Potential performance of a 0 h/1 h algorithm and a single cut-off measure of high-sensitivity troponin T in a diverse population: main results of the IN-HOPE study.

AIMS: Chest pain is a major cause of medical evaluation at emergency department (ED) and demands observation to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays used as isolated measure and by 0- and 1-h algorithms are accepted as a rule-in/rule-out strategy, but there is a lack of validation in specific populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: The IN-HOspital Program to systematizE Chest Pain Protocol (IN-HOPE study) is a multicentre study that prospectively included patients admitted to the ED due to suspected symptoms of AMI at 16 sites in Brazil. Medical decisions of all patients followed the standard approach of 0 h/3 h protocol, but, in addition, blood samples were also collected at 0 and 1 h and sent to a central laboratory (core lab) to measure high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). To assess the theoretical performance of 0 h/1 h algorithm, troponin < 12 ng/L with a delta < 3 was considered rule-out while a value ≥ 52 or a delta ≥ 5 was considered a rule-in criterion (the remaining were considered as observation group). The main objective of the study was to assess, in a population managed by the 0 h/3 h protocol, the accuracy of 0 h/1 h algorithm overall and in groups with a higher probability of AMI. All patients were followed up for 30 days, and potential events were adjudicated. In addition to the prospective cohort, a retrospective analysis was performed assessing all patients with hs-cTnT measured during the year of 2021 but not included in the prospective cohort, regardless of the indication of the test. A total of 5.497 patients were included (583 in the prospective and 4.914 in the retrospective analysis). The prospective cohort had a mean age of 57.3 (± 14.8) and 45.6% of females with a mean HEART score of 4.0 ± 2.2. By the core lab analysis, 74.4% would be eligible for a rule-out approach (45.3% of them with a HEART score > 3) while 7.3% would fit the rule-in criteria. In this rule-out group, the negative predictive value for index AMI was 100% (99.1-100) overall and regardless of clinical scores. At 30 days, no death or AMI occurred in the rule-out group of both 0/1 and 0/3 h algorithms while 52.4% of the patients in the rule-in group (0 h/1 h) were considered as AMI by adjudication. In the observation group (grey zone) of 0 h/1 h algorithm, GRACE discriminated the risk of these patients better than HEART score. In the retrospective analysis, 1.091 patients had a troponin value of <5 ng/L and there were no cardiovascular deaths at 30 days in this group. Among all 4.914 patients, the 30-day risk of AMI or cardiovascular death increased according to the level of troponin: 0% in the group < 5 ng/L, 0.6% between 5 and 14 ng/L, 2.2% between 14 and 42 ng/L, 6.3% between 42 and 90 ng/L, and 7.7% in the level ≥ 90 ng/L. CONCLUSION: In this large multicentre study, a 0 h/1 h algorithm had the potential to classify as rule-in or rule-out in almost 80% of the patients. The rule-out protocol had high negative predictive value regardless of clinical risk scores. Categories of levels of hs-cTn T also showed good accuracy in discriminating risk of the patients with a very favourable prognosis for cardiovascular death in the group with value < 5 ng/L. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04756362.

Potential performance of a 0 h/1 h algorithm and a single cut-off measure of high-sensitivity troponin T in a diverse population: main results of the IN-HOPE study

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a major cause of medical evaluation at emergency department (ED) and demands observation to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays used as isolated measure and by 0 h and 1 h algorithms are accepted as a rule-in/rule-out strategy but there is a lack of validation in specific populations. METHODS: The IN-HOspital Program to systematizE chest pain protocol (In Hope study) is a multicentre study that prospectively included patients admitted to the ED due to suspected symptoms of AMI at 16 sites in Brazil. Medical decisions of all patients followed the standard approach of 0/3-h protocol but, in addition, blood samples were also collected at 0 and 1 hour and sent to a central laboratory (core lab) to measure high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT). To assess the theoretical performance of 0/1-h algorithm, troponin < 12 ng/L with a delta <--- 3 was considered rule out while a value ≥ 52 and/or a delta ≥ 5 was considered a rule in criteria (the remaining were considered as observation group). The main objective of the study was to assess, in a population managed by the 0/3-h protocol, the accuracy of 0/1-h algorithm overall and in groups with higher probability of AMI. All patients were followed for 30 days, and potential events were adjudicated. In addition to the prospective cohort, a retrospective analysis was performed assessing all patients with hs-cTnT measured during the year of 2021 but not included in the prospective cohort, regardless the indication of the test. RESULTS: A total of 5.497 patients were included (583 in the prospective and 4.914 in the retrospective analysis). The prospective cohort had a mean age of 57.3 (± 14.8) and 45.6% of females with a mean HEART score of 4.0 ± 2.2. By the core lab analysis, 74.4% would be eligible for a rule-out approach (45.3% of HEART score > 3) while 7.3% would fit the rule-in criteria. In this rule-out group, the negative predictive value for index AMI was 100% (99.1-100) overall and regardless clinical scores. At 30 days, no death or AMI occurred in the rule-out group of both 0/1 and 0/3-hour while 52.4% of the patients in the rule-in group (0/1-hour) were considered as AMI by adjudication. In the observation group (grey zone) of 0/1- hour algorithm, GRACE discriminated the risk of these patients better than HEART score. In the retrospective analysis, 1.091 patients had a troponin value < 5 ng/L and there were no cardiovascular deaths at 30 days in this group. Among all 4.914 patients, the 30-day risk of AMI or cardiovascular death increased according to the level of troponin: 0% in the group < 5 ng/L, 0.6% between 5 and 14 ng/L, 2.2% between 14 and 42 ng/L, 6.3% between 42 and 90 ng/L and 7.7% in the level ≥ 90 ng/L. CONCLUSIONS: In this large multicentre study, a 0/1-h algorithm had the potential to classify as rule in or out almost 80% of the patients. The rule-out protocol had high negative predictive value regardless of clinical risk scores. Categories of levels of hs-cTn T also showed good accuracy in discriminating risk of the patients with a very favourable prognosis for cardiovascular death in the group with values < 5 ng/L.

