Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hum Hypertens ; 31(2): 151-156, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27535123

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between early blood pressure (BP) changes (detected using ambulatory BP monitoring; ABPM) with different markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The study design was observational cross-sectional in 85 T1DM patients, clinically normotensive and with normo-albuminuria. We analyzed the relationships between ABPM-measured BP alterations over 24 h with the inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) and the markers of endothelial damage (vascular adhesion molecule, intercellular adhesion molecule and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI)). Despite being recorded as normotensive, 27 (31.8%) subjects presented with an average of pathological BP. VEGF levels were significantly elevated in the patients with an altered mean diurnal values compared with normotensives (112.33 (72.87-213.53) pg ml-1 vs 71.03 (37.71-107.92) pg ml-1; P=0.007). Further, VEGF levels correlated significantly with the parameters of diurnal BP and of 24 h values. IL-6 concentration was a risk factor in the patients with hypertension (OR=1.406; P=0.027). There were no modifications in the levels of markers of endothelial damage. Summarizing, there is an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, but not the endothelial adhesion molecules, in early stages of arterial hypertension in patients with T1DM.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Inflamação/sangue , Hipertensão Mascarada/sangue , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/complicações , Masculino , Hipertensão Mascarada/complicações , Análise Multivariada , Adulto Jovem
2.
Nutr Hosp ; 29(3): 508-12, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24558991

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of major comorbidities of morbidity obese patients and to evaluate the gastric bypass effect on the weight status, cardiovascular risk and quality of life in these patients. METHODS: The evolution of weight, comorbidity, 10- year follow-up of cardiovascular risk (estimated by the Framingham risk score) and quality of life using the test BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System) was analyzed in 162 patients with morbid obesity before and 2 years after gastric bypass. RESULTS: Body mass index (BMI) was reduced from 51.12 ± 7.22 to 29.94 ± 4.86 kg/m2 (72.85% loss of excess weight). Hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were resolved in 71.93%, 91.38% and 82.93% respectively (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular risk greater than 10% was reduced from 25.91% to 4.32% (p < 0.001). According to BAROS scale, surgery was positive in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric bypass is very effective in weight loss; benefits in comorbidities, cardiovascular risk and quality of life.


Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia de las principales comorbilidades asociadas a la obesidad mórbida y evaluar el efecto del bypass gástrico sobre el estado ponderal, riesgo cardiovascular y calidad de vida en estos pacientes. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo con medidas del cambio intrasujeto (antes-después) en una muestra de 162 pacientes de los resultados del bypass gástrico sobre la evolución ponderal, comorbilidades asociadas, riesgo cardiovascular a 10 años (estimado mediante las tablas de Framingham) y calidad de vida mediante el test BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System). Resultados: El índice de masa corporal (IMC) se reduce de 51,12 ± 7,22 kg/m2 a 29,94 ± 4,86 kg/m2 (72,85% de sobrepeso perdido) y se resuelven la hipertensión arterial (HTA), la dislipemia y la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DMT2) en el 71,93%, 91,38% y 82,93% respectivamente (p < 0,001). El riesgo cardiovascular mayor del 10% se reduce del 25,91% al 4,32% (p < 0,001). Según la escala BAROS, el resultado de la cirugía fue favorable en el 95% de los casos. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica mediante bypass gástrico demuestra ser muy efectiva para la reducción ponderal y comorbilidades asociadas, mejorando notablemente la calidad de vida.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Derivação Gástrica/psicologia , Obesidade Mórbida/psicologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco
3.
Nutr. hosp ; 29(3): 508-512, 2014. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-120617

RESUMO

Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia de las principales comorbilidades asociadas a la obesidad mórbida y evaluar el efecto del bypass gástrico sobre el estado ponderal, riesgo cardiovascular y calidad de vida en estospacientes. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo con medidas del cambio intrasujeto (antes-después) en una muestra de 162 pacientes de los resultados del bypass gástrico sobre la evolución ponderal, comorbilidades asociadas, riesgo cardiovascular a 10 años (estimado mediante las tablas de Framingham) y calidad de vida mediante el test BAROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System).Resultados: El índice de masa corporal (IMC) se reduce de 51,12 ± 7,22 kg/m2 a 29,94 ± 4,86 kg/m2 (72,85% de sobrepeso perdido) y se resuelven la hipertensión arterial(HTA), la dislipemia y la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DMT2)en el 71,93%, 91,38% y 82,93% respectivamente (p <0,001). El riesgo cardiovascular mayor del 10% se reduce del 25,91% al 4,32% (p < 0,001). Según la escala BAROS, el resultado de la cirugía fue favorable en el 95% de los casos. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica mediante bypass gástrico demuestra ser muy efectiva para la reducción ponderal y comorbilidades asociadas, mejorando notablemente la calidad de vida (AU)


Objectives: To determine the prevalence of majorcomorbidities of morbidity obese patients and to evaluate the gastric bypass effect on the weight status, cardiovascular risk and quality of life in these patients. Methods: The evolution of weight, comorbidity, 10-year follow-up of cardiovascular risk (estimated by the Framingham risk score) and quality of life using the test B AROS (Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System) was analyzed in 162 patients with morbid obesity before and 2 years after gastric bypass. Results: Body mass index (BMI) was reduced from 51.12± 7.22 to 29.94 ± 4.86 kg/m2 (72.85% loss of excess weight).Hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were resolved in 71.93%, 91.38% and82.93% respectively (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular risk greater than 10% was reduced from 25.91% to 4.32% (p< 0.001). According to BAROS scale, surgery was positive in 95% of cases. Conclusions: Gastric bypass is very effective in weightless; benefits in comorbidities, cardiovascular risk and quality of life (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Derivação Gástrica , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Qualidade de Vida , Redução de Peso/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...