Management of factor XI deficiency in oncological liver and colorectal surgery by therapeutic plasma exchange: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is a rare congenital hemostatic disorder associated with increased bleeding tendency in trauma, surgery or when other hemostatic defects are present. Perioperative hemostatic management of a patient with a severe FXI deficiency undergoing major oncological liver and colorectal surgery with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) is reported. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 54-year-old male with severe FXI deficiency was scheduled for resection of synchronous rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases. Baseline prothrombin time (PT) was 97 %, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 89 s(s) and FXI levels <1 IU/dL. The rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM™) presented a prolonged INTEM clotting time (CT) = 443 s (RV 100-240 s) and a clot formation time (CFT) = 110 s (RV 30-100 s). TPE with FFP was carried out achieving FXI levels up to 46 IU/dL and an aPTT of 33 s, normalizing thromboelastometry parameters to an INTEM CT = 152 s and a CFT = 86 s before the procedure. After surgery, the patient received daily FFP to maintain FXI levels above 30 IU/dL until discharge on the eighth day. A total of 30 FFP units were transfused during hospital stay. No significant bleeding events neither transfusion related complications were observed during the perioperative period. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of correlation between FXI levels and bleeding risk, a multidisciplinary approach based on daily FXI levels monitoring, close clinical assessment and factor supplementation is mandatory. In conclusion, TPE with FFP is an efficacious alternative strategy to correct severe FXI deficiency in patients undergoing major surgery.

The fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived method is not useful in patients anticoagulated with low molecular weight heparins or rivaroxaban.

Essentials Fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived (FIBPT-d) behavior in anticoagulated patients is under studied. FIBPT-d method overestimates fibrinogen in rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin samples. Unfractionated heparin and dabigatran samples showed similar bias to the control group. Rabbit brain and human recombinant thromboplastin behavior was different in rivaroxaban samples. SUMMARY: Background The fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived (FIBPT-d) method with photo-optical coagulometers is easy and economical. However, there are few reports on the behavior of this test on samples from patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Objective To compare fibrinogen results obtained with the Clauss (FIB C) method and the FIBPT-d method with two thromboplastins in anticoagulated patients. Population The study population comprised 295 consecutive anticoagulated patients: 99 treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), 49 treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), 47 treated with LMWH, 50 treated with rivaroxaban, 50 treated with dabigatran, and 100 normal controls (NCs). Methods Dabigatran samples were analyzed by the use of FIB C with HemosIL Fibrinogen C or 100 NHI thrombin units mL-1 reagents; rabbit brain and human recombinant thromboplastins with HemosIL PTFibrinogen HS plus (HS) and Recombiplastin 2G (RP) were used for FIBPT-d method. Heparin and rivaroxaban levels were assessed with HemosIL Liq antiXa with specific calibrators; dabigatran levels were determined with the HemosIL Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay. All assays were performed on the ACL TOP platform in two laboratories. Percentage biases for the FIBPT-d method versus the FIB C method were calculated by the use of Bland-Altman plots. Results Positive biases of the FIBPT-d method versus the FIB C method with both thromboplastins were seen in NC samples (13.7% and 18.9% for HS and RP, respectively), but biases with HS in rivaroxaban and VKA patient samples were higher than that in NC samples, at 31.9% and 34.0%, respectively. LMWH patient samples showed higher bias than NC samples: 26.5% and 29.3.0% with HS and RP, respectively. UFH and dabigatran patient samples showed similar bias as NC samples. Conclusion The FIBPT-d method should not be used in anticoagulated patients, because the FIBPT-d mathematical algorithm has been validated only in normal subjects, so overestimation could occur in these patients.

Variability of cut-off values for the detection of lupus anticoagulants: results of an international multicenter multiplatform study.

