Preventing nipple pain/trauma in breastfeeding women: a best practice implementation project at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Spain).

OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with recommendations to alleviate nipple pain and/or trauma (NPT) and to reduce the rate of breastfeeding abandonment for this reason. INTRODUCTION: As a fundamental priority, health programmes encourage mothers to breastfeed exclusively for the first 6 months of the baby's life and to supplement breast milk with other foods up to the age of 2 years. However, the presence of NPT can reduce or prevent compliance with this recommendation. METHODS: The project was designed and carried out using a framework based on the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI-PACES). Six audit criteria were used in preaudits and postaudits to observe any changes in compliance with the recommendations. Between audits, the Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tool was used to identify stakeholders, barriers and facilitators of the project. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven breastfeeding women were studied in the baseline phase and 275 during follow-up. Compliance in four criteria improved, and the rates of NPT decreased (pain: from 63.3 to 53.5%; P  = 0.02; trauma: from 37.8 to 24.7%; P  = 0.01). The proportion of women advised by qualified personnel increased from 63 to 88% whereas those who cited pain as the reason for abandoning exclusive breastfeeding decreased from 1.5 to 1.1%. CONCLUSION: This evidence-based implementation project achieved significantly improved compliance rates in most of the evidence-based criteria considered. In consequence, the prevalence of NPT fell significantly. Nevertheless, there was no significant impact on the proportion of mothers abandoning breastfeeding for this reason.

ECoLaE: validación de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y habilidades en lactancia materna para enfermería / ECoLaE: Validation of a questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills for Nursing

OBJETIVO: Validar en enfermeras el cuestionario «Encuesta sobre conocimientos en lactancia» (ECoLa). DISEÑO: Estudio de validación, con una adaptación lingüística previa, acorde a las competencias y formación de las enfermeras. Emplazamiento: Cantabria. PARTICIPANTES: Enfermeras generalistas, especialistas en pediatría y matronas del Servicio Cántabro de Salud, con responsabilidad en el cuidado madre-hijo. Mediciones principales: Se evaluaron las propiedades psicométricas de la versión para enfermería del ECoLa. Consistencia interna: mediante alfa-Cronbach para las preguntas de respuesta múltiple y para el global, y la fórmula de Kuder-Richardson (KR20) para las preguntas con respuestas dicotómicas. Concordancia interobservadores: mediante el coeficiente kappa en los ítems 18 y 21. Fiabilidad test-retest: con 11 sujetos mediante el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. RESULTADOS: La puntuación media del cuestionario fue de 21,15±4,67 puntos. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas con respecto al sexo, ni al número de hijos. Hubo asociación entre la puntuación obtenida en el cuestionario y la experiencia previa en lactancia y con el perfil profesional (matrona 24,23 puntos, enfermera especialista en pediatría 21,20 puntos, enfermera 20 puntos; p < 0,01). Consistencia interna: KR20 de 0,802. El α-Cronbach para preguntas de respuesta múltiple fue de 0,719, y para la totalidad fue de 0,866. Concordancia interobservadores: ítem 18 (kappa = 0,6), ítem 30 (kappa = 0,825), puntuación total (kappa = 0,856). Fiabilidad test-retest: puntuación global (CCI = 0,856; IC 95% 0,55-0,96), pregunta 30 (CCI = 0,93; IC 95% 0,75-0,98). CONCLUSIONES: La escala posee propiedades psicométricas que hacen válido y fiable su uso en la evaluación de la formación de los profesionales de enfermería

OBJECTIVE: To validate the "Questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills" in Nurses (EcoLa). DESIGN: A validation study, with prior linguistic adaptation, according to the skills and training of the nurses. LOCATION: Cantabria. PARTICIPANTS: General nurses, paediatrics specialists, and midwives from the Cantabrian Health Service, with responsibility for mother-child care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS:The psychometric properties of the nursing version of ECoLa were evaluated. Internal consistency was measured using alpha-Cronbach for multiple choice and overall answer questions, and Kuder-Richardson's formula (KR20) for dichotomous response questions. Inter-observer concordance was measured using the kappa coefficient in items 18 and 21, and the test-retest reliability with 11 subjects using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean score in the questionnaire was 21.15±4.67 points. There were no statistically significant differences as regards the gender or number of children. There was an association between the score obtained in the questionnaire and previous experience in lactation, and with the professional profile (midwife 24.23 points, paediatric nurse 21.20 points, and general nurse 20 points; P < .01). The internal consistency showed a KR20 of 0.802, and the α-Cronbach for multiple-choice questions was 0.719, and 0.866 for overall. Interobserver concordance for Item 18 had a kappa = 0.6, for item 30 kappa = 0.825), and for total score the kappa = 0.856). The test-retest reliability overall score (CCI = 0.856, 95% CI 0.55-0.96), and for question 30 (CCI = 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire scale has psychometric properties that make its use valid and reliable in the evaluation of the training of nursing professionals

[ECoLaE: Validation of a questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills for Nursing]. / ECoLaE: validación de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y habilidades en lactancia materna para enfermería.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the "Questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills" in Nurses (EcoLa). DESIGN: A validation study, with prior linguistic adaptation, according to the skills and training of the nurses. LOCATION: Cantabria. PARTICIPANTS: General nurses, paediatrics specialists, and midwives from the Cantabrian Health Service, with responsibility for mother-child care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The psychometric properties of the nursing version of ECoLa were evaluated. Internal consistency was measured using α-Cronbach for multiple choice and overall answer questions, and Kuder-Richardson's formula (KR20) for dichotomous response questions. Inter-observer concordance was measured using the kappa coefficient in items 18 and 21, and the test-retest reliability with 11 subjects using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean score in the questionnaire was 21.15±4.67 points. There were no statistically significant differences as regards the gender or number of children. There was an association between the score obtained in the questionnaire and previous experience in lactation, and with the professional profile (midwife 24.23 points, paediatric nurse 21.20 points, and general nurse 20 points; P<.01). The internal consistency showed a KR20 of 0.802, and the α-Cronbach for multiple-choice questions was 0.719, and 0.866 for overall. Interobserver concordance for Item 18 had a kappa=0.6, for item 30 kappa=0.825), and for total score the kappa=0.856). The test-retest reliability overall score (CCI=0.856, 95% CI 0.55-0.96), and for question 30 (CCI=0.93, 95% CI 0.75-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire scale has psychometric properties that make its use valid and reliable in the evaluation of the training of nursing professionals.