Avaliação de marcadores de inflamação em pacientes com lesão renal aguda em unidade de terapia intensiva / Assessement of inflammatory mediators in critically ill AKI patients

A incidência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) é de 5 a 25% e está associada a elevada mortalidade. A intensidade da resposta inflamatória reflete a magnitude do processo fisiopatológico da LRA e parece estar relacionada a um aumento na gravidade desses pacientes. Os objetivos desse estudo foram: a) avaliar o nível de mediadores inflamatórios em pacientes críticos com LRA; b) avaliar o perfil desses mediadores em conjunto com parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais, comparando pacientes críticos com e sem LRA; c) avaliar o impacto desses mediadores na sobrevida dos pacientes. Foi realizado um estudo observacional, prospectivo, do tipo caso-controle, em quatro UTIs do HCFMUSP no período entre novembro de 2006 e março de 2008. LRA foi definida segundo a classificação de RIFLE. Foram realizadas dosagens séricas dos seguintes marcadores: fator de necrose tumoral- (TNF-), receptor solúvel do tipo 1 do TNF- (sTNFR1), interleucina (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, leptina e proteína C-reativa (PCR). Os mediadores foram dosados no dia do diagnóstico de LRA (D1), dois dias após o D1, denominado D3 e quatro dias após o D1, denominado D5. A população final de análise foi composta por 52 pacientes no grupo caso e 9 pacientes no grupo controle. No D1, os níveis séricos de IL-6 estavam significativamente mais elevados nos pacientes com LRA: 61,68 (14,30 389,11) pg/mL versus 13,21 (1,50 47,06) pg/mL (p=0,032). Da mesma forma, os níveis de TNF-: 3,22 (0,57 xvi 15,9) pg/mL nos pacientes com LRA versus 0,32 (0,32 0,34) pg/mL nos controles (p<0,001). Os níveis séricos de sTNFR1 dosados, neste primeiro dia, foi significativamente menor no grupo LRA: 554,48 (459,48 770,61) pg/mL versus 768,82 (590,78 840,86) pg/mL no grupo controle, (p=0,035). No D3, os níveis séricos de TNF- mantiveram-se mais elevados, 4,64 (1,10 11,81) pg/mL versus 0,32 (0,32 0,34) pg/mL (p<0,001). Após análise de regressão logística, a dosagem mais elevada de TNF-, no D1...

The incidence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Intensive Care Units (ICU) ranges between 5 and 25% and is associated with an increased mortality. The degree of the inflammatory response reflects the severity of the physiopathologic process involved in AKI which appears to be correlated to the underline severity of the disease in these patients. The aims of this study were: a) evaluate serum level of inflammatory mediators in AKI critically ill patients; b) assess the pattern of these inflammatory mediators in addition to some others clinical and laboratory parameters, in order to compare these values in patients with and without AKI; c) correlate the serum level of these inflammatory markers and patient survival. We conduct a prospective, observational, case-control study in four ICUs at Clinic Hospital of University of Sao Paulo from November 2006 to March 2008. AKI was defined based on the RIFLE classification system. The following inflammatory mediators were measured in the serum: tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR1), interleukin (IL) -6, IL-8, IL-10, leptin e C-reactive protein (PCR). The inflammatory mediators were measured in the day of AKI diagnosis (D1), two and four days after the diagnosis, named D3 and D5, respectively. We analyzed 52 AKI patients and 9 controls. In D1 serum levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in AKI patients: 61.68 (14.30 389.11) pg/mL vs 13.21 (1.50 47.06) pg/mL in controls (p=0.032). Also the serum levels of TNF- were higher in AKI patients; 3.22 (0.57 15.9) pg/mL vs 0.32 (0.32 0.34) pg/mL in controls (p<0.001). The serum levels of sTNFR1 in the first day were significantly lower in the AKI group; 554.48 (459.48 770.61) pg/mL vs 768.82 (590.78 840.86) pg/mL in controls, (p=0.035). In D3, the serum levels of TNF- were still higher, 4.64 (1.10 11.81) pg/mL vs 0.32 (0.32 0.34) pg/mL (p<0.001). After logistic regression, the higher serum levels of TNF- remained as independent...