Increasing Early Childhood Screening in Primary Care Through a Quality Improvement Collaborative.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple early childhood screenings are recommended, but gaps persist in implementation. Our aim for this project was to improve screening, discussion, referral, and follow-up of development, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), maternal depression, and social determinants of health (SDoH) to 90% by July 2018. METHODS: This 1-year national quality improvement collaborative involved 19 pediatric primary care practices. Supported by virtual and in-person learning opportunities, practice teams implemented changes to early childhood screening. Monthly chart reviews were used to assess screening, discussion, referral, and follow-up for development, ASD, maternal depression, and SDoH. Parent surveys were used to assess parent-reported screening and referral and/or resource provision. Practice self-ratings and team surveys were used to assess practice-level changes. RESULTS: Participating practices included independent, academic, hospital-affiliated, and multispecialty group practices and community health centers in 12 states. The collaborative met development and ASD screening goals of >90%. Largest increases in screening occurred for maternal depression (27% to 87%; +222%; P < .001) and SDoH (26% to 76%; +231%; P < .001). Statistically significant increases in discussion of results occurred for all screening areas. For referral, significant increases were seen for development (53% to 86%; P < .001) and maternal depression (23% to 100%; P = .008). Parents also reported increased screening and referral and/or resource provision. Practice-level changes included improved systems to support screening. CONCLUSIONS: Practices successfully implemented multiple screenings and demonstrated improvement in subsequent discussion, referral, and follow-up steps. Continued advocacy for adequate resources to support referral and follow-up is needed to translate increased screening into improved health outcomes.

Development and validation of the Proxy-Reported Pulmonary Outcomes Scale for premature infants.

OBJECTIVE: Test the feasibility of using a bedside nurse-reported tool (Proxy-Reported Pulmonary Outcome Scale, PRPOS) for evaluating the severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) by assessing functional, disease-related measures. STUDY DESIGN: Bedside nurses tested the 26-item instrument by observing preterm infants (23-30 weeks at birth) at 36 to 37(4/7) weeks postmenstrual age before, during, and after a care time. We analyzed item reliability, validity, and model fit to determine the six items to include in the final measurement tool. RESULT: We completed assessments on 188 preterm infants. The frequency of an abnormal PRPOS item score increased with increasing National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD) BPD category. The six-candidate items produced an internally consistent scale. Addition of the NICHD BPD classification increased reliability moderately; addition of feeding items decreased reliability. The PRPOS score correlated with postmenstrual age at discharge. Infants discharged on oxygen or diuretics had higher median PRPOS scores than did infants who were not prescribed those therapies. CONCLUSION: The PRPOS is an internally consistent, proxy-reported measure of respiratory function in premature infants, based on observable, functional performance measures. Initial testing demonstrates known-groups validity and ongoing testing can assess predictive validity.

Lessons learned from building a culture and infrastructure for continuous quality improvement at Cabarrus Health Alliance.

This case study describes a local public health agency's multiyear effort to establish an infrastructure and organizational culture for continuous quality improvement, using data from interviews with the agency's senior leaders, managers, and frontline staff. Lessons learned include the importance of setting stretch goals, engaging leaders at all levels of the organization, empowering frontline staff to make changes, providing quality improvement training for staff and leaders, starting with small projects first, spreading quality improvement efforts to involve all parts of the agency, and sustaining momentum by creating a supporting infrastructure for continuous quality improvement and continually initiating new projects.

Development of a proxy-reported pulmonary outcome scale for preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: To develop an accurate, proxy-reported bedside measurement tool for assessment of the severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (also called chronic lung disease) in preterm infants to supplement providers' current biometric measurements of the disease. METHODS: We adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) methodology to develop the Proxy-Reported Pulmonary Outcomes Scale (PRPOS). A multidisciplinary group of registered nurses, nurse practitioners, neonatologists, developmental specialists, and feeding specialists at five academic medical centers participated in the PRPOS development, which included five phases: (1) identification of domains, items, and responses; (2) item classification and selection using a modified Delphi process; (3) focus group exploration of items and response options; (4) cognitive interviews on a preliminary scale; and (5) final revision before field testing. RESULTS: Each phase of the process helped us to identify, classify, review, and revise possible domains, questions, and response options. The final items for field testing include 26 questions or observations that a nurse assesses before, during, and after routine care time and feeding. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully created a prototype scale using modified PROMIS methodology. This process can serve as a model for the development of proxy-reported outcomes scales in other pediatric populations.

Family alert: implementing direct family activation of a pediatric rapid response team.

A hospital's "no false alams" policy has been validated by staff's and families' appropriate activation of the rapid response team.

Management patterns of childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome.

As an initial effort to identify opportunities to improve the management of children with nephrotic syndrome, the goal of this study was to assess the present-day management of children with primary nephrotic syndrome. A web-based survey was designed to assess the current management styles of all pediatric nephrology faculties at ten participating institutions. Ninety-one percent completed the initial survey. The duration of initial glucocorticoid therapy ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. Physicians reported that the recommendation for kidney biopsy was dependent on the response to initial corticosteroid therapy, with the minority always recommending a biopsy for frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent cases. All responding physicians recommended a kidney biopsy in steroid-resistant cases. Treatment strategies were reported to vary based upon the steroid response pattern and, where available, kidney histopathology. Striking variations in therapeutic preferences were described when alternatives to glucocorticoids were considered. The variability of management practices among pediatric nephrologists in the USA combined with the changing characteristics of our pediatric population raise concerns about our future strategies for improving healthcare for children coping with nephrotic syndrome. This variability is not unique to children's healthcare or to nephrology. However, a systematic approach to patient care and improvement in health outcomes has been shown to substantially improve morbidity and mortality outcomes in children with chronic health conditions.

Model for improvement - Part Two: Measurement and feedback for quality improvement efforts.

Measurement and feedback are fundamental to quality improvement. There is a knowledge gap among health care professionals in knowing how to measure the impact of their quality improvement projects and how to use these data to improve care. This article presents a pragmatic approach to measurement and feedback for quality improvement efforts in local health care settings, such as hospitals or clinical practices. The authors include evidence-based strategies from health care and other industries, augmented with practical examples from the authors' collective years of experience designing measurement and feedback strategies.