Immunotherapy use in older adults with cancer with frailty: A young SIOG review paper.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a treatment option in most tumor types and improved survival in patients with cancer in the last decade. Older patients with cancer are underrepresented in the pivotal clinical trials with ICIs. Older patients with cancer often have significant comorbidities and geriatric syndromes like frailty, which can complicate cancer care and treatment decisions. Frailty is among the most prevalent geriatric syndromes in patients with cancer and could lead to inferior survival and a higher risk of complications in patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the effect of frailty on the efficacy and safety of ICIs is understudied. This review focuses on the available evidence regarding the association between frailty and ICI efficacy and safety. Although the survival benefits of ICIs have generally been shown to be independent of age, the available real-world data has generally suggested higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment discontinuation in older patients. While international organizations recommend conducting a comprehensive geriatric assessment CGA to assess and address frailty before the start of anti-cancer therapies, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or higher is frequently used in clinical practice as synonymous with frailty, albeit with significant limitations. The available data has generally demonstrated diminished ICI efficacy in patients with an ECOG 2 or higher compared to patients with better performance status, while the incidence of high-grade irAEs were similar. Whilst evidence regarding outcomes with ICI in older patients and in those with sub-optimal performance status is growing, there is very limited data specifically evaluating the role of frailty with ICIs. These studies found a shortened overall survival, yet no evidence of a lower response rate to ICIs. These patients experienced more AEs, but they did not necessarily have a higher incidence of irAEs.

Development of geriatric oncology in Latin America: A report from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group.

Population aging represents a critical issue for global cancer care, notably in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Latin America is a large region composed of 21 countries with notable diversity in both human development and access to quality healthcare. Thus, it is necessary to understand how care for older individuals is being delivered in such large and diverse regions of the world. This review describes the recent advances made in Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, focusing on the creation and implementation of educational, research, and clinical activities in geriatric oncology. These initiatives intend to change healthcare professionals' perceptions about the care for older adults and to improve the way older patients are being treated.

Calculated LDL-cholesterol: comparability of the extended Martin/Hopkins, Sampson/NIH, Friedewald and four other equations in South African patients.

AIMS: The reference method for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is ultracentrifugation. However, this is unsuitable for routine use and therefore direct LDL-C assays and predictive equations are used. In this study, we compared the Friedewald, extended Martin/Hopkins, Sampson/NIH and four other equations to a direct assay. METHODS: We analysed 44 194 lipid profiles from a mixed South African population. The LDL-C predictive equations were compared with direct LDL-C assay and analysed using non-parametric statistics and error grid analysis. RESULTS: Both the extended Martin/Hopkins and Sampson/NIH equations displayed the best correlation with direct LDL-C in terms of desirable bias and total allowable error. The direct LDL-C assay classified 13.9% of patients in the low LDL-C (1.0-1.8 mmol/L) category, in comparison to the extended Martin/Hopkins equation (13.4%), the Sampson equation (14.6%) and the Friedewald equation (16.0%). The Sampson/NIH was least biased in the low LDL-C category (<1.8 mmol/L) and produced the least overall clinically relevant errors compared with the extended Martin/Hopkins and Friedewald equations in the low-LDL-C category. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest only a marginal difference between the extended Martin/Hopkins equation and the Sampson/NIH equation with the use of the Beckman Coulter DxC800 analyser in this population. The results favour the implementation of the Sampson/NIH equation when the Beckman Coulter DxC analyser is used, but the extended Martin/Hopkins may also be safely implemented. Both of these equations performed significantly better than the Friedewald equation. We recommend that patients be monitored using one of these methods and that each laboratory perform its own validation of either equation to ensure continuation and accuracy, and to prevent between-method variation.

Performance of equations for calculated LDL-C in hypertriglyceridaemia: Which one correlates best with directly measured LDL-C?

