Extended septal myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation: clinical results at a national referral centre.

OBJECTIVES: Extended septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation are 2 invasive treatments for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Our goal was to compare which of these techniques achieved a higher reduction in gradients, improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and reduction in medical treatment. METHODS: It is a single-centre observational and retrospective analysis. We used multivariable regression analyses to assess the association of ablation/myectomy with different outcomes. The odds ratio or coefficient along with the 95% confidence interval was estimated according to the group and adjusted for the corresponding preprocedural variables and EuroSCORE II. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients underwent septal myectomy, and 25 patients underwent alcohol septal ablation. Basal and Valsalva gradients after myectomy were reduced to a higher degree in comparison to ablation: 21.0 mmHg [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval -30.7; -11.3], and 34.3 mmHg (P < 0.001, -49.1; -19.5) respectively. Those patients who received a myectomy had a lower probability of having moderate mitral regurgitation (odds ratio = 0.18, P = 0.054). Patients after septal myectomy were more likely to be NYHA functional class I (80.4%), whereas patients after ablation were more likely to be NYHA functional class III (48%). Both groups continued with beta-blocker therapy, but disopyramide could be discontinued after the myectomy in more cases (20%-36% vs 59%-1.3%; P < 0.001), and there was a tendency to discontinue calcium channel blockers (48%-16% vs 15.4-3.8%; P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment using preprocedural gradients and EuroSCORE II, myectomy achieves greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients compared to septal ablation.

The frozen elephant trunk: seeking a more definitive treatment for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional treatment for type A aortic dissection includes replacement of the ascending aorta with an open distal anastomosis in the hemiarch position. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) is a hybrid technique that extends the repair to the descending thoracic aorta. The goal is to improve resolution of malperfusion syndrome and to induce positive aortic remodelling and reduce the need for reintervention on the downstream aorta. We aim to summarize the data on the short and long-term outcomes of this technique. METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was conducted isolating all articles dealing with aortic remodelling after the use of FET in case of type A acute aortic dissection. Keywords 'aortic dissection', 'frozen elephant trunk', 'aortic remodelling' and 'false lumen thrombosis' were used. Data for type B and chronic aortic dissections were excluded. RESULTS: FET use favourably influences aortic remodelling. The main advantages lie in the exclusion of distal entry tears in either the aortic arch or descending aorta thus restoring antegrade blood flow in the true lumen and inducing false lumen thrombosis. False lumen thrombosis is not only induced at the level of the stent deployment but also lower in the distal descending aorta. Moreover, it offers an adequate landing zone in the mid-descending aorta for second-stage endovascular or open surgical aortic repair, if needed. CONCLUSIONS: FET can be advantageous in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection dealing with extended aortic pathology.

Clinical impact of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: A prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the benefits of del Nido cardioplegia compared with cold blood cardioplegia solution in terms of myocardial protection during adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: A total of 474 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, heart valve surgery, thoracic aortic surgery, or combined procedures were randomized to the del Nido cardioplegia group (n = 234) or the cold blood cardioplegia solution group (n = 240) after provided informed consent. The primary end points assessed inotropic support requirements, severe cardiovascular events, and troponin trend within the first 48 hours of intensive care unit stay. Reperfusion arrhythmias, aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and other clinical perioperative variables were considered as secondary end points. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found regarding postoperative inotropic support requirements or the incidence of severe cardiovascular events. The del Nido cardioplegia group showed a higher return to spontaneous sinus rhythm (P< .001), a lower number of defibrillation attempts (P< .001), and an earlier peak troponin value in the postoperative period. Peak blood glucose levels and intravenous insulin requirements were significantly lower in the del Nido cardioplegia group. We found no significant differences regarding aortic crossclamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time. We did observe a lower incidence of postoperative stroke in the del Nido cardioplegia group (2.6% vs 6.7%; P= .035). CONCLUSIONS: del Nido cardioplegia can be used safely and with comparable outcomes compared with traditional cardioplegia solutions. Additional advantages over glycemic control, reperfusion arrhythmias, and its comfortable redosing interval make del Nido an interesting alternative for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery. A significant decrease in postoperative stroke will require further research to shed light on the results of this study. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Aortic valve reimplantation in patients with connective tissue syndromes: A 15-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to analyse early- and long-term outcomes of aortic valve reimplantation (David operation) in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational analysis using data from a prospectively maintained surgical database from March 2004 to April 2021. Patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with aortic root aneurysm with the diagnosis of heritable thoracic aortic disease received the David procedure. Marfan syndrome was found in 143 (91.1%) patients, Loeys-Dietz in 13 and Ehler-Danlos in 1 patient. The median age was 35.0 (IQR: 17.5) years and the median ascending aorta diameter in the Valsalva sinuses was 48 mm (IQR: 4). A Valsalva graft was used in 8 patients; the David V technique was performed in the rest of the cases. The median follow-up time was 7.3 years [standard deviation: 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.12-8.05]. Only 2 patients died during the follow-up period. The overall survival was 99% (95% CI: 95%; 99%); 98% (95% CI: 92%; 99%); and 98% (95% CI: 92%; 99%) at 5, 10 and 15 years. Freedom from significant aortic regurgitation (AR> II), reintervention and postoperative type-B dissection was 90% (95% CI: 77%; 95%), 96% (95% CI: 91%; 99%) and 87% (95% CI: 68%; 95%) at 15 years, respectively. No differences were found in any outcome between Marfan syndrome and Loeys-Dietz syndrome. No statistically significant differences in survival were found when we compared expected gender- and age-specific population survival values. CONCLUSIONS: The David operation is an excellent option for the treatment of patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease and dilatated aortic root. Surgical expertise in referral centres is essential to achieve the best long-term results.