Essentials Between-lab variations of cut-off values in lupus anticoagulant detection are unknown. Cut-off values were calculated in 11 labs each testing plasma from 120 donors with 3 platforms. Major variation was observed even within the same platform. Cut-off values determined in different labs are not interchangeable. SUMMARY: Background Cut-off values for interpretation of lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection are poorly investigated. Aims (i) To assess whether results from healthy donors were normally distributed and (ii) the between-laboratories differences in cut-off values for screening, mixing and LA confirmation when calculated as 99th or 95th centiles, and (iii) to assess their impact on the detection rate for LA. Methods Each of 11 laboratories using one of the three widely used commercial platforms for LA detection was asked to collect plasmas from 120 healthy donors and to perform screening, mixing and LA confirmation with two methods (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] and dilute Russell viper venom [dRVV]). A common set of LA-positive or LA-negative freeze-dried plasmas was used to assess the LA detection rate. Results were centralized (Milano) for statistical analysis. Results and conclusions (i) Clotting times or ratios for healthy subjects were not normally distributed in the majority of cases. The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined preferably by the non-parametric method based on centiles. (ii) There were relatively large inter-laboratory cut-off variations even within the same platform and the variability was marginally attenuated when results were expressed as ratios (test-to-normal pooled plasma). The take-home message is that cut-off values should be determined locally. (iii) There were differences between cut-off values calculated as 99th or 95th centiles that translate into a different LA detection rate (the lower the centile the greater the detection rate). The take-home message is that cut-off values determined as the 95th centile allow a better LA detection rate.

Frequent false-positive results of lupus anticoagulant tests in plasmas of patients receiving the new oral anticoagulants and enoxaparin.

INTRODUCTION: Oral direct thrombin and Xa inhibitors are worldwide distributed for prevention and treatment of thrombosis. It is important to recognize their effects on lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. The aim of the study is to describe the rate of false-positive results of LA tests on plasmas of patients with previous negative LA tests results that receive dabigatran etexilate (DAB) 110 mg/twice a day, rivaroxaban (RIV) 10 mg/day or 15 mg/twice a day, or enoxaparin 40 mg/day. METHODS: Blood was taken between 1.5 and 4 h post administration. Tests evaluated are as follows: prothrombin time, APTT, dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) screen, APTT, and DRVVT mixing studies, index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) with normal plasma, screen/confirm normalized ratio (NR) for DRVVT and silica clotting time (SCT). RESULTS: Plasmas from patients taking DAB (n = 22) presented 100% prolonged APTT and DRVVT with ICA above the cutoff point and 81.8% positive screen/confirm NR, 100% prolonged SCT screen, but 4.5% positive confirmatory NR. All patients receiving RIV at 15 mg/twice a day (n = 4) presented positive DRVVT screen, mixing, and confirmatory tests, 75% and 100% prolonged APTT and SCT screen, with negative screen/confirm NR. Those taking RIV 10 mg/day (n = 22) showed 81.8% prolonged DRVVT screen, 82.3% and 76.5% of them with positive mixing and confirmatory studies. Patients receiving enoxaparin also presented high prevalence of APTT and DRVVT false-positive results. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran etexilate, RIV, and enoxaparin affect tests for LA not only in screening and mixing, but also in confirmatory studies. We considered that LA testing should not to be performed when patients are taken these drugs, particularly if blood is collected at peak, in order to avoid false-positive results.

New guidelines for lupus anticoagulant: sensitivity and specificity of cut-off values calculated with plasmas from healthy controls in mixing and confirmatory tests.

INTRODUCTION: The updated guidelines for lupus anticoagulant (LA) diagnosis indicate locally calculate the cut-off values of the index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) and the clotting time in seconds (s) for mixing studies and % of correction (%C) for confirmatory tests. We assess sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPC) of the cut-off values obtained as the 99th percentile from 60 plasmas of healthy individuals. METHODS: We analysed 647 plasmas from patients studied in the last 3 years, and results were revaluated according to the new criteria and cut-off values. Four hundred and three had LA, and 75 of them were under oral anticoagulants (OA). We performed three screening tests: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), diluted Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and dilute prothrombin time (dPT), and previous diagnosis was carried out using our home-made cut-off calculated by receiver operating characteristics curves. We reanalysed the mixing and confirmatory data of APTT/dRVVT, the tests selected in the new guidelines. To evaluate SPC, 244 plasmas (160 OA and 84 congenital deficient patients) were studied. RESULTS: Considering mixing studies, the cut-off values demonstrate that SEN of ICA-APTT was 94% and of clotting time in second (s) 83%, with an SPC of 77% and 84%, respectively. For ICA-dRVVT, SEN was 72% and for clotting time in second (s) 77%, with SPC of 98% and 84%, respectively. The cut-off values for %C for confirmatory APTT show good SEN 82% and high SPC 96%; for confirmatory dRVVT lower SEN 77%, but a SPC of 100%. CONCLUSION: The combination of mixing and confirmatory tests interpreted according to the new guidelines can clearly differentiate LA from other coagulopathies.

