Trastornos del movimiento y de la conducta durante el sueño en el adulto / Sleep-related movement and behavioural disorders in adults

Los trastornos del movimiento y de la conducta durante el sueño pueden tener un impacto en la calidad del sueño del paciente y dar lugar a síntomas diurnos. En estos grupos de enfermedades se incluyen entidades como el síndrome de piernas inquietas, los movimientos periódicos de las piernas y las parasomnias del sueño de movimientos oculares rápidos (REM) y no REM. El conocimiento de sus características clínicas y nociones sobre su manejo es de gran importancia para el neurólogo y especialista en sueño por su frecuencia e impacto en la calidad del sujeto. Con frecuencia, estos pacientes son referidos a dichos especialistas, y es relevante conocer que ciertos trastornos del sueño pueden asociarse a otras enfermedades neurológicas

Sleep-related movement and behaviour disorders may have an impact on sleep quality and lead to daytime symptoms. These groups of conditions include diseases such as restless legs syndrome, periodic leg movements, and REM and NREM parasomnias. The knowledge of their clinical features and management is of utmost importance for the neurologist and sleep specialist. Frequently, these patients are referred to such specialists and it is relevant to know that certain sleep disorders may be associated with other neurological conditions

Recomendaciones sobre estudios neurofisiológicos en tiempos de pandemia de COVID-19 / Recommendations on neurophysiological studies during the COVID-19 pandemic

A finales de enero, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declaró el brote actual de la enfermedad por coronavirus COVID-19 como emergencia de salud pública de importancia internacional. En España, desde que el 14 de marzo de 2020 el Gobierno decretase el estado de alarma, los médicos encargados de las pruebas neurofisiológicas las hemos estado realizando sin tener un criterio consensuado ni unas pautas adecuadas de seguridad claras para los facultativos, los técnicos ni los pacientes. Las siguientes recomendaciones, basadas en el actual conocimiento de la enfermedad y, por tanto, susceptibles de variaciones en el futuro, se proponen cuando la pandemia parece que ha entrado en un proceso de disminución de la virulencia y, con ello, las medidas estrictas de confinamiento hasta ahora mantenidas; sin embargo, ante la posibilidad de una segunda oleada de rebrotes de la pandemia, parece necesario establecer unas recomendaciones básicas y de mínimos para respetar el derecho del paciente a una atención adecuada, similar a la previa a la pandemia, y mantener unos mínimos de seguridad para los propios pacientes y los médicos, técnicos y personal sanitario que realizan estas pruebas. Se trata de recomendaciones sobre el establecimiento de una prioridad basándose en el motivo de consulta, el establecimiento de llamadas de comprobación de la situación clínica del paciente antes de acudir a la consulta externa y las normas de ejecución de las pruebas neurofisiológicas, que se basan, en general, en la preservación de circuitos hospitalarios, el respeto y el cuidado de las barreras de contagio conocidas de esta enfermedad, y la utilización de material desechable. Estas recomendaciones son de especial interés, sobre todo por la incertidumbre de no saber la evolución de la infección por el SARS-CoV-2 en las próximas semanas o meses

At the end of January, the current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus disease was declared an important international public health emergency. In Spain, since the government declared the state of alarm on 14 March 2020, doctors responsible for carrying out neurophysiological tests have been performing them without any consensus criterion or clear safety guidelines for doctors, technicians or patients. The following recommendations, based on current knowledge of the disease and therefore liable to change in the future, are proposed when the pandemic appears to have entered a process of decreasing virulence and, with it, the strict containment measures established to date. However, in view of the possibility of a second wave of the pandemic, it seems necessary to establish basic and minimum recommendations to respect the patient's right to appropriate care, similar to that provided prior to the pandemic, and to maintain minimum safety standards for the patients themselves and for the doctors, technicians and health personnel carrying out these tests. These recommendations concern the constitution of a priority based on the reason for consultation, the establishment of calls to check the patient's clinical situation before going to the outpatient department and the rules for carrying out neurophysiological tests, which are generally based on the preservation of hospital circuits, respect for and observation of the known barriers to contagion of this disease, and the use of disposable material. These recommendations are of particular interest, especially given the uncertainty of not knowing the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in the coming weeks or months

La estimulación cerebral profunda en el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo refractario al tratamiento: una revisión sistemática / Deep brain stimulation and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review

Introducción: Al menos el 10% de pacientes con trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo (TOC) son refractarios al tratamiento psicofarmacológico. La aparición de nuevas tecnologías neuroquirúrgicas (estimulación cerebral profunda[ECP]) de modulación de la actividad neuronal alterada está posibilitando su extensión a casos graves y refractarios de TOC en los que anteriormente se utilizaban técnicas quirúrgicas no reversibles. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar la evidencia científica existente sobre la eficacia y aplicabilidad de esta técnica en este grupo de pacientes. Método: Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura en las bases de datos PubMed/Medline, Embase y PsycINFO usando las palabras clave relacionadas con «deep brain stimulation», «DBS» y «obsessive-compulsive disorder», «OCD». Dos de los autores seleccionaron los artículos, de manera independiente, a partir de sus abstracts y en función de si describían alguno de los aspectos principales de la técnica en el TOC: aplicabilidad; mecanismo de acción; dianas terapéuticas cerebrales; efectividad; efectos secundarios, y coterapias. Toda la información fue sistemáticamente extraída y evaluada. Resultados: El análisis crítico de la evidencia señala que la aplicación de la ECP en el tratamiento del TOC refractario está aportando resultados satisfactorios, con rangos asumibles de efectos secundarios. Sin embargo, todavía no hay evidencia suficiente que permita priorizar el uso de una determinada diana cerebral. La selección de pacientes ha de seguir un análisis de riesgo/beneficio, debiéndose individualizar la decisión de mantener un tratamiento concomitante farmacológico/psicoterapéutico. Conclusiones: La ECP se encuentra todavía en el ámbito de la investigación, pero su aplicación en el TOC-refractario es cada vez más frecuente, produciendo en la mayoría de los estudios una significativa mejoría de los síntomas, y también del funcionamiento y calidad de vida. Es preciso realizar más estudios controlados y aleatorizados sobre su efectividad a largo plazo, y sobre su relación riesgo/beneficio y costes

Introduction: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. Method: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. Results: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. Conclusions: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit

Deep brain stimulation and treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. / La estimulación cerebral profunda en el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo refractario al tratamiento: una revisión sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: At least 10% of patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) are refractory to psychopharmacological treatment. The emergence of new technologies for the modulation of altered neuronal activity in Neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS), has enabled its use in severe and refractory OCD cases. The objective of this article is to review the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness and applicability of this technique to refractory OCD. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify the main characteristics of deep brain stimulation, its use and applicability as treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therefore, we reviewed PubMed/Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases, combining the key-words 'Deep brain stimulation', 'DBS' and 'Obsessive-compulsive disorder' 'OCS'. The articles were selected by two of the authors independently, based on the abstracts, and if they described any of the main characteristics of the therapy referring to OCD: applicability; mechanism of action; brain therapeutic targets; efficacy; side-effects; co-therapies. All the information was subsequently extracted and analysed. RESULTS: The critical analysis of the evidence shows that the use of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD is providing satisfactory results regarding efficacy, with assumable side-effects. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any single brain target over another. Patient selection has to be done following analyses of risks/benefits, being advisable to individualize the decision of continuing with concomitant psychopharmacological and psychological treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The use of DBS is still considered to be in the field of research, although it is increasingly used in refractory-OCD, producing in the majority of studies significant improvements in symptomatology, and in functionality and quality of life. It is essential to implement random and controlled studies regarding its long-term efficacy, cost-risk analyses and cost/benefit.

Primary Care Physicians Can Comprehensively Manage Patients with Sleep Apnea. A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: General practitioners play a passive role in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. Simplification of the diagnosis and use of a semiautomatic algorithm for treatment can facilitate the integration of general practitioners, which has cost advantages.Objectives: To determine differences in effectiveness between primary health care area (PHA) and in-laboratory specialized management protocols during 6 months of follow-up.Methods: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial with two open parallel arms and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in six tertiary hospitals in Spain. Sequentially screened patients with an intermediate to high OSA probability were randomized to PHA or in-laboratory management. The PHA arm involved a portable monitor with automatic scoring and semiautomatic therapeutic decision-making. The in-laboratory arm included polysomnography and specialized therapeutic decision-making. Patients in both arms received continuous positive airway pressure treatment or sleep hygiene and dietary treatment alone. The primary outcome measure was the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, blood pressure, incidence of cardiovascular events, hospital resource utilization, continuous positive airway pressure adherence, and within-trial costs.Measurements and Main Results: In total, 307 patients were randomized and 303 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Based on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the PHA protocol was noninferior to the in-laboratory protocol. Secondary outcome variables were similar between the protocols. The cost-effectiveness relationship favored the PHA arm, with a cost difference of €537.8 per patient.Conclusions: PHA management may be an alternative to in-laboratory management for patients with an intermediate to high OSA probability. Given the clear economic advantage of outpatient management, this finding could change established clinical practice.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02141165).