[Effect on the time of admission to the Intensive Care Unit of the start-up of an Critical Care Outreach Team]. / Efecto sobre el momento del ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos de la puesta en marcha de un servicio extendido de medicina intensiva.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of the Critical Care Outreach Teams can influence the time of admission of patients to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, quasi-experimental "before-after" cohort study. All patients admitted to the unit urgently from Monday to Friday for two periods (between February 1, 2022 and June 30 and between February 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023) are included. The patients were divided into regular shift admissions (08-15h) and on-call (15-08h). The secondary objective was to assess whether there were differences in mortality between the two periods. RESULTS: During the first period of the study, 239 patients were admitted. 29.29% entered the ordinary shift and 70.71% on duty shift. During the second period, 211 patients were included with 43.13% of admissions in the ordinary shift. The comparison between the two periods observed a significant increase in the percentage of admissions in the morning hours in the second period (P=.0031). Mortality in the first period was 13.80% and in the second period 9.95%. The comparison between the two periods did not reveal significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The start-up of the Critical Care Outreach Teams is associated with an increase in the proportion of ICU admissions in the morning period without any observed changes in mortality.

Results After Implementing a Program of Intensive Care to Facilitate Organ Donation.

A program of intensive care to facilitate organ donation (ICOD) represents one of the ways to increase donation rate following brain death (BD). OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact and cost-effectiveness of setting up an ICOD strategy. METHOD: Retrospective cases of BD donors from the Spanish region La Rioja were included, after implementation of an ICOD program (2011-2016). This was activated in cases of devastating neurologic injury where treatment had been rejected following therapeutic futility criteria. Follow-up of kidney and liver transplant patients with the obtained grafts was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 134 potential donors were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), of whom 106 were selected under the ICOD strategy. BD was diagnosed in 108 cases (25 conventional donors, 83 ICOD donors). A total of 21.6% of potential ICOD donors did not evolve to BD, subsequently dying in the ICU. ICOD cases accounted for more than 50% of donors each year. This cohort had an average stay of 2.4 days in the ICU and accounted for a small proportion of total ICU admissions. A total of 68 (81.9%) ICOD donors were finally effective and 146 grafts were extracted, the majority being abdominal organs (liver and kidney). Probability of survival 1 year after liver transplant (ICOD donor) was 90.9%, with 1 case of primary graft failure. Survival 1 year after kidney transplant (ICOD donor) was 92.7%. No differences were detected in survival rates of kidney and liver transplant patients regarding donor type (ICOD vs conventional). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ICOD program allows an increase in the pool of valid and quality grafts for transplant as well as implying a minimum consumption of intensive medicine resources. The results in transplant patients support this strategy.