Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 187: 104035, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37244324

RESUMO

The present white paper, referring to the 4th Assisi Think Tank Meeting on breast cancer, reviews state-of-the-art data, on-going studies and research proposals. <70% agreement in an online questionnaire identified the following clinical challenges: 1: Nodal RT in patients who have a) 1-2 positive sentinel nodes without ALND (axillary lymph node dissection); b) cN1 disease transformed into ypN0 by primary systemic therapy and c) 1-3 positive nodes after mastectomy and ALND. 2. The optimal combination of RT and immunotherapy (IT), patient selection, IT-RT timing, and RT optimal dose, fractionation and target volume. Most experts agreed that RT- IT combination does not enhance toxicity. 3: Re-irradiation for local relapse converged on the use of partial breast irradiation after second breast conserving surgery. Hyperthermia aroused support but is not widely available. Further studies are required to finetune best practice, especially given the increasing use of re-irradiation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Mastectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Mastectomia Segmentar , Axila/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia
2.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 101(10): 649-655, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654985

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationships between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral healthy breast and tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 228 women (mean age, 47.6 years±10 [SD]; range: 24-74 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC were included. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after NAC and 127 patients underwent MRI before, during (after the 4th cycle of NAC) and after NAC. Quantitative semi-automated analysis of BPE of the contralateral healthy breast was performed. Enhancement level on baseline MRI (baseline BPE) and MRI after chemotherapy (final BPE), change in enhancement rate between baseline MRI and final MRI (total BPE change) and between baseline MRI and midline MRI (early BPE change) were recorded. Associations between BPE and tumor response, menopausal status, tumor phenotype, NAC type and tumor stage at diagnosis were searched for. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer cells in the breast and ipsilateral lymph nodes. RESULTS: No differences were found in baseline BPE, final BPE, early and total BPE changes between pCR and non-pCR groups. Early BPE change was higher in non-pCR group in patients with stages 3 and 4 breast cancers (P=0.019) and in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients (P=0.020). CONCLUSION: Early reduction of BPE in the contralateral breast during NAC may be an early predictor of loss of tumor response, showing potential as an imaging biomarker of treatment response, especially in women with stages 3 or 4 breast cancers and in HER2 - negative breast cancers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(2): 505-512, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29980908

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our experience of multidisciplinary clinic providing a joint approach by radiation oncologist and anesthetist for patients with cancer pain to evaluate the adequacy and the IMprovement in MAnagement (IM-MA study) of this symptom. METHODS: A Team for Pain Management (TPM) represented by radiation oncologist and anesthetist weekly provided consultations to patient presenting cancer pain. TPM prospectively reported epidemiologic, symptomatic, and pharmacological data. TPM modified pain therapy and indicated antalgic radiotherapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks after intervention. RESULTS: From November 2015 to April 2016, 65 patients were evaluated by TPM. At the baseline, 18 patients (27.7%) were undertreated (i.e., receiving inadequate pain management); furthermore, 27 patients (41.5%) despite receiving strong opioids had uncontrolled pain. After 4 weeks from intervention, undertreated patients were reduced to 1.53%. For those patients undergone to radiotherapy, response at 34 weeks was scored as follows: complete response 28.8%, partial response 46.7%, pain progression 0.95%, indeterminate response 23.8%. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary Team for Pain Management improved the clinical management, optimizing pain control and increasing adequacy of pharmacological management. The TPM intervention seems particularly worth for patients presenting specific features including BTcP, neuropathic pain, severe pain due to bone metastases, and any potential candidate to radiotherapy. Larger series and QoL questionnaires are required to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Anestesistas/tendências , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Radioterapia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...