Circulating levels of tissue factor and proinflammatory cytokines in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome or leprosy related antiphospholipid antibodies.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with thromboembolic complications. In APS, most aPL are autoantibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I and prothrombin, which play a major role in the APS pathogenesis. Nevertheless, antibodies with the same antigen specificity are also found in aPL patients with leprosy, in whom thromboembolic complications are uncommon. The in vivo upregulation of the tissue factor (TF) pathway and the imbalance of cytokines have been proposed as potential mechanisms of thrombosis in the APS. We measured the circulating levels of TF, interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) in 83 patients with autoimmune aPL (42 with and 41 without clinical features of definite primary APS), 48 leprosy patients (33 with aPL) and 48 normal controls. There was a trend (P = 0.06) to higher median sTF in patients with autoimmune aPL (139 pg/mL) compared with leprosy patients (103.5 pg/mL) and controls (123 pg/mL). In addition, the frequency of raised sTF levels (> 187 pg/mL) was significantly higher in the group with autoimmune aPL [22.9% (APS 21.4%, non-APS 24.4%)] but not in leprosy (10.4%) compared with controls (4.2%). Elevated levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha and a trend to lower IFN-gamma were found in patients with definite APS. Leprosy patients with aPL, however, had increased TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma but normal IL-6 levels. Levels of sIL-6R did not differ between controls and either patients with autoimmune aPL or leprosy. The different cytokine profiles as well as differences in circulating levels of TF might contribute to the high thrombotic risk found in patients with autoimmune aPL but not in leprosy related aPL patients.

Autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies impair the inhibition of activated factor X by protein Z/protein Z-dependent protease inhibitor.

The hemostatic process is tightly regulated by several antithrombotic mechanisms. Among them, protein Z (PZ)-dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI) potently inhibits factor (F)Xa in a manner dependent on calcium ions, phospholipids and PZ. Autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are mainly directed against phospholipid-binding plasma proteins such as beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) and prothrombin, and are known to interfere with phospholipid-dependent hemostatic pathways. In this study, we investigated whether purified aPL are able to interfere with inhibition of FXa by PZ/ZPI. beta2GPI modestly delayed the FXa inactivation by PZ/ZPI and most isolated aPL-IgGs were found to further increase the inhibitory potential of beta2GPI on PZ/ZPI activity. Without beta2GPI, the PZ/ZPI activity was unaffected by the addition of aPL-IgG. As PZ deficiency is hypothesized to lead to a prothrombotic state, we performed a case-control study to measure plasma levels of PZ and ZPI in 66 patients with autoimmune aPL and 152 normal controls. The prevalence of low PZ levels (below the 5th percentile of controls) was significantly greater in the 37 patients with definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (24.3%) but not in the 29 aPL patients not fulfilling the criteria for APS (10.3%) compared with the normal group (4.6%, P < 0.001 vs. APS). ZPI antigen levels were similar in patients with aPL and normal controls. Concomitant PZ deficiency increased by approximately sevenfold the risk of arterial thrombosis in aPL patients. Taken together, these data suggest that the PZ/ZPI system is commonly impaired in aPL patients thus probably increasing the thrombotic risk.

High titers of autoantibodies to tissue factor pathway inhibitor are associated with the antiphospholipid syndrome.

As the activity of the tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) may be impaired in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), 162 aPL patients were evaluated for autoantibodies to recombinant TFPI (anti-TFPI) using an optimized ELISA. Anti-TFPI (>18 U mL(-1) for IgG and/or > 15 U mL-1 for IgM) were detected in 54 patients with aPL (33.3%) and in three out of 79 normal controls (3.8%, P < 0.0001). Among aPL patients, the prevalence of positive anti-TFPI was 38.3 and 28.4% in those with or without diagnosis of definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Patients with definite APS had a significantly greater frequency of high titer (>50 U mL(-1)) anti-TFPI than aPL patients from the no definite APS group (18.5% vs. 6.2%, OR 3.7, P= 0.017). Most aPL recognized full-length TFPI, but not a truncated form of TFPI lacking the C-terminus of the molecule. Isolated IgGs from subjects with anti-TFPI impaired the dose-dependent inhibitory effect of TFPI on factor Xa activity in the presence, but not in the absence of phospholipid vesicles. Thus, aPL with high titer anti-TFPI limit TFPI action and are associated with the APS.

