Decisions about treatment with targeted therapies in a palliative care unit: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative care integration into the oncologic treatment pattern is recognized and strongly recommended to anticipate end-of-life issues and avoid disproportionate care. Targeted therapies (TTs), with their very rapid onset of action and relatively good tolerance, may have an effect on cancer-related symptoms, which could be beneficial in the context of palliative care. METHODS: Data were extracted from a cohort of all patients hospitalized in an acute palliative care unit between 03.04.2019 and 07.04.2020. Data for all consecutive patients for which a decision on a TT was made during hospitalization were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified. Thirty-one patients were currently receiving TT on admission. For 19/31 (61.3%) patients, the treatment was discontinued. The remaining 12 patients had TT after discharge from the palliative care unit (continuation of the same TT or modification of the TT during the stay), with an average duration of 208 days and an average of 46 days between the last TT and death. TT was introduced or reintroduced in 7 patients of the 11 patients hospitalized without treatment at admission. In this group, the average duration of treatment was 28 days, with an average of 28 days between the last TT and death. Five of the patients who received re-challenged TT experienced a subjective improvement of their symptom. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: TT was discontinued in the majority of our patients. However, in some cases, the treatment was maintained because it was effective on cancer-related symptoms even at the end of life. However, this should not overshadow the palliative process. The continuation or introduction of a specific oncological treatment requires close cooperation between oncologists and palliative care physicians and an honest and clear explanation to patients and their families.

Outcomes of patients with cancer and sarcoid-like granulomatosis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case-control study.

PURPOSE: Sarcoid-like granulomatosis (SLG) reaction caused by immunotherapy remains poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the outcome of patients with cancer and SLG associated with immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2016 and June 2020, 434 patients with immunological adverse events were screened from the ImmunoTOX assessment board of Gustave Roussy, an academic cancer centre in France. Among them, 28 patients had SLG associated with immunotherapy (SLG cohort) and 406 patients had other immunological adverse events (control cohort). Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients were compared from SLG and control cohort. RESULTS: The SLG cohort consisted of 28 patients, 14 women and 14 men, with the median (range) age of 56.5 (28.7-75.3) years. Patients in the SLG cohort with sarcoidosis were asymptomatic (only radiographical finding) in 13 (46.4%) cases; otherwise, the most frequent symptoms were dyspnoea in 8 (28.6%) patients and cough in 5 (17.8%) patients. The computerised tomography scan found sarcoidosis localisations in mediastinal or peri-hilar thoracic lymph nodes in 26 (92.9%) patients, and lung parenchymal involvement was found in 14 (50.0%) patients. The radiographic Scadding stages for sarcoidosis classification were distributed in stages 0, I, II, III and IV in 2 patients (7.1%), 13 patients (46.4%), 11 patients (39.3%), 1 patient (3.6%) and 1 patient (3.6%), respectively. Compared with patients with other immunological toxicities (cohort control), patients with sarcoidosis presented most frequently with melanoma (75.0% versus 21.9% of patients; p < 0.001) and more often received combined therapies of anti-programmed cell death 1 plus anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 protein (46.4% versus 12.6% of patients; p = 0.002). Patients with sarcoidosis had an improved overall survival (OS); the median OS was not reached in the SLG cohort and 40.4 months in the control cohort, hazard ratio = 0.232 (95% confidence interval: 0.086-0.630) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Sarcoidosis-like reactions in patients receiving immunotherapy were reported as non-severe immunological reactions in most cases and were correlated with improved OS. SLG should not be misdiagnosed as tumour progression in patients receiving immunotherapy treatment for cancer.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma in children and adolescents treated in pediatric oncology units.

OBJECTIVES: Recent progress in the understanding of tumor biology and new targeted therapies has led to improved survival in adults with malignant melanoma (MM). MM is rare in children, especially before puberty. We report here our experience with pediatric patients with MM, describe the clinical presentation, treatment and evolution, and compare prepubescent and postpubescent disease. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, national multicenter study was undertaken of 52 cases of MM in children and adolescents. Demographic, histopathology, treatment evolution data, and survival distributions are described. RESULTS: Median age was 15 years (5-18). The tumors were often amelanotic (45%) and raised (83%), and Breslow thickness was greater than 4 mm in 35% of cases. Histological examination showed superficial spreading (n = 16) or spitzoid (n = 16) or nodular (n = 9) pattern. Twelve children (23%) were less than 10 years of age. The spitzoid histotype was more frequent in prepubescent children (seven of 12). Seventeen patients relapsed, of whom four had skin lesions initially diagnosed as benign. Ten patients died after relapse. Five-year event-free survival and overall survival were 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.3-76) and 75.5% (95% CI: 56.8-87.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MM appears to be different in prepubescent children, of whom most had a spitzoid histotype. Diagnosis can be difficult, leading to delay in treatment. New biological tools to identify targets for treatment in MM and to differentiate spitzoid melanomas from Spitz nevi now exist. As effective targeted therapies are now available, we recommend requesting biological examination of all melanocyte-derived skin lesions in children that could be malignant.

Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota.

Antibodies targeting CTLA-4 have been successfully used as cancer immunotherapy. We find that the antitumor effects of CTLA-4 blockade depend on distinct Bacteroides species. In mice and patients, T cell responses specific for B. thetaiotaomicron or B. fragilis were associated with the efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade. Tumors in antibiotic-treated or germ-free mice did not respond to CTLA blockade. This defect was overcome by gavage with B. fragilis, by immunization with B. fragilis polysaccharides, or by adoptive transfer of B. fragilis-specific T cells. Fecal microbial transplantation from humans to mice confirmed that treatment of melanoma patients with antibodies against CTLA-4 favored the outgrowth of B. fragilis with anticancer properties. This study reveals a key role for Bacteroidales in the immunostimulatory effects of CTLA-4 blockade.

Nail toxicities induced by systemic anticancer treatments.

Patients treated with systemic anticancer drugs often show changes to their nails, which are usually well tolerated and disappear on cessation of treatment. However, some nail toxicities can cause pain and functional impairment and thus substantially affect a patient's quality of life, especially if they are given taxanes or EGFR inhibitors. These nail toxicities can affect both the nail plate and bed, and might present as melanonychia, leukonychia, onycholysis, onychomadesis, Beau's lines, or onychorrhexis, as frequently noted with conventional chemotherapies. Additionally, the periungual area (perionychium) of the nail might be affected by paronychia or pyogenic granuloma, especially in patients treated with drugs targeting EGFR or MEK. We review the nail changes induced by conventional chemotherapies and those associated with the use of targeted anticancer drugs and discuss preventive or curative options.

Sentinel node status and immunosuppression: recurrence factors in localized Merkel cell carcinoma.

The prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been examined previously in heterogeneous retrospective studies. The current retrospective study included a homogeneous population of patients with a localized MCC, all staged with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Factors associated with 3-year progression-free survival were analysed using logistic regression. The sentinel lymph node was positive in 32% of patients. The recurrence rate was 26.9%. In first analyses (n = 108), gender (p = 0.0115) and the presence of immunosuppression (p = 0.0494) were the only significant independent factors. In further analyses (n = 80), excluding patients treated with regional radiotherapy, sentinel lymph node status was the only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.0281). Immunosuppression and positive sentinel lymph node are associated with a worse prognosis in patients with MCC. Nodal irradiation impacts on the prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node status.

eIF4F is a nexus of resistance to anti-BRAF and anti-MEK cancer therapies.

In BRAF(V600)-mutant tumours, most mechanisms of resistance to drugs that target the BRAF and/or MEK kinases rely on reactivation of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway, on activation of the alternative, PI(3)K-AKT-mTOR, pathway (which is ERK independent) or on modulation of the caspase-dependent apoptotic cascade. All three pathways converge to regulate the formation of the eIF4F eukaryotic translation initiation complex, which binds to the 7-methylguanylate cap (m(7)G) at the 5' end of messenger RNA, thereby modulating the translation of specific mRNAs. Here we show that the persistent formation of the eIF4F complex, comprising the eIF4E cap-binding protein, the eIF4G scaffolding protein and the eIF4A RNA helicase, is associated with resistance to anti-BRAF, anti-MEK and anti-BRAF plus anti-MEK drug combinations in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, colon and thyroid cancer cell lines. Resistance to treatment and maintenance of eIF4F complex formation is associated with one of three mechanisms: reactivation of MAPK signalling, persistent ERK-independent phosphorylation of the inhibitory eIF4E-binding protein 4EBP1 or increased pro-apoptotic BCL-2-modifying factor (BMF)-dependent degradation of eIF4G. The development of an in situ method to detect the eIF4E-eIF4G interactions shows that eIF4F complex formation is decreased in tumours that respond to anti-BRAF therapy and increased in resistant metastases compared to tumours before treatment. Strikingly, inhibiting the eIF4F complex, either by blocking the eIF4E-eIF4G interaction or by targeting eIF4A, synergizes with inhibiting BRAF(V600) to kill the cancer cells. eIF4F not only appears to be an indicator of both innate and acquired resistance but also is a promising therapeutic target. Combinations of drugs targeting BRAF (and/or MEK) and eIF4F may overcome most of the resistance mechanisms arising in BRAF(V600)-mutant cancers.

[Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma]. / Carcinomes épidernmoïdes cutanés.

The squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent cutaneous carcinoma, after basal cell carcinomas. Cutaneous SCC have a good prognosis, in most cases, but the achievement of elderly people and the frequent recurrence, made a real health problem. Cutaneous SCC are able to disseminate in lymph node preferentially. It's mandatory to search this involvement clinically and radiologically in doubt, before treatment. The surgery with complete excision with 4 to 10 mm safe margins is the reference treatment. Radiotherapy is an efficient treatment when surgery can't be done or in case of incomplete unresectable excision or in adjuvant setting after complete lymph node resection. Clinical and histological factors are identified and permit to classify patients in two groups, low and high risk of recurrence. The immunosuppression is an important risk factor in the emergence of CE but also in the evolution. We observed last years at the apparition of numerous CE and keratoacanthomas, in 10 to 30 % of patients treated by BRAF inhibitors. The physiopathology of induced lesions is now well understood. Metastatic cutaneous SCC are rare but with poor prognosis. EGFR inhibitors seem to be efficient in this indication but they would be more relevant in neoadjuvant setting to obtain a tumoral reduction available to carcinologic surgery in locally advanced unresectable tumors.

[Management of patients with melanoma]. / Prise en charge du mélanome.

Management of patients with metastatic melanoma has been revolutionized over the last few years with targeted anti-BRAF therapies for BRAF-mutant melanomas (in about 50% of the cases) and immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4. Several new drugs are now authorized and available. Because of their new mechanisms of action, they also have new adverse events and guidelines concerning their safety are of critical importance. New innovative strategies using combination of targeted therapies and immunotherapies with anti-PD-1 are in accelerated development. The quality of patient-physician relationship is central to this promising but complex new paradigm of treatment.

Reversible and adaptive resistance to BRAF(V600E) inhibition in melanoma.

Treatment of BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma by small molecule drugs that target the BRAF or MEK kinases can be effective, but resistance develops invariably. In contrast, colon cancers that harbour the same BRAF(V600E) mutation are intrinsically resistant to BRAF inhibitors, due to feedback activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Here we show that 6 out of 16 melanoma tumours analysed acquired EGFR expression after the development of resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Using a chromatin-regulator-focused short hairpin RNA (shRNA) library, we find that suppression of sex determining region Y-box 10 (SOX10) in melanoma causes activation of TGF-ß signalling, thus leading to upregulation of EGFR and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-ß (PDGFRB), which confer resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Expression of EGFR in melanoma or treatment with TGF-ß results in a slow-growth phenotype with cells displaying hallmarks of oncogene-induced senescence. However, EGFR expression or exposure to TGF-ß becomes beneficial for proliferation in the presence of BRAF or MEK inhibitors. In a heterogeneous population of melanoma cells having varying levels of SOX10 suppression, cells with low SOX10 and consequently high EGFR expression are rapidly enriched in the presence of drug, but this is reversed when the drug treatment is discontinued. We find evidence for SOX10 loss and/or activation of TGF-ß signalling in 4 of the 6 EGFR-positive drug-resistant melanoma patient samples. Our findings provide a rationale for why some BRAF or MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma patients may regain sensitivity to these drugs after a 'drug holiday' and identify patients with EGFR-positive melanoma as a group that may benefit from re-treatment after a drug holiday.

[Drug therapy of melanoma: anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies]. / Mélanome - Thérapeutique par les médications : anticorps anti-CTLA-4 et anti-PD1.