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for measuring LDL-C is impractical and direct measurements have numerous shortcomings. Older predictive equations are used only with triglycerides (TG's) below 4.52 mmol/L. We evaluated the newer equations validated for use in hypertriglyceridaemia by comparison with direct LDL-C. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Datasets from two platforms (Abbott Architect and Roche Cobas) comprised of a large cohort of 64,765 individuals were used to compare the Sampson-National Institutes of Health 2 (S-NIH2) and Extended Martin-Hopkins (E-MH) equations for LDL-C with direct LDL-C (dLDL-C) assays. RESULTS: With TG's of 4.52-9.04 mmol/L the S-NIH2 equation tended to calculate lower values than measured by dLDL-C and the E-MH equation calculated higher values. Both equations correlated better with the dLDL-C measured on Abbott than Roche with the E-MH equation having more values falling within acceptable concordance levels on both platforms. CONCLUSION: The E-MH equation correlates better with dLDL-C than the S-NIH2 on both platforms with TG levels up to 9.04 mmol/L. With hypertriglyceridaemia, the E-MH equation is less likely than the S-NIH2 equation to underestimate LDL-C when compared to the dLDL-C and will be less likely to underdiagnose patients with LDL-C levels requiring treatment according to current guidelines.

Best practice for LDL-cholesterol: when and how to calculate.

The lipid profile is important in the risk assessment for cardiovascular disease. The lipid profile includes total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides (TGs) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C). LDL-C has traditionally been calculated using the Friedewald equation (invalid with TGs greater than 4.5 mmol/L and is based on the assumption that the ratio of TG to cholesterol in very- low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) is 5 when measured in mg /dL). LDL-C can be quantified with a reference method, beta-quantification involving ultracentrifugation and this is unsuitable for routine use. Direct measurement of LDL-C was expected to provide a solution with high TGs. However, this has some challenges because of a lack of standardisation between the reagents and assays from different manufacturers as well as the additional costs. Furthermore, mild hypertriglyceridaemia also distorts direct LDL-C measurements. With the limitations of the Friedewald equation, alternatives have been derived. Newer equations include the Sampson-National Institutes of Health (NIH) equation 2 and the Martin-Hopkins equation. The Sampson-NIH2 equation was derived using beta-quantification in a population with high TG and multiple least squares regression to calculate VLDL-C, using TGs and non-HDL-C as independent variables. These data were used in a second equation to calculate LDL-C. The Sampson-NIH2 equation can be used with TGs up to 9 mmol/L. The Martin-Hopkins equation uses a 180 cell stratification of TG/non-HDL-C to determine the TG:VLDL-C ratio and can be used with TGs up to 4.5 mmol/L. Recently, an extended Martin-Hopkins equation has become available for TGs up to 9.04 mmol/L.This article discusses the best practice approach to calculating LDL-C based on the available evidence.

Comparability of calculated LDL-C with directly measured LDL-C in selected paediatric and adult cohorts.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The gold standard for measuring LDL-C is impractical for routine use while direct measurements have numerous shortcomings. This study investigated the correlation of predictive equations with currently used enzymatic assays in populations where these have historically proven unreliable to determine whether equations may be used interchangeably. No reference measure was available for comparison in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined two analytical datasets from different platforms to evaluate the correlation of predictive equations for LDL-C (Friedewald, Sampson-NIH2, Martin-Hopkins, Extended Martin-Hopkins, Hattori and Anandaraja) with direct LDL-C assays in a large paediatric (n = 7598) and an adult cohort with uncontrolled diabetes (n = 57165). Non-parametric statistics were used for comparison. RESULTS: In the paediatric cohort, the Sampson-NIH2 equation correlated best with the direct LDL-C assays with the most values falling within desirable bias (35.9-44%) and TEa (68.6-72.9%) and the lowest RMSE (0.5904-0.6138) across platforms, but tended to underestimate LDL-C levels. The Martin-Hopkins equation is less likely to underestimate these values. In diabetes, the Martin-Hopkins equation correlated the best with values falling within acceptable bias (40.2-50.5%) and TEa (75-80.6%). In hypertriglyceridaemia the Extended Martin-Hopkins equation correlates best with the direct LDL-C assays. CONCLUSION: Different measurement platforms influence the results of predictive equations and directly measured LDL-C. We propose utilising the Martin-Hopkins equation as an alternative to dLDL-C assays in adults with diabetes and for screening purposes in paediatric populations to avoid underestimating cardiovascular risk.

