥ 2 in each segment). Complete adherence to preparation was observed in the majority of participants in both groups. No significant differences were noted between groups in withdrawal or cecal intubation times, or in adenoma detection rates. The unrestricted diet was better tolerated than the 3-day low-residue diet (82.5% vs. 32.3%). Preparation assessed during intubation was adequate in 82.5% of the unrestricted diet group and in 90.3% of the 3-day low-residue diet group. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to test the impact of an unrestricted diet for adequate bowel preparation. Comparable cleansing results were achieved, but the unrestricted diet showed better tolerability.

Restrictive diets are unnecessary for colonoscopy: Non-inferiority randomized trial.

Background and study aims In colonoscopy, preparation is often regarded as the most burdensome part of the intervention. Traditionally, specific diets have been recommended, but the evidence to support this policy is insufficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the decision not to follow a restrictive diet on bowel preparation and colonoscopy outcomes. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, controlled, non-inferiority randomized trial with FIT-positive screening colonoscopy. The subjects were assigned to follow the current standard (1-day low residue diet [LRD]) or a liberal diet. The allocation was balanced for the risk of inadequate cleansing using the Dik et al. score. All participants received the same instructions for morning colonoscopy preparation. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate preparations as defined by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Secondary outcomes included tolerability and measures of colonoscopy performance and quality. Results A total of 582 subjects were randomized. Of these, 278 who received the liberal diet and 275 who received the 1-day LRD were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Non-inferiority was demonstrated with adequate preparation rates of 97.8% in the 1-day LRD and 96.4% in the liberal diet group. Tolerability was higher with the liberal diet (94.7% vs. 83.2%). No differences were found with respect to cecal intubation time, aspirated volume, or length of the examination. Global and right colon average adenoma detection rates per colonoscopy were similar. Conclusions The liberal diet was non-inferior to the 1-day LRD, and increased tolerability. Colonoscopy performance and quality were not affected. (NCT05032794).

Diagnostic accuracy of the Oakland score versus haemoglobin for predicting outcomes in lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) is a common cause of hospitalization. Recent guidelines recommend the use of prognostic scales for risk stratification. However, it remains unclear whether risk scores are more accurate than some simpler prognostic variables. OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive values of haemoglobin alone and the Oakland score for predicting outcomes in ALGIB patients. DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective study at a University Hospital. Data were extracted from the hospital's clinical records. The Oakland score was calculated at admission. Study outcomes were defined according to the original article describing the Oakland score: safe discharge (the primary Oakland score outcome), transfusion, rebleeding, readmission, therapeutic intervention and death. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve and accuracy using haemoglobin and the Oakland score were calculated for each outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients were included. Eighty-four (32.6%) needed transfusion, 50 (19.4%) presented rebleeding, 31 (12.1%) required therapeutic intervention, 20 (7.8%) were readmitted and six (2.3%) died. There were no differences in the AUROC curve values for haemoglobin versus the Oakland score with regard to safe discharge (0.82 (0.77-0.88) vs 0.80 (0.74-0.86), respectively) or to therapeutic intervention and death. Haemoglobin was significantly better for predicting transfusion and rebleeding, and the Oakland score was significantly better for predicting readmission. CONCLUSION: In our study, the Oakland score did not perform better than haemoglobin alone for predicting the outcome of patients with ALGIB. The usefulness of risk scores for predicting outcomes in clinical practice remains uncertain.