Link between anti-CD36 antibodies and thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Some studies have previously suggested the involvement of antibodies directed against CD36 (anti-CD36) in the pathogenesis of thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-CD36 in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and its relationship with thrombosis. METHODS: Anti-CD36 were tested using an indirect MAIPA assay in 62 patients with autoimmune aPL but without SLE; there were 38 with and 24 without thrombosis. Nineteen patients with thrombosis served as an aPL(-) control group and 58 healthy subjects as the normal control group. RESULTS: 15 of 62 aPL patients (24.2%) but only 1 of 58 (1.7%) normal controls had anti-CD36 (p < 0.0005). As compared to normal controls, the prevalence of anti-CD36 was significantly higher in aPL patients with (26.3%, p < 0.0005) or without thrombosis (20.8%, p < 0.01). Anti-CD36 were significantly more frequent in aPL patients with thrombosis than in thrombosis aPL(-) subjects (26.3% vs 0%, p = 0.02). The presence of anti-CD36 seems to be more frequent in aPL patients with recurrent thrombosis than in those with a single episode (36.8% vs 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The presence of anti-CD36 is highly prevalent in patients with autoimmune aPL with a trend to being more frequent in patients with recurrent episodes of thrombosis.

Central retinal vein occlusion and thrombophilia risk factors.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of risk factors predisposing to thrombosis in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). We prospectively examined 37 consecutive patients with CRVO, and 144 healthy controls, for major and potential inherited and acquired thrombophilic risk factors. Among them, only the prevalence of hyperhomocysteinaemia (10/37, 27.0%) and antiphospholipid antibodies positivity (5/37, 13.5%) were significantly higher in patients with respect to controls (5.5%, P < 0.001 and 2.1%, P < 0.01, respectively). Both hyperhomocysteinaemia and antiphospholipid antibodies seem to be associated with CRVO. A search for acquired thrombophilia is advisable in patients with CRVO.

Markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate plasma levels of markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with or without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to compare them to those found in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: 42 patients with leprosy (35 lepromatous and 7 borderline): 29 aPL(+) and 13 aPL(-), as well as 26 healthy subjects as normal controls (NC) and 79 control aPL patients without leprosy (59 with and 20 without APS) were included in the study. Plasma soluble P and E selectin (sPsel and sEsel), and VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1), prothrombin F1 + 2 fragment (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D dimer (DD) were measured by ELISA. The protein C pathway was assessed by the ProC global test. RESULTS: Leprosy patients with aPL presented increased median levels of sPsel [ng/ml (82.0 vs 36.0, p < 0.001)] and sVCAM-1 [ng/ml (495 vs 335, p < 0.001)] compared to NC, as observed in control aPL patients without leprosy. Levels of sPsel in aPL(+) patients with leprosy were significantly higher than in aPL(-) ones (52.5 ng/ml), p = 0.005. However, plasma markers of thrombin generation were increased in control aPL patients without leprosy but not in those with leprosy. ProcC global test was abnormal in 24.1% of leprosy patients with aPL compared to 4.4% of NC (p < 0.024), and to 57.2% of control patients with aPL without leprosy (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that although patients with leprosy present a high prevalence of aPL, and platelet and endothelial cell activation in vivo to the same extent than patients with APS, they do not show a procoagulant state.

Markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with antiphospholipid antibodies

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate plasma levels of markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with or without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to compare them to those found in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: 42 patients with leprosy (35 lepromatous and 7 borderline): 29 aPL(+) and 13 aPL(-), as well as 26 healthy subjects as normal controls (NC) and 79 control aPL patients without leprosy (59 with and 20 without APS) were included in the study. Plasma soluble P and E selectin (sPsel and sEsel), and VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1), prothrombin F1 + 2 fragment (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D dimer (DD) were measured by ELISA. The protein C pathway was assessed by the ProC global test. RESULTS: Leprosy patients with aPL presented increased median levels of sPsel [ng/ml (82.0 vs 36.0, p smaller 0.001)] and sVCAM-1 [ng/ml (495 vs 335, p smaller 0.001)] compared to NC, as observed in control aPL patients without leprosy. Levels of sPsel in aPL(+) patients with leprosy were significantly higher than in aPL(-) ones (52.5 ng/ml), p = 0.005. However, plasma markers of thrombin generation were increased in control aPL patients without leprosy but not in those with leprosy. ProcC global test was abnormal in 24.1 per cent of leprosy patients with aPL compared to 4.4 per cent of NC (p smaller 0.024), and to 57.2 per cent of control patients with aPL without leprosy (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that although patients with leprosy present a high prevalence of aPL, and platelet and endothelial cell activation in vivo to the same extent than patients with APS, they do not show a procoagulant state.

Major and potential prothrombotic genotypes in a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism.

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A (PT-20210A) variant are well-known risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VT). The thermolabile variant (TT) of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, and homozygosity for the 4G allele of the promoter region of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are potential genetic polymorphisms that have not been consistently associated with increased risk of VT. A case-control study was performed on 192 consecutive unrelated patients referred for evaluation of thrombophilia because of VT and 200 healthy controls. FVL was found in 10.4% of patients compared to 3.0% of controls, while 6.3% of patients were carriers of the PT-20210A allele compared to 2.0% of controls. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) were 5.92 and 4.03 for FVL (P=.001) and the PT-20210A (P=.033), respectively. The prevalence of homozygotes for MTHFR (TT) and PAI-1 (4G/4G) among patients and controls were 13.7% versus 13.0% and 21.6% versus 23.5%, respectively (P=ns). A total of 121 patients underwent a complete screening for FVL, the PT-20210A, protein C (PC), protein S (PS), antithrombin III (ATIII), levels of factor VIII, and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). In 59 patients (48.8%) at least one defect was found, being a single defect in 55 and combined defects in 4 patients. Plasma levels of homocysteine (Hcy) were measured in 138 patients and 144 controls. Subjects from both groups carrying the MTHFR-TT variant had higher Hcy levels than those with the normal genotype. Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) by itself is a risk factor for VT (OR 4.92, P<.0001). We conclude that FVL and the PT-20210A are risk factors for VT as well as Hcy levels, but the MTHFR and PAI-1 polymorphisms do not appear to be associated with VT in our country.

Thrombophilic factors in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTE-PH) is an infrequent cause of pulmonary hypertension that develops in 0.1-0.2% of patients who survive after an acute venous thromboembolic event. According to the largest series so far reported, 15-30% of patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH have an underlying congenital or acquired hypercoagulable state. To determine the prevalence of thrombophilic factors in our population, we analyzed 24 patients admitted to our institution between November 1992 and March 2000 fulfilling criteria for CTE-PH. Eighteen patients disclosed abnormal results in the screening for thrombophilia. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies) was the abnormality most frequently found (12 out of 24 patients). We found hyperhomocysteinaemia in 7/14, true protein S deficiency in 1/10, protein C deficiency in 1/13, activated protein C resistance in 1/22, antithrombin III deficiency in 1/24, and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation in 1/18 patients. Factor V Leiden was normal in all 18 patients studied. Five patients (20.8%) disclosed more than one thrombophilic abnormality. In conclusion, contrary to the largest series of patients with CTE-PH so far reported, we found that 75% of patients with CTE-PH presented at least one thrombophilic risk factor, being antiphospholipid antibodies in 50% of the cases. We recommend a thorough screening for thrombophilia in all patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH.