How should low-density lipoprotein cholesterol be calculated in 2022?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The reference method for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) quantitation is ß-quantification, a technically demanding method that is not convenient for routine use. Indirect calculation methods to estimate LDL-C, including the Friedewald equation, have been used since 1972. This calculation has several recognized limitations, especially inaccurate results for triglycerides (TG) >4.5 mmol/l (>400 mg/dl). In view of this, several other equations were developed across the world in different datasets.The purpose of this review was to analyze the best method to calculate LDL-C in clinical practice by reviewing studies that compared equations with measured LDL-C. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 45 studies that compared these formulae. The Martin/Hopkins equation uses an adjustable factor for TG:very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratios, validated in a large dataset and demonstrated to provide more accurate LDL-C calculation, especially when LDL <1.81 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) and with elevated TG. However, it is not in widespread international use because of the need for further validation and the use of the adjustable factor. The Sampson equation was developed for patients with TG up to 9 mmol/l (800 mg/dl) and was based on ß-quantification and performs well on high TG, postprandial and low LDL-C samples similar to direct LDL-C. SUMMARY: The choice of equation should take into the level of triglycerides. Further validation of different equations is required in different populations.

The role of neonatal screening in nutritional evolution in the first 12 months after diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: to assess the progression of pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients' nutritional status during the first 12 months after diagnosis and to establish its association with neonatal screening and clinical variables. Patients were recruited from two reference centers in Southern Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was carried out with all the patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2014. Anthropometric, clinic and neonatal screening were collected from medical files. Analysis of anthropometric markers over time was performed by generalized estimating equations. A multivariate regression analysis model to predict the Δ percentile body mass index (BMI) (BMI percentile difference between one year after the treatment and BMI percentile at diagnosis) was done. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Analysis of nutritional data over the period between six months and one year after diagnosis showed significant improvement of BMI, weight/age and weight/height percentiles and Z scores. The neonatal screening was associated with a significant increase of 31.2 points in ΔBMI percentile at the one-year evaluation (p<0.05). On the other hand, a one-point increase of initial BMI percentile was associated with a reduction of 0.6 points in ΔBMI percentile. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the role of neonatal screening in the nutritional status of patients diagnosed with CF in the first year after diagnosis. Early diagnosis can significantly contribute to the achievement of appropriate anthropometric indicators and important nutritional recovery of CF patients.

The role of neonatal screening in nutritional evolution in the first 12 months after diagnosis of cystic fibrosis

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: to assess the progression of pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients' nutritional status during the first 12 months after diagnosis and to establish its association with neonatal screening and clinical variables. Patients were recruited from two reference centers in Southern Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was carried out with all the patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2014. Anthropometric, clinic and neonatal screening were collected from medical files. Analysis of anthropometric markers over time was performed by generalized estimating equations. A multivariate regression analysis model to predict the Δ percentile body mass index (BMI) (BMI percentile difference between one year after the treatment and BMI percentile at diagnosis) was done. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Analysis of nutritional data over the period between six months and one year after diagnosis showed significant improvement of BMI, weight/age and weight/height percentiles and Z scores. The neonatal screening was associated with a significant increase of 31.2 points in ΔBMI percentile at the one-year evaluation (p<0.05). On the other hand, a one-point increase of initial BMI percentile was associated with a reduction of 0.6 points in ΔBMI percentile. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the role of neonatal screening in the nutritional status of patients diagnosed with CF in the first year after diagnosis. Early diagnosis can significantly contribute to the achievement of appropriate anthropometric indicators and important nutritional recovery of CF patients.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Avaliar a evolução do estado nutricional de pacientes pediátricos com fibrose cística (FC), provenientes de dois centros de referência do sul do Brasil, durante os 12 primeiros meses após o diagnóstico e estabelecer associação com a triagem neonatal e com variáveis clínicas. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado com todos os pacientes diagnosticados entre 2009 e 2014. Foram coletados dados antropométricos, clínicos e de realização da triagem neonatal a partir dos prontuários dos pacientes. A análise dos indicadores antropométricos ao longo do tempo foi realizada por equações de estimativas generalizadas. Utilizou-se o modelo de análise de regressão multivariada para predizer o D percentil índice de massa corporal - IMC/I (diferença entre percentil de IMC/I um ano após o tratamento e percentil de IMC/I no momento do diagnóstico). RESULTADOS: Participaram do estudo 47 pacientes. A análise dos dados antropométricos ao longo do período de seis meses e um ano após o diagnóstico demonstrou melhora significativa dos parâmetros de percentil e escore Z de IMC/I, peso/idade e peso/estatura em cada período analisado. A realização da triagem neonatal foi associada com um aumento significativo de 31,2 pontos no Δ percentil de IMC/I durante o período de um ano (p<0,05). Por outro lado, um ponto a mais de percentil de IMC/I inicial foi associado com uma redução de 0,6 ponto no Δ percentil de IMC/I (p<0,01). CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo evidencia o papel da triagem neonatal na evolução antropométrica de pacientes com FC no primeiro ano após o diagnóstico. O diagnóstico precoce pode contribuir significativamente para a recuperação nutricional desses pacientes.