Compound Endoscopic Morphological Features for Identifying Non-Pedunculated Lesions ≥20 mm with Intramucosal Neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: The major limitation of piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the inaccurate histological assessment of the resected specimen, especially in cases of submucosal invasion. OBJECTIVE: To classify non-pedunculated lesions ≥20 mm based on endoscopic morphological features, in order to identify those that present intramucosal neoplasia (includes low-grade neoplasia and high-grade neoplasia) and are suitable for piecemeal EMR. DESIGN: A post-hoc analysis from an observational prospective multicentre study conducted by 58 endoscopists at 17 academic and community hospitals was performed. Unbiased conditional inference trees (CTREE) were fitted to analyse the association between intramucosal neoplasia and the lesions' endoscopic characteristics. RESULT: 542 lesions from 517 patients were included in the analysis. Intramucosal neoplasia was present in 484 of 542 (89.3%) lesions. A conditional inference tree including all lesions' characteristics assessed with white light imaging and narrow-band imaging (NBI) found that ulceration, pseudodepressed type and sessile morphology changed the accuracy for predicting intramucosal neoplasia. In ulcerated lesions, the probability of intramucosal neoplasia was 25% (95%CI: 8.3-52.6%; p < 0.001). In non-ulcerated lesions, its probability in lateral spreading lesions (LST) non-granular (NG) pseudodepressed-type lesions rose to 64.0% (95%CI: 42.6-81.3%; p < 0.001). Sessile morphology also raised the probability of intramucosal neoplasia to 86.3% (95%CI: 80.2-90.7%; p < 0.001). In the remaining 319 (58.9%) non-ulcerated lesions that were of the LST-granular (G) homogeneous type, LST-G nodular-mixed type, and LST-NG flat elevated morphology, the probability of intramucosal neoplasia was 96.2% (95%CI: 93.5-97.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Non-ulcerated LST-G type and LST-NG flat elevated lesions are the most common non-pedunculated lesions ≥20 mm and are associated with a high probability of intramucosal neoplasia. This means that they are good candidates for piecemeal EMR. In the remaining lesions, further diagnostic techniques like magnification or diagnostic +/- therapeutic endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered.

Comparable quality of bowel preparation with single-day versus three-day low-residue diet: Randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is controversy about the length of low-residue diet (LRD) for colonoscopy preparation. The aim of the study was to compare one-day vs. three-day LRD associated to standard laxative treatment for achieving an adequate colonoscopy preparation in average risk subjects with positive fecal immunochemical test undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: A non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was performed in the setting of average risk colorectal cancer screening program. Participants were randomized to receive 1-day vs. 3-day LRD in addition to standard polyethilenglicol treatment. Adequacy of preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Primary outcome was achieving a BBPS ≥ 2 in all colon segments. Analysis was performed for a non-inferiority margin of 5%, a 95% statistical power and one-sided 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: A total of 855 patients were randomized. Adequate bowel preparation was similar between groups: 97.9% of patients in the 1-day LRD group vs 96.9% in the 3-day LRD group achieved the primary outcome (P-value for non-inferiority < 0.001). The percentage of patients with BBPS scores ≥ 8 was superior in the 1-day LRD group (254 vs 221 in the 3-day LRD group, P = 0.032). The 1-day regimen was better tolerated than the 3-day diet. 47.7% (vs 28.7%, P < 0.05) of patients rated the 1-day LRD as very easy to follow. CONCLUSION: The 1-day LRD is non-inferior to 3-day LRD for achieving an adequate colon cleansing before average risk screening colonoscopy and it is better tolerated.

Predictive Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Symptomatic Patients without Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis within the COLONPREDICT Cohort.

We aimed to assess the risk of cancer in patients with abdominal symptoms after a complete colonoscopy without colorectal cancer (CRC), according to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose, we performed a post-hoc analysis within a cohort of 1431 patients from the COLONPREDICT study, prospectively designed to assess the fecal immunochemical test accuracy in detecting CRC. Over 36.5 ± 8.4 months, cancer was detected in 115 (8%) patients. Patients with CEA values higher than 3 ng/mL revealed an increased risk of cancer (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1), CRC (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-17.7) and non-gastrointestinal cancer (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8). A new malignancy was detected in 51 (3.6%) patients during the first year and three variables were independently associated: anemia (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8), rectal bleeding (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7) and CEA level >3 ng/mL (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-7.1). However, CEA was increased only in 31.8% (95% CI, 16.4-52.7%) and 50% (95% CI, 25.4-74.6%) of patients with and without anemia, respectively, who would be diagnosed with cancer during the first year of follow-up. On the basis of this information, CEA should not be used to assist in the triage of patients presenting with lower bowel symptoms who have recently been ruled out a CRC.

