Effectiveness of Stroke Rehabilitation Compared between Intensive and Nonintensive Rehabilitation Protocol: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death, physical disability, and economic burden. Nowadays, various types of rehabilitation are available. Rehabilitation centers in Thailand provide services in different ways, including starting time, duration, and frequency of each therapy. In addition, many rehabilitation wards have a standing policy to reduce length of stay (LOS) due to economic considerations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and efficiency between intensive and nonintensive rehabilitation protocol for stroke patients. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted among stroke patients who admitted to rehabilitation wards at 14 centers. All participants received either intensive or non-intensive rehabilitation program. Barthel Index (BI) at admission (BIad), BI at discharge (BIdc), and LOS were recorded. The effectiveness was difference in BIdc and BIad score (ΔBI), and the efficiency was ΔBI divided by LOS (ΔBI/LOS). RESULTS: Seven hundred and eighty stroke patients were included. Mean age was 61.9 ± 13.3 years, and 59.7% were male. The majority of patients (79.5%) were admitted for intensive rehabilitation. Effectiveness and efficiency were significantly higher in the intensive group than in the nonintensive group (4.5 ± 3.4 versus 2.6 ± 3.2 and .24 ± .30 versus .18 ± .33, respectively). LOS, intensive rehabilitation, and quality of life were significantly positively correlated with effectiveness; whereas, age, onset to admission interval (OAI), and BIad were significantly negatively correlated with the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke patients admitted for intensive rehabilitation had better effectiveness and efficiency than those admitted for non-intensive rehabilitation. Younger patients with shorter OAI, lower BIad, and longer LOS realized significantly enhanced effectiveness.

Motor recovery of stroke patients after rehabilitation: one-year follow-up study.

Purpose To investigate motor recovery of stroke patients 1 year after rehabilitation. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional study of 192 stroke patients discharged from rehabilitation wards in nine tertiary hospitals was conducted. Motor recovery was assessed using the Brunnstrom motor recovery stages (BMRS), at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Factors related to the BMRS of the hand, arm and leg were analyzed. Results The mean age of patients was 62.2 years (57.3% male). Significantly more patients presented improvement of at least one BMRS of the hand, arm and leg compared with those with decreasing BMRS (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with BMRS III- VI at 6 months was greater than that at discharge, but the recovery at 12 months was slightly higher than that at 6 months. It seems that motor recovery from stroke was near maximal at six months. Regarding the factors related to motor recovery, only lengths of stay (LOS) <30 d during the first admission and Barthel index at discharge ≥10 were related to the improvement of BMRS of the hand, arm and leg on multivariate analysis. Additionally, no complication at discharge was associated with the improvement of BMRS of the leg. Conclusions Approximately half of our stroke patients had motor improvement of at least one stage of BMRS at one year. Motor recovery after stroke at the end of the first year was associated with shorter LOS during the first admission, higher discharge Barthel index score and absence of complications at discharge.

Inpatient rehabilitation services for patients after stroke in Thailand: a multi-centre study.

OBJECTIVE: To set a baseline for measuring the development of medical rehabilitation services and outcomes for patients after stroke and promoting rehabilitation medicine in Thailand. DESIGN: Multi-centre, prospective study. SUBJECTS: Patients after stroke in Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry (TSRR), aged > or = 18 years, with stable medical signs, able to follow a 1-step command and sit for at least 30 min. METHODS: Rehabilitation services were recorded daily as units of treatment (1 unit = 20 min). Length of stay and treatment costs were calculated. RESULTS: Of 327 patients enrolled in the study, 285 (87.2%) completed their treatment programme. Mean length of stay was 29.4 (standard deviation 17.9) days. The average number of total treatment units for stroke rehabilitation was 319.5 (range 27-1674 units), with 205 units of nursing, 40 units of physical therapy and 34 units of occupational therapy as the top 3 services provided. The mean total cost for all treatments during rehabilitation was 28,399 (standard deviation 22,511) baht (approximately USD 789). The ratio of costs not related to rehabilitation to those related to rehabilitation was approximately 2:1. CONCLUSION: This study reports the baseline for measuring the development of rehabilitation services for patients after stroke with a mean length of stay of one month, and for estimating the reasonable costs.

An epidemiologic study of the Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry (TSRR): a multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To perform the registry of stroke patients receiving the in-patient comprehensive rehabilitation program at main tertiary hospitals from March to December 2006. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Demographic data including medical history and pathology of stroke were recorded. All subjects received a comprehensive rehabilitation program until they reached their rehabilitation goals or discharge criteria. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty seven patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62 +/- 12 years, and 59% were males. Most of the patients were married (73.1%), lived in an urban area (62.1%), and had an education level of primary school or lower (58.7%). The median duration from onset to admission for rehabilitation was 24 days. The major medical history was hypertension (74.9%), followed by dyslipidemia (54.4%), diabetes mellitus (26.6%), and ischemic heart disease (18.0%). Fifty-one (15.6%) patients had a history of previous stroke. Cerebral infarction was found in 71.9%, including thrombosis (45.3%), lacuna infarction (15.3%), and emboli (8.0%) and 28.1% had hemorrhagic stroke. On admission, more than half (51.8%) had cognitive impairment and one-third (31.5%) had bowel-bladder problems. Almost all of the patients (99.4%) had family support. Either their spouse or siblings had undertaken the main caregiver role (46.5% and 40.4% respectively). However, more than 80% of the patients were discharged to their own homes or immediate family's house. CONCLUSION: This was the first multi-center registry of inpatient stroke rehabilitation in Thailand. It presented the epidemiologic aspects in order to become national data of stroke patients receiving medical rehabilitation services.