Increased lipid peroxidation correlates with platelet activation but not with markers of endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Recent studies have shown that patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have increased lipid peroxidation. We evaluated the urinary excretion of 11-dehydro thromboxane B2 (11-DH-TXB(2) and isoprostane F(2alpha)III (IPF(2alpha)III), reflecting platelet activation and lipid peroxidation in vivo, and plasma soluble markers of endothelial cell, platelet and blood coagulation activation: soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), P- and E-selectin (sPsel and sEsel), F1 + 2 fragment of prothrombin (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D-Dimer (DD). We studied 79 patients with aPL (47 with previous thrombosis), 45 healthy volunteers (normal controls, NC), 12 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without aPL and a thrombosis control group (TCG) without thrombophilia (n = 16). Urinary levels (mean, range) of eicosanoids and isoeicosanoids were significantly increased in 39 patients with aPL compared with 25 NC, 11-DH-TXB(2) 164.0 ng/mmol creatinine (9.5-1162.8) versus 43.4 ng/mmol creatinine (4.2-87.6), P < 0.001; IPF(2alpha)III 56.9 pg/mg creatinine (5.5-388.7) versus 27.0 pg/mg creatinine (4.6-87.6), P = 0.03. Both metabolites were significantly correlated (rho = 0.49, P = 0.014), but none correlated with any clinical manifestation or antibody profile. The aPL group presented increased levels of sPsel, sEsel, sVCAM-1, TAT, F1 + 2 and DD, but any soluble marker correlated with IPF2alphaIII. Urinary 11-DH-TXB(2) correlated with sPsel (rho = 0.39, P = 0.04). Compared with SLE controls, the SLE group with aPL had higher levels of F1 + 2. Plasma levels of F1 + 2 and DD were significantly increased and a trend to higher sPsel was found in aPL patients with thrombosis compared with the TCG. Platelet activation, lipid peroxidation and blood coagulation activation seem to be important in the pathophysiology of antiphospholipid syndrome.

High prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in leprosy: evaluation of antigen reactivity.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been reported not only in autoimmune disorders but also in various infectious diseases. Accumulating evidence indicates that beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) and prothrombin are the main proteins to which autoimmune aPL bind. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of different aPL in patients with leprosy. We included 51 outpatients (42 lepromatous and 9 borderline leprosy) without any clinical feature of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). 35 had lupus anticoagulant and 31 had anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). Anti-beta2GPI antibodies were highly positive in 29/51 and anti- prothrombin antibodies (anti-II) were detected in 23/51. Almost all aCL and anti-beta2GPI were of IgM isotype, while IgG isotype was more frequent among anti-II. No statistical difference was found when aPL were evaluated in patients grouped according to their bacteriological status. Furthermore, patients under treatment (n=33) had a similar frequency of positive aPL compared to patients in vigilance (n=14). Assessing the specificity of antibody binding to CL and beta2GPI in ELISA by means of inhibition studies with cardiolipin-beta2GPI liposomes, leprosy and APS sera showed a similar behaviour. Comparable results were also found in both groups of patients when inhibition experiments with lysate of Mycobacterium leprae were carried out. In summary, leprosy-related aPL resemble those found in patients with APS but the immunoglobulin isotype is different, with IgM much more prevalent in leprosy patients.

Which are the best biological markers of the antiphospholipid syndrome?

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of both clinical and biological features. Due to the heterogeneity of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) the laboratory approach for their detection includes clotting-based tests for lupus anticoagulant (LA) as well as solid-phase assays for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). In addition, as it has been shown that autoimmune aPL recognize epitopes on phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma proteins, assays detecting antibodies to beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI) or prothrombin have been developed. The association between venous or arterial thrombosis and recurrent fetal loss with the presence of conventional aPL (LA and/or aCL) has been confirmed by many studies. The LA and IgG aCL at moderate/high titre seem to exhibit the strongest association with clinical manifestations of the APS. Several reports indicate that LA is less sensitive but more specific than aCL for the APS. Assays against PLs other than CL as well as the use of mixtures of PLs have been proposed to improve the detection of APS-related aPL. Concerning antibodies to PL-binding proteins (detected in the absence of PLs), there is evidence that anti-beta 2-GPI are closely associated with thrombosis and other clinical features of the APS. Moreover, these antibodies may be more specific in the recognition of the APS and in some cases may be present in the absence of aPL detected by standard tests. Many issues are still under debate and are discussed in this review, such as the problems of standardization of anti-beta 2-GPI assays, detection of the IgA isotype of aCL and anti-beta 2-GPI, the coagulation profiles of LA in the recognition of the thrombotic risk and the association of particular markers with subsets of patients with APS.