Emergency surgical retrieval of a migrated LAmbre device through the mitral valve.

Left atrial appendage occlusion has become an alternative for long-term anticoagulation for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Although the procedure is safe, life-threatening complications such as embolization of the device or cardiac tamponade might occur. We present a case of a LAmbre device that migrated 4 days after being implanted and remained trapped in the mitral valve. Secondary massive mitral regurgitation with severe stenosis and haemodynamic instability required emergency surgery. The device was successfully removed, but severe damage in the anterior leaflet and chords forced a valve replacement.

Cardiac paraganglioma: stent in right coronary artery prior to surgery resection.

Cardiac paragangliomas are extremely rare. Sometimes surgical resection is a challenge owing to the proximity of vital structures and coronary arteries involvement. We report a case of a 34-year-old man with cardiac paragangliomas located between right atrium and right ventricle with a feeding blood supply from collaterals of the right coronary artery. In this case, we implanted a covered single stent (PK Papyrus®) in the right coronary artery with the objective of embolizing collateral branches and to reinforce the coronary artery wall. Although tumour mass was not reduced, vascularization was minimized, and this hybrid strategy made the surgery easier and safer.

Are 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography results reliable in patients with ascending aortic grafts? A prospective study in non-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to define characteristic patterns of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in non-infected patients with ascending aortic prosthetic grafts during the first year after surgery. METHODS: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively in 26 uninfected patients. Clinical, analytical and microbiological (blood culture) assessments were performed to confirm the absence of infection. FDG uptake intensity [measured through maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the target-to-background ratio] and distribution patterns were obtained. Models of generalized estimating equations were used to assess the evolution of the SUVmax over time. The results were compared to those in our endocarditis-over-ascending-aortic-graft series database. The receiver operating characteristic curves of the control group and the 12-month group were assessed. RESULTS: All patients showed increased uptake in all areas. The uptake pattern was heterogeneous in 47.4%, 43.5% and 42.3% at 3, 6 and 12 months. The means and standard deviations of the SUVmax in the graft were 4.80 (±0.99), 4.28 (±0.88) and 4.14 (±0.87) at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. A comparison of all values obtained in the 6th and 12th months compared to those from the 3rd month revealed a slow decrease that may persist after the first year. The cut-off value of SUVmax of 4.24 had an overall sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 57.7% for patients seen at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Non-infected ascending aortic grafts showed no predominant uptake pattern; they also showed increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose activity that could persist beyond the first year. Caution is therefore recommended when interpreting PET/CT images obtained during the first year after surgery.

Del Nido Cardioplegia Versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of cardioplegia solutions as a myocardial protection technique is essential during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The del Nido cardioplegia solution (DNS) has been widely used as a myocardial preservation technique for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Its unique pharmacological features have created growing interest for adult cardiac surgery, especially for elderly patients or those with ventricular dysfunction who are more prone to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ever since its implementation, several retrospective studies have been published to validate the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of DNS in adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization, valve replacement, or combined procedures. Recently, a meta-analysis based on nine retrospective studies was published claiming the noninferiority of DNS compared to other conventional cardioplegia solutions. Few prospective randomized studies have been conducted whose primary outcome was the assessment of DNS clinical efficacy compared to other solutions commonly used in adult patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the benefits of DNS compared to Cardi-Braun blood cardioplegia solution in clinical and biochemical terms regarding myocardial protection during adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: This is the protocol of a controlled, randomized, single-center clinical trial carried out at the Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital in Spain. A total of 474 participants over the age of 18 years undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be assigned to groups by simple randomization to receive either DNS or Cardi-Braun blood cardioplegia solution. The primary outcome will be the differences between groups in myocardial protection in biochemical terms (ie, perioperative troponin levels) and clinical terms (ie, presence of the composite variable acute cardiovascular event). The clinical trial will be carried out under conditions of respect for the fundamental rights of the person and the ethical principles that affect biomedical research with human beings, as well as in accordance with international recommendations contained in the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. RESULTS: The inclusion process started in 2018. Data cleaning and analyses are expected to take place in the fall of 2020 and the results are expected in January 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This study is particularly relevant as it will be one of the first to analyze the clinical effects of del Nido cardioplegia on the basis of direct myocardial protection parameters. In light of published studies, carrying out prospective studies based on primary clinical objectives with a larger sample, high-risk patients, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass times continues to be necessary. We believe that our study addresses an important gap in the knowledge of del Nido cardioplegia in adult patient cardiac surgery and will be able to clarify the possible benefits of this method in a large population of patients undergoing these procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) 2017-005144-14; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2017-005144-14+; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04094168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04094168. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17826.