Safety of a silicone elastomer vaginal ring as potential microbicide delivery method in African women: A Phase 1 randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are in urgent need of female-initiated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preventative methods. Vaginal rings are one dosage form in development for delivery of HIV microbicides. However, African women have limited experience with vaginal rings. OBJECTIVES: This Phase I, randomized, crossover trial assessed and compared the safety, acceptability and adherence of a silicone elastomer placebo vaginal ring, intended as a microbicide delivery method, inserted for a 12-week period in healthy, HIV-negative, sexually active women in South Africa and Tanzania. METHODS: 170 women, aged 18 to 35 years were enrolled with 88 women randomized to Group A, using a placebo vaginal ring for 12 weeks followed by a 12-week safety observation period. 82 women were randomized to Group B and observed for safety first, followed by a placebo vaginal ring for 12 weeks. Safety was assessed by clinical laboratory assessments, pelvic/colposcopy examinations and adverse events. Possible carry-over effect was addressed by ensuring no signs or symptoms of genital irritation at crossover. RESULTS: No safety concerns were identified for any safety variables assessed during the trial. No serious adverse events were reported considered related to the placebo vaginal ring. Vaginal candidiasis was the most common adverse event occurring in 11% of participants during each trial period. Vaginal discharge (2%), vaginal odour (2%), and bacterial vaginitis (2%) were assessed as possibly or probably related to the vaginal ring. Thirty-four percent of participants had sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at screening, compared to 12% of participants who tested positive for STIs at crossover and the final trial visit. Three participants (2%) tested HIV positive during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The silicone elastomer vaginal ring had no safety concerns, demonstrating a profile favorable for further development for topical release of antiretroviral-based microbicides.

Curcuma longa (Turmeric) for Prevention of Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Pilot Study.

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is common and frequently occurs in the first cycle of treatment in approximately 40% to 50% of patients who receive capecitabine. Turmeric (Curcuma longa) is a plant used in Ayurvedic medicine with clinical activity in various inflammatory conditions. Our objective was to evaluate whether turmeric was active for the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS. We included patients older than 18 years of age without previous exposure to capecitabine who were scheduled to receive this medication. Before starting treatment, after three weeks and at the end of six weeks, we evaluated dermatologic toxicity, conducted quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQC30 and DLQI) and collected serum inflammatory biomarkers (inerleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin). We administered turmeric at a dose of 4 g/day (2 pills 12 hours apart) starting at the beginning of capecitabine treatment and lasting six weeks. We included 40 patients whose mean age was 62 years. Most were female (80%), 52% had breast cancer, and 47.5% had GI tumors. After the first cycle of capecitabine treatment, we observed that 11 of 40 patients developed HFS (27.5%; 95% CI [15, 42]), whereas four patients developed HFS equal or superior to grade 2 (10%; 95% CI [3.3, 23]). We did not find any correlations between the inflammatory markers tested and HFS. We show that turmeric combined with capecitabine seems to produce a lower rate of HFS, especially grade 2 or higher. These findings need to be reproduced in larger controlled studies.