Endoscopist's Judgment Is as Useful as Risk Scores for Predicting Outcome in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Guidelines recommend using prognostic scales for risk stratification in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It remains unclear whether risk scores offer greater accuracy than clinical evaluation. Objective: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of the endoscopist's judgment against different risk-scoring systems (Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford, Baylor and the Cedars-Sinai scores) for predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). Methods: Between February 2006 and April 2010 we prospectively recruited 401 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding; 225 received endoscopic treatment. The endoscopist recorded his/her subjective assessment ("endoscopist judgment") of the risk of rebleeding and death immediately after endoscopy for each patient. Independent evaluators calculated the different scores. Area under the receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for rebleeding and mortality. Results: The areas under ROC curve of the endoscopist's clinical judgment for rebleeding (0.67-0.75) and mortality (0.84-0.9) were similar or even superior to the different risk scores in both the whole group and in patients receiving endoscopic therapy. Conclusions: The accuracy of the currently available risk scores for predicting rebleeding and mortality in PUB patients was moderate and not superior to the endoscopist's judgment. More precise prognostic scales are needed.

Risk of gastrointestinal cancer in a symptomatic cohort after a complete colonoscopy: Role of faecal immunochemical test.

BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been recommended to assess symptomatic patients for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. Nevertheless, some conditions could theoretically favour blood originating in proximal areas of the gastrointestinal tract passing through the colon unmetabolized. A positive FIT result could be related to other gastrointestinal cancers (GIC). AIM: To assess the risk of GIC detection and related death in FIT-positive symptomatic patients (threshold 10 µg Hb/g faeces) without CRC. METHODS: Post hoc cohort analysis performed within two prospective diagnostic test studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of different FIT analytical systems for CRC and significant colonic lesion detection. Ambulatory patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred consecutively for colonoscopy from primary and secondary healthcare, underwent a quantitative FIT before undergoing a complete colonoscopy. Patients without CRC were divided into two groups (positive and negative FIT) using the threshold of 10 µg Hb/g of faeces and data from follow-up were retrieved from electronic medical records of the public hospitals involved in the research. We determined the cumulative risk of GIC, CRC and upper GIC. Hazard rate (HR) was calculated adjusted by age, sex and presence of significant colonic lesion. RESULTS: We included 2709 patients without CRC and a complete baseline colonoscopy, 730 (26.9%) with FIT ≥ 10 µgr Hb/gr. During a mean time of 45.5 ± 20.0 mo, a GIC was detected in 57 (2.1%) patients: An upper GIC in 35 (1.3%) and a CRC in 14 (0.5%). Thirty-six patients (1.3%) died due to GIC: 22 (0.8%) due to an upper GIC and 9 (0.3%) due to CRC. FIT-positive subjects showed a higher CRC risk (HR 3.8, 95%CI: 1.2-11.9) with no differences in GIC (HR 1.5, 95%CI: 0.8-2.7) or upper GIC risk (HR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.5-2.2). Patients with a positive FIT had only an increased risk of CRC-related death (HR 10.8, 95%CI: 2.1-57.1) and GIC-related death (HR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.1-4.3), with no differences in upper GIC-related death (HR 1.4, 95%CI: 0.6-3.3). An upper GIC was detected in 22 (0.8%) patients during the first year. Two variables were independently associated: anaemia (OR 5.6, 95%CI: 2.2-13.9) and age ≥ 70 years (OR 2.7, 95%CI: 1.1-7.0). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients without CRC have a moderate risk increase in upper GIC, regardless of the FIT result. Patients with a positive FIT have an increased risk of post-colonoscopy CRC.

Prediction of advanced colonic neoplasm in symptomatic patients: a scoring system to prioritize colonoscopy (COLONOFIT study).

