Risk Factors, Prevalence, and Outcomes of Invasive Fungal Disease Post Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies: A Retrospective Monocenter Real-Life Analysis.

(1) Background: Autologous, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and other cellular therapies, including CAR T cell and gene therapy, constitute a cornerstone in the management of various benign and malignant hematological disorders. Invasive fungal infections (IFD) remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in HCT recipients. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and risk factors of IFD following HCT and other cellular therapies in an era of novel antifungal prophylaxis. (2) Methods: In this study, we retrospectively enrolled adult HCT recipients who were treated at our JACIE-accredited center according to standard operating procedures over the last decade (2013-2022). (3) Results: 950 patients who received cellular therapies were studied. None of the 19 CAR T cell and neither of the two gene therapy recipients developed IFD whereas 3/456 autologous HCT recipients who suffered from primary refractory/relapsed lymphomas presented with probable IFD. Overall, 11 patients who received allogeneic HCT experienced probable IFD, possible IFD was found in 31/473, and IFD was proven in 10/473. A second IFD episode was present in three patients. Four-year OS was significantly lower in proven compared to probable IFD (p = 0.041) and was independently associated with HCT-CI (p = 0.040) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.045). (4) Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, the prevalence of proven and probable IFD in an era of novel antifungal prophylaxis was found to be relatively low. However, IFDs were associated with poor outcomes for patients who received allogeneic HCT.

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) and Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) Levels Are Significantly Associated with Endothelial Injury Indices in Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (HSCT-TMA) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) represent life-threatening syndromes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In both conditions, endothelial dysfunction is a common denominator, and development of relevant biomarkers is of high importance for both diagnosis and prognosis. Despite the fact that soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) have been determined as endothelial injury indices in various clinical settings, their role in HSCT-related complications remains unexplored. In this context, we used immunoenzymatic methods to measure suPAR and GDF-15 levels in HSCT-TMA, acute and/or chronic GVHD, control HSCT recipients, and apparently healthy individuals of similar age and gender. We found considerably greater SuPAR and GDF-15 levels in HSCT-TMA and GVHD patients compared to allo-HSCT and healthy patients. Both GDF-15 and suPAR concentrations were linked to EASIX at day 100 and last follow-up. SuPAR was associated with creatinine and platelets at day 100 and last follow-up, while GDF-15 was associated only with platelets, suggesting that laboratory values do not drive EASIX. SuPAR, but not GDF-15, was related to soluble C5b-9 levels, a sign of increased HSCT-TMA risk. Our study shows for the first time that suPAR and GDF-15 indicate endothelial damage in allo-HSCT recipients. Rigorous validation of these biomarkers in many cohorts may provide utility for their usefulness in identifying and stratifying allo-HSCT recipients with endothelial cell impairment.

A non-interventional study of microcirculation dynamics in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors compared to controls: evidence of impaired microvascular response regardless of conventional cardiovascular risk factors.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) survivors have been recently recognized as patients at increased cardiovascular risk. We hypothesized that vascular function remains impaired in alloHCT survivors free of graft-versus-host-disease or relapse. We enrolled consecutive adult alloHCT survivors and non-HCT control individuals (January 2019-March 2020), matched for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Microvascular dysfunction was dynamically assessed in real time by Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis (LASCA). Carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) were assessed as surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease. We studied 75 patients after a median of 3.2 (range 2.1-4.9) years from alloHCT, who had suffered from grade 2 to 3 acute (20%) and/or moderate/severe chronic GVHD (42%), and 75 controls. Although traditional cardiovascular risk factors and surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease did not differ between groups, alloHCT survivors showed significantly impaired microvascular function (baseline and peak flux, time to peak, base to peak and base to occlusion change). LASCA indices were also independently associated with alloHCT. Our study shows for the first-time impaired microcirculation dynamics in alloHCT survivors, independently of cardiovascular risk factors. Additional studies are needed to address the role of novel markers in cardiovascular risk prediction, along with effects of disease type, phase, and pre-transplant treatments.

Predictors of Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Patients With Overlap or Chronic Graft-vs-Host-Disease.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that novel biologic agents are associated with increased risk of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Ruxolitinib, an approved treatment for graft-vs-host-disease (GVHD), has been associated with thrombocytopenia of unclear etiology. METHODS: We investigated factors and outcomes associated with transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) in patients with GVHD. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with overlap or chronic GVHD at our Joint Accreditation Committee ISCT-Europe & EBMT-accredited unit (January 2016-June 2019). Ruxolitinib has been administered off-label since 2016. RESULTS: Among 160 patients with GVHD, 18 were diagnosed with TA-TMA. TA-TMA developed at a median of 150 posttransplant days (range, 98-3013). Among pre- and posttransplant factors, TA-TMA was associated only with ruxolitinib administration and severe GVHD. Interestingly, these 2 variables did not correlate with each other. In the multivariate analysis, both were independent predictors of TA-TMA. Time-dependent analysis confirmed ruxolitinib's association with TA-TMA. With a follow-up of 38.4 months (4.6-83.9) in surviving patients, 5-year overall survival was 52.9%, independently predicted by TA-TMA, severe acute GVHD, and CD34+ cells infused. Ruxolitinib was not associated with survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that ruxolitinib and GVHD severity are associated with TA-TMA. Given the expanding use of ruxolitinib in GVHD and ongoing trials on chronic GVHD, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Assessment of Endothelial Injury and Pro-Coagulant Activity Using Circulating Microvesicles in Survivors of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

