Proteomic analysis in canine leishmaniasis.

The aim of this study was to perform a proteomic analysis on serum of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania parasite. Sera from 24 dogs, n. 8 with high IFAT titre of anti-Leishmania antibodies (>or= 1:640), n. 8 with uncertain titre (= 1:40), and n. 8 with IFAT negative were used. Sera of each group were pooled together to form three pools: P (high titre); U (uncertain titre); and N (negative). The P pool was analyzed, using a mass spectrometry-based approach to search for Leishmania proteins (qualitative analysis). In a second experiment, protein signal intensities of U and P pools were compared with the signal intensities of N pool by a quantitative mass spectrometry method based on isotopic dilution. The quantitative analysis detected a total of 70 proteins, of which 17 and 5 resulted over- and under-represented in sample P, respectively.

Exemestane improves survival compared with megoestrol acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen. results Of a double-blind randomised phase III trial.

Exemestane is an aromatase inactivator. 769 Postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had failed on tamoxifen were randomised to exemestane or megoestrol acetate in this double-blind trial. Objective response rate was similar between treatments. Median time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival was significantly longer with exemestane. Drug-related withdrawals and drug-related deaths were more common with megoestrol acetate.

High activity and tolerability demonstrated for exemestane in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had previously failed on tamoxifen treatment.

This phase II, multicentre, open-label, clinical trial evaluated antitumoral efficacy, tolerability and endocrine effects following 25 mg of treatment with oral exemestane given daily to postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included oestrogen and/or progesterone positivity or a prior response to hormonal therapy if receptor status was unknown; prior failure to tamoxifen therapy; and progressive disease. Patients were divided into three strata: patients who did not respond to tamoxifen or progressed after disease stabilisation (SD) for less than 6 months (stratum 1); patients who, after an initial response or SD lasting at least 6 months, experienced disease progression whilst on tamoxifen (stratum 2); patients with recurrent metastatic disease during or within 12 months of discontinuing adjuvant tamoxifen (stratum 3). Of the 137 patients who received exemestane, 4 experienced a complete response (CR) and 28 a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 23%. Another 33 patients had SD for > or = 24 weeks, resulting in an overall success rate of 47%. The median time to objective response was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.9-24.1). The median response duration was 69.4 weeks, the median duration of overall success 59.1 weeks, the median time to progression (TTP) 25.1 weeks and the median time to treatment failure (TTF) 24 weeks. Response to previous hormonal therapy had little effect on the results, except that there was a trend toward a higher overall success rate in patients who did not respond to previous hormonal therapy. After 8 weeks of therapy, serum levels of oestradiol (E2), oestrone (E1) and oestrone sulphate (E1S) were suppressed to 15.2%, 9.7% and 10.7% of baseline, respectively. The most common adverse events of drug-related or indeterminate cause were hot flushes (14%), dizziness (9%), nausea (8%) and increased sweating (5%). Exemestane had a favourable effect on performance status and tumour-related signs and symptoms, both of which improved or stabilised in approximately 67% and 68% of patients respectively. Exemestane is a unique therapy that is highly active and well tolerated as a new treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Activity of exemestane in metastatic breast cancer after failure of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of a new steroidal aromatase inactivator, exemestane, in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease (PD) after treatment with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II trial, eligible patients were treated with exemestane 25 mg daily (n = 241) followed, at the time PD was determined, by exemestane 100 mg daily (n = 58). RESULTS: On the basis of the intent-to-treat analysis by independent review, exemestane 25 mg produced objective responses in 6.6% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 10.6%) and overall success (complete response + partial response + no change for 24 weeks or longer) in 24.3% (95% CI, 19.0% to 30.2%). The median durations of objective response and overall success were 58.4 weeks (95% CI, 49.7 to 71.1 weeks) and 37.0 weeks (95% CI, 35.0 to 39.4 weeks), respectively. Increasing the dose of exemestane to 100 mg upon the development of PD produced one partial response (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 9.2%). Both dosages were well tolerated and were discontinued because of adverse events in only 1.7% of patients. CONCLUSION: Exemestane 25 mg once daily seems to be an attractive alternative to chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after multiple hormonal therapies have failed.

Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) versus megestrol acetate (MA) in postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 769 patients were randomized to EXE 25 mg/d (n = 366) or MA (n = 403) 40 mg four times daily. Tumor response, duration of tumor control, tumor-related signs and symptoms (TRSS), quality of life (QOL), survival, and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall objective response (OR) rates were higher in patients treated with EXE than in those treated with MA (15.0% v 12.4%); a similar trend was noted in patients with visceral metastases (13.5% v 10.5%). Median survival time was significantly longer with EXE (median not reached) than with MA (123.4 weeks; P =.039), as were the median duration of overall success (OR or stable disease > or = 24 weeks; 60.1 v 49.1 weeks; P =.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 v 16.6 weeks; P =.037), and time to treatment failure (16.3 v 15.7 weeks; P =.042). Compared with MA, there were similar or greater improvements in pain, TRSS, and QOL with EXE. Both drugs were well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 weight changes were more common with MA (17.1% v 7.6%; P =.001). CONCLUSION: EXE prolongs survival time, time to tumor progression, and time to treatment failure compared with MA and offers a well-tolerated treatment option for postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen.

