Cluster analysis in fibromyalgia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The multifaceted nature of Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) symptoms has been explored through clusters analysis. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the cluster research on FM (variables, methods, patient subgroups, and evaluation metrics). METHODS: We performed a systematic review following the PRISMA recommendations. Independent searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, employing the terms "fibromyalgia" and "cluster analysis". We included studies dated to January 2024, using the cluster analysis to assess any physical, psychological, clinical, or biomedical variables in FM subjects, and descriptively synthesized the studies in terms of design, cluster method, and resulting patient profiles. RESULTS: We included 39 studies. Most with a cross-sectional design aiming to classify subsets based on the severity, adjustment, symptomatic manifestations, psychological profiles, and response to treatment, based on demographic and clinical variables. Two to four different profiles were found according to the levels of severity and adjustment to FMS. According to symptom manifestation, two to three clusters described the predominance of pain versus fatigue, and thermal pain sensitivity (less versus more sensitive). Other clusters revealed profiles of personality (pathological versus non-pathological) and psychological vulnerability (suicidal ideation). Additionally, studies identified different responses to treatment (pharmacological and multimodal). CONCLUSION: Several profiles exist within FMS population, which point out to the need for specific treatment options given the different profiles and an efficient allocation of healthcare resources. We notice a need towards more objective measures, and the validation of the cluster results. Further research might investigate some of the assumptions of these findings, which are further discussed in this paper.

Brain compensatory mechanisms in depression and memory complaints in fibromyalgia: The role of theta oscillatory activity.

BACKGROUND: The different clinical presentations of fibromyalgia (FMS) may play independent roles in the unclear etiology of cognitive impairments and depressive symptoms seen in this population. Understanding how these clinical presentations are associated with FMS's clinical and neurophysiological aspects is important when developing effective treatments. AIM: To explore the relationship between memory complaints and depressive symptoms, and the different clinical and neurophysiological characteristics of FMS. METHODS: Cross-sectional data analysis from a randomized clinical trial. Baseline demographics, physical fitness, sleep, anxiety, depression, cortical excitability, and pain (clinical and mechanistic) data from 63 FMS subjects were used. Multiple linear and logistic association models were constructed. RESULTS: Final regression models including different sets of predictions were statistically significant (p < 0.001), explaining approximately 50% of the variability in cognitive complaints and depression status. Older subjects had higher levels of anxiety, poor sleep quality, lower motor threshold, and higher relative theta power in the central area, are more likely to have clinical depression. Higher anxiety, pain and theta power were associated with an increase memory complaint. CONCLUSION: Depression symptoms seem to be associated with TMS-indexed motor threshold and psychosocial variables, while memory complaints are associated with pain intensity and higher theta oscillations. These mechanisms may be catalyzed and/or triggered by some behavioral and clinical features such as older age, sleep disruption, and anxiety. The correlation with clinical variables suggests the increasing of theta oscillations is a compensatory response in patients with FMS, which can be explored in future studies to improve the treatment for FMS.

Using Home-based, Remotely Supervised, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that uses low-amplitude direct currents to alter cortical excitability. Previous trials have established the safety and tolerability of tDCS, and its potential to mitigate symptoms. However, the effects are cumulative, making it more difficult to have adherence to the treatment since frequent visits to the clinic or outpatient center are required. Moreover, the time needed for transportation to the center and the related expenses limit the accessibility of the treatment for many participants. Following guidelines for remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) implementation, we propose a protocol designed for remotely supervised and home-based participation that uses specific devices and materials modified for patient use, with real-time monitoring by researchers through an encrypted video conferencing platform. We have developed detailed instructional materials and structured training procedures to allow for self- or proxy-administration while supervised remotely in real time. This protocol has a specific design to have a series of checkpoints during training and execution of the visit. This protocol is currently in use in a large pragmatic study of RS-tDCS for phantom limb pain (PLP). In this article, we will discuss the operational challenges of conducting a home-based RS-tDCS session and show methods to enhance its efficacy with supervised sessions.

Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, Therapeutic Trends, and Outcomes in Arterial Thrombosis Complicating Unvaccinated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review.

Data on characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus (COVID)-19 patients complicated with arterial thrombosis (AT) are scarce. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review (PRISMA, PROSPERO statements; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. We included publications from December 2019 to October 2020. Groups: (a) ischemic stroke, (b) thrombotic storm, (c) peripheral vascular thrombosis, (d) myocardial infarction, and (e) left cardiac thrombus or in-transit thrombus (venous system thrombus floating or attaching to the right heart). We considered 131 studies. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were: hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. A high proportion presented with asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19 (n = 91, 41.4%). We identified a high percentage of isolated ischemic stroke and thrombotic storm. Groups with higher mortality rate: intracardiac thrombus (1/2, 50.0%), thrombotic storm (18/49, 36.7%), and ischemic stroke (48/131, 36.6%). A small number received thromboprophylaxis. Most patients received antithrombotic treatment. The most frequent bleeding complication was intracranial hemorrhage, primarily with isolated stroke. Overall mortality was 33.6% (74/220). Despite a wide range of COVID-19 severity, a high proportion had AT as a complication of non-severe disease. AT can affect different vascular territories; mortality is associated with stroke, intensive care unit stay, and severe COVID-19.

Differences between surviving and non-surviving venous thromboembolism COVID-19 patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, the treatment, outcome, clinical presentation, risk stratification of patients with venous thromboembolism and COVID-19 have not been well characterized. METHODS: We searched for systematic reviews, cohorts, case series, case reports, editor letters, and venous thromboembolism COVID-19 patients' abstracts following PRISMA and PROSPERO statements. We analyzed therapeutic approaches and clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolism COVID-19 patients. Inclusion: COVID-19 patients with venous thromboembolism confirmed by an imaging method (venous doppler ultrasound, ventilation-perfusion lung scan, computed tomography pulmonary angiogram, pulmonary angiography). We assessed and reported the original Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for each pulmonary embolism patient. In addition, we defined major bleedings according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. RESULTS: We performed a systematic review from August 9 to August 30, 2020. We collected 1,535 papers from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley, and Opengrey. We extracted data from 89 studies that describe 143 patients. Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin was used as parenteral anticoagulation in 85/143 (59%) cases. The Food and Drug Administration-approved alteplase regimen guided the advanced treatment in 39/143 (27%) patients. The mortality was high (21.6%, CI 95% 15.2-29.3). The incidence of major bleeding complications was 1 (0.9%) in the survival group and 1 (3.2%) in the death group. Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index was class I in 11.6% and II in 22.3% in survivors compared to 0% and 6.5% in non-survivors, respectively. Patients who experienced venous thromboembolism events at home were more likely to live than in-hospital events. CONCLUSIONS: We determined a high mortality incidence of pulmonary embolism and a low rate of bleeding. Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin drove parenteral anticoagulation and alteplase the advanced treatment in both groups. The original Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index could be helpful in the risk stratification.