BACKGROUND: Fast-track colonoscopy to detect patients with colorectal cancer based on high-risk symptoms is associated with low sensitivity and specificity. The aim was to derive a predictive score of advanced colonic neoplasia in symptomatic patients in fast-track programs. METHODS: All patients referred for fast-track colonoscopy were evaluated. Faecal immunological haemoglobin test (3 samples; positive> 4 µg Hb/g), and a survey to register clinical variables of interest were performed. Colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma were considered as advanced colonic neoplasia. A sample size of 600 and 500 individuals were calculated for each phase 1 and phase 2 of the study, respectively (Phase 1, derivation and Phase 2, validation cohort). A Bayesian logistic regression analysis was used to derive a predictive score. RESULTS: 1495 patients were included. Age (OR, 21), maximum faecal-Hb value (OR, 2.3), and number of positive samples (OR, 28) presented the highest ORs predictive of advanced colonic neoplasia. The additional significant predictive variables adjusted for age and faecal-Hb variables in Phase 1 were previous colonoscopy (last 5 years) and smoking (no, ex/active). With these variables a predictive score of advanced colonic neoplasia was derived. Applied to Phase 2, patients with a Score > 20 had an advanced colonic neoplasia probability of 66% (colorectal cancer, 32%), while those with a Score ≤ 10, a probability of 10% (colorectal cancer, 1%). Prioritizing patients with Score > 10, 49.4% of patients would be referred for fast-track colonoscopy, diagnosing 98.3% of colorectal cancers and 77% of advanced adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system was derived and validated to prioritize fast-track colonoscopies according to risk, which was efficient, simple, and robust.

Hemostatic spray powder TC-325 for GI bleeding in a nationwide study: survival and predictors of failure via competing risks analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: TC-325 (Hemospray, Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC) is an inorganic hemostatic powder recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness, safety, and predictors of TC-325 failure in a large real-life cohort. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at 21 Spanish centers. All patients treated with TC-325 until September 2018 were included. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as failed intraprocedural hemostasis or recurrent bleeding within the first 30 postprocedural days. Secondary outcomes included safety and survival. Risk and predictors of failure were assessed via competing-risk models. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 261 patients, of whom 219 (83.9%) presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The most common causes were peptic ulcer (28%), malignancy (18.4%), and therapeutic endoscopy-related GIB (17.6%). TC-325 was used as rescue therapy in 191 (73.2%) patients. The rate of intraprocedural hemostasis was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-96%). Risks of TC-325 failure at postprocedural days 3, 7, and 30 were 21.1%, 24.6%, and 27.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, spurting bleeding (P = .004), use of vasoactive drugs (P = .02), and hypotension (P = .008) were independent predictors of failure. Overall 30-day survival was 81.9% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and intraprocedural hemostasis was associated with a better prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; P = .006). Two severe adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION: TC-325 was safe and effective for intraprocedural hemostasis in more than 90% of patients, regardless of the cause or site of bleeding and its use as rescue therapy. In this high-risk cohort treated with TC-325, the 30-day failure rate exceeded 25% and was highest with spurting bleeding or hemodynamic instability.

Utilidad de la histología para el diagnóstico de la gastroenteropatía por hipertensión portal. Concordancia entre la imagen endoscópica y las biopsias gastrointestinales. Papel del marcador CD34 / Utility of histology for the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastroenteropathy. Concordance between the endoscopic image and gastrointestinal biopsies. Role of the CD34 marker

Introducción: En la endoscopia digestiva alta de pacientes con cirrosis hepática a menudo se observan lesiones inespecíficas, que se suelen orientar como gastropatía por hipertensión portal (GHP). Sin embargo, el diagnóstico de GHP puede ser difícil, tanto endoscópica como histológicamente. El estudio de expresión de CD34, que realza las células endoteliales de la microvasculatura podría ayudar al diagnóstico diferencial. Los objetivos del estudio fueron evaluar la correlación entre la endoscopia y la histología en el diagnóstico de la GHP y valorar la utilidad del CD34 en el diagnóstico de la misma. Material y métodos: Se analizaron biopsias fúndicas de 100 pacientes cirróticos y 20 controles, y se realizó inmunotinción para CD34. Se compararon con las imágenes endoscópicas. Resultados: Se observó una correlación muy baja entre la histología con el diagnóstico endoscópico de GHP (kappa=0,15). Además, la medición del diámetro de los vasos gástricos realzados mediante el uso de la tinción inmunohistoquímica (CD34) no mostró buena correlación con el diagnóstico endoscópico (p=0,26) y tampoco parece aportar información relevante para el diagnóstico histológico de GHP. Discusión: Existe una baja correlación entre la histología y la endoscopia para el diagnóstico de GHP. El uso de la inmunotinción para CD34 no mejora la rentabilidad diagnóstica del estudio histológico

