TMPRSS2 is a functional receptor for human coronavirus HKU1.

Four endemic seasonal human coronaviruses causing common colds circulate worldwide: HKU1, 229E, NL63 and OC43 (ref. 1). After binding to cellular receptors, coronavirus spike proteins are primed for fusion by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) or endosomal cathepsins2-9. NL63 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a receptor10, whereas 229E uses human aminopeptidase-N11. HKU1 and OC43 spikes bind cells through 9-O-acetylated sialic acid, but their protein receptors remain unknown12. Here we show that TMPRSS2 is a functional receptor for HKU1. TMPRSS2 triggers HKU1 spike-mediated cell-cell fusion and pseudovirus infection. Catalytically inactive TMPRSS2 mutants do not cleave HKU1 spike but allow pseudovirus infection. Furthermore, TMPRSS2 binds with high affinity to the HKU1 receptor binding domain (Kd 334 and 137 nM for HKU1A and HKU1B genotypes) but not to SARS-CoV-2. Conserved amino acids in the HKU1 receptor binding domain are essential for binding to TMPRSS2 and pseudovirus infection. Newly designed anti-TMPRSS2 nanobodies potently inhibit HKU1 spike attachment to TMPRSS2, fusion and pseudovirus infection. The nanobodies also reduce infection of primary human bronchial cells by an authentic HKU1 virus. Our findings illustrate the various evolution strategies of coronaviruses, which use TMPRSS2 to either directly bind to target cells or prime their spike for membrane fusion and entry.

Evidence based policy making during times of uncertainty through the lens of future policy makers: four recommendations to harmonise and guide health policy making in the future.

The Covid-19 pandemic has not only outlined the importance of using evidence in the healthcare policy making process but also the complexity that exists between policymakers and the scientific community. As a matter of fact, scientific data is just one of many other concurrent factors, including economic, social and cultural, that may provide the rationale for policy making. The pandemic has also raised citizens' awareness and represented an unprecedented moment of willingness to access and understand the evidence underpinning health policies.This commentary provides policy recommendations to improve evidence-based policy making in health, through the lens of a young generation of public policy students and future policymakers, enrolled in a 24-hour course at Sciences Po Paris entitled "Evidence-based policy-making in health: theory and practice(s)".Four out of 11 recommendations were prioritised and presented in this commentary which target both policymakers and the scientific community to make better use of evidence-based policy making in health. First, policy makers and scientists should build trusting partnerships with citizens and engage them, especially those facing our target health care issues or systems. Second, while artificial intelligence raises new opportunities in healthcare, its use in contexts of uncertainty should be addressed by policymakers in terms of liability and ethics. Third, conflicts of interest must be disclosed as much as possible and effectively managed to (re) build a trust relationship between policymakers, the scientific community and citizens, implying the need for risk management tools and cross border disclosure mechanisms. Last, well-designed and secure health information systems need to be implemented, following the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) principles for health data. This will take us a step further from data to 'policy wisdom'.Overall, these recommendations identified and formulated by students highlight some key issues that need to be rethought in the health policy cycle through elements like institutional incentives, cultural changes and dialogue between policy makers and the scientific community. This input from a younger generation of students highlights the importance of making the conversation on evidence-based policy making in health accessible to all generations and backgrounds.

Aspiration after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Incidence, risk factors, management, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome of postoperative aspiration in patients managed with a supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) for selected invasive squamous carcinoma of the larynx. METHODS: In all, 457 patients underwent SCPL at an academic, tertiary referral care center, 1975-2000. The incidence of aspiration defined in accord with Pearson's scale was recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for potential statistical relation with various variables. The management and outcome of aspiration are presented. RESULTS: Normal swallowing without aspiration was noted in 259 patients (58.9%). Grades 1, 2, and 3 aspiration occurred in 87, 48, and 53 patients (19%, 10.5%, and 11.6%), respectively. A significant relationship was noted between aspiration and increased age, performing cricohyoidopexy, not repositioning the pyriform sinuses, and resecting an arytenoid cartilage. A prediction model, based on multinomial logistic regression, found that the probability that severe aspiration cases (grade 2-3) exceeded the subclinical ones (grade 0-1) occurred only when a cricohyoidopexy with partial or total arytenoid resection was performed in patients >70 years of age (p = .0000001). Management of aspiration required a temporary gastrostomy, a permanent gastrostomy, and a completion total laryngectomy in 65, 3, and 7 of 188 patients (34.5%, 1.6%, and 3.7%, respectively) who aspirated, and 65, 3, and 7 of 457 of the entire population (14.2%, 0.6%, and 1.5%, respectively). Aspiration-related death was not encountered in the current series. CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration after SCPL is a common but rarely severe event, with a low incidence for permanent gastrostomy or completion laryngectomy. Aspiration can be minimized with careful patient selection and precise surgical technique.