Exemestane improves survival in metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized study.

We compared the efficacy and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) with megestrol acetate (MA) in women with metastatic breast cancer. This phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 769 postmenopausal women who had experienced tamoxifen failure. Treatment arms consisted of EXE 25 mg once daily (n=366) or MA 40 mg four times daily (160 mg daily; n=403). Peer-reviewed, intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated that EXE induced a trend toward higher rates of complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) (15.0% vs. 12.4%) and of CR+PR+stable disease (SD)=24 weeks (37.4% vs. 34.6%), but differences were not statistically significant. Statistically significant differences favoring EXE were seen in median duration of CR+PR+SD=24 weeks (60.1 vs. 49.1 weeks; P=0.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 vs. 16.6 weeks; P=0.037), time to treatment failure (16.3 vs. 15.7 weeks; P=0.042), and overall survival (not reached vs. 123.4 weeks; P=0.039). Both treatments were well tolerated, but MA was associated with more grade 3 or 4 weight gain (8% vs. 17%, P=0.001); the pain score was sim-ilar in both groups. There was a trend toward superiority in treatment-related signs and symptoms (TRSS) with EXE. There was greater improvement in the pain score and TRSS in patients achieving an objective response with EXE vs. MA. Quality of life improved or was similar for EXE in most domains. Exemestane offers an important new treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer.

Phase I trial of 9-cis retinoic acid in adults with solid tumors.

Retinoids have been shown to be potent inhibitors of epithelial carcinogenesis. Recent evidence has demonstrated that retinoid actions are mediated through nuclear receptors, which are proteins encoded by the retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor gene families. These receptors are activated by binding to specific retinoids; of the known naturally occurring retinoids, 9-cis retinoic acid is unique in its ability to bind to both receptor families. Because of its unique receptor-binding characteristics, 9-cis retinoic acid may have biological activity not possible with other retinoids. For this reason, we conducted a Phase I trial of 9-cis retinoic acid in adult patients with solid tumors. Twenty-two patients were treated twice daily with p.o. 9-cis retinoic acid at doses ranging from 20 mg/m2/day to 150 mg/m2/day. The patients had non-small cell lung cancer (n = 8), breast cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 3), head and neck cancer (n = 2), nonmelanoma skin cancer (n = 2), or ovarian cancer (n = 2). The dose-limiting (WHO grade III) toxic effects, which occurred at the 150-mg/m2/day dose level, were headaches and diarrhea. Less severe (grades I and II) toxic effects included cheilitis, dry skin, conjunctivitis, fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia, alkaline phosphatase elevation, myalgia/arthralgia, and hypercalcemia. Of the 15 patients evaluable for tumor response, no objective responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a reduction in peak 9-cis retinoic acid plasma levels with chronic administration. Based on this study, the recommended Phase II dose of 9-cis retinoic acid in adult patients with solid tumors is 100 mg/m2/day administered in a divided dose twice daily.

Combination 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha-2a in the therapy of solid tumors.

Preclinical data indicate that the combination of retinoids and interferons have synergistic antiproliferative and differentiating effects in some hematologic and solid tumor models. These observations have led to clinical trials in which 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) 1 mg/kg/day was combined with interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) 3 or 6 x 10(6) U/day. The first two such trials produced exciting results: 50% response rate in patients with previously untreated stages IB-IVA cervix cancer and 68% in patients with advanced squamous cell skin cancer. These data led to a number of additional trials of the combination, but the high response rates seen in the initial cervix and skin trials have not been duplicated in the other squamous tumors tested (head and neck, lung, pretreated cervix). In addition, trials in two non-squamous histologies were negative (lung and melanoma). However, the regimen was not always studied in an optimal population of previously untreated patients and the negative results in pretreated cervix patients point to the relevance of this consideration. Nevertheless, the observation that the combination of 13cRA and IFN alpha (both of which bind to specific receptors and change gene expression) is able to induce regression in advanced tumors, must be regarded as highly important. Key questions to be addressed include an understanding of the biologic mechanism of specific tumor sensitivity (why some squamous tumors and not others?), and mechanisms of resistance in sensitive tumor types (e.g. cervix). Such data may lead to trials targeted to tumor types with defined biologic features having a high likelihood of clinical benefit. In the meantime, studies integrating this combination with other active treatment modalities such as radiation is warranted in cervix and skin carcinomas.

Combination 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha-2a in the therapy of solid tumors.