(1) Background: survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) suffer from morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that vascular injury and pro-coagulant activity are evident in alloHCT survivors without existing alloHCT complications or relapse. (2) Methods: we enrolled consecutive adult alloHCT survivors without established cardiovascular disease and control individuals matched for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (January-December 2019). Circulating microvesicles (MVs) of different cellular origins (platelet, erythrocyte, and endothelial) were measured by a standardized flow cytometry protocol as novel markers of vascular injury and pro-coagulant activity. (3) Results: we recruited 45 survivors after a median of 2.3 (range 1.1-13.2) years from alloHCT, and 45 controls. The majority of patients suffered from acute (44%) and/or chronic (66%) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although the two groups were matched for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, alloHCT survivors showed significantly increased platelet and erythrocyte MVs compared to controls. Within alloHCT survivors, erythrocyte MVs were significantly increased in patients with a previous history of thrombotic microangiopathy. Interestingly, endothelial MVs were significantly increased only in alloHCT recipients of a myeloablative conditioning. Furthermore, MVs of different origins showed a positive association with each other. (4) Conclusions: endothelial dysfunction and increased thrombotic risk are evident in alloHCT recipients long after alloHCT, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. An apparent synergism of these pathophysiological processes may be strongly involved in the subsequent establishment of cardiovascular disease.

Neurological adverse events post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: major determinants of morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the field, diagnosis and management of the wide spectrum of neurological events post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remain challenging. Therefore, we investigated their incidence, diagnosis, management and long-term prognosis in alloHCT recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively recorded data from consecutive alloHCT recipients with or without neurological complications in our center. RESULTS: Among 758 alloHCT recipients, 127 (16.8%) presented with neurological complications. Complications developed in central nervous system (89.7%) during the late post-transplant period. Neurological adverse events included a wide spectrum of infectious and non-infectious etiologies. With a median follow-up of 11.4 months, incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 52.8%, relapse mortality 48.6%, transplant-related mortality 39.1% and 5-year overall survival (OS) 25.8% in patients with neurological complications. Timing of appearance of neurological complications, early or late, was associated only with acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease/GVHD. Independent pre-transplant risk factors of neurological complications in the multivariate model were unrelated or alternative donors, ALL diagnosis and non-myeloablative conditioning. In multivariate analysis of post-alloHCT events, favorable OS was independently associated with resolution of neurological syndromes, absence of chronic GVHD and sibling transplantation. In our cohort, 10-year OS was significantly lower in patients with neurological complications and independently associated with acute and chronic GVHD, relapse, fungal and bacterial infections and neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our large study with long-term follow-up highlights the wide spectrum of neurological complications in alloHCT. Accurate recognition is required for adequate management, a major determinant of survival. Thus, long-term increased awareness and collaboration between expert physicians is warranted.

Isolated Extramedullary Relapse as a Poor Predictor of Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia.

Limited and conflicting data exist on outcomes of patients with extramedullary relapses (EMRs) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for acute leukemias. We retrospectively reviewed charts of consecutive allo-HCT recipients who underwent transplantation in our center with the indication of acute leukemia (July 1990 to July 2018). Incidences of isolated EMR (iEMR) and bone marrow relapse (BMR) were calculated using cumulative incidence (CI) analysis, with each and treatment-related mortality considered a competing risk. We studied 554 allo-HCT recipients for 1.8 years (range, .04 to 27.75). Ten-year CI of 10.5% for iEMR was associated only with advanced disease phase at transplantation, whereas 10-year CI of 34.8% for BMR was independently associated with pretransplant disease phase, lines of treatment, and fungal infections. Most iEMR and BMR patients (75% and 81%, respectively) received systemic treatment combined with local radiation for iEMR (26%) and donor lymphocyte infusions (16% and 28%, respectively) when feasible. Extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was recorded in 47% of iEMR and 48% of BMR patients. Outcomes were poor both in iEMR (10-year overall survival [OS], 18.3%) and BMR (10-year OS, 19.1%). Independent predictors of OS were disease phase, type of donor, acute and chronic GVHD, fungal infections, iEMR, and BMR. In a large population with long-term follow-up, incidence of iEMR was relatively high, developed at the late post-transplant period, and was associated only with disease phase at transplantation. Furthermore, iEMR and BMR conferred similarly poor outcomes despite systemic treatment or extensive chronic GVHD.