Management of patients with metastatic melanoma has improved radically in recent years with the development of new drugs capable of signifcantly prolonging life expectancy. Two strategies have been implemented: targeted anti-BRAF therapy for BRAF-mutated melanomas, and non specific immunotherapies based on anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) and, more recently, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. These antibodies, by blocking physiological brakes on immune activation, induce an indirect immune response. Ipilimumab, a drug approved in 2011 is of benefit to 20 % of patients but can also trigger significant immune-mediated toxicity. Anti-PD-1 antibodies presently in development seem to have a better therapeutic index, with higher response rates and less toxicity than ipilimumab. Combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 v is also giving encouraging preliminary results. In future, these new drugs will probably be used in combination, either concurrently or sequentially.

[Immunotherapies and melanoma]. / L'immunothérapie dans le mélanome.

Metastatic melanoma treatment has been radically modified over the last four years with the emergence of new and effective therapeutic strategies targeted anti-BRAF therapies as well as immunotherapy. Following this latter immunotherapy strategy, anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab demonstrated a benefit in terms of overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma and is now challenged by other checkpoint inhibitors, antibodies directed against PD-1 and PD-L1 that have extremely promising benefit/risk ratio. Adverse events as well as evaluation criteria are different from the ones associated with classical chemotherapy or targeted therapies. The challenge for the next years will be to optimize these new strategies, by possibly using these new drugs sequentially or in combination for a higher clinical benefit for our patients.

[Impact of cutaneous toxicities associated with targeted therapies on quality of life. Results of a longitudinal exploratory study]. / Impact des toxicités cutanées associées aux thérapies ciblées sur la qualité de vie. Résultats d'une étude pilote longitudinale.

Targeted therapies represent a promising option in cancer treatment, which have shown tumor control and patients survival benefits. But these drugs have systemic side effects, in particular frequent and various cutaneous effects. Few data have been published about the impact of these symptoms on patients' quality of life, particularly for psychological and social aspects. That is why we wished to evaluate this impact in order to propose a preventive management and optimize patients' care. Twenty-seven patients participated in both evaluation times of a longitudinal quantitative pilot study. They completed the same set of psychological questionnaires before taking treatment and 30 days after. Patients were mainly men with a metastatic lung, digestive or cutaneous cancer. Analyses showed that dermatological symptoms in 22 patients were associated for a majority of them with a decrease of quality of life, characterized by difficulties in houseworks and leisure activities, and a social functioning impairment. Adverse skin events did not seem to affect emotional state. These results must be confirmed by further investigations in a larger-scale prospective research.

Cutaneous side effects associated with sunitinib: an analysis of 8 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib is an antineoplastic agent, specifically a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Thanks to its targeted action, this drug is relatively well tolerated. The main side effects are asthenia, gastrointestinal disturbances, and dermatological effects. The aim of our study was to collect information about dermatological side effects and assess them in patients treated with sunitinib. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed on 8 patients treated with sunitinib between January 2006 and July 2009. RESULTS: Twelve different types of side effects were observed: genital lesion (9), cutaneous eruption (7), hand-foot syndrome (6), yellow discoloration of skin (4), hair depigmentation (4), xerosis (4), pigmented lesion (4), vascular lesion (3), erythema (3), splinter haemorrhage of fingernails (1), facial oedema (1), and pruritus (1). To date vascular and pigmented lesions associated with sunitinib have not been recorded in literature, genital lesions have only been described in the scrotal region. These genital lesions led to discontinuation of treatment by 4 patients in our study. CONCLUSION: Although the risk/benefit ratio is favourable for sunitinib, all health care professionals must be aware of the risk of such adverse events. When genital lesions are observed, dose adjustment is recommended. Thorough clinical examination and patient interviews are necessary to detect these effects.

Dermatologic symptoms associated with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib.

BACKGROUND: The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib (Nexavar) is associated with a relatively high incidence of dermatologic symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate and provide guidance on the diagnosis and clinical management of dermatologic symptoms associated with sorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: English-language studies representative of a patient population with a variety of tumor types, who received single-agent sorafenib, were selected. Particular emphasis was placed on the phase III Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGETs). RESULTS: Frequently observed dermatologic side effects (any grade in TARGETs) of sorafenib include rash/desquamation (40%), hand-foot skin reaction (30%), alopecia (27%), and pruritus (19%). Generally, dermatologic symptoms resolve with appropriate management, including topical treatments, dose interruptions, dose reductions, or a combination of these. LIMITATIONS: The results presented here are based on a limited number of studies. CONCLUSION: Although sorafenib is associated with dermatologic symptoms, these are usually resolved with appropriate intervention, patient-led practical treatment, and preventative measures.