Preclinical data indicate that the combination of retinoids and interferons have synergistic antiproliferative and differentiating effects in some hematologic and solid tumor models. These observations have led to clinical trials in which 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) 1 mg/kg/day was combined with interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha) 3 or 6 x 10(6) U/day. The first two such trials produced exciting results: 50% response rate in patients with previously untreated stages IB-IVA cervix cancer and 68% in patients with advanced squamous cell skin cancer. These data led to a number of additional trials of the combination, but the high response rates seen in the initial cervix and skin trials have not been duplicated in the other squamous tumors tested (head and neck, lung, pretreated cervix). In addition, trials in two nonsquamous histologies were negative (lung and melanoma). However, the regimen was not always studied in an optimal population of previously untreated patients and the negative results in pretreated cervix patients point to the relevance of this consideration. Nevertheless, the observation that the combination of 13cRA and IFN alpha (both of which bind to specific receptors and change gene expression) is able to induce regression in advanced tumors, must be regarded as highly important. Key questions to be addressed include an understanding of the biologic mechanism of specific tumor sensitivity (why some squamous tumors and not others?), and mechanisms of resistance in sensitive tumor types (e.g. cervix). Such data may lead to trials targeted to tumor types with defined biologic features having a high liklihood of clinical benefit. In the meantime, studies integrating this combination with other active treatment modalities such as radiation is warranted in cervix and skin carcinomas.

Interferon alfa 2a in superficial bladder cancer prophylaxis: toleration and long-term follow-up. A phase I-II study.

Twenty patients (17 M., 3F., -mean age 61.5 yrs) affected by superficial bladder tumors (TINOMO) were included in the study. All patients had cold mucosa biopsy to exclude the presence of dysplasia or CIS; the histopathological grade was G1 in 19 cases and G2 in 1. The treatment was started between 3 to 7 days after radical TUR with intravesical instillations of recombinant Interferon alfa 2a, at the daily dose of 54 million/Units for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks. No systemic adverse effects were observed. Local toleration and efficacy were assessed by cystoscopy, performed at the end of treatment after 6 weeks and then at three month intervals. At the first control 15% of patients showed an early local reaction with bollous oedema surrounding the resected area (with spontaneously disappeared after few days). No other abnormal findings were observed at the 6-week control. After a median follow-up of 98 weeks, 15 of the 19 evaluable patients (79%, C.I. 60-91) were disease-free. The median relapse time was 39.9 weeks, while clinical and local tolerance were optimal. These preliminary data confirm the complete absence of toxicity of Interferon alfa 2a administered at relatively high doses intravesically and indicate that this compound has some effect on superficial bladder cancer.

Primary hypothyroidism associated with interleukin-2 and interferon alpha-2 therapy of melanoma and renal carcinoma.

Four patients out of twenty with renal cancer and melanoma undergoing cancer immunotherapy with interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon alpha-2 (IFN-alpha 2) had laboratory evidence of hypothyroidism starting at cycle three to six, with a decline in serum thyroxine below normal and, in three cases, a rise in serum thyrotropin and thyroglobulin. One hypothyroid patient had elevated serum antimicrosomal antibody titres before the start of treatment and two others responded similarly during therapy. Three of the sixteen euthyroid patients also developed elevated titres of this antibody. Partial or complete remission was observed in seven of the patients--three of the four with hypothyroidism showed tumour regression. Thus IL-2 and IFN-alpha 2 can cause hypothyroidism, presumably via induction or exacerbation of autoimmune thyroid reactions. The occurrence of hypothyroidism may be mediated by high-dose IL-2 (rather than by LAK cell therapy as previously suggested) and potentiated by IFN-alpha 2.

Intrahepatic cholestasis in acute viral hepatitis: a double-blind trial with dihydroxydibutylether in comparison with placebo.

The authors studied the effectiveness of a choleretic drug, dihydroxydibutylether (DHBE), 900 mg daily, in patients with acute viral hepatitis and intrahepatic cholestasis. The four-week, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial showed a more rapid return to normal bilirubin and fasting and post-prandial biliary acid values and plasma transaminases levels in the DHBE-treated group of patients.

Collagen synthesis by Duchenne myogenic clones: pathogenic implications for the disease.

Myogenic cell clones were grown in triplicates from a 3-year-old boy with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and three normal control boys matched for age. The well-differentiated Duchenne myogenic clone had lower creatine kinase activity and lower MM isozyme than the control clones. Analysis of (3H)-proline incorporation demonstrated a 2.2-fold increase in (3H)-hydroxyproline released into the medium of Duchenne myogenic cell clones, whereas intracellular (3H)-hydroxyproline levels showed normal values. These results strongly suggest that the increased amount of collagen present in Duchenne dystrophic muscle is related to the primary defect of the disease and is not due to a secondary replacement fibrosis.