Comparison of three approaches for inhibiting insulin-like growth factor I receptor and their effects on NSCLC cell lines in vitro.

The insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) mitogenic signaling mediates malignant cell survival by many complex and redundant pathways. This study compared the effects of IGF-1R inhibition on viability and apoptosis of two NSCLC cell lines, using three different methods for the impairment of IGF-1R function: (IR3, an anti-IGF-1R antibody; tyrphostin AG1024, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and IGF-1R-small interfering RNA (siRNA). IGF-1R inhibition led to a decrease of cell survival and induced apoptosis in a manner depending on the approach used for the receptor inhibition. To find an explanation, we analyzed the effects of these treatments on three major antiapoptotic pathways evoked by IGF-1R signaling: IRS-1, Shc and 14.3.3-dependent mitochondrial translocation of Raf-1 kinase (mitRaf). (IR3 downregulated IRS-1 phosphorylation in A549 cells and Shc phosphorylation in U1810 cells. While in A549 cells AG1024 treatment decreased both IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation, in U1810 cells the IRS-1 phosphorylation was only slightly affected and the Shc phosphorylation drastically downregulated. Neither (IR3 nor AG1024 had any effect on Raf-1 kinase translocation. Irrespective of the cell line, IGF-1R-siRNA treatment induced downregulation of both IRS-1 and Shc phosphorylation coupled with the abrogation of mitRaf. In addition, the IGF-1R-siRNA proved to be the most potent inducer of apoptosis suggesting that more than one antiapoptotic pathway in IGF-1R signaling should be inhibited to effectively induce apoptosis in lung cancer cells.

Single cell analysis of G1 check points-the relationship between the restriction point and phosphorylation of pRb.

Single cell analysis allows high resolution investigation of temporal relationships between transition events in G1. It has been suggested that phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRb) is the molecular mechanism behind passage through the restriction point (R). We performed a detailed single cell study of the temporal relationship between R and pRb phosphorylation in human fibroblasts using time lapse video-microscopy combined with immunocytochemistry. Four principally different criteria for pRb phosphorylation were used, namely (i) phosphorylation of residues Ser795 and Ser780, (ii) degree of pRb-association with the nuclear structure, a property that is closely related with pRb phosphorylation status, (iii) release of the transcription factor E2F-1 from pRb, and (iv) accumulation of cyclin E, which is dependent on phosphorylation of pRb. The analyses of individual cells revealed that passage through R preceded phosphorylation of pRb, which occurs in a gradually increasing proportion of cells in late G1. Our data clearly suggest that pRb phosphorylation is not the molecular mechanism behind the passage through R. The restriction point and phosphorylation of pRb thus seem to represent two separate check point in G1.

Expression patterns of S100A7 (psoriasin) and S100A9 (calgranulin-B) in keratinocyte differentiation.

S100 proteins are involved in many biological processes. S100A7 and S100A9 have been shown to be markedly upregulated both in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and in psoriasis. We have examined the relationship between keratinocyte differentiation and the expression of the two proteins. Using Western blot analysis and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), both S100A7 and S100A9 were shown to be induced in normal primary keratinocytes (HEKn), when differentiation was promoted by high extracellular calcium, loss of contact with extracellular matrix and confluent conditions, as previously reported for S100A7 in mammary epithelial cells. Differentiation was confirmed by using RT-PCR for the differentiation marker keratin-1. Using immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies, we compared the expression of the two proteins in a spectrum of conditions of dysregulated keratinocyte differentiation. We found a strikingly similar distribution of the proteins. Their expression correlated with the degree of keratinocyte differentiation. They were both absent in undifferentiated basalioma and strongly expressed in carcinoma in situ, as well as in keratoacanthoma and differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. In normal epithelium, they were expressed in the superficial, differentiated region of the epithelium rather than in the basal region. These findings support the hypothesis that these two S100 proteins are involved in keratinocyte differentiation.

Changes in cell shape and anchorage in relation to the restriction point.

The restriction point (R) separates the G1 phase of continuously cycling cells into two functionally different parts. The first part, G1-pm, represents the growth factor dependent post-mitotic interval from mitosis to R, which is of constant length (3-4 h). The second part, G1-ps, represents the growth factor independent, pre-S phase interval of G1 that lasts from R to S and that varies in time from 1 to 10 h. G1-pm cells rapidly exit (within 1 h) from the cell cycle and enter G0 as a response to serum withdrawal. The finding that R occurs at a set time after mitosis indicates that R may be related to the metabolic and/or structural changes that the cell underwent during the previous mitosis. We have recently shown that phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRb) is not the molecular mechanism behind R, as has been suggested previously. Here, we present an alternative explanation for R. In the present study, we applied a single cell approach using time-lapse analysis, which revealed that upon serum starvation the G1-pm cells rapidly underwent a transient change in cell shape from flat to spherical before exiting to G0. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) counteracted this change in shape and also prevented exit to G0 to the same extent. Furthermore epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin like growth factor (IGF-1), which only partially counteracted this change, only partially counteracts exit to G0. These data clearly indicate a direct link between change in cell shape and exit to G0 in G1-cells that have not passed R.