Introduction: Upper gastroscopy in patients with cirrhosis often reveals non-specific lesions, which are usually oriented as portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). However, the diagnosis of PHG can be difficult, both from an endoscopic and histological point of view. The study of CD34 expression, which enhances the endothelial cells of the microvasculature, could help the differential diagnosis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the correlation between endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of PHG and to assess the utility of CD34 in the diagnosis of PHG. Material and methods: The results of immunostaining with CD34 gastric fundus biopsies from 100 cirrhotic patients and 20 controls were compared with the endoscopic images. Results: The correlation between the histology and the endoscopic diagnosis of PHG was very low (kappa=0.15). In addition, the measurement of the diameter of the gastric vessels enhanced by the use of immunohistochemical staining (CD34) did not show good correlation with the endoscopic diagnosis (p=.26) and did not provide relevant information for the histological diagnosis of PHG either. Discussion: The correlation between histology and endoscopy is low for the diagnosis of PHG. The use of immunostaining for CD34 does not seem to improve the diagnostic yield of the histological study

Utility of histology for the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastroenteropathy. Concordance between the endoscopic image and gastrointestinal biopsies. Role of the CD34 marker. / Utilidad de la histología para el diagnóstico de la gastroenteropatía por hipertensión portal. Concordancia entre la imagen endoscópica y las biopsias gastrointestinales. Papel del marcador CD34.

INTRODUCTION: Upper gastroscopy in patients with cirrhosis often reveals non-specific lesions, which are usually oriented as portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). However, the diagnosis of PHG can be difficult, both from an endoscopic and histological point of view. The study of CD34 expression, which enhances the endothelial cells of the microvasculature, could help the differential diagnosis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the correlation between endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of PHG and to assess the utility of CD34 in the diagnosis of PHG. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of immunostaining with CD34 gastric fundus biopsies from 100 cirrhotic patients and 20 controls were compared with the endoscopic images. RESULTS: The correlation between the histology and the endoscopic diagnosis of PHG was very low (kappa=0.15). In addition, the measurement of the diameter of the gastric vessels enhanced by the use of immunohistochemical staining (CD34) did not show good correlation with the endoscopic diagnosis (p=.26) and did not provide relevant information for the histological diagnosis of PHG either. DISCUSSION: The correlation between histology and endoscopy is low for the diagnosis of PHG. The use of immunostaining for CD34 does not seem to improve the diagnostic yield of the histological study.

Accuracy of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification System in Identification of Deep Invasion in Colorectal Polyps.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: T1 colorectal polyps with at least 1 risk factor for metastasis to lymph node should be treated surgically and are considered endoscopically unresectable. Optical analysis, based on the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification system, is used to identify neoplasias with invasion of the submucosa that require endoscopic treatment. We assessed the accuracy of the NICE classification, along with other morphologic characteristics, in identifying invasive polyps that are endoscopically unresectable (have at least 1 risk factor for metastasis to lymph node). METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective study of data collected by 58 endoscopists, from 1634 consecutive patients (examining 2123 lesions) at 17 university and community hospitals in Spain from July 2014 through June 2016. All consecutive lesions >10 mm assessed with narrow-band imaging were included. The primary end point was the accuracy of the NICE classification for identifying lesions with deep invasion, using findings from histology analysis as the reference standard. Conditional inference trees were fitted for the analysis of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Of the 2123 lesions analyzed, 89 (4.2%) had features of deep invasion and 91 (4.3%) were endoscopically unresectable. The NICE classification system identified lesions with deep invasion with 58.4% sensitivity (95% CI, 47.5-68.8), 96.4% specificity (95% CI, 95.5-97.2), a positive-predictive value of 41.6% (95% CI, 32.9-50.8), and a negative-predictive value of 98.1% (95% CI, 97.5-98.7). A conditional inference tree that included all variables found the NICE classification to most accurately identify lesions with deep invasion (P < .001). However, pedunculated morphology (P < .007), ulceration (P = .026), depressed areas (P < .001), or nodular mixed type (P < .001) affected accuracy of identification. Results were comparable for identifying lesions that were endoscopically unresectable. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of 2123 colon lesions >10 mm, we found the NICE classification and morphologic features identify those with deep lesions with >96% specificity-even in non-expert hands and without magnification. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02328066.

