The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Tricuspid valve disease is an often underrecognized clinical problem that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, patients will often present late in their disease course with severe right-sided heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and life-limiting symptoms that have few durable treatment options. Traditionally, the only treatment for tricuspid valve disease has been medical therapy or surgery; however, there have been increasing interest and success with the use of transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies over the past several years to treat patients with previously limited therapeutic options. The tricuspid valve is complex anatomically, lying adjacent to important anatomic structures such as the right coronary artery and the atrioventricular node, and is the passageway for permanent pacemaker leads into the right ventricle. In addition, the mechanism of tricuspid pathology varies widely between patients, which can be due to primary, secondary, or a combination of causes, meaning that it is not possible for 1 type of device to be suitable for treatment of all cases of tricuspid valve disease. To best visualize the pathology, several modalities of advanced cardiac imaging are often required, including transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, to best visualize the pathology. This detailed imaging provides important information for choosing the ideal transcatheter treatment options for patients with tricuspid valve disease, taking into account the need for the lifetime management of the patient. This review highlights the important background, anatomic considerations, therapeutic options, and future directions with regard to treatment of tricuspid valve disease.

Sarcoid Heart Disease: an Update on Diagnosis and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an update on cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and to discuss the current recommendations and progress in diagnosis and management of this disease. Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Cardiac involvement is seen in at least 25% and is associated with poor prognosis. Manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can vary from presence of silent myocardial granulomas, which may lead to sudden death, to symptomatic conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss newer imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in conjunction with clinical criteria increasingly used for diagnosing and prognosticating patients with CS. Immunosuppression (primarily corticosteroids) is recommended for treatment of CS; however, its efficacy has never been proven in prospective randomized studies. The role of imaging to guide the use of immunotherapy is unknown. Cardiac sarcoidosis continues to challenge clinicians due to its protean presentations, lack of diagnostic standards, and data for risk stratification and treatment. There is a need for prospective, randomized controlled trials to understand how best to diagnose and treat cardiac sarcoidosis.

Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Independent of Left Ventricular Function.

This study investigated the association between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), heart transplantation, and death in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We identified 110 CS patients meeting 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) diagnostic criteria with baseline LVEF <35% (n = 32) or ≥35% (n = 78). The primary end point was sustained VA or sudden cardiac death (SCD), and secondary end points included risk of heart transplantation, death, or a composite. Logistic regression determined risk factors for VA/SCD, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed for secondary end points. Receiver operating curve analysis determined the best discrimination point of LVEF for each end point; sensitivity analyses evaluated the effects of higher LVEF on each end point. Over a follow-up of 2.6 (range 1.0 to 5.8) years, 49 (44.5%) CS patients experienced VA/SCD, including 19 of 32 (59.4%) with LVEF <35%, and 30 of 78 (38.5%) with LVEF ≥35%. After adjustment, LVEF <35% was not significantly associated with an increased risk of VA/SCD compared with LVEF ≥35% (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence intervals 0.5 to 3.7). Although LVEF <35% was associated with an increased risk of heart transplantation and death (28.1% vs 12.8%, p = 0.05), this was not significant after adjustment (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence intervals 0.5 to 9.0, p = 0.53). In conclusion, patients with CS experience high rates of VA, SCD, and heart transplantation, even when LVEF is mildly impaired or normal. Patients with LVEF <35% are at particularly elevated risk of VA/SCD. Our findings highlight the imperative to investigate arrhythmia risk in all patients with CS, even in the setting of an otherwise reassuring LVEF.

Accuracy of Doppler blood pressure measurement in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients.

AIMS: Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in continuous-flow ventricular assist device (CF-VAD) patients is imperative to reduce stroke risk. This study assesses the accuracy of the Doppler opening pressure method compared with the gold standard arterial line method in CF-VAD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a longitudinal cohort of HeartMate II and HVAD patients, arterial line BP and simultaneously measured Doppler opening pressure were obtained. Overall correlation, agreement between Doppler opening pressure and arterial line mean vs. systolic pressure, and the effect of arterial pulsatility on the accuracy of Doppler opening pressure were analysed. A total of 1933 pairs of Doppler opening pressure and arterial line pressure readings within 1 min of each other were identified in 154 patients (20% women, mean age 55 ± 15, 50% HeartMate II and 50% HVAD). Doppler opening pressure had good correlation with invasive mean arterial pressure (r = 0.742, P < 0.0001) and more closely approximated mean than systolic BP (mean error 2.4 vs. -8.4 mmHg). Arterial pulsatility did not have a clinically significant effect on the accuracy of the Doppler opening pressure method. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler opening pressure should be the standard non-invasive method of BP measurement in CF-VAD patients.

Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Is There Increasing Overlap?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the leading causes of mortality in the USA. In this review, we highlight these shared disease pathways and provide a framework for a systems-based approach to reduce overall risk burden. RECENT FINDINGS: From traditional risk factors such as age and tobacco use to more recently recognized entities including clonal hematopoiesis, we are gaining insights into shared mechanisms. Because of these overlapping risks, providers on each level of patient care (primary care providers, cardiologists, oncologists) need to recognize and reduce these underlying risk factors. There is significant overlap in the epidemiology and risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease and cancer, providing opportunities for joint risk factor modification.

Evolving Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Despite efforts at early revascularization in acute coronary syndrome and advancing technologies in the field of temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS), the mortality from cardiogenic shock (CS) remains very high. Treatment of these patients involves understanding the trajectory of the condition and making complex decisions regarding the appropriate selection of medical and device therapies. The current definition of CS is not universally applicable and defines shock in absolute terms. CS should be thought of as a continuum rather than a binary diagnosis and is best defined as a clinical syndrome of tissue hypoperfusion resulting from cardiac dysfunction. Early intervention with appropriate timing and selection of apposite TMCS device may be the key to improving outcomes. TMCS device selection is a complex process requiring consideration of the severity of CS, patient-specific risks, technical limitations, overall goals of care, and assessment of futility of care. In this review, we discuss identification and pathophysiology of CS, and critically review acute management strategies, both medical and mechanical therapies and outline areas that need further investigation.

Radiation recall reaction causing cardiotoxicity.

Radiation recall phenomenon is a tissue reaction that develops within a previously irradiated area, precipitated by the subsequent administration of certain chemotherapeutic agents. It commonly affects the skin, but can also involve internal organs with functional consequences. To our best knowledge, this phenomenon has never been reported as a complication on the heart and should be consider as a potential cause of cardiotoxicity.

Benefits and limitations of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis of a primary cardiac lymphoma.

Primary cardiac tumors are far rarer than tumors metastatic to the heart. Angiosarcoma is the primary cardiac neoplasm most frequently detected; lymphomas constitute only 1% of primary cardiac tumors. We present the case of a 55-year-old woman with a recently diagnosed intracardiac mass who was referred to our institution for consideration of urgent orthotopic heart transplantation. Initial images suggested an angiosarcoma; however, a biopsy specimen of the mass was diagnostic for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The patient underwent chemotherapy rather than surgery, and she was asymptomatic 34 months later. We use our patient's case to discuss the benefits and limitations of multiple imaging methods in the evaluation of cardiac masses. Certain features revealed by computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography can suggest a diagnosis of angiosarcoma rather than lymphoma. Cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography enable reliable distinction between benign and malignant tumors; however, the characteristics of different malignant tumors can overlap. Despite the great usefulness of multiple imaging methods for timely diagnosis, defining the extent of spread and the hemodynamic impact, and monitoring responses to treatment, we think that biopsy analysis is still warranted in order to obtain a correct histologic diagnosis in cases of suspected malignant cardiac tumors.