Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Granulomatous Hepatitis After Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma: Report of 2 Cases and Literature Discussion.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors can potentially affect every organ system, are sometimes challenging, and require a multidisciplinary approach. Most common irAEs are very well characterized, but some other such rare autoimmune liver diseases are probably underdiagnosed and less explored. We present here the case of a 69-year-old man with metastatic melanoma developing a severe primary biliary cirrhosis under pembrolizumab, and of a 52-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma with granulomatous hepatitis in the context of an immune-related multiorgan inflammatory reaction due to ipilimumab and nivolumab. Both cases were in part steroid refractory and required a complex diagnostic assessment and long-term therapeutic management. The liver biopsy was crucial for ensuring a correct diagnosis. Clinicians should be aware of rare liver diseases in the context of increased liver enzymes under immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially if not responding to corticosteroids. The primary diagnostic workup should localize the liver damage (biliary or parenchymal) and distinguish irAEs from other pathologic conditions such as metastasis, second benign and malignant tumors, viral hepatitis, and cholelithiasis. If in doubt, a liver biopsy should be performed. Early diagnosis and accurate assessment of hepatic adverse events is necessary for prompt and effective treatment, with reduction of inappropriate discontinuation of immunotherapy, morbidity, and mortality.

Patient Attitudes and Their Awareness Towards Skin Cancer-Related Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: In the emerging era of digitalization and electronic health, skin cancer-related apps represent useful tools to support dermatologic consultation and examination. Yet, little is known about how patients perceive the value of such apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate patient attitudes and their awareness toward skin cancer-related apps. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 200 patients from the oncological outpatient unit was conducted at the University Hospital (LMU Munich, Germany) between September and December 2018. Patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire on the popularity and usefulness of health-related and skin cancer-related apps. A descriptive analysis was performed with the expression of categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the median and range were indicated. Contingency tables and chi-square tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 98.9% (195/197) of patients had never used skin cancer-related apps or could not remember. In 49.7% (93/187) of cases, patients were unsure about the usefulness of skin cancer apps, whereas 42.6% (78/183) thought that skin cancer apps could supplement or support the professional skin examination performed by a physician. However, 47.9% (90/188) were interested in acquiring more information by their dermatologists about skin cancer apps. Young age (P=.002), male gender (P=.02), a previous history of melanoma (P=.004), and higher educational level (P=.002) were significantly associated with a positive attitude. Nevertheless, 55.9% (105/188) preferred a printed patient brochure on skin cancer to downloading and using an app. CONCLUSIONS: The experience and knowledge of skin cancer-related apps was surprisingly low in this population, although there was a high general interest in more information about such apps. Printed patient brochures were the preferred information source.