Eficacia diagnóstica de la sonda nasogástrica y de la relación nitrógeno ureico en sangre (BUN)/creatinina para distinguir el origen alto o bajo de la hemorragia digestiva / Diagnostic utility of nasogastric tube aspiration and the ratio of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine for distinguishing upper and lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding

Objetivo. La guía clínica para el tratamiento de la hemorragia digestiva (HD) baja del American College of Gastroenterology publicada en el año 2016 defiende la valoración del aspirado por sonda nasogástrica (SNG) y la evaluación de la relación nitrógeno ureico en sangre (BUN)/creatinina para diferenciar el origen alto o bajo de la HD. Sin embargo, la recomendación de ambas se realiza con un grado de evidencia bajo. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia diagnóstica del aspirado por SNG y la relación BUN/creatinina para diferenciar el origen de una HD. Métodos. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura para identificar los estudios que evalúan la precisión diagnóstica de la relación BUN/creatinina y el aspirado por SNG en pacientes con HD sin hematemesis. Resultados. Ambos métodos tienen una baja sensibilidad para detectar un sangrado digestivo alto. Tanto el aspirado hemático como la relación BUN/creatinina elevada aumentan significativamente la probabilidad de una HD alta. La razón de verosimilitud positiva varía de 2 a 11. Sin embargo, la sensibilidad de ambas pruebas para la HD alta fue muy baja (razón de verosimilitud negativa alrededor de 0,6). Conclusiones. Un resultado negativo en cualquiera de las dos pruebas proporciona poca información y no permite descartar con seguridad una HD alta. Por ello, no se puede recomendar el uso del aspirado por SNG para descartar un origen alto de la HD. Si existe duda diagnóstica es necesario la realización de una endoscopia digestiva alta

Background and objective. The American College of Gastroenterology's 2016 clinical guidelines for treating lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract bleeding recommends evaluating of nasogastric tube aspiration and the ratio of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine to differentiate upper from lower GI bleeds. However, the evidence base to support recommending these 2 diagnostic variables is low. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of nasogastric tube aspiration and the BUN-to-creatinine ratio for distinguishing between upper and lower GI bleeding. Methods. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to find studies reporting the diagnostic precision of the BUN-to-creatinine ratio and nasogastric aspiration in patients with GI bleeding without hematemesis. Results. The sensitivity of both methods is low for detecting upper GI bleeding. Both blood in the aspirate and an elevated BUN-to-creatinine ratio significantly increase the probability of finding an upper GI source. The positive likelihood ratio varies from positive 2 to 11. However, the sensitivity of both tests for a diagnosis of upper GI bleeding is very low (negative likelihood ratio of 0.6). Conclusions. A negative result on either of the 2 diagnostic tests provides little useful information and does not firmly rule out an upper GI bleed. Nasogastric tube aspiration cannot be recommended for distinguishing between upper and lower GI bleeding. If the diagnosis is in doubt, endoscopic exploration of the upper GI tract is necessary

Concordancia inter e intraobservador en el diagnóstico de la gastropatía por hipertensión portal / Inter and intra-observer concordance for the diagnosis of portal hypertension gastropathy

Introducción: en la actualidad no existe una clasificación endoscópica totalmente aceptada para evaluar el grado de gastropatía de la hipertensión portal (GHP). Hay pocos estudios que evalúen la concordancia inter e intraobservador o el grado de concordancia entre las distintas clasificaciones endoscópicas. Objetivos: evaluar la concordancia inter e intraobservador respecto a la presencia de gastro y enteropatía portal utilizando distintas clasificaciones endoscópicas. Métodos: fueron incluidos pacientes con cirrosis hepática a los que se realizó una enteroscopia bajo sedación. Se describió la localización de las lesiones y el grado de las mismas. Las imágenes se registraron mediante grabación en vídeo que posteriormente fue valorada por tres endoscopistas diferentes de manera independiente, uno de ellos el endoscopista inicial. La concordancia entre observaciones se evaluó utilizando el índice kappa. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 74 pacientes (edad media de 63,2 años, con una proporción de 53/21 hombre/mujer). La concordancia entre los tres endoscopistas, para la presencia o ausencia de GHP según las clasificaciones de Tanoue y McCormack, fue muy baja: kappa = 0,16 y 0,27 respectivamente. Conclusiones: las actuales clasificaciones de la gastropatía portal presentan un grado de acuerdo intra e interobservador muy bajo tanto para el diagnóstico como para la evaluación de la gravedad de la gastropatía (AU)

Introduction: At present there is no fully accepted endoscopic classification for the assessment of the severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). Few studies have evaluated inter and intra-observer concordance or the degree of concordance between different endoscopic classifications. Objectives: To evaluate inter and intra-observer agreement for the presence of portal hypertensive gastropathy and enteropathy using different endoscopic classifications. Methods: Patients with liver cirrhosis were included into the study. Enteroscopy was performed under sedation. The location of lesions and their severity was recorded. Images were videotaped and subsequently evaluated independently by three different endoscopists, one of whom was the initial endoscopist. The agreement between observations was assessed using the kappa index. Results: Seventy-four patients (mean age 63.2 years, 53 males and 21 females) were included. The agreement between the three endoscopists regarding the presence or absence of PHG using the Tanoue and McCormack classifications was very low (kappa scores = 0.16 and 0.27, respectively). Conclusions: The current classifications of portal hypertensive gastropathy have a very low degree of intra and inter-observer agreement for the diagnosis and assessment of gastropathy severity (AU)

Inter and intra-observer concordance for the diagnosis of portal hypertension gastropathy.

INTRODUCTION: At present there is no fully accepted endoscopic classification for the assessment of the severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). Few studies have evaluated inter and intra-observer concordance or the degree of concordance between different endoscopic classifications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate inter and intra-observer agreement for the presence of portal hypertensive gastropathy and enteropathy using different endoscopic classifications. METHODS: Patients with liver cirrhosis were included into the study. Enteroscopy was performed under sedation. The location of lesions and their severity was recorded. Images were videotaped and subsequently evaluated independently by three different endoscopists, one of whom was the initial endoscopist. The agreement between observations was assessed using the kappa index. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (mean age 63.2 years, 53 males and 21 females) were included. The agreement between the three endoscopists regarding the presence or absence of PHG using the Tanoue and McCormack classifications was very low (kappa scores = 0.16 and 0.27, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current classifications of portal hypertensive gastropathy have a very low degree of intra and inter-observer agreement for the diagnosis and assessment of gastropathy severity.

Diagnostic utility of nasogastric tube aspiration and the ratio of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine for distinguishing upper and lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding. / Eficacia diagnóstica de la sonda nasogástrica y de la relación nitrógeno ureico en sangre (BUN)/creatinina para distinguir el origen alto o bajo de la hemorragia digestiva.

OBJECTIVES: The American College of Gastroenterology's 2016 clinical guidelines for treating lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract bleeding recommends evaluating of nasogastric tube aspiration and the ratio of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine to differentiate upper from lower GI bleeds. However, the evidence base to support recommending these 2 diagnostic variables is low. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of nasogastric tube aspiration and the BUN-to-creatinine ratio for distinguishing between upper and lower GI bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to find studies reporting the diagnostic precision of the BUN-to-creatinine ratio and nasogastric aspiration in patients with GI bleeding without hematemesis. RESULTS: The sensitivity of both methods is low for detecting upper GI bleeding. Both blood in the aspirate and an elevated BUN-to-creatinine ratio significantly increase the probability of finding an upper GI source. The positive likelihood ratio varies from positive 2 to 11. However, the sensitivity of both tests for a diagnosis of upper GI bleeding is very low (negative likelihood ratio of 0.6). CONCLUSION: A negative result on either of the 2 diagnostic tests provides little useful information and does not firmly rule out an upper GI bleed. Nasogastric tube aspiration cannot be recommended for distinguishing between upper and lower GI bleeding. If the diagnosis is in doubt, endoscopic exploration of the upper GI tract is necessary.

OBJETIVO: La guía clínica para el tratamiento de la hemorragia digestiva (HD) baja del American College of Gastroenterology publicada en el año 2016 defiende la valoración del aspirado por sonda nasogástrica (SNG) y la evaluación de la relación nitrógeno ureico en sangre (BUN)/creatinina para diferenciar el origen alto o bajo de la HD. Sin embargo, la recomendación de ambas se realiza con un grado de evidencia bajo. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia diagnóstica del aspirado por SNG y la relación BUN/creatinina para diferenciar el origen de una HD. METODO: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura para identificar los estudios que evalúan la precisión diagnóstica de la relación BUN/creatinina y el aspirado por SNG en pacientes con HD sin hematemesis. RESULTADOS: Ambos métodos tienen una baja sensibilidad para detectar un sangrado digestivo alto. Tanto el aspirado hemático como la relación BUN/creatinina elevada aumentan significativamente la probabilidad de una HD alta. La razón de verosimilitud positiva varía de 2 a 11. Sin embargo, la sensibilidad de ambas pruebas para la HD alta fue muy baja (razón de verosimilitud negativa alrededor de 0,6). CONCLUSIONES: Un resultado negativo en cualquiera de las dos pruebas proporciona poca información y no permite descartar con seguridad una HD alta. Por ello, no se puede recomendar el uso del aspirado por SNG para descartar un origen alto de la HD. Si existe duda diagnóstica es necesario la realización de una endoscopia digestiva alta.

Luxación de la articulación temporomandibular después de una endoscopia: una complicación infrecuente / Temporomandibular joint dislocation after endoscopy: A rare complication

No disponible

Good diagnostic accuracy of a chemiluminescent immunoassay in stool samples for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with dyspepsia.

Laboratory-based chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) are widely used in clinical laboratories. Some years ago, a CLIA test was developed for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool samples, known as LIAISON H. pylori SA, but little information on its use has been reported. To evaluate the accuracy of the LIAISON H. pylori SA assay for diagnosing H. pylori infection prior to eradication treatment. Diagnostic reliability was evaluated in 252 untreated consecutive patients with dyspepsia. The gold standard for diagnosing H. pylori infection was defined as the concordance of the rapid urease test (RUT), histopathology and urea breath test (UBT). The CLIA assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and 95% CIs were calculated. According to the gold standard selected, 121 patients were positive for H. pylori infection and 131 negative. LIAISON H. pylori SA had a sensitivity of 90.1% and a specificity of 92.4%, with positive and negative predictive values of 91.6% and 90.1%, respectively. The accuracy of the LIAISON H. pylori SA chemiluminescent diagnostic assay seems comparable to that of ELISA or the best-performing LFIAs. Its sensitivity and specificity, however, seem slightly lower than those of histology, RUT or UBT. The advantages of the assay are that it is cheap, automated, and minimally labor-intensive.

Diagnostic accuracy of three monoclonal stool tests in a large series of untreated Helicobacter pylori infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: Immunochromatographic tests need to be improved in order to enhance their reliability. Recently, several new kits have appeared on the market. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of three monoclonal rapid stool tests - the new Uni-Gold™ H.pylori Antigen (Trinity Biotech, Ireland), the RAPID Hp StAR (Oxoid Ltd., UK) and the ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA (Meridian Diagnostics, USA) - for detecting H. pylori infection prior to eradication treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and reliability (concordance between observers) were evaluated in 250 untreated consecutive dyspeptic patients. The gold standard for diagnosing H. pylori infection was defined as the concordance of two or more of rapid urease test (RUT), histopathology and urease breath test (UBT) or positive culture in isolation. Readings of immunochromatographic tests were performed by two different observers. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The three tests showed a good correlation, with Kappa values>0.9. RAPID Hp StAR had a sensitivity of 91%-92% and a specificity ranging from 77% to 85%. Its sensitivity was higher than that of Uni-Gold™ H.pylori Antigen and ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA (p<0.01). Uni-Gold™ H.pylori Antigen kit showed a sensitivity of 83%, similar to ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA. Specificity of Uni-Gold™ H.pylori Antigen approached 90% (87-89%) and was superior to that of RAPID Hp StAR (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Uni-Gold™ H.pylori Antigen and ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA present similar levels of diagnostic accuracy. RAPID Hp StAR was the most sensitive but less reliable of the three immunochromatographic stool tests. None are as accurate and reliable as UBT, RUT and histology.