Sickle cell disease and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Sickle cell disease (SCD) has been found to be associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death from coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). We sought to study clinical outcomes in patients with SCD and a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients (>18 years) with SCD who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. Data on baseline characteristics and overall outcomes were collected and analyzed using SAS 9.4 for Windows. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients with SCD were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in the study period, out of which 39.3% were diagnosed and managed in the outpatient setting/emergency room (ER) and 60.3% in the inpatient setting. Disease-modifying therapy such as hydroxyurea did not impact inpatient vs outpatient/ER management (P > 0.05). Only 5.71% (n = 2) required intensive care unit admission and were mechanically ventilated and 3.9% (2 patients) died of complications of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: We identified a lower mortality (3.9%) rate among patients in our cohort in comparison to previous studies and a higher burden of inpatient hospitalizations as compared to outpatient/ER management. Further prospective data are needed to validate these findings. Key messages What is already known on this topic COVID-19 has been shown to have a disproportionately unfavorable impact on African Americans, including longer hospital stays, higher rates of ventilator dependence, and a higher overall mortality rate. Limited data also suggest that sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19. What this study adds Our analysis did not show a higher mortality due to COVID-19 in patients with SCD. However, we identified a high burden of inpatient hospitalizations in this population. COVID-19-related outcomes did not improve with the use of disease-modifying therapies. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy These results will aid in decision making for triage of patients with COVID-19 and SCD and ensure the most appropriate use of healthcare resources. Our analysis underscores the need for more robust data to identify patients at higher risk of severe disease and/or mortality, necessitating inpatient hospitalization and aggressive management.

Plasmablastic Lymphoma, a Rare Entity in Bone Marrow with Unusual Immunophenotype and Challenging Differential Diagnosis.

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is an aggressive malignancy that usually occurs in the setting of immunosuppression. The immunohistochemical profile of PBL is that of terminally differentiated B lymphocytes. CD138, CD38, and MUM1 are usually immunopositive. However, pan B-cell markers such as CD20 and PAX-5 are usually negative. MYC rearrangement is the most commonly encountered genetic alteration, with immunoglobulin (IG), especially immunoglobulin heavy (IGH) chain, being the most frequent partner. We report a case of PBL in a 48-year-old human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV-) positive male who was admitted to the hospital with signs and symptoms suspicious for tumor lysis syndrome. Bone marrow examination revealed hypercellular marrow with trilineage hypoplasia and sheets of intermediate to large neoplastic cells with basophilic vacuolated cytoplasm comprising the majority of cellular elements of the bone marrow. The neoplastic cells were negative for conventional B-cell, T-cell, plasma cell, and myeloid markers, while flow cytometric analysis revealed an abnormal CD45-dim population that was partially weakly positive for CD71 and CD79b. The diagnosis was initially thought to be a high-grade primitive hematopoietic neoplasm, possibly an acute undifferentiated leukemia. BOB-1, however, was immunopositive in the neoplastic cells, confirming its B-cell origin. MYC was positive by immunohistochemistry and break-apart FISH, as were CD45, MUM-1, and EMA immunostains. There was immunoglobulin kappa (IGK) light chain gene rearrangement by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Additionally, Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV-) encoded small RNAs (EBER) were positive by in situ hybridization (ISH). The tumor proliferation index by Ki-67 immunostaining approached 95%. Although the tumor cells were negative for CD38 and CD138, the diagnosis of PBL was still rendered. We recommend using a broad spectrum of B-cell markers, including BOB-1 and OCT-2, in such challenging cases of B-cell lymphomas with no expression of conventional B-cell markers. We also emphasize that the negative CD38 and CD138 should not exclude PBL from the differential diagnosis.

Utility of routine pretreatment evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines.

Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is widely used in the management of breast cancer. Despite the lack of clinical evidence, obtaining prechemotherapy left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan is a widely adopted practice throughout the world. We present here the results of a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who had LVEF measurements in anticipation of an anthracycline chemotherapy to determine whether predefined cardiac risk factors predicted for poor cardiac function. Retrospective data were analyzed from 482 female breast cancer patients in whom LVEF was measured before starting anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Baseline demographics and multiple risk factors associated with congestive heart failure were collected. Twenty-six possible risk factors for CHF were defined, and the frequency of finding an abnormal LVEF as a function of total risk factors was assessed. Statistical tests include chi-squared and logistic regression analysis. The median age of the study population was 52 years. The original chemotherapy plan was changed in 7 patients (1.45%) based on LVEF findings, all of which had asymptomatic LV dysfunction (LVEF ranging 40%-50%). In 32 patients, despite normal LVEF results, anthracyclines were omitted secondary to prior cardiac issues. In 17 patients where LVEF was reported normal, anthracyclines were skipped based on patient's preference, tumor characteristics, or upstaging of the cancer based on imaging studies. No patient with ≤2 risk factors had an abnormal LVEF (N = 350). The probability of finding an abnormal LVEF in patients without any cardiac risk factors is extremely rare. Skipping baseline LVEF assessment may be an option in some patients with no